Meet the Other Phone. Child-safe in minutes.

Meet the Other Phone.
Child-safe in minutes.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

So, who is going to employ all these disabled people the government wants to wean of welfare

1000 replies

Jimisnotmyname · 18/03/2025 16:14

Really wondering. Not saying it is necessarily a bad thing to encourage those who can work, to work but as a carer for 2 disabled family members, I am hugely struggling to find another job as nobody is willing to give me any flexibility (which I need as a carer) and there are always candidates who do not need the same accomodations I do. I would imagine that many of those currently not in work because of disability or a health condition, will often need a similar level of flexibility. I just wonder who on the the government think will offer jobs galore on these circumstances??

OP posts:
runaway13 · 19/03/2025 00:16

Mbhhhvff · 18/03/2025 17:07

I wonder this too because I’m a SAHM desperate to return to work and can’t get a job because they question the break (plus I don’t have up to date references). I feel unemployable because nobody is interested. Also jobs receive so many applicants these days, so I can’t understand where they are going to magic up the jobs from either. In fact so many companies seem to be laying people off rather than taking people on due to costs.

Start with voluntary work.. it's a way back to work. That's what I did following my. cancer diagnosis, I am carer for a relative with profound disabilities and need to travel times a week on trains to see them. I have no family support. I have severe depression and am full of aches and pains, yet I still work full-time (from home) and I am 65. Worked since age 16 in some shitty jobs. Getting and keeping a job for most people is not that hard, a bit of effort and resilience is needed. I don't mean to be unkind but we cannot keep paying out for people who say they don't want to/can't work. I know people on benefits who can.

OneMoreForLuck · 19/03/2025 00:22

WilmaFlintstone1 · 18/03/2025 16:44

I’m autistic with ADHD. I hold down a job and don’t need or claim any benefits.
My son has the same neurodivergent brain as me but he has moderate learning difficulties.

‘At 18 he was nowhere near enough ready for the world of work. At age 22 he now might be. For me the big change I wanted to see is there…..he can try working in a job without losing his benefits to see if he’s employable. If he’s not then everything stays the same. This is a change which has been long needed.

im hoping though to see some structure around supporting young people in my son’s position. He won’t cope in care homes, hospitals or education places but he might in a supermarket or as a farm helper.

There's already a way to try out a job without losing benefits. It's called "permitted work". It's been around for years - I did it myself.

WalkingonWheels · 19/03/2025 00:27

TheQuaintOrca · 19/03/2025 00:08

Obviously not everyone in a wheelchair can work and I've known people in wheelchairs who wouldn't be able to work, but the fact that there are people out there being in wheelchairs or with epilepsy shows for some they can not only work but they can work in highly paid and well regarded professions. There was even a surgeon who was a wheelchair user. I've known others in wheelchairs who absolutely could wfh but never pursued it. Having a certain condition or being in a wheelchair should not automatically mean not working.

Wheelchair users are actually intelligent human beings shocker!!

Yes, funnily enough, lots of us were professionals with excellent careers before becoming disabled. Some of us can continue to work, some of us can't.

WalkingonWheels · 19/03/2025 00:31

DodoTired · 18/03/2025 23:50

what you experience is very sad but it is very extreme - many many people with Crohns can work and travel and live fulfilling lives. My friend has it and she skis and sails and - yes - works. Despite occasions flare ups.

same with diabetes, endometriosis and thyroid issues- just mere fact someone has them doesn’t mean they are disabled and cannot work. So the PP explaining that she of course couldn’t work because of multiple diseases (after ptsd after 2 mere years of working, lol) - doesn’t sound as “get out of jail free” as she thinks

It's not extreme, though. As someone with Crohns, I spend time in hospital with others who have Crohns. I've never met anyone in real life with the disease who can live a normal life, let alone do extreme sports and work full time.

Get out of jail free? What do you mean by that? Do you mean obtain the absolutely pitiful £900 a month that disabled people get from PIP? £400 if the mobility element is used on a wheelchair or car.

Do you honestly think disabled people capable of working are choosing not to, for nine hundred fucking quid a month?

CassandraWebb · 19/03/2025 00:34

buffyfaith · 19/03/2025 00:15

The thing is maybe people CAN work but who’s going to employ them?
I am averaging one sickness a month mostly because of endometriosis, i go from fine to unable to work with no warning
Not many employers are going to be happy with that

My sick leave is around this, probably more (partly because my condition flares every time I get my period). Didn't stop me getting promoted several times. Then I moved employer and passed my probation fine despite regular sick days. They know I work hard when I can, they know I make sure my files are in order so people can cover at short notice.

OneTealMentor · 19/03/2025 00:36

WalkingonWheels · 19/03/2025 00:31

It's not extreme, though. As someone with Crohns, I spend time in hospital with others who have Crohns. I've never met anyone in real life with the disease who can live a normal life, let alone do extreme sports and work full time.

Get out of jail free? What do you mean by that? Do you mean obtain the absolutely pitiful £900 a month that disabled people get from PIP? £400 if the mobility element is used on a wheelchair or car.

Do you honestly think disabled people capable of working are choosing not to, for nine hundred fucking quid a month?

Don't you get housing benefit and council tax relief too?

CassandraWebb · 19/03/2025 00:39

DodoTired · 18/03/2025 23:50

what you experience is very sad but it is very extreme - many many people with Crohns can work and travel and live fulfilling lives. My friend has it and she skis and sails and - yes - works. Despite occasions flare ups.

same with diabetes, endometriosis and thyroid issues- just mere fact someone has them doesn’t mean they are disabled and cannot work. So the PP explaining that she of course couldn’t work because of multiple diseases (after ptsd after 2 mere years of working, lol) - doesn’t sound as “get out of jail free” as she thinks

Agreed, my ex has it . He thought his life was over when he was diagnosed. He's now an incredibly successful business leader, heads up a major national organisation. Owns several very nice houses. Leads a very full life. I don't doubt there are tough times too. But somehow he's made it work.

I appreciate everyone's symptoms are different but this thread has shown that people with disabilities and serious conditions who do work need to talk more about it, so more people can see that it is possible (and how)

WalkingonWheels · 19/03/2025 00:40

OneTealMentor · 19/03/2025 00:36

Don't you get housing benefit and council tax relief too?

Lol! No. I have a husband, which apparently means that I have all the support I need.

octopusenergyfree50 · 19/03/2025 00:43

WeylandYutani · 18/03/2025 16:26

I am scared of this too. I have not worked for over 10 years and have no qualifications since I was 19 which is a really old GNVQ.
When I used to go to the job centre, I had to have someone go with me. They can't go with me to interviews and work.
When I get overwhelmed, I can't talk and I shut down. How will I get a job if I can't even pass an interviews?
All the talk of the changes to benefits has made me feel like I don't want to be here anymore.

@WeylandYutani sending a hug. They don't understand that they are making people feel worthless. hold your head up high and don't let people shame you. It's not clear exactly what is definitely going to happen and what isn't at the moment there might be some changes. I'm sure you won't be the only one feeling like this and I'm so sorry this is happening.
I'm never voting labour again and many more won't either

OneTealMentor · 19/03/2025 00:44

WalkingonWheels · 19/03/2025 00:40

Lol! No. I have a husband, which apparently means that I have all the support I need.

I guess you're fortunate in a way then having someone else to support you financially but the gov would probably have given you more money if not

ParrotParty · 19/03/2025 00:47

Flopsythebunny · 18/03/2025 20:12

That doesn't make sense. Pip is an in work benefit. You can already claim pip and work

Or whatever benefits are given - it was basically saying they can do a no risk trial working

octopusenergyfree50 · 19/03/2025 00:48

Overtheatlantic · 18/03/2025 16:20

Care homes, local authorities and education institutions will offer more flexibility than regular corporate jobs.

@Overtheatlantic can't work in a care home unless you are fit enough to do moving and handling of people, not many disabled people can do that!

Marylou72 · 19/03/2025 00:52

tfresh · 18/03/2025 16:26

For those with mental health issues, the routine of employment might help them. Its better we take these steps now rather than when we're forced to by the IMF.

The country can no longer afford (nor could it ever really) to be pay people with such a wide range of illnesses, either top up benefits or to not work at all.

I don't think any country on earth can.

Can afford to pay 3.96 billion per year for immigrants though? 🙄

WalkingonWheels · 19/03/2025 00:58

OneTealMentor · 19/03/2025 00:44

I guess you're fortunate in a way then having someone else to support you financially but the gov would probably have given you more money if not

The reality of it is he can't afford to support us all financially. We scrape by but only just, and are surviving not thriving. Married disabled people where one party works are absolutely fucked over.

Not to mention he also has an autoimmune disease so has to struggle working full time. I'm scared of the day when his body gives up, because it will.

CalicoPusscat · 19/03/2025 00:58

@PaintDecisions that sounds similar to a friend of mine; he has everything going for him and I'm not qualified to talk about any mental struggle he might have.

He had a breakdown in central London but luckily kind people got him to safety. He's one of the people we want to protect.

bloopbloopeee · 19/03/2025 01:05

BrandonFlowersEyesWithEyeliner · 18/03/2025 17:15

First it was 'back pain'

Then it was 'anxiety'

Then it was 'fibromyalgia'

Then it was 'long COVID '

These diagnoses are so open to abuse from people that need a nice wishy washy set of symptoms, that can't be proved, to cling to.

Try having fibromyalgia. It's a ball! But sure, it doesn't exist ...

Morph22010 · 19/03/2025 01:09

MistressoftheDarkSide · 18/03/2025 22:16

In the run up to all this there were multiple threads about the proposed cuts, and on a couple I repeatedly asked the question where are all these super flexible and inclusive employers going to come from. Funnily enough despite repeatedly asking, people just kept being righteously ableist but couldn't actually answer the question.

It strikes me the question still isn't being actually answered. Lots of idealistic suggestions that overlook so many obvious pachyderms in the room.

The biggest one is that in the current economic climate, companies need to make maximum profit for minimum outlay, hence job cutting left, right and centre, plus the tinkering with NI and huge rates rises for business premises, not to mention the encroachment of automation and AI that is making certain industries virtually obsolete (no pun intended).

The employment market is changing at an exponential rate, and while it's laudable to think employers will want to embrace the disabled, the costs of reasonable adjustments will not be cost effective for many.

Someone else pointed out the disingenuous language this drive to "help" benefits claimants is being couched in. That it should be considered supportive and an extension of "therapy". Are employers really going to want to sink time and money into that at a time when their basic operating costs are being elevated?

Don't get me wrong, I'm all in favour of those who feel they can work being enabled to do so, and those who can't being supported to at least live like human beings, however, like everything else being proposed, there seems to be a populist wrecking ball being swung through the most vulnerable sections if society.

I also believe the pace and intensity and complexity of modern life, plus economic stress, is partly behind the apparently increasing numbers of the unwell and disabled. We have little idea of how our environment, with all the cumulative additives, chemicals, pollutants and toxins are truly affecting us, not to mention the potential legacy of over 3000 nuclear tests since 1945, above and below ground that could have impacted the earth and water.

The impact of technology from a neurological perspective is not yet fully understood, and while we are urged to limit screentime we are also hugely dependent on it for every aspect of modern life.

In terms of places of employment, my relatively affluent South coast university hometown has so many empty shops in the town centre, it's embarrassing. No department stores, even M&S have decamped to out of town retail parks and parking is a very expensive joke.

Call centre jobs are very hard to come by, and as others have mentioned, WFH is being phased out.

We're in a pretty pickle indeed, and I stand in solidarity with those on the lowest economic rung of the ladder, wondering where the hell the next rungs have gone.

The less money people have to spend, the more the economy will decline, and the more people will suffer.

The only way to do it is to give employees a financial incentive to employ, maybe by not having to pay employers ni on that persons salary.

however the main issue with this given the changes is how do you identify the people this is aimed at and give the ni exemption? Previously you could have said ni exemption for people on pip, but it seems like the majority the gov want to get back into work will no longer qualify for pip

ColdwarEra · 19/03/2025 01:11

This reply has been deleted

This has been deleted by MNHQ for breaking our Talk Guidelines.

BlakeCarrington · 19/03/2025 01:25

Emanresuunknown · 18/03/2025 17:31

I work in a city centre office. We have several staff either in a wheelchair or using mobility aids like crutches, or a walking frame. We have ramps, lifts, disabled loos, staff who need it have specialised furniture such as special desks. I have colleagues with visual impairments who have specialist keyboards, screens, and software on their computers supplied by the employer as an adjustment for their disability. I have colleagues who are neurodiverse, colleagues with caring responsibilities, all have various reasonable adjustments in place.

I have worked for 3 different large employers in the last 7 years and the same arrangements were in place at all of them.

People seem to think no employers out there have made any concessions for disability?! Obviously there will be some shit employers out there but there are also lots of good ones?

Same here, my employer invests a lot in this regard.

buffyfaith · 19/03/2025 01:44

CassandraWebb · 19/03/2025 00:34

My sick leave is around this, probably more (partly because my condition flares every time I get my period). Didn't stop me getting promoted several times. Then I moved employer and passed my probation fine despite regular sick days. They know I work hard when I can, they know I make sure my files are in order so people can cover at short notice.

But realistically in most jobs… take the NHS for example, after 3 occasions of sickness you would be on a warning then no sickness for 6 months or you trigger the next stage
Not many employers are as forgiving
Occupational health told me I should work part time, I said well who pays the mortgage then? She said “well does PIP not help with the costs of it?”
Um no… I don’t get PIP

Newtess · 19/03/2025 02:25

I work in local government with some chronic health conditions. They are good with me, allowing me to work from home if I need to, use flexitime for medical appointments. But there are a lot of applications for jobs here now, sometimes 50 per vacancy. I doubt I'd have been picked if I applied now.

Purpleturtle43 · 19/03/2025 05:13

Overtheatlantic · 18/03/2025 16:20

Care homes, local authorities and education institutions will offer more flexibility than regular corporate jobs.

That's nonsense, care homes and education settings are front facing roles with no option to WFH, definitely not flexible a flexible option.

TheGruffalochild · 19/03/2025 05:51

mids2019 · 18/03/2025 16:56

This is where things fall apart

Employers aren't charities and employing people with disabilities unfortunately soon leads to performance reviews as the disabled person cannot meet objectives which the company puts forward to make the employee worth the investment

There needs to performance standards for any employee and if those aren't met then employers as a matter of course have to manage performance.

We are just going to have a cycle of disabled people entering unsuitable jobs only to be managed out in a few weeks/months only for the cycle to start again. Also employers are going to be concerned about safety liability of any neural disability.

Do we want people with ADHD operating heavy machinery which needs focus? Are we going to put the autistic in public facing roles such as retail just to face a barrage of complaints from customers about communication difficulties? Are we going to accept the inevitable bullying of employees and the associated damage to the employee and tribunal costs?

Hard reality is there are going to be a lot of poor disabled people. There aren't these fantastical inclusive jobs that are floating around which readily accept disability.

There is already a massive gap of manual labor workforce and those required to be there in person. House renovation work, plumbing, electrics, construction work , etc. Care workers and teachers, nursery staff. Hard days work where you have to show up in person, do shifts, do extra hours, work with your hands or with people and graft. People go into these jobs healthy and come out sick. Then they don’t get the support they need to get healthy again. Back pain caused by heavy lifting can be resolved if you access the right services. Mental health issues like burnout and depression caused by an unruly class or toxic environment can be supported if you provide a better environment and surrounding services. This is where focus needs to be.

Meanwhile the “comfortable” admin jobs are disappearing as they are replaced by AI. Customer service agents, self checkouts, data entry, minute taking etc. It’s much cheaper for employers to pay for AI that never goes off sick. There won’t be enough of these jobs to accommodate everyone.

Workplace culture also plays a role. Is it a workplace where a parent can take unlimited sick days to take care of their child? Can you take sick days to care for your elderly relatives? Are mental health days available to all employees? If not you are creating a divide between employees which eventually leads to bitterness which then creates a toxic environment which then leads to more people taking time off with burnout, depression etc

mids2019 · 19/03/2025 05:52

Another thing that needs mentioning in terms of jobs is that I have seen able people actively agitate for disabled colleagues to be sacked as they feel they are not pulling their weight. It is horrible today but disabled people do get bullied and if we consider work based bullying is probably going to disproportionately impact those with disabilities.

also if you look at jobs where there is a demand many are simply not suited for the disabled e.g. Truck drivers, warehouse work, manual care work, warehouse operatives, cleaners etc. If we take more sedentary roles these are often competitive graduate roles and there may be so points that able people are being displaced to allow disabled people to take these roles as it is the government mantra to get disabled people into work.

on fact one thing that is not calculated is the economic impact of the efficiency loss of getting disabled people into the workforce due to the loss of efficency and overheads for business. It seems the government are displacing an economic burden form the public to private sector and the private sector is not going to ultimately accept this. Many business in them last that employed a high number of disabled people in the past either had state subsidy or were large companies that could absorb costs and created great PR from an inclusive image.

Oblomov25 · 19/03/2025 05:55

I too dint know how this is going to work. Realistically it can't because businesses are cutthroat ruthless, there to make money.

Please create an account

To comment on this thread you need to create a Mumsnet account.

This thread is not accepting new messages.
Swipe left for the next trending thread