In the run up to all this there were multiple threads about the proposed cuts, and on a couple I repeatedly asked the question where are all these super flexible and inclusive employers going to come from. Funnily enough despite repeatedly asking, people just kept being righteously ableist but couldn't actually answer the question.
It strikes me the question still isn't being actually answered. Lots of idealistic suggestions that overlook so many obvious pachyderms in the room.
The biggest one is that in the current economic climate, companies need to make maximum profit for minimum outlay, hence job cutting left, right and centre, plus the tinkering with NI and huge rates rises for business premises, not to mention the encroachment of automation and AI that is making certain industries virtually obsolete (no pun intended).
The employment market is changing at an exponential rate, and while it's laudable to think employers will want to embrace the disabled, the costs of reasonable adjustments will not be cost effective for many.
Someone else pointed out the disingenuous language this drive to "help" benefits claimants is being couched in. That it should be considered supportive and an extension of "therapy". Are employers really going to want to sink time and money into that at a time when their basic operating costs are being elevated?
Don't get me wrong, I'm all in favour of those who feel they can work being enabled to do so, and those who can't being supported to at least live like human beings, however, like everything else being proposed, there seems to be a populist wrecking ball being swung through the most vulnerable sections if society.
I also believe the pace and intensity and complexity of modern life, plus economic stress, is partly behind the apparently increasing numbers of the unwell and disabled. We have little idea of how our environment, with all the cumulative additives, chemicals, pollutants and toxins are truly affecting us, not to mention the potential legacy of over 3000 nuclear tests since 1945, above and below ground that could have impacted the earth and water.
The impact of technology from a neurological perspective is not yet fully understood, and while we are urged to limit screentime we are also hugely dependent on it for every aspect of modern life.
In terms of places of employment, my relatively affluent South coast university hometown has so many empty shops in the town centre, it's embarrassing. No department stores, even M&S have decamped to out of town retail parks and parking is a very expensive joke.
Call centre jobs are very hard to come by, and as others have mentioned, WFH is being phased out.
We're in a pretty pickle indeed, and I stand in solidarity with those on the lowest economic rung of the ladder, wondering where the hell the next rungs have gone.
The less money people have to spend, the more the economy will decline, and the more people will suffer.