My take on the discussion after RTFT.
@LovingHare is a younger person, possibly a recent/current politics student. Has some interesting ideas, not all of which are wrong, which they think is fact, and a 'just suck it up as American might is right' tone. Provocative ideas, but lacking in critical analysis by not addressing the issues from a 360 degree standpoint, hence tendency to think that Trump's actions are just how politics work.
@OneLemonDog has a greater depth of understanding of the situation and a more mature and nuanced approach. Comments are reasoned. Found that trying to debate with @LovingHare is like debating with a chicken.
@CerealPosterHere has joined the debate to remind Americans and us, of recent history, including when Nato members came to America's assistance after 9/11. Something that Trump has erased from his own memory.
One of the things I have found is that anti-abortionists and the religious Right, are still willing to agree with Trump on anything. I have heard Ukraine aid described as 'wasting American $' and I had to point out that the money was mostly spent in the US, buying US military equipment.
Will things change when on-off tariffs and DOGE actions affect 401K valuations and increase the CoL of those who voted for him?
I recently heard an economic adviser from Allianz refer to Trump deal making as starting with the nuclear option in the expectation of frightening the other party into immediate concessions. I hope the governments of Denmark, Canada and Panama don't fall for his tactics and stand up to American expansionism ... disguised as a security need.