Meet the Other Phone. A phone that grows with your child.

Meet the Other Phone.
A phone that grows with your child.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

Benefit cuts proposal

1000 replies

Charliechoosecarefully · 18/03/2025 13:35

I just wanted it to have a specific thread:-

Kendall says government to consult on merging JSA and ESA benefits.

Kendall says WCA being scrapped, with Pip assessment process being used instead - will be scrapped in 2028.

Kendall says 'right to try' will let people on sickness benefits try work without immediately having benefits cut.

Kendall says UC payments being rebalanced, with standard rate going up, and some health top-ups frozen or cut.

Kendall says reassessments for people on universal credit with health top-ups to be beefed up

Kendall says universal credit claimants with most severe disabilities will not face reassessment

Kendall confirms Pip eligibility rules to be tightened, and assessment process to be reviewed - 4 pointed needed in one descriptor.

Kendall says under-22s could be prevented from claiming health top-up for universal credit

Sourced from the guardian.

OP posts:
Thread gallery
16
kinkytoes · 18/03/2025 14:29

Rosecoffeecup · 18/03/2025 14:27

Since when did illegal immigrants have resource to public funds? Or do you mean people here legally?

Well they're clearly not paying for their own food and board, are they?

Darkmom · 18/03/2025 14:29

My DS is 16 and claims PIP so this is going to impact him.

DS won’t be eligible for universal credit
due to savings he has so I’m not sure he’ll be impacted by the changes for under 22 year olds.

I’m hoping that these changes mean government does make it so DS can find employment.

Willyoujustbequiet · 18/03/2025 14:29

DenholmElliot11 · 18/03/2025 13:47

I think it's time we all started weening ourselves off top-ups and UC to be honest. Best to try and earn enough not to need it. We've been on it for 30 years now and they can take it away at any time.

Some people will never be able to. You must understand that?

SugarandSpiceandAllThingsNaice · 18/03/2025 14:29

Bumpitybumper · 18/03/2025 14:25

I think perhaps it represents a bit of a conceptual shift. Previously here had been a school of thought that people shouldn't be detrimented by their disability at all. That the state had some responsibility to step in and help equalise things by paying money for additional hardship and difficulties incurred. Now it's more that the state will only step in if you are so impacted in one area to the extent that it causes a significant impact to your life that's extremely difficult/impossible to overcome.

I think this is a sensible step forward but will be a bit of a shock to many who have have come to rely on the current system.

Rubbish, there is no such conceptual shift because they are increasing the benefits for perfectly abled people who are between jobs and who have the least difficulty and cost for daily living and are less likely to be discriminated against by employers when getting a job.

They are stepping in more for those with no difficulties from disability, and withdrawing from those who have difficulties.

Iwanttoliveonamountain · 18/03/2025 14:29

Won’t they be in the never reassessed group?

ARichtGoodDram · 18/03/2025 14:30

If they were interested in getting people to work the civil service wouldn't have brought back in a mandatory arbitrary amount of days people were back in the office.

The best way to get people who have health issues into work is to have decent jobs that are flexible and offer home working.

My DD has narcolepsy. She works for HMRC. Pre pandemic she was part time. Since the pandemic she went full time. Her job is, according to her boss and their boss, perfectly capable of remaining wfh. But she's been mandated to the office 3 days and they have no flexibility (blanket ban on flexible working requests atm). The office she was based in was closed during Covid. The one she's in now involves booking a hot desk so not even required in the office for team cohesion or working together.
She'll end up back to part time once her boss can no longer allow her full wfh.

Gilead · 18/03/2025 14:30

kinkytoes · 18/03/2025 14:21

I'll get flamed for this but I really wish they'd cut back on benefits for illegal immigrants than for disabled people.

I cannot believe Labour are attacking the most vulnerable in our society (I also include the elderly in that) 😢 They wonder why mental health is at an all time low!

Illegals immigrants don’t get benefits, because they’re usually undetected, or have disappeared into the community. The people we house in hotels etc get 10 pounds a week for telephone top ups.
Those who are here and being assessed, if they are in housing they get £37 per week to cover everything.

Mirabai · 18/03/2025 14:30

APocketFullOfRye · 18/03/2025 14:28

The fraud assessment wasn’t based on whether people were lying on the forms or to gps etc.
It was based on people with fake ids, claiming twice etc. hence the 0%

Its impossible to watch people all the time to know if someone’s faking it so also impossible to know the figures on that.

Edited

It would be very difficult to claim twice or use a fake ID - PIP and ESA require medical evidence from GPs and consultants.

ARichtGoodDram · 18/03/2025 14:31

Letmecallyouback · 18/03/2025 14:29

I currently get 4 points in one of the descriptors for daily living with 2 points in every other and 12 points for enhanced mobility. I was only reassessed 3 months ago for UC and given the severe disability top up for LCWRA. Even I am now thinking does this mean I will now be reassessed? Again. I agree there needs to be reform but my greatest fear is the wrong people get caught in the crossfire

With 4 points in one section and the mobility section not being changed you'll be fine.

This will likely impact new claims (they can't reassess everyone in one go) and renewals.

And it'll still be a good way off as it all has to be finalised, agreed and then implemented

Letmecallyouback · 18/03/2025 14:31

kinkytoes · 18/03/2025 14:21

I'll get flamed for this but I really wish they'd cut back on benefits for illegal immigrants than for disabled people.

I cannot believe Labour are attacking the most vulnerable in our society (I also include the elderly in that) 😢 They wonder why mental health is at an all time low!

What benefits do illegal immigrants get?

Bignanna · 18/03/2025 14:31

Rosecoffeecup · 18/03/2025 14:27

Since when did illegal immigrants have resource to public funds? Or do you mean people here legally?

illegal immigrants are on benefits until their asylum claims are processed and granted, which then allows them to work.

SugarandSpiceandAllThingsNaice · 18/03/2025 14:31

kinkytoes · 18/03/2025 14:21

I'll get flamed for this but I really wish they'd cut back on benefits for illegal immigrants than for disabled people.

I cannot believe Labour are attacking the most vulnerable in our society (I also include the elderly in that) 😢 They wonder why mental health is at an all time low!

Illegal immigrants don’t get any benefits, and most legal immigrants do not get benefits either. 🤨

SugarandSpiceandAllThingsNaice · 18/03/2025 14:32

Bignanna · 18/03/2025 14:31

illegal immigrants are on benefits until their asylum claims are processed and granted, which then allows them to work.

Asylum seekers are not illegal immigrants.

kinkytoes · 18/03/2025 14:32

Gilead · 18/03/2025 14:30

Illegals immigrants don’t get benefits, because they’re usually undetected, or have disappeared into the community. The people we house in hotels etc get 10 pounds a week for telephone top ups.
Those who are here and being assessed, if they are in housing they get £37 per week to cover everything.

Never mind £10 telephone top ups! How much is it to house them in those hotels?

I'm not saying we're generous to them per se, just that there are so many it all adds up.

APocketFullOfRye · 18/03/2025 14:33

Willyoujustbequiet · 18/03/2025 14:29

Some people will never be able to. You must understand that?

But those who can never work have been protected

Orangesandlemons77 · 18/03/2025 14:33

ElizaSchuylerHamilton243 · 18/03/2025 14:09

I'm gutted. I work part time and have multiple chronic conditions so I get PIP on both daily living and mobility. But I got 2 in 5 areas and 8 in mobility so I'd only get mobility undr the new rules. I really can't manage working full time and the pip payments have really helped our family. It's the only benefit we receive - we aren't like the stereotype relying on every benefit we can.

Could it be possible for you to score 4 in an area at next review, you could appeal if needed. I'm sorry to hear this.

Letmecallyouback · 18/03/2025 14:34

ARichtGoodDram · 18/03/2025 14:31

With 4 points in one section and the mobility section not being changed you'll be fine.

This will likely impact new claims (they can't reassess everyone in one go) and renewals.

And it'll still be a good way off as it all has to be finalised, agreed and then implemented

I hope you are right. It does scare me. I have been just not looking at the news stories about it for weeks.

Bumpitybumper · 18/03/2025 14:34

SugarandSpiceandAllThingsNaice · 18/03/2025 14:25

The fraud rate on PIP is 0.1% doing that so tell me how cutting PIP by about 25% ( £6bn from £23bn) is only going to affect the 0.1% of piss takers?

Over a million of 3 million claiming PIP are going to lose it and many more will get less PIP.

It is morally indefensible.

Edited

The DWP have no idea about the amount of fraudulent claims submitted and approved for PIP. Please stop touting this 0% figure around as if it's in anyway robust. The amount of surveillance you would have to undertake on each claimant to even begin to prove that they had exaggerated or manufactured their health conditions would be extremely expensive and impossible to resource. Not to mention the intrusion and human rights issues that would be brought up for claimants.

There are also lots of claims that aren't completely fraudulent but are in a grey area where the costs of the additional health difficulties faced by people don't necessarily warrant the government stepping in and helping with PIP in the way it currently does. Anyone that has terrible eyesight or rubbish teeth will know that the luck of the draw sometimes means that our physical and mental health costs us more money than the average person We can't expect the government to pick up the bill for every additional cost we incur because of this.

SugarandSpiceandAllThingsNaice · 18/03/2025 14:35

APocketFullOfRye · 18/03/2025 14:28

The fraud assessment wasn’t based on whether people were lying on the forms or to gps etc.
It was based on people with fake ids, claiming twice etc. hence the 0%

Its impossible to watch people all the time to know if someone’s faking it so also impossible to know the figures on that.

Edited

No it wasn’t. You can’t claim twice, it’s all by your NI and there is no way to get an extra NI.

And GPs don’t just go by what people say. You need a ton of medical evidence with your NHS# to get PIP from hospital, consultants and so on.

dawngreen · 18/03/2025 14:36

APocketFullOfRye · 18/03/2025 14:33

But those who can never work have been protected

But it says it is been cut so the long term sick get less. How is that protecting ppl. When you have to pay for extra stuff being disabled???

Downwiththecrumpets81 · 18/03/2025 14:36

Well that’s me fucked then. Without PIP I won’t be able to pay for the monthly osteopath appointments and for the supplements I take which mean that my conditions are managed to the point where I can at least work part time. So I won’t have any pay or PIP, brilliant.

As for the young people/mental health crisis, I presume they’re going to be funneling money into providing actual services which successfully manage mental health problems? Otherwise these young people aren’t suddenly going to find themselves magically better and able to join the workforce. Strangely I haven’t seen any mention of that though.

Willyoujustbequiet · 18/03/2025 14:36

APocketFullOfRye · 18/03/2025 14:33

But those who can never work have been protected

From what I'm reading on here now you can't claim until 22.

So what about severely disabled young adults who their parents can't claim for anymore but they can't claim in their own right either?

What do they live on? Who pays for their carers/therapies now?

SugarandSpiceandAllThingsNaice · 18/03/2025 14:38

Bumpitybumper · 18/03/2025 14:34

The DWP have no idea about the amount of fraudulent claims submitted and approved for PIP. Please stop touting this 0% figure around as if it's in anyway robust. The amount of surveillance you would have to undertake on each claimant to even begin to prove that they had exaggerated or manufactured their health conditions would be extremely expensive and impossible to resource. Not to mention the intrusion and human rights issues that would be brought up for claimants.

There are also lots of claims that aren't completely fraudulent but are in a grey area where the costs of the additional health difficulties faced by people don't necessarily warrant the government stepping in and helping with PIP in the way it currently does. Anyone that has terrible eyesight or rubbish teeth will know that the luck of the draw sometimes means that our physical and mental health costs us more money than the average person We can't expect the government to pick up the bill for every additional cost we incur because of this.

Edited

Whatever, seems like even when the facts say otherwise you decide to cling on to the ableist narrative that there’s a ton of skivers claiming PIP. I don’t blame you, the propaganda swamping our news feeds an telly for decades has repeated this message. It’s just too bad you can’t see through it.

DaffodilsGalore · 18/03/2025 14:38

Charliechoosecarefully · 18/03/2025 13:52

I think it was rather balanced, it wasn’t as bad as suggested but covers a broad range.

My child is severely disabled and unlikely to work so it’ll be interesting to see if the “under 22” is a blanket rule or if there’s exceptions to the rules as obviously some children/young people will never work and that’s just reality.

Guess we’ll have to see what happens going forward.

Balanced ?!?

It changes nothing from what they initially said.
Theyre throwing disabled people under the bus.
Theyre throwing young adults under the bus. Those in foster care first example. Or those with either families too poor to care for them or toxic families.
The change to 4 points means the vast majority of people will miss out of the daily element of PIP.

The only thing that makes sense is to have a common evaluation between PIP and UC. If it was based on the current UC stuff, it’d be better Vut if course it won’t.

Letmecallyouback · 18/03/2025 14:39

Bignanna · 18/03/2025 14:31

illegal immigrants are on benefits until their asylum claims are processed and granted, which then allows them to work.

They are not on benefits. They only get Asylum Support which is not a benefit.

Please create an account

To comment on this thread you need to create a Mumsnet account.

This thread is not accepting new messages.
Swipe left for the next trending thread