Meet the Other Phone. Flexible and made to last.

Meet the Other Phone.
Flexible and made to last.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

Benefit cuts proposal

1000 replies

Charliechoosecarefully · 18/03/2025 13:35

I just wanted it to have a specific thread:-

Kendall says government to consult on merging JSA and ESA benefits.

Kendall says WCA being scrapped, with Pip assessment process being used instead - will be scrapped in 2028.

Kendall says 'right to try' will let people on sickness benefits try work without immediately having benefits cut.

Kendall says UC payments being rebalanced, with standard rate going up, and some health top-ups frozen or cut.

Kendall says reassessments for people on universal credit with health top-ups to be beefed up

Kendall says universal credit claimants with most severe disabilities will not face reassessment

Kendall confirms Pip eligibility rules to be tightened, and assessment process to be reviewed - 4 pointed needed in one descriptor.

Kendall says under-22s could be prevented from claiming health top-up for universal credit

Sourced from the guardian.

OP posts:
Thread gallery
16
SugarandSpiceandAllThingsNaice · 18/03/2025 14:56

Bumpitybumper · 18/03/2025 14:54

No, you don't! You can have suicidal ideation without actually having a documented suicide attempt. Medical reports are largely founded on patient testimonial for lots of mental health conditions. If you're reporting a set of symptoms that can't be proved or disproved then you will likely be given a diagnosis that matches the symptoms you reported. The alternative is that the doctors start accusing people of lying and only giving medical evidence to those that they believe.

So everyone is lying to psychiatrists and psychologists and they’re not seeing through it? Ummm ok. Btw “suicidal ideation” is less severe than “being suicidal”

The increase in deaths by suicides and suicide attempts would indicate sufferers seeking mental health treatment are not lying and in fact, we have a health crisis not an over diagnosis because of liars crisis.

Miley1967 · 18/03/2025 14:56

Puddlewoman · 18/03/2025 14:55

Thing is we need people to work lower paying jobs in places like care homes nurseries, we need cleaners, retail and catering staff. And you can't pay them too much because profits and you have complaints of why would i train to be a Dr, lawyer etc if I could get the same amount working in mcdonalds.
So by taking away the top ups you are effectively saying that people who work lower paid jobs should suffer for it.

They are not taking away the top ups for low paid working people unless they also have LCWRA on their claim in which case that will be reducing for new claims from 2026 I think.

Indoorplants · 18/03/2025 14:56

Frowningprovidence · 18/03/2025 14:09

I don't quite understand what they have outlined apart from the 4 points thing which is clear.

I think that's more likely to impact 'mild" physical conditions claiming than the mental health issues everyone is so cross about.

I agree, usually autism scores quite highly in the social commjnication areas, which I hope doesn't change, but people with physical difficulties may now lose out.

anniegun · 18/03/2025 14:56

Bignanna · 18/03/2025 14:16

Will these proposals really get people back into work? It’s suppose to prevent living on benefits being a lifestyle choice.
Apparently one I four young people don’t intend to work. Bit more stick and less carrot required here?

They have provided zero carrots. And what work is there available for people whose health conditions make them unreliable or inconsistant workers

MaidOfSteel · 18/03/2025 14:57

ARichtGoodDram · 18/03/2025 14:05

The merging of contributions base ESA and JSA will have a massive impact on families where one partner is working and one isn't.

Currently contributions based don't take your partners income into account if you are in the support group.

The mention of time limiting the new combination replacement suggests that after the time limit it would be UC, which does take household income into account.

I receive contributions based ESA and I’m in the Support Group. I’m having trouble understanding what this merger means. Am I going to lose all my ESA?

Mielikki · 18/03/2025 14:57

kinkytoes · 18/03/2025 14:52

But they do cost a lot of money to the public purse.

Apologies my wording wasn't perfect.

Public money is public money and that's what Labour are apparently trying to save.

Well yes, which is why the home office regularly target employers of illegal immigrants. What more do you expect them to do exactly?

Lovemusic33 · 18/03/2025 14:57

The over 22 thing is worrying me the most. I have 2 young adult dc claiming high rate PIP, one has physical disabilities as well as autism and is about to leave uni (which has been a huge struggle and she’s now on AD’s and not coping), my other dd is in specialist provision and will likely leave education before she’s 22, she is severely autistic and I can’t see her ever working (she needs 24 hour care). I’m currently not working as I’m caring for dd2, adult services are trying to help me get care for dd2 so I can return to work. At the moment we rely on UC and PIP to survive.

I worry as dd1 will not be old enough to claim any health benefits from UC when she finishes uni in May, she will struggle to find employment due to her physical disabilities as well as her autism, we also live in the middle of nowhere and she can’t drive so work placements are limited unless she can work from home. I can’t see her coping with a full time job but she hopes to work part time.

I understand cuts need to be made due to the amount of people claiming but it’s going to hit some people hard. A lot of work places are not disabled friendly, a lot of work places won’t want to employ someone who will need time off for illness and appointments so where are all these jobs going to come from?

MidnightMeltdown · 18/03/2025 14:58

johnworf · 18/03/2025 14:45

I probably sound very naive but how on earth can you claim PIP fraudulently? In my case I claimed for my son and had to provide a mountain of medical evidence in the form of letters from consultants that he sees, who confirmed his various disabilities and how they are managed.

I just don't get how you can be awarded PIP if you pretend you have an illness/disability.

People lie and exaggerate their symptoms

https://www.stokesentinel.co.uk/news/stoke-on-trent-news/shameless-benefit-cheat-mum-claimed-9404424

Shameless benefit cheat mum claimed £20k in PIP while running 10k races

Multiple sclerosis sufferer Sara Morris, aged 49, severely exaggerated her condition to claim Personal Independence Payment (PIP)

https://www.stokesentinel.co.uk/news/stoke-on-trent-news/shameless-benefit-cheat-mum-claimed-9404424

Bumpitybumper · 18/03/2025 14:58

SugarandSpiceandAllThingsNaice · 18/03/2025 14:54

There is data, you are simply ignoring it.
And you cant get PIP by filling out the form alone- you need medical evidence backing it up. Many who claim PIP genuinely need advice and help to do the form and put together an application. So the existence of help isn’t proof of fraud.

There isn't any reliable data. The 0% figure isn't even close to plausible and there is clearly no methodology that has been used to make it accurate.

I know the PIP process well. I also know what counts as medical evidence for conditions like anxiety, depression etc. If you go to your doctor reporting symptoms of these conditions then they are more than likely going to believe you. There is no mechanism that can be used to prove that you're lying.

kinkytoes · 18/03/2025 14:58

Mielikki · 18/03/2025 14:57

Well yes, which is why the home office regularly target employers of illegal immigrants. What more do you expect them to do exactly?

Not offer free housing and food.

Apologies again if I have worded things wrongly. I think most people on the thread know what I mean.

dottydodah · 18/03/2025 14:59

DenhamElliott11 So we all "work harder" and wont need tops? In what world does this happen then? The world of "Im doing OK everyone else go hang?" Honestly does no one cares about people like the lady on Breakfast TV BBC1 this morning ,who uses her PIP to pay a carer 32 hours. so she can wash and dress.or people who are stuck on Min wages .Wouldnt we all like to be running ICI if we could? Get real and be grateful you dont have to worry! BTW I am not claiming any benefits, (Husband has a generous pension ,I have a small pension and my DS is an Ind chemist earning 50k plus bonus ! Still think of others less fortunate!

Miley1967 · 18/03/2025 14:59

MaidOfSteel · 18/03/2025 14:57

I receive contributions based ESA and I’m in the Support Group. I’m having trouble understanding what this merger means. Am I going to lose all my ESA?

I doubt it will affect existing claimants but they seem to be saying that in the future a merged contributions based JSA and ESA will be more generous but time limited.

SugarandSpiceandAllThingsNaice · 18/03/2025 15:00

She is one of the 0.1% of PIP recipients who commit fraud,

EilonwyWithRedGoldHair · 18/03/2025 15:00

ARichtGoodDram · 18/03/2025 14:30

If they were interested in getting people to work the civil service wouldn't have brought back in a mandatory arbitrary amount of days people were back in the office.

The best way to get people who have health issues into work is to have decent jobs that are flexible and offer home working.

My DD has narcolepsy. She works for HMRC. Pre pandemic she was part time. Since the pandemic she went full time. Her job is, according to her boss and their boss, perfectly capable of remaining wfh. But she's been mandated to the office 3 days and they have no flexibility (blanket ban on flexible working requests atm). The office she was based in was closed during Covid. The one she's in now involves booking a hot desk so not even required in the office for team cohesion or working together.
She'll end up back to part time once her boss can no longer allow her full wfh.

How can they have a blanket ban? Could she go the occupational health route and have it as a reasonable adjustment?

Mrsttcno1 · 18/03/2025 15:00

The bottom line is that it is going to be harder to access things like PIP, they are raising the bar- yes, that is what is happening. But that’s what is needed, when you look at the figures for the amount of new PIP claims DAILY it is quite obvious that we needed to make the bar higher, we can’t afford not to.

Miley1967 · 18/03/2025 15:01

Lovemusic33 · 18/03/2025 14:57

The over 22 thing is worrying me the most. I have 2 young adult dc claiming high rate PIP, one has physical disabilities as well as autism and is about to leave uni (which has been a huge struggle and she’s now on AD’s and not coping), my other dd is in specialist provision and will likely leave education before she’s 22, she is severely autistic and I can’t see her ever working (she needs 24 hour care). I’m currently not working as I’m caring for dd2, adult services are trying to help me get care for dd2 so I can return to work. At the moment we rely on UC and PIP to survive.

I worry as dd1 will not be old enough to claim any health benefits from UC when she finishes uni in May, she will struggle to find employment due to her physical disabilities as well as her autism, we also live in the middle of nowhere and she can’t drive so work placements are limited unless she can work from home. I can’t see her coping with a full time job but she hopes to work part time.

I understand cuts need to be made due to the amount of people claiming but it’s going to hit some people hard. A lot of work places are not disabled friendly, a lot of work places won’t want to employ someone who will need time off for illness and appointments so where are all these jobs going to come from?

It isn't even being brought in until next year I think so she'll be 23 then.

EasternStandard · 18/03/2025 15:01

This reply has been deleted

Message deleted by MNHQ. Here's a link to our Talk Guidelines.

Not sure on this but it sounds like a big change. Time limited sounds like it just stops and then what

Longsummerdays25 · 18/03/2025 15:01

This reply has been deleted

Message deleted by MNHQ. Here's a link to our Talk Guidelines.

skintasabint · 18/03/2025 15:02

My grandson is severely autistic, nonverbal etc… I worry for his and my daughters futures

PickAChew · 18/03/2025 15:02

DenholmElliot11 · 18/03/2025 13:47

I think it's time we all started weening ourselves off top-ups and UC to be honest. Best to try and earn enough not to need it. We've been on it for 30 years now and they can take it away at any time.

I'll tell that to my severely learning disabled DS.

pizzaHeart · 18/03/2025 15:02

Miley1967 · 18/03/2025 14:55

They are going to be going all out to speed up the backlog of re-assessments that still haven't been cleared from covid so unlikley you will be re-assessed again.

@Letmecallyouback your Pip award letter says for how long you got the award and when it’s going to be reassessed.

SugarandSpiceandAllThingsNaice · 18/03/2025 15:02

Bumpitybumper · 18/03/2025 14:58

There isn't any reliable data. The 0% figure isn't even close to plausible and there is clearly no methodology that has been used to make it accurate.

I know the PIP process well. I also know what counts as medical evidence for conditions like anxiety, depression etc. If you go to your doctor reporting symptoms of these conditions then they are more than likely going to believe you. There is no mechanism that can be used to prove that you're lying.

The 0.1% number is straight from the government report on fraud across all benefits. Tell me are you similarly dismissive of the other fraud %s?

Miley1967 · 18/03/2025 15:02

EasternStandard · 18/03/2025 15:01

Not sure on this but it sounds like a big change. Time limited sounds like it just stops and then what

Yes i guess it stops and you would have to then claim means tested benefits like UC instead if you qualify.

bestcatlife · 18/03/2025 15:03

This reply has been deleted

Message deleted by MNHQ. Here's a link to our Talk Guidelines.

Bumpitybumper · 18/03/2025 15:03

SugarandSpiceandAllThingsNaice · 18/03/2025 14:56

So everyone is lying to psychiatrists and psychologists and they’re not seeing through it? Ummm ok. Btw “suicidal ideation” is less severe than “being suicidal”

The increase in deaths by suicides and suicide attempts would indicate sufferers seeking mental health treatment are not lying and in fact, we have a health crisis not an over diagnosis because of liars crisis.

Edited

Where have I said everyone is doing this? Where have I even suggested most people are doing this? Suicidal ideation and suicidal intent are different but the latter also may not end in a suicide attempt. It is complex.

Two things can be true at the same time. There can be a genuine increase in mental health issues and some people will hijack this to fraudulently claim benefits they're not entitled to knowing that it's extremely difficult to prove fraud in these scenarios.

Please create an account

To comment on this thread you need to create a Mumsnet account.

This thread is not accepting new messages.