Meet the Other Phone. Protection built in.

Meet the Other Phone.
Protection built in.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

Benefit cuts proposal

1000 replies

Charliechoosecarefully · 18/03/2025 13:35

I just wanted it to have a specific thread:-

Kendall says government to consult on merging JSA and ESA benefits.

Kendall says WCA being scrapped, with Pip assessment process being used instead - will be scrapped in 2028.

Kendall says 'right to try' will let people on sickness benefits try work without immediately having benefits cut.

Kendall says UC payments being rebalanced, with standard rate going up, and some health top-ups frozen or cut.

Kendall says reassessments for people on universal credit with health top-ups to be beefed up

Kendall says universal credit claimants with most severe disabilities will not face reassessment

Kendall confirms Pip eligibility rules to be tightened, and assessment process to be reviewed - 4 pointed needed in one descriptor.

Kendall says under-22s could be prevented from claiming health top-up for universal credit

Sourced from the guardian.

OP posts:
Thread gallery
16
9fthighfence · 18/03/2025 14:48

johnworf · 18/03/2025 14:45

I probably sound very naive but how on earth can you claim PIP fraudulently? In my case I claimed for my son and had to provide a mountain of medical evidence in the form of letters from consultants that he sees, who confirmed his various disabilities and how they are managed.

I just don't get how you can be awarded PIP if you pretend you have an illness/disability.

Come on, it can’t be hard to claim to be severely depressed / suicidal. There are no physical tests for this. If you wanted to claim PIP and were dishonest you could do so.

SugarandSpiceandAllThingsNaice · 18/03/2025 14:49

9fthighfence · 18/03/2025 14:46

Yes but those ‘some people’ ought not be 25% of the workforce should they?

Ffs, 25% of the workforce (working age population) isn’t on health and disability benefits. At least get your figures correct.

Bumpitybumper · 18/03/2025 14:49

SugarandSpiceandAllThingsNaice · 18/03/2025 14:38

Whatever, seems like even when the facts say otherwise you decide to cling on to the ableist narrative that there’s a ton of skivers claiming PIP. I don’t blame you, the propaganda swamping our news feeds an telly for decades has repeated this message. It’s just too bad you can’t see through it.

There are no facts! That's my point. We have literally no idea how many piss takers there are. All we can go off is what we suspect might be happening based on our life experiences as there is virtually no actual data on this. Personally I suspect that there is a reasonably low level of out and out fraud but that the bigger issue is that people exaggerate a bit and lean into difficulties as they are advised to do so by various websites and forums and also because they naturally want to maximise their awards. It's just human nature! I don't think people that think they're actually committing fraud as they believe they are just making sure they get what they're entitled to. It's hard to suffer with imperfect health and accept that there is no help available for you.

bestcatlife · 18/03/2025 14:50

@9fthighfence and what about the ones that are genuinely suicidal? Just let them go and die somewhere? I hope you never know what it's like to feel that way.

Mielikki · 18/03/2025 14:50

kinkytoes · 18/03/2025 14:21

I'll get flamed for this but I really wish they'd cut back on benefits for illegal immigrants than for disabled people.

I cannot believe Labour are attacking the most vulnerable in our society (I also include the elderly in that) 😢 They wonder why mental health is at an all time low!

Illegal immigrants don't get benefits. Obviously.

SugarandSpiceandAllThingsNaice · 18/03/2025 14:50

9fthighfence · 18/03/2025 14:48

Come on, it can’t be hard to claim to be severely depressed / suicidal. There are no physical tests for this. If you wanted to claim PIP and were dishonest you could do so.

Don’t be daft, you can’t just claim to be depressed and suicidal, you have to prove it with documented suicide attempts and doctors assessments.

9fthighfence · 18/03/2025 14:50

SugarandSpiceandAllThingsNaice · 18/03/2025 14:49

Ffs, 25% of the workforce (working age population) isn’t on health and disability benefits. At least get your figures correct.

25% of the working age population of Blackpool do indeed claim to be too ill to work.

ARichtGoodDram · 18/03/2025 14:51

As always the forgotten thing about the fake claims is this -

People faking it, and there are always going to be a small number for any benefit (but it is a small number according to successive governments own figures), have much more energy than genuinely disabled people.

So while folks celebrate making it harder for the fakers try and remember that every extra hoop needing jumped will mean a hell of a lot more to many many genuine claimants thank a few fakers

Bumpitybumper · 18/03/2025 14:51

9fthighfence · 18/03/2025 14:48

Come on, it can’t be hard to claim to be severely depressed / suicidal. There are no physical tests for this. If you wanted to claim PIP and were dishonest you could do so.

Exactly.

Think how you would prove that you have depression/anxiety etc if you were a genuine claimant. Think how much of this is ultimately reliant on patient testimonial and what you tell medical professionals. How can you distinguish a genuine claimant from a fraudulent one?

stargazingortryingto · 18/03/2025 14:51

Eastie77Returns · 18/03/2025 14:43

Statement from Kendall on PIP

“Social and demographic change means more people are now living with a disability, but the increase in disability benefits is double the rate of increasing prevalence of working-age disability in the country, with claims amongst young people up 150%, for mental health conditions up 190% and claims for learning difficulties up over 400%, according to the IFS.
Every day there are more than 1,000 new Pip awards. That’s the equivalent of adding a population the size of Leicester every single year”.

Regardless of your views on these latest changes, surely it’s clear that the amount spent on benefits is just not sustainable?

We genuinely need to investigate why so many young people feel they cannot work due to mental health conditions. I’m in my 40s and when I left uni and started work 20 odd years I didn’t know a single person my age who was not working and claiming benefits due to anxiety or any other MH condition. Was Streeting was condemned for suggesting MH issues are over diagnosed but might he have a point? One young person in my team was sat at her desk in tears recently. She was panicked and anxious because she’d forgotten to bring in her Rescue Remedy spray and was concerned about what might happen if she had an anxious moment before a customer presentation. In the end she went home early and was signed off work for the rest of the week. I mean…this to me is a normal, every day worry (feeling a bit nervous before a customer meeting) but it now merits being signed off work.

20 years ago, you were entering a workforce with more and better paid opportunities, and more generous terms and conditions, and would have been able to afford a better place to live than someone in your shoes these days.

Young people have worked out that it doesn't matter how hard they work, they will never enjoy the quality of life their parents had, unless they inherit assets. We are no longer living in a meritocracy (if we ever were). We live in an inheritocracy now, where all that really matters is how many assets you inherit. I don't blame them for checking out. The social contract has broken, and they are expected to exchange their youth and labour for fuck all.

UsernameTalk · 18/03/2025 14:52

DenholmElliot11 · 18/03/2025 13:47

I think it's time we all started weening ourselves off top-ups and UC to be honest. Best to try and earn enough not to need it. We've been on it for 30 years now and they can take it away at any time.

So what about the severely disabled or people caring for severely disabled children. Just shit out of luck?

kinkytoes · 18/03/2025 14:52

Mielikki · 18/03/2025 14:50

Illegal immigrants don't get benefits. Obviously.

But they do cost a lot of money to the public purse.

Apologies my wording wasn't perfect.

Public money is public money and that's what Labour are apparently trying to save.

Longsummerdays25 · 18/03/2025 14:53

The government have no choice whatsoever. The costs are unsustainable. I am comfortable those that are severely disabled will have nothing to fear, and life might become easier for them if anything. Those that are claiming and could work, should be working. There’s an awful lot of people claiming that shouldn’t be and not working could be making their condition even worse. Depression for instance, and I say that as someone whom
has had severe depression.

Mielikki · 18/03/2025 14:53

Letmecallyouback · 18/03/2025 14:39

They are not on benefits. They only get Asylum Support which is not a benefit.

Illegal immigrants do not get asylum support. Only asylum claimants get asylum support.

pizzaHeart · 18/03/2025 14:53

Toomanysquishmallows · 18/03/2025 13:47

I think the proposal for under 22,s is utterly disgusting. My dd attends a special school , the vast majority of the pupils there will never be able to work , it feel like these young people and their families are being punished.

My understanding for this category is that PIP will stay, its other benefits won’t be available but if they are in education they can’t claim them anyway.

waxymoron · 18/03/2025 14:53

The 'right to try' employment or whatever bollocks that was. Remember Workfare? Basically unscrupulous companies will grab people and make them work 40 hours a week for their benefits (roughly £75 per week..
Poundland were big advocates of this slave labour as I recall. It helps no-one except corporations who can afford it.
I highly doubt people put on this will be allowed to 'try' a career they would dearly love to train for,
it's all shit

jellyfishperiwinkle · 18/03/2025 14:54

Bumpitybumper · 18/03/2025 14:49

There are no facts! That's my point. We have literally no idea how many piss takers there are. All we can go off is what we suspect might be happening based on our life experiences as there is virtually no actual data on this. Personally I suspect that there is a reasonably low level of out and out fraud but that the bigger issue is that people exaggerate a bit and lean into difficulties as they are advised to do so by various websites and forums and also because they naturally want to maximise their awards. It's just human nature! I don't think people that think they're actually committing fraud as they believe they are just making sure they get what they're entitled to. It's hard to suffer with imperfect health and accept that there is no help available for you.

When I applied for attendance allowance and a blue badge for my elderly mum I certainly didn't exaggerate, but neither did I sugar coat what she is going through with metastasised pancreatic cancer which will kill her in maybe weeks or months. Both were approved in days based on her medical records, fortunately.

Bumpitybumper · 18/03/2025 14:54

SugarandSpiceandAllThingsNaice · 18/03/2025 14:50

Don’t be daft, you can’t just claim to be depressed and suicidal, you have to prove it with documented suicide attempts and doctors assessments.

No, you don't! You can have suicidal ideation without actually having a documented suicide attempt. Medical reports are largely founded on patient testimonial for lots of mental health conditions. If you're reporting a set of symptoms that can't be proved or disproved then you will likely be given a diagnosis that matches the symptoms you reported. The alternative is that the doctors start accusing people of lying and only giving medical evidence to those that they believe.

SugarandSpiceandAllThingsNaice · 18/03/2025 14:54

Bumpitybumper · 18/03/2025 14:49

There are no facts! That's my point. We have literally no idea how many piss takers there are. All we can go off is what we suspect might be happening based on our life experiences as there is virtually no actual data on this. Personally I suspect that there is a reasonably low level of out and out fraud but that the bigger issue is that people exaggerate a bit and lean into difficulties as they are advised to do so by various websites and forums and also because they naturally want to maximise their awards. It's just human nature! I don't think people that think they're actually committing fraud as they believe they are just making sure they get what they're entitled to. It's hard to suffer with imperfect health and accept that there is no help available for you.

There is data, you are simply ignoring it.
And you cant get PIP by filling out the form alone- you need medical evidence backing it up. Many who claim PIP genuinely need advice and help to do the form and put together an application. So the existence of help isn’t proof of fraud.

possumtea · 18/03/2025 14:54

iwentjasonwaterfalls · 18/03/2025 14:44

I can't find it now but someone made an excellent point about the insistence on returning to the office.

We're constantly trying to get my epilepsy under control (losing battle at the moment) and I regularly have seizure clusters. If I could work from home, I could work in between the seizures and then make up any lost time at the end. If being in the office is mandatory, my sickness record will be a mess because it'd be time off work every time (not to mention relying on colleagues to help during/after seizures as opposed to my husband, who knows what to do).

I'm applying for lots of work from home jobs, but there's such a push to get back to the office that I just don't understand.

The fact you’re even prepared to work
between seizure clusters breaks my heart. I’ve seen these clusters (I assume focal) and to think of working post ictal would be so hard.

They’re penalising the wrong people.

(edited for spelling)

Bumpitybumper · 18/03/2025 14:55

jellyfishperiwinkle · 18/03/2025 14:54

When I applied for attendance allowance and a blue badge for my elderly mum I certainly didn't exaggerate, but neither did I sugar coat what she is going through with metastasised pancreatic cancer which will kill her in maybe weeks or months. Both were approved in days based on her medical records, fortunately.

Then my post isn't relevant to your mum's claim is it. I never suggested everyone exaggerates but that some certainly do.

Puddlewoman · 18/03/2025 14:55

DenholmElliot11 · 18/03/2025 13:47

I think it's time we all started weening ourselves off top-ups and UC to be honest. Best to try and earn enough not to need it. We've been on it for 30 years now and they can take it away at any time.

Thing is we need people to work lower paying jobs in places like care homes nurseries, we need cleaners, retail and catering staff. And you can't pay them too much because profits and you have complaints of why would i train to be a Dr, lawyer etc if I could get the same amount working in mcdonalds.
So by taking away the top ups you are effectively saying that people who work lower paid jobs should suffer for it.

Miley1967 · 18/03/2025 14:55

Letmecallyouback · 18/03/2025 14:29

I currently get 4 points in one of the descriptors for daily living with 2 points in every other and 12 points for enhanced mobility. I was only reassessed 3 months ago for UC and given the severe disability top up for LCWRA. Even I am now thinking does this mean I will now be reassessed? Again. I agree there needs to be reform but my greatest fear is the wrong people get caught in the crossfire

They are going to be going all out to speed up the backlog of re-assessments that still haven't been cleared from covid so unlikley you will be re-assessed again.

DimplesToadfoot · 18/03/2025 14:55

This reply has been deleted

Message deleted by MNHQ. Here's a link to our Talk Guidelines.

Katypp · 18/03/2025 14:55

An alternative way cut back on welfare would be to use UC to top up maintenance payments rather than them being disregarded altogether and/or scrapping the triple lock for pensions.
It's clearly ridiculous that a single parent can claim full UC and then get another payment from their ex of any amount and it is disregarded, so the tax payer is, in certain circumstances, funding pocket money for wealthy families.
It's also unfair that pensioners are immune to the cutbacks that are being made elsewhere, except for the WFP, which was a one-off payment only.

Please create an account

To comment on this thread you need to create a Mumsnet account.

This thread is not accepting new messages.