Meet the Other Phone. Only the apps you allow.

Meet the Other Phone.
Only the apps you allow.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

Sending love to trans people on MN and beyond

825 replies

cassandre · 17/04/2025 20:58

This isn't an AIBU. I just wanted to send love to trans people, in the UK especially, and to other members of the LGBTQIA+ community.

This hasn't been the easiest week for trans people, but there are a lot of us out there who accept you for who you are. We have your backs and we believe that eventually, tolerance and compassion will win.💖💖💖

Love from a longtime MNer and trans-inclusive feminist.

OP posts:
Thread gallery
12
Helleofabore · 18/04/2025 19:00

poetryandwine · 18/04/2025 18:28

Yes, the brains of those who have been transgender since a young age are more likely to be atypical of their biological sex

And this is where you are making claims that without the data are unverifiable.

Because, we know that people with similar mental health issues may show similar results within their sex. Studies need to control for this. Was this at all controlled for?

We also know that people who have similar interests develop brain similarities.

Therefore, unless there is adequate control of these variables, the study has not shown that there were, you are making a claim that has not been shown.

The only claim you can make is that they MAY be more likely to be atypical of their biological sex, but that there is no evidence that this a strong correlation.

BunfightBetty · 18/04/2025 19:04

AlizeeEasy · 18/04/2025 17:53

What do you think should happen with trans men? They always seem left out of the argument, have you seen pictures of what some trans men look like? Some are big burly bearded blokes. If you force trans women out of female spaces then you force trans men into them

It’s absolutely fine for transmen to be in female spaces. They’re female. What they look like is immaterial.

JandamiHash · 18/04/2025 19:18

poetryandwine · 18/04/2025 15:56

Male and female brains differ in certain ways upon MRI examination. This is well established and not controversial

The research I cited and other research shows that those who identify as transgender from a young age have brains that are more likely to show characteristics of the brains of the opposite sex.

Shades of grey, shades of grey.

And this proves what exactly? And why do you think it wasn’t used in the Scottish Minister’s evidence?

JandamiHash · 18/04/2025 19:19

Bogginsthe3rd · 18/04/2025 16:07

I'm not sure if you understood the study. The results of the MRI were validated by looking at random samples of cis gendered participants and then comparing to trans women (and then adjusting for those with mental health disorders).

Which proves what exactly?

JandamiHash · 18/04/2025 19:22

poetryandwine · 18/04/2025 16:08

Until yesterday this barrister was legally entitled to the life they had been living. Gratuitously taking away their right to any adjustment period to react to this major change in law was simply nasty.

How would you like to go on national TV to discuss the losing side of a battle that was beyond dear to your heart and have the victor say the most hurtful, gratuitous personal thing they could get away with to you? When it was completely unnecessary.

One thing I generally love about this country is the graciousness of the victors The victorious woman on C4 and a number of PP on this thread are little better than Donald Trump.

Until yesterday they felt entitled to trample all over women’s privacy and safety. The law has clarified that they actually can’t do that, and should never have done that. They can still live their life and are protected based on their gender identity, but they are not entitled to barge into the spaces of the opposite sex anymore

JandamiHash · 18/04/2025 19:25

poetryandwine · 18/04/2025 16:08

Until yesterday this barrister was legally entitled to the life they had been living. Gratuitously taking away their right to any adjustment period to react to this major change in law was simply nasty.

How would you like to go on national TV to discuss the losing side of a battle that was beyond dear to your heart and have the victor say the most hurtful, gratuitous personal thing they could get away with to you? When it was completely unnecessary.

One thing I generally love about this country is the graciousness of the victors The victorious woman on C4 and a number of PP on this thread are little better than Donald Trump.

Also there was no change in the law. I’m surprised a scientist doesn’t understand that.

How would you like to go on national TV to discuss the losing side of a battle that was beyond dear to your heart and have the victor say the most hurtful, gratuitous personal thing they could get away with to you?

How would you like to have spent over a decade having your oppressors interpret the law the way they wanted and used that interpretation to trample over you, bully you, gaslight you and appropriate your class?

Frankly women’s empty for TRAs and their feelings ran out a long time ago when it became clear that they gave absolutely no fucks about women.

And you telling women #BeKind to our oppressors, their feelz are more important, just shows your misogyny. These same people don’t mind being hateful to women, and in my book: if you can dish it out you should be able to take it

JandamiHash · 18/04/2025 19:28

Annascaul · 18/04/2025 16:35

Self ID had never become law, whatever RMW would have you believe.
He never had the legal right to enter women’s spaces. He just bulldozed his way in, as he apparently plans to continue doing, even after the verdict.

Exactly. Rather than feeling sorry for themsleves and demonising feminists as evil takers away of rights, they should be apologising

poetryandwine · 18/04/2025 19:29

JandamiHash · 18/04/2025 19:18

And this proves what exactly? And why do you think it wasn’t used in the Scottish Minister’s evidence?

See above

JandamiHash · 18/04/2025 19:30

I’m trying to think about what today would look like if the ruling was in favour of self ID. The TRAs would be gloating, posing in toilets, writing letters to everywhere demanding they enforce the ruling etc. can you imagine! And yet women can’t tell truths to the people who would have been doing this and can’t have a moment’s glory for it going in our favour? Fuck that noise.

JandamiHash · 18/04/2025 19:31

Didimum · 18/04/2025 17:20

For me, I think it’s now time for men in society to start doing the work in ensuring the transgender community feel comfortable, safe and accepted in public settings. They need to start with accepting and embracing that there are many different ways to be male, and that whatever type of male, adult or child, you are, you don’t need to grow to despise your body or feel as though your body does not fit your brain. If there are true myriad and all accepted facets of manhood and womanhood, then there should be no fear for that brain to be in either biological categorisation.

It’s abundantly clear to me, especially having a son, that male socialisation is heavily restricted and exclusive, not to mention aggressive and ridiculing of any male who is even slightly outside the bounds of those restrictions.

Men need to do better.

It makes one wonder why TRAs have always put the onus on women to do better and never men. I wonder why that could possibly be.

poetryandwine · 18/04/2025 19:33

JandamiHash · 18/04/2025 19:25

Also there was no change in the law. I’m surprised a scientist doesn’t understand that.

How would you like to go on national TV to discuss the losing side of a battle that was beyond dear to your heart and have the victor say the most hurtful, gratuitous personal thing they could get away with to you?

How would you like to have spent over a decade having your oppressors interpret the law the way they wanted and used that interpretation to trample over you, bully you, gaslight you and appropriate your class?

Frankly women’s empty for TRAs and their feelings ran out a long time ago when it became clear that they gave absolutely no fucks about women.

And you telling women #BeKind to our oppressors, their feelz are more important, just shows your misogyny. These same people don’t mind being hateful to women, and in my book: if you can dish it out you should be able to take it

I and my female colleagues spent longer than this being discriminated against at work, even though it was illegal. I understand gaslighting.

It is wrong for women to be gaslit and it is equally wrong to claim that because there is some protection in law for trans people they need not worry. I would go so far as to call that gaslighting.

JandamiHash · 18/04/2025 19:33

AlizeeEasy · 18/04/2025 17:26

No one ever claimed they can, sex and gender are different. You can change gender but not sex

I mean gender is just abstract nonsense really isn’t it, a synonym for personality. It means nothing except stereotypes. Sex is what matters and the law upholds this - observing single sex spaces is fair for everyone

JandamiHash · 18/04/2025 19:36

cassandre · 18/04/2025 17:28

😢Alas, I'm sure you're right.

Again, this whole thread is an illustration of why MN (generally speaking) is not a welcoming place for trans people.

To me, the real feminism on MN happens in places like the Relationships threads, where women are giving one another real-life support. In the FWR threads, not so much. Because there only one form of feminism seems to be accepted. And if you disagree with the majority view, you're labelled anti-feminist.

It's a shame.

@poetryandwine I appreciate your scientific citations.

When I say that I want tolerance, I mean it. I see women on MN pouring so much energy into attacking other women who disagree with them. And even though trans-inclusivity is an absolutely central tenet of feminism for me, I don't see it as helpful to belittle other feminists, regardless of how much I disagree with their views.

Instead of directing hate speech at each other, we could all be acting as allies to fight the toxic Andrew Tate/Trump-style patriarchy that is currently threatening our world.

An another way of saying “Women: STFU and #BeKind”

Who cares if women attack other women. Transwomen are still men. Womanhood isn’t awarded on “niceness points”, it’s inherent and immutable and even if the next woman is the biggest twat to walk the earth, she’s still a woman and a man is not.

We do tackle the Andrew Tate mindset BTW. Another person who, like TRAs, reinforces dangerous sexist stereotypes.

JandamiHash · 18/04/2025 19:39

Bogginsthe3rd · 18/04/2025 17:40

You sound and act pretty amateurishly. Not that @poetryandwine did any incorrect copying and pasting, but if that's your yardstick for being an academic it's pretty embarrassing for you. What you would be good at sorting out is people good at Microsoft word (v2007 - office365). Are you a perhaps a head hunter for legacy versions of MS office?

Poetry didn’t do ^any* copy and pasting. And the study she cited didn’t have any bearing or proof on the claim that transwomen have lady brains.

Still not gonna tell me what a woman is?

BundleBoogie · 18/04/2025 19:40

poetryandwine · 18/04/2025 15:23

The venom dripping from a number of posts on this thread is an example of why legal protections are not enough.

Last night on C4 News a woman from the victorious side made a point of quite unnecessarily referring to the transwoman Scottish barrister speaking for the losing side as a man. Whatever your views of the barrister’s gender, it was a gratuitous slap in the face on national TV. The victorious woman looked smug; Cathy Newman looked shocked. Because there was no need to hurt someone’s feelings in that setting.

It is certainly of a piece with a fair portion of the comments here.

But if she doesn’t believe in ‘gender’ as a thing, what is she supposed to call a man? Why do you think anyone should be compelled to say words they fundamentally disagree either?

Do consider that women should have rights at all?

Bogginsthe3rd · 18/04/2025 19:41

JandamiHash · 18/04/2025 19:39

Poetry didn’t do ^any* copy and pasting. And the study she cited didn’t have any bearing or proof on the claim that transwomen have lady brains.

Still not gonna tell me what a woman is?

It's tricky to counter the simplistic way you describe the study but @poetryandwine did a good job of describing the conclusions to you previously and I've also done the same.

JandamiHash · 18/04/2025 19:42

AlizeeEasy · 18/04/2025 17:50

If a trans woman is in a rape crisis, it’s because she’s been raped and needs support too. I’m deeply concerned about trans women (especially post op) being put in male prisons. Ultimately these places need to be safe for everyone, I don’t think of trans women being the big bad danger that others appear to think

But why should women have men (the vast majority of TW are pre op BTW as is their fundamental right to be and stay) in their rape crisis centres and prison cells? Especially when the prisoner TW are sex offenders?

Helleofabore · 18/04/2025 19:44

So.... are we going to see the data behind the first study from Bakker? or did @poetryandwine just read the abstract?

JandamiHash · 18/04/2025 19:44

AlizeeEasy · 18/04/2025 17:53

What do you think should happen with trans men? They always seem left out of the argument, have you seen pictures of what some trans men look like? Some are big burly bearded blokes. If you force trans women out of female spaces then you force trans men into them

Again, people need to stop thinking gender critical women are basing womanhood on what people look like. Someone can have a beard 100 tattoos and back hair, if they’re a woman they’re a woman and therefore pose little to zero threat to other women.

We are the OPPOSITE of caring about this. We are saying “Women can look however they want, they are still women”. Trans people and supporters do the opposite to that. They reinforce stereotypes based on looks and taste.

JandamiHash · 18/04/2025 19:45

AlizeeEasy · 18/04/2025 17:55

Are you comfortable with the idea of a trans man in a cell with a woman? Some are big burly bearded blokes, I’m more uncomfortable with that idea really

Yes, absolutely, because she’s a woman and a women’s prison cell is where she would belong

Annascaul · 18/04/2025 19:46

JandamiHash · 18/04/2025 19:42

But why should women have men (the vast majority of TW are pre op BTW as is their fundamental right to be and stay) in their rape crisis centres and prison cells? Especially when the prisoner TW are sex offenders?

It’s astounding, really. These fully intact males wouldn’t be safe amongst other males, let’s put them in with the women…
I’m assuming Alizee isn’t actually female, because I can’t wrap my head around a woman actually thinking like this.

JandamiHash · 18/04/2025 19:48

AlizeeEasy · 18/04/2025 18:05

Correction. I think women should have access to those spaces alone. But transwomen are women

So the answer is no, women shouldn’t have access to sex based rights?

JandamiHash · 18/04/2025 19:50

poetryandwine · 18/04/2025 18:18

A person’s feelings were gratuitously hurt on national television because the victor couldn’t resist rubbing salt in the wound.

I would have been equally enraged on anyone’s behalf and no matter the issue. I have spent decades standing for and with women in the scientific workforce and other arenas and in many cases metaphorically drying their tears.

In my view the question of trans men in women’s spaces is nuanced. Sometimes it is inappropriate and sometimes to judge by this thread women can be as prejudiced as the men we criticise for not hearing us.

So what - that person readily believes that men should be able to force their way into women’s spaces and if women object they’re bigots. Misogynists don’t deserve respect. If we are so worried about feelings, what about the feelings of women who’ve put up with this shit for years because a load of men misinterpreted a law?

JandamiHash · 18/04/2025 19:51

poetryandwine · 18/04/2025 18:28

Yes, the brains of those who have been transgender since a young age are more likely to be atypical of their biological sex

In The context of the sex based spaces discussion, what conclusion do you think this draws?

JandamiHash · 18/04/2025 19:52

BundleBoogie · 18/04/2025 18:34

Stating a verifiable objective fact about someone is not ‘prejudice’. HTH.

Being prevented from speaking plainly about these men is what got us where we are today which is having to take the SG to court to prove that the law still says that men are not women. Stop trying to shut us down.

It’s SO telling when a poster is more upset at a man’s feelings being hurt than they are that this man correctively rapes women