Meet the Other Phone. Child-safe in minutes.

Meet the Other Phone.
Child-safe in minutes.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

To think Lucy Connolly has been made an example of?

1000 replies

SouthernFashionista · 06/04/2025 22:43

Have any of you read this article about Lucy Connolly who tweeted inflammatory comments following the Southport murders? I have to admit that at the time I was fully supportive of having her locked up, with the key thrown away. But reading this article made me view it all a little differently. Surely she has done her time?
www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2025/04/04/lucy-connolly-southport-riots-axel-rudakubana-taylor-swift/

OP posts:
Thread gallery
19
HPFA · 07/04/2025 14:10

Gloriia · 07/04/2025 14:05

So what. People say offensive stuff on sm all the time, it does not warrant a prison sentence.
A fine or community hours would've sufficed.

Calling for innocent people to be burnt to death is a bit more than "offensive".

TENSsion · 07/04/2025 14:17

Maitri108 · 07/04/2025 13:15

The person with the Swastika was arrested.

And how long in prison did they serve?

What about these people?

How long a prison sentence did they receive?

To think Lucy Connolly has been made an example of?
Boredofbeinganadult · 07/04/2025 14:17

Maitri108 · 07/04/2025 11:46

I assume you live in a well and aren't aware of the circumstances surrounding her crime. During a period of civil unrest, she sent one of a series of racist Tweets urging people to set occupied buildings on fire. Rioters attempted to set an occupied building on fire.

We can't be sure that her Tweet, which received over 300k views, was directly responsible for the murder attempt but I'm sure it contributed.

She pled guilty and received a low sentence for the crime, to serve 40% of it. She got off lightly.

I understand that inciting racial hate isn't a worthy crime in your opinion, but the law thankfully disagrees.

Get a grip

Velmy · 07/04/2025 14:19

Boredofbeinganadult · 07/04/2025 02:11

Don’t make me laugh 😂 Do you genuinely believe this woman deserves to go to prison for 30 months for a tweet she made and then deleted? Prisons are full, take Huw Edwards for example, he had 41 images at least of child rape on his phone of children aged between 7-9 and yet he got to walk away whilst this woman is actually serving a sentence. There isn’t room in prisons to lock people up over a tweet. I know who I would rather have in prison. If you think this woman should be in prison then you have issues.

They should both be in prison.

If you don't understand why one is and the other isn't, I don't know what to tell you. It's not difficult 🤷🏻‍♂️

Boredofbeinganadult · 07/04/2025 14:21

nomas · 07/04/2025 11:22

Please never sit on a jury Hmm

You neither if you think sending people to prison over tweets is the answer

Boredofbeinganadult · 07/04/2025 14:23

Velmy · 07/04/2025 14:19

They should both be in prison.

If you don't understand why one is and the other isn't, I don't know what to tell you. It's not difficult 🤷🏻‍♂️

It’s also not difficult to understand that prisons are bursting at the seams so sending people to prison over tweets is ridiculous

Maitri108 · 07/04/2025 14:26

Boredofbeinganadult · 07/04/2025 14:23

It’s also not difficult to understand that prisons are bursting at the seams so sending people to prison over tweets is ridiculous

People weren't sent to prison for Tweeting. People were sent to prison for committing crimes.

PollyPaintsFlowers · 07/04/2025 14:32

And yet no further action here until an outrage on social media made the police re-open the case

Met Police claimed imam’s sermon saying ‘destroy Jewish homes’ is not a crime

archive.ph/bHXxm

Boredofbeinganadult · 07/04/2025 14:37

Maitri108 · 07/04/2025 14:26

People weren't sent to prison for Tweeting. People were sent to prison for committing crimes.

Ridiculous 😂

PhilippaGeorgiou · 07/04/2025 14:38

Sentiments which are shared by millions of British people.

Get rid of all the extraneous babble, and that is what her defence of Connolly comes down to. I despise those sentiments, but people have every right to express them. What they do not have a right to do is to advocate arson and murder. Lots of people have tragedy in their lives. Lots of people "aren't racist" because they know some people whose skin isn't white. None of that justifies arson and murder or encouraging it. She is where she deserves to be. She gets no sympathy from me.

Maitri108 · 07/04/2025 14:39

Boredofbeinganadult · 07/04/2025 14:37

Ridiculous 😂

I know. It is ridiculous that you don't understand the difference.

Boredofbeinganadult · 07/04/2025 14:41

.

Maitri108 · 07/04/2025 14:41

PhilippaGeorgiou · 07/04/2025 14:38

Sentiments which are shared by millions of British people.

Get rid of all the extraneous babble, and that is what her defence of Connolly comes down to. I despise those sentiments, but people have every right to express them. What they do not have a right to do is to advocate arson and murder. Lots of people have tragedy in their lives. Lots of people "aren't racist" because they know some people whose skin isn't white. None of that justifies arson and murder or encouraging it. She is where she deserves to be. She gets no sympathy from me.

The author is hardly unbiased. She said that riots were understandable, race hate is a political view and the racist is a political prisoner. Perhaps police should be looking for her on CCTV.

Locutus2000 · 07/04/2025 14:42

Maitri108 · 07/04/2025 11:46

I assume you live in a well and aren't aware of the circumstances surrounding her crime. During a period of civil unrest, she sent one of a series of racist Tweets urging people to set occupied buildings on fire. Rioters attempted to set an occupied building on fire.

We can't be sure that her Tweet, which received over 300k views, was directly responsible for the murder attempt but I'm sure it contributed.

She pled guilty and received a low sentence for the crime, to serve 40% of it. She got off lightly.

I understand that inciting racial hate isn't a worthy crime in your opinion, but the law thankfully disagrees.

This. Context matters.

TooBigForMyBoots · 07/04/2025 14:43

PollyPaintsFlowers · 07/04/2025 14:32

And yet no further action here until an outrage on social media made the police re-open the case

Met Police claimed imam’s sermon saying ‘destroy Jewish homes’ is not a crime

archive.ph/bHXxm

He didn't urge his listeners to destroy Jewish homes.

PollyPaintsFlowers · 07/04/2025 14:44

TooBigForMyBoots · 07/04/2025 14:43

He didn't urge his listeners to destroy Jewish homes.

Try reading the article

A preacher at an <a class="break-all" href="https://archive.ph/o/bHXxm/www.telegraph.co.uk/world-news/2024/11/18/jews-gay-people-hide-identity-arab-areas-germany/" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">east London mosque told followers to “curse the Jews” and “break their words” just two weeks after the Hamas massacre in southern Israel last year, it was reported.
He said: “Oh Allah, curse the Jews and the children of Israel. Oh Allah, curse the infidels and the polytheists.
“Oh Allah, break their words, shake their feet, disperse and tear apart their unity and ruin their houses and destroy their homes.”

Boredofbeinganadult · 07/04/2025 14:45

TooBigForMyBoots · 07/04/2025 14:43

He didn't urge his listeners to destroy Jewish homes.

So what he said is fine then?

TENSsion · 07/04/2025 14:45

TooBigForMyBoots · 07/04/2025 14:43

He didn't urge his listeners to destroy Jewish homes.

What??

To think Lucy Connolly has been made an example of?
TooBigForMyBoots · 07/04/2025 14:46

I did read it. If we locked preachers up for urging their God to smite people, cells would be full every Monday.😆

Locutus2000 · 07/04/2025 14:46

Boredofbeinganadult · 07/04/2025 14:41

.

Edited

Ah yes, the Conservative Post, a bastion of neutrality and unbiased opinion.

TENSsion · 07/04/2025 14:47

Locutus2000 · 07/04/2025 14:42

This. Context matters.

Ah yes “context”

The reason police allowed swastikas
to be waved around

Boredofbeinganadult · 07/04/2025 14:48

TooBigForMyBoots · 07/04/2025 14:46

I did read it. If we locked preachers up for urging their God to smite people, cells would be full every Monday.😆

Same if we locked everyone up who ever wrote an offensive tweet

TENSsion · 07/04/2025 14:48

TooBigForMyBoots · 07/04/2025 14:46

I did read it. If we locked preachers up for urging their God to smite people, cells would be full every Monday.😆

Why not?

You're saying it isn’t threatening violence that’s the crime but “who” threatens violence

Maitri108 · 07/04/2025 14:48

TENSsion · 07/04/2025 14:47

Ah yes “context”

The reason police allowed swastikas
to be waved around

The person with the Swatstika was arrested.

HPFA · 07/04/2025 14:48

PhilippaGeorgiou · 07/04/2025 14:38

Sentiments which are shared by millions of British people.

Get rid of all the extraneous babble, and that is what her defence of Connolly comes down to. I despise those sentiments, but people have every right to express them. What they do not have a right to do is to advocate arson and murder. Lots of people have tragedy in their lives. Lots of people "aren't racist" because they know some people whose skin isn't white. None of that justifies arson and murder or encouraging it. She is where she deserves to be. She gets no sympathy from me.

This sums it up exactly.

Many people actually think it's "understandable" to blame all migrants for a crime (wrongly) assumed to have been committed by a migrant.

If I committed a horrible crime the same people would never think it was OK to go out and attack random middle aged jigsaw puzzle loving white women

Please create an account

To comment on this thread you need to create a Mumsnet account.

This thread is not accepting new messages.
Swipe left for the next trending thread