Meet the Other Phone. Protection built in.

Meet the Other Phone.
Protection built in.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

New view on mental health

353 replies

Finallylostit · 06/04/2025 17:40

Read this today. This Doctor is refreshingly honest and a thought provoking perspective on the explosion in the mental health industry

www.dailymail.co.uk/health/article-14576559/REAL-cause-explosion-autism-depression-psychiatrist-DR-ALISTAIR-SANTHOUSE.html

OP posts:
Thread gallery
7
Riaanna · 07/04/2025 21:46

lifeturnsonadime · 07/04/2025 21:39

I'll leave you to it Rhianna.

My child was not diagnosed with the pda profile. I don't care if you don't like that word.

I took him to the expert who said he didn't meet the criteria for the profile.

So?

Riaanna · 07/04/2025 21:47

pointythings · 07/04/2025 21:40

Your insistence on splitting hairs about this is not adding anything to this discussion.

Goes both ways surely?

JorgyPorgy · 07/04/2025 21:49

I believe there is no such thing as “normal” , everyone is on a spectrum and everyone , young and old, has traits that can be attributed to certain neurodiversities , it doesn’t mean someone should be diagnosed and labelled. Of course there are the more extreme ends of the spectrum eg with low functioning autism where diagnosis is very helpful in understanding complex needs. But I personally think some parents are seeking / paying for private diagnosis to confirm their kids are “special / different” just because the kid is prone to tantrums, is a bit behind at school post pandemic etc. Ive seen this happen to a totally “normal” kid who now believes they’re different. Some parents just want to shrink their kids.

Riaanna · 07/04/2025 21:52

JorgyPorgy · 07/04/2025 21:49

I believe there is no such thing as “normal” , everyone is on a spectrum and everyone , young and old, has traits that can be attributed to certain neurodiversities , it doesn’t mean someone should be diagnosed and labelled. Of course there are the more extreme ends of the spectrum eg with low functioning autism where diagnosis is very helpful in understanding complex needs. But I personally think some parents are seeking / paying for private diagnosis to confirm their kids are “special / different” just because the kid is prone to tantrums, is a bit behind at school post pandemic etc. Ive seen this happen to a totally “normal” kid who now believes they’re different. Some parents just want to shrink their kids.

And then this turns up.

Everyone is not on the spectrum.

lifeturnsonadime · 07/04/2025 21:53

JorgyPorgy · 07/04/2025 21:49

I believe there is no such thing as “normal” , everyone is on a spectrum and everyone , young and old, has traits that can be attributed to certain neurodiversities , it doesn’t mean someone should be diagnosed and labelled. Of course there are the more extreme ends of the spectrum eg with low functioning autism where diagnosis is very helpful in understanding complex needs. But I personally think some parents are seeking / paying for private diagnosis to confirm their kids are “special / different” just because the kid is prone to tantrums, is a bit behind at school post pandemic etc. Ive seen this happen to a totally “normal” kid who now believes they’re different. Some parents just want to shrink their kids.

Ah so my kid school refused pre-pandemic and had an NHS autism diganosis after he was trying to kill himself rather than go to school, turned out he had complex unmet needs.

He's the opposite of low functioning, now after his needs were met appropriately he is at a top university and will, most likely, fully contribute and function as an adult.

He's still autistic. When he couldn't function he was low functioning, now he can function he is extremely high functioning.

Understanding his needs helps him to (hopefully) ensure that he doesn't end up low functioning and being a burden on society as an adult.

AroundTheMulberryBush · 07/04/2025 21:59

Riaanna · 07/04/2025 21:38

See comment above. It cannot be diagnosed because there is no agreed diagnostic criteria.

Exactly. Autism is the diagnosis with a PDA profile (if appropriate). PDA itself isn't a diagnosis, you don't get diagnosed with PDA. It's a profile of Autism. I'm not sure why people are disagreeing with you on that. It's far from splitting hairs, it's a very important distinction. They seem to be misunderstanding the diagnostic processes and the diagnosis of the people that they work with.

JorgyPorgy · 07/04/2025 21:59

This reply has been deleted

Message deleted by MNHQ. Here's a link to our Talk Guidelines.

JorgyPorgy · 07/04/2025 22:02

This reply has been deleted

Message deleted by MNHQ. Here's a link to our Talk Guidelines.

lifeturnsonadime · 07/04/2025 22:03

This reply has been deleted

Message deleted by MNHQ. Here's a link to our Talk Guidelines.

No what I wanted to do was point out that the low/high functioning point that you made is nonsense.

If so-called 'high functioning' autistic people do not receive the right support this can mean that they can't function and become a burden on society.

No one with a brain cell thinks that this is a progressive way to treat people or will be a sensible way to save costs.

lifeturnsonadime · 07/04/2025 22:05

And using laughing emojis at my post just makes you look ignorant Jorgy Porgy

Do you find it funny when people talk about suicidal children?

JorgyPorgy · 07/04/2025 22:09

lifeturnsonadime · 07/04/2025 22:03

No what I wanted to do was point out that the low/high functioning point that you made is nonsense.

If so-called 'high functioning' autistic people do not receive the right support this can mean that they can't function and become a burden on society.

No one with a brain cell thinks that this is a progressive way to treat people or will be a sensible way to save costs.

Edited

Again, if you read properly, you will see I said “for example” ( eg) low functioning. Low functioning was just an example. My point is that not every kid who has tantrums for example is autistic and needs diagnosing as such. My point was some kids are getting over diagnosed. Over diagnosis/ mid diagnosis is as unhelpful as not diagnosing those who actually warrant a diagnosis. Stop making this about you.

lifeturnsonadime · 07/04/2025 22:11

JorgyPorgy · 07/04/2025 22:09

Again, if you read properly, you will see I said “for example” ( eg) low functioning. Low functioning was just an example. My point is that not every kid who has tantrums for example is autistic and needs diagnosing as such. My point was some kids are getting over diagnosed. Over diagnosis/ mid diagnosis is as unhelpful as not diagnosing those who actually warrant a diagnosis. Stop making this about you.

Well it's a good job that doesn't happen then isn't it.

You appear to have zero understanding of how autism is diagnosed.

lifeturnsonadime · 07/04/2025 22:13

This reply has been deleted

Message deleted by MNHQ. Here's a link to our Talk Guidelines.

JorgyPorgy · 07/04/2025 22:15

This reply has been deleted

Message deleted by MNHQ. Here's a link to our Talk Guidelines.

Riaanna · 07/04/2025 22:18

This reply has been deleted

Message deleted by MNHQ. Here's a link to our Talk Guidelines.

So you basically posted nothing. Excellent.

JorgyPorgy · 07/04/2025 22:19

This reply has been deleted

Message deleted by MNHQ. Here's a link to our Talk Guidelines.

Erm you’re the one who attacked me saying I’ve no brain cells, and zero understanding. You made my subjective observation based on my personal experience all about you and your kid. I’m sorry your kid has had issues and I’m pleased they’ve been resolved through a warranted diagnosis. Just because your kid received a rightful diagnosis doesn’t mean that other kids aren’t being harmfully over diagnosed / mis diagnosed.

JorgyPorgy · 07/04/2025 22:20

Riaanna · 07/04/2025 22:18

So you basically posted nothing. Excellent.

No, you just need to go back and reread til you understand.

Riaanna · 07/04/2025 22:21

JorgyPorgy · 07/04/2025 22:09

Again, if you read properly, you will see I said “for example” ( eg) low functioning. Low functioning was just an example. My point is that not every kid who has tantrums for example is autistic and needs diagnosing as such. My point was some kids are getting over diagnosed. Over diagnosis/ mid diagnosis is as unhelpful as not diagnosing those who actually warrant a diagnosis. Stop making this about you.

No one is diagnosing kids as autistic based on a tantrum.

lifeturnsonadime · 07/04/2025 22:21

This reply has been deleted

Message deleted by MNHQ. Here's a link to our Talk Guidelines.

Except I didn't say that. I appreciate I said that I would not engage but that is not a licence for you to make things up that are not true.

What I actually said is that 'no one with a brain cell' thinks that it is progressive to remove support which results in an autistic person who is currently functioning well being unable to function.

You have obviously determined that that applies to you but it is not what I called you/ said about you.

Now I really am going to leave you to it.

PineappleChicken · 07/04/2025 22:23

Well I think this thread has run its course now. Like every thread on this subject it descends into this nonsense.

JorgyPorgy · 07/04/2025 22:23

This reply has been deleted

Message deleted by MNHQ. Here's a link to our Talk Guidelines.

lifeturnsonadime · 07/04/2025 22:24

PineappleChicken · 07/04/2025 22:23

Well I think this thread has run its course now. Like every thread on this subject it descends into this nonsense.

Agree.

Riaanna · 07/04/2025 22:26

This reply has been deleted

Message deleted by MNHQ. Here's a link to our Talk Guidelines.

It isn’t an example because it doesn’t happen.

JorgyPorgy · 07/04/2025 22:29

lifeturnsonadime · 07/04/2025 22:21

Except I didn't say that. I appreciate I said that I would not engage but that is not a licence for you to make things up that are not true.

What I actually said is that 'no one with a brain cell' thinks that it is progressive to remove support which results in an autistic person who is currently functioning well being unable to function.

You have obviously determined that that applies to you but it is not what I called you/ said about you.

Now I really am going to leave you to it.

But I didn’t say anything about removing support?! it seems you misunderstood my post and the implication was that you think I’m talking about removing support? Otherwise why go on about that in your reply to me? No one was talking about removing support .

JorgyPorgy · 07/04/2025 22:31

Riaanna · 07/04/2025 22:26

It isn’t an example because it doesn’t happen.

Oh Ok miss authority on medical diagnosis .