The 140 lawyers I’ve approached over a 5 year period regarding my Dad. That’s around 1 a week or more in group emails. Many of those solicitors didn’t respond at all to my legal summary. The rest said they were at capacity or that it was too complex for the firm. I suspect that this isn’t a coincidence. One solicitor I saw in person said she didn’t get the attachments. When I went to a Journalist in person she said she didn’t read my file delivered despite having it for a week and was pains to stress this.
The issue with my Dad is that a few weeks before he died it appears he loaned 1.9 million dollars to a convicted thief. However a few years ago I worked out that I don’t think he ever loaned this money. I think his settlement agent has taken it out of a settlement account weeks before he died -
possibly. I think this because there are transactions suggesting he was due to purchase a property before he died. This property hasn’t eventuated and the settlement agent was in cahoots with the convicted thief.
I went to the police and other government agencies and was shut down and told I didn’t have enough evidence. I was threatened by a prosecutor to leave it alone even though the money was legallg meant for my sister who was very unwell and my family and I. We were also unnecessarily dragged through legal wrangling.
I was intimidated by police who said I was deluded and imagining the whole thing. I have bank statements supporting my concerns but nobody will investigate or inform me that they are. The coroner said there isn’t enough information. I’ve received odd responses from politicians that are identical saying that it’s a legal issue but as if they don’t understand.
I have gone to other journalists who ignore me after saying they’ll look into it.
I have applied to see my Dad’s coronial file and been denied and told no inquest will be held and so forth.
I Have applied under FOI for documents pertaining to the alleged fraud as there was an investigation into these people and the settlement agent wasn’t prosecuted. I’ve been denied the documents and told to appeal it to the Information FOI agency and have been repeatedly ignored for 2 years.
I’ve spoken to someone saying they are involved who told me that there are links with government and many people were stolen from and never got their money back, that most people gave up. I was also told that police fraud raided the settlement agents office and he took deposits from many people but was never prosecuted.
The information that I do have suggests it’s unlikely neither police and our securities regulator didn’t have strong suspicions or even evidence of a fraud against my Dad weeks before he died or around his death, and have done nothing or kept me in the dark.
I do think it’s possible with new laws that my data has been targeted or intercepted and that’s why I can’t get a lawyer. I was threatened and intimidated I would get nowhere. While I find this extraordinary I think that everything about this has been oppressive. The responses on here on this forum almost feel like they’re contrived.
On the issue of my sister I don’t necessarily think it’s a hit or something from a Netflix movie. What I do think is that anything is possible and that I’m being oppressed and I don’t think the idea I find a hobby and forget my two relatives have died without answers is the part of this that’s insane. Also that I am attacked as crazy and told to be quiet.
The poster who said I was delusional and that this delusion serves me is wrong. I feel responsible and sick at the idea my sister was harmed. The point of this post was never to claim she was harmed and the fact that posters have tried to make me out to be set in stone about this, concerns me. I’m clearly wanting to discuss why this all seems to patchy and weird.
Another poster said that it’s normal for notes and recollections to vary. The photos are from the hospital report. The fact they don’t take issue in the report with the statements and notes conflicting, is concerning. The point of the report isn’t just to present conflicting facts but analyse and examine if notes are correct and if not why not. Simply relating inconsistencies to family in a report and glazing over this, is a big deal.