Meet the Other Phone. Flexible and made to last.

Meet the Other Phone.
Flexible and made to last.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

Benefit cuts proposal

1000 replies

Charliechoosecarefully · 18/03/2025 13:35

I just wanted it to have a specific thread:-

Kendall says government to consult on merging JSA and ESA benefits.

Kendall says WCA being scrapped, with Pip assessment process being used instead - will be scrapped in 2028.

Kendall says 'right to try' will let people on sickness benefits try work without immediately having benefits cut.

Kendall says UC payments being rebalanced, with standard rate going up, and some health top-ups frozen or cut.

Kendall says reassessments for people on universal credit with health top-ups to be beefed up

Kendall says universal credit claimants with most severe disabilities will not face reassessment

Kendall confirms Pip eligibility rules to be tightened, and assessment process to be reviewed - 4 pointed needed in one descriptor.

Kendall says under-22s could be prevented from claiming health top-up for universal credit

Sourced from the guardian.

OP posts:
Thread gallery
16
sharkysharks · 18/03/2025 18:03

@Wildflowers99 I think it's ridiculous, I know people who are disabled and could do with more benefits but so many are disingenuous I think.

sharkysharks · 18/03/2025 18:04

@Justsayit123 no they earn that with their partner (7k between them) but still qualify for £800 a month for therapy

Kirbert2 · 18/03/2025 18:05

9fthighfence · 18/03/2025 17:38

These should be self funded. What about people who haven’t yet done the pip application? Do they just wallow in nhs waiting lists while you jump the queue for exactly the same need. That not a fair system.

They can do the pip application and then do the same if they qualify? I had to wait 18 weeks for my sons DLA to come through and I'm using it exactly as it is intended for.

Or I could just leave him to his one NHS physio session a week which will mean that he'll never progress and will 100% be physically disabled for the rest of his life. With his private therapies, he has a chance which will cost the taxpayers less in the long run if it means he won't need DLA or PIP either at all or the higher rate if he can get the therapy he needs.

Wildflowers99 · 18/03/2025 18:05

Simplynotsimple · 18/03/2025 18:03

Of course you’ll stand by it, you’ve shielded yourself in so much ignorance that cannot be penetrated by facts. But we get the gist - ‘I wish the people with disabilities that I can’t see would just be hidden away like in the good old days so I can pretend they don’t exist and they stop being put in schools and taking away from my normal kids’.

Where were they in the 90s and 2000s then? No asylums or institutions then, and far lower diagnosis than we have now.

Secretmeetings · 18/03/2025 18:05

Wildflowers99 · 18/03/2025 18:02

What. The. Fuck

Ridiculous. That is why the ONLY the truly disabled should qualify. Nothing to do with means testing because it would be extremely challenging for a disabled person to earn that much. BUT if they did well done, what an achievement.

ticktock19 · 18/03/2025 18:05

Wildflowers99 · 18/03/2025 18:02

What. The. Fuck

Oh it was a very interesting call - go on to Global Player - Tom Swarbrick programme probably the last 15 mins of the show - caller called Daniel. Needs PIP to continue to fund his CAT therapy for his autism which apparently costs him huge sums of money a month.

Liz Kendall is now on live with Andrew Marr on LBC

sharkysharks · 18/03/2025 18:06

1000 new PIP awards a day is ridiculous. Social security will not last without reform

DodoTired · 18/03/2025 18:06

ARichtGoodDram · 18/03/2025 14:05

The merging of contributions base ESA and JSA will have a massive impact on families where one partner is working and one isn't.

Currently contributions based don't take your partners income into account if you are in the support group.

The mention of time limiting the new combination replacement suggests that after the time limit it would be UC, which does take household income into account.

Well maybe both people need to work then?? We can’t afford to have one stay at home parent

FlakyBrickPombear · 18/03/2025 18:07

This reply has been deleted

This has been deleted by MNHQ for breaking our Talk Guidelines.

sharkysharks · 18/03/2025 18:07

1 in 3 has a health condition
1 in 4 is disabled

Ageing population which means more illness and disabilities. What do people propose long term?

Mirabai · 18/03/2025 18:07

Wildflowers99 · 18/03/2025 18:03

I am disabled and I don’t expect anyone else to care about me more than they care about their own family.

So which descriptors do you think ”nebulous things like sensory requirements, something to do with executive function, people with social anxiety” would qualify for?

Lavenderflower · 18/03/2025 18:08

Wildflowers99 · 18/03/2025 17:58

Yes I would.

I used to believe in the old socialism, ‘from each according to his means, to each according to their needs’.

But that was when needs were people disabled from working in a mine, or people with Down Syndrome, or people with amputations. Now ‘needs’ means nebulous things like sensory requirements, something to do with executive function, people with social anxiety… things you can’t really grasp, and far too many of them.

There seems to be a developing myth that some people are special and wired differently and deserve to be on benefits for life, because they’re just not like everyone who works.

I don’t believe that there aren’t jobs to fit somebody whatever their mental profile. But I feel like whatever is suggested or done to help these people, there will always be some kind of reason as to why they can’t do it, and we ‘just don’t understand’. I’m on the verge of thinking throwing £££ in mental health care and job coaches would be throwing good money after bad, maybe we should just slash benefits, give them a very basic package and then if they have the impetus they can find a job and improve things for themselves.

The taxpayer is tired. I’m tired. I’ve worked since I was 18. The streets in our town are full of potholes, our bins get taken less and less regularly, my kids’ school asks for basic items like cutlery because all the money goes on SEN. There’s talk of closing our library to fund yet more school transport, the public toilets have been locked up for good. I’m not in a position to feel benevolent toward anyone else until I feel I have an acceptable quality of life for my own children, and right now I’m not feeling that.

I expect a flaming for this, but I stand by it.

I think it highly so - technically speaking I have a sensory disability. Sensory covers both deafness and sight. I don't know many who wouldn't classify a person with either hearing or sight loss with a disability whether the impairment is mild to severe.

RejoiceandSing · 18/03/2025 18:08

Means testing would affect so many different systems it would probably cost more than it could save.
For example, in most councils showing that you get the mobility element of PIP means you can get a Blue Badge. If only low earners could be awarded PIP, there would have to be a whole new assessment set up for Blue Badges. Because earning over some measly cut off doesn't mean you can magically walk further or get your wheelchair out of the car in a standard space.

Wildflowers99 · 18/03/2025 18:08

sharkysharks · 18/03/2025 18:07

1 in 3 has a health condition
1 in 4 is disabled

Ageing population which means more illness and disabilities. What do people propose long term?

That we differentiate between ‘having a condition’ and ‘being disabled’?

MrsSchrute · 18/03/2025 18:09

kinkytoes · 18/03/2025 14:21

I'll get flamed for this but I really wish they'd cut back on benefits for illegal immigrants than for disabled people.

I cannot believe Labour are attacking the most vulnerable in our society (I also include the elderly in that) 😢 They wonder why mental health is at an all time low!

Illegal immigrants don't have access to benefits.

Bumpitybumper · 18/03/2025 18:09

Secretmeetings · 18/03/2025 18:01

If you are disabled you are disabled, no buts FACT. How is means testing it appropriate, basically claiming some truly disabled aren't....

We don't have a poor/ rich society but a benefit claimers/ non benefit claimers system. This is causing societal division when we should be aiming for cohesion.

We means test dental treatment and eye tests. These are all elements of essential care that impact some people much more than they impact others. It isn't unprecedented to means test things like this. It's not the same as denying that people have poor eyesight or have dental issues. It just means they are in a position to pay for their own treatment/tests etc

sharkysharks · 18/03/2025 18:10

That we differentiate between ‘having a condition’ and ‘being disabled’?

people don't want that though. Economically we are fucked

sharkysharks · 18/03/2025 18:10

How is means testing it appropriate,

Why is any means testing appropriate?

DodoTired · 18/03/2025 18:10

That’s asylum seekers, their numbers are very low. It’s not the same as illegal immigrants

Wildflowers99 · 18/03/2025 18:11

This reply has been deleted

This has been deleted by MNHQ for breaking our Talk Guidelines.

I see these types of people every day at work. Benefits have done nothing but enable their addiction, embed their MH issues, and isolate them from the world.

Secretmeetings · 18/03/2025 18:11

sharkysharks · 18/03/2025 18:07

1 in 3 has a health condition
1 in 4 is disabled

Ageing population which means more illness and disabilities. What do people propose long term?

This is why we URGENTLY need to sort out the younger generation. Otherwise there will be nothing to for anyone and society will collapse.

We all need to take personal responsibility.

chipmonkmusic · 18/03/2025 18:12

SugarandSpiceandAllThingsNaice · 18/03/2025 16:35

What about the hospital? Or doctor? That costs money to get there.

Hospital transport or voluntary transport?

My old church used to run a free service paid for by fundraising.

Disabled people can get a bus pass.

Rosscameasdoody · 18/03/2025 18:12

Penguinmouse · 18/03/2025 18:00

Well this is the point - under current rules she’s entitled to it but isn’t using it towards her disability so she obviously doesn’t have increased costs. It’s not controversial to put a bit of nuance in a system where someone in full time employment who uses PIP to just pay their bills is judged under the same criteria as someone with significant extra costs. What does Emily need her PIP for?

It’s the need that counts, not the way people use it. Maybe she uses it to pay bills to offset costs her disability brings elsewhere. I’ve said this a lot on MN, but worth reiterating. Unless you live with someone 24/7, have access to and the knowledge to understand their medical records, and are privy to the information on their benefit claim, you have absolutely no idea what is genuine and what is not. And if ‘Emily’ was the subject of that BBC report, l would point out that what appeared on the screen is not necessarily all there was. The BBC are very skilled in getting their bias across, and all I’ve seen in the run up to these cuts is a slew of articles in the media and online, designed to denigrate disabled claimants, to pave the way for the cuts. Happens every single time. Don’t know why people still fall for it.

Scutterbug · 18/03/2025 18:13

Oioisavaloy27 · 18/03/2025 17:49

See surely she is not entitled to pip now then? She obviously does not need it.

I know of a lady who claimed.pio because she was bullied at school she's in her 30's and never worked a day in her life. She also claims.for all her 4 children.

PIP is really hard to get. You don’t receive it due to historical bullying. She will have had to provide evidence of some significant trauma. I sent over 40 pieces of evidence in my original claim. 20 plus in my latest renewal. They will contact my GP, my psychologist and my psychiatrist.

sharkysharks · 18/03/2025 18:13

@Secretmeetings you are deluded if you think it's just the young! Even if every young people
worked there aren't enough them hence why we are fucked.

We all need to take personal responsibility.

Blaming the young only isn't doing that.

Please create an account

To comment on this thread you need to create a Mumsnet account.

This thread is not accepting new messages.