Something this thread shows is huge culturally different attitudes towards education in the UK.
There is increasingly a divide between those who are aspirational for their kids and want to promote hard work and striving for your best, and people who talk about ‘just being happy’ and wanting kids to make their own choices about whether to work hard and push themselves or not.
It’s so evident in areas where there are grammar schools, that some groups of parents have this aspiration by their over-representation: and lots of other parents would say they are overly pushy parents and ruining their kids lives.
Of course kids have different abilities and will and can achieve different things. But isn’t it a terrible shame if someone who could get top grades achieved significantly below because their school or parents didn’t encourage them enough to aim for their potential.
Teen life is hard and pressures can be big, but there is time in the week for teens to go to school, do a range of activities, see friends and have down time, as well as doing more homework than an 11 year old in secondary school might expect.
There’s a balance isn’t there. No, it’s not right to pile on pressure to achieve what might be impossible or to suggest that the kids are only loved when attainment is top. But lots of people wrongly think this is happening when loving parents encourage and set a context for their DC to work hard and achieve their best - when they set up patterns of hard work and study and build it as the norm.
I think OP worded her first post poorly. If she had said her DC was getting 7s but capable of 9s, I’d like to think less people would have leapt on her. But actually I suspect many would because somehow many see having aspiration and aiming for their best for kids as some kind of dirty and abusive action. It’s the attitude that underpins a lot of problems in society and does the next generation no favours, because how they can they strive for their best, when their parents aren’t willing to encourage them to do that?