Meet the Other Phone. Protection built in.

Meet the Other Phone.
Protection built in.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

To dump him for wearing glasses?

555 replies

ThisFluentBiscuit · 19/02/2025 23:41

Lighthearted AIBU.

I have a lovely sexy FWB. Problem: He permanently obscures his handsome face by wearing these awful glasses. He won't wear contacts - has tried them and hates them. His glasses are really unsexy, but it's hard to get them smaller because they're the bifocal type with a line across. He looks like a bank manager from the early Nineties. When he takes them off, he looks about 20 years younger and 10 times hotter. Drives me mad.

Also it's frustrating that I've got this handsome man who ruins all the general foxiness when we go out with these glasses. He sometimes sends me photos of himself - he's on holiday right now and just sent me a shot - and my vagina is starting to shrivel a bit at the bank manager look. It was OK for the first couple of years because it was all new, and we don't see each other THAT much anyway (although we're firm friends so we text a lot).

I'm beginning to realise that the glasses are going nowhere.

TLDR: His glasses are giving me the ick. Should I dump him for someone who's not perma-wearing a sexual impediment blazoned across his face?

OP posts:
Thread gallery
7
Bythewayimgoingouttonight · 20/02/2025 10:06

ThisFluentBiscuit · 20/02/2025 09:10

Why?

Because it’s so beyond pathetic that it can’t possibly be true.

BunnyLake · 20/02/2025 10:07

ThisFluentBiscuit · 20/02/2025 09:49

I'm not self-centered; I always ask about his life and I'm very generous in the sack.

I didn’t say you were but it seems if he is still attracting other women he probably doesn’t see his glasses as an issue. He may even have another fwb who loves his geeky old fashioned, bank manager look contrasting with his actual good looks (you say he’s hot so I’m assuming he’s good looking). That can be a turn on for some.

LaMarschallin · 20/02/2025 10:09

ThisFluentBiscuit · 20/02/2025 10:01

In the same thread, it's been said that I write like someone's granny and like a smutty lads' mag. Whiplash...

It's not "whiplash" though.
Lads' mags were a big thing in the 90s - a man reading them 20-30 years ago could easily be a grandad now.
You do write about sex in a very dated way.

FamilyPhoto · 20/02/2025 10:09

ChompandaGrazia · 19/02/2025 23:42

I think you’d be doing him a favour. He can do better.

Preach.

ThisFluentBiscuit · 20/02/2025 10:09

Wonderi · 20/02/2025 10:06

I agree.

If he was trying to impress OP or any other woman then he may try and put more effort into his looks but he doesn’t need to.

He’s got OP having sex with him without needing to make an effort and potentially others, so whatever he’s doing is working.

I agree with this.

The lack of effort with his clothes compared to when we first met is a bit irritating. He used to look really nice when I saw him. Designer jeans and a nice shirt tucked in with a belt, showing off his long legs and slim hips. V. sexy. Now I get polyester sportswear flapping around everywhere, while I am made-up and blowdried to see him. Although not so much now.

OP posts:
Sooverwork · 20/02/2025 10:10

Oh just bore off why don’t you … Sex and the City was over 20 years ago. Wannabe

ThisFluentBiscuit · 20/02/2025 10:10

LaMarschallin · 20/02/2025 10:09

It's not "whiplash" though.
Lads' mags were a big thing in the 90s - a man reading them 20-30 years ago could easily be a grandad now.
You do write about sex in a very dated way.

Well, what would you say?

OP posts:
BunnyLake · 20/02/2025 10:11

Barleysugar86 · 20/02/2025 10:00

What's with all the ridiculous lads mag style smut writing? You're giving me the ick OP I can't read anymore.

His glasses have got to be a lot more appealing than someone who says sausage casing! If anything is ‘ick’ it’s that. OP is definitely starting to sound like she’s on a wind up now, even if the basic story is true.

BunnyLake · 20/02/2025 10:13

ThisFluentBiscuit · 20/02/2025 10:09

I agree with this.

The lack of effort with his clothes compared to when we first met is a bit irritating. He used to look really nice when I saw him. Designer jeans and a nice shirt tucked in with a belt, showing off his long legs and slim hips. V. sexy. Now I get polyester sportswear flapping around everywhere, while I am made-up and blowdried to see him. Although not so much now.

He’s tired and bored of you. Even if he’s happy to have sex you're just a ‘sausage casing’ to him.

ThisFluentBiscuit · 20/02/2025 10:14

BunnyLake · 20/02/2025 10:13

He’s tired and bored of you. Even if he’s happy to have sex you're just a ‘sausage casing’ to him.

Yes, probably.

OP posts:
FireandRain23 · 20/02/2025 10:14

ThisFluentBiscuit · 20/02/2025 01:02

No, he doesn't. He could get contacts and wear them on our dates, like I do. But he doesn't want to. Just wants to go around with Norman Major glasses glued to his face 18 hours a day for the rest of his life.

He dresses too casually for me, as well. The times when he's turned up wearing dark jeans and a nice shirt that's actually tucked in, and a belt, or dark-navy trousers, he's looked WOOF WOOF. But the silky football tops and flappy long shorts are just not it.

So frustrating when he's so good in bed and could look so sexy with nicer dressing and some contacts. I don't think that smart jeans and a tucked-in shirt are too much to ask for.

You don’t need a partner, you need a Ken doll with different outfits.

RosaMoline · 20/02/2025 10:14

You sound horrible. And if this is meant to be a reflection of your ‘sense of humour’ then you’re deeply unfunny.

MaloryJones · 20/02/2025 10:15

Ick ?
How old are You ?!

Lost count of how many times you used that word !

YABU

CantHoldMeDown · 20/02/2025 10:17

This reply has been withdrawn

This has been withdrawn by MNHQ at the poster's request.

Hecatoncheires · 20/02/2025 10:20

Ach, the OP is just having a bit of a giggle. I actually think she sounds fun! Compared to some of the things seen on MN this is pretty tame. I'm still convinced she's in love with him and is protecting herself by latching onto the glasses.

OP, I hope it works out for you and your friend. I see potential! Through my non-lined glasses. Though I do I have to fork out a fortune for thinner lenses otherwise I'd be as unsexy as your friend with my milk-bottle specs. 😆

ThisFluentBiscuit · 20/02/2025 10:20

FireandRain23 · 20/02/2025 10:14

You don’t need a partner, you need a Ken doll with different outfits.

I wish I could style him up. Everyone says I have a good sense of style, and I could make him look like a Ralph Lauren model.

OP posts:
wizzywig · 20/02/2025 10:22

Is he wearing a thin short sleeved white shirt that you can see his vest through?

LaMarschallin · 20/02/2025 10:22

ThisFluentBiscuit · 20/02/2025 10:10

Well, what would you say?

For what?
Specifically, "the sack"?
I'd say "in bed" (although, I wouldn't be on here talking about my sex life anyway).

chaosmaker · 20/02/2025 10:23

I'd have called your thread 'thick' not 'lighthearted'.

ThisFluentBiscuit · 20/02/2025 10:23

Hecatoncheires · 20/02/2025 10:20

Ach, the OP is just having a bit of a giggle. I actually think she sounds fun! Compared to some of the things seen on MN this is pretty tame. I'm still convinced she's in love with him and is protecting herself by latching onto the glasses.

OP, I hope it works out for you and your friend. I see potential! Through my non-lined glasses. Though I do I have to fork out a fortune for thinner lenses otherwise I'd be as unsexy as your friend with my milk-bottle specs. 😆

I could have been in love with him, except for stuff like his grim religion and what else....OH YES THOSE MANKY GLASSES AND THAT GROSS POLYESTER!

Thanks for the nice comment!

OP posts:
ThisFluentBiscuit · 20/02/2025 10:25

wizzywig · 20/02/2025 10:22

Is he wearing a thin short sleeved white shirt that you can see his vest through?

Oh. My God. Don't!!!! That's what's next, isn't it?

Well, thanks for the nightmares! All downhill from here!

I think he did leave his socks on last time, actually. I seem to remember one of the toes dangling loose when we were done.

OP posts:
SwingTheMonkey · 20/02/2025 10:25

You don’t seem to be getting the message, op. You’re coming across like you feel rather superior to him and he’s lucky to have you as a fwb. But actually, he’s putting in very little effort because you don’t matter to him. He's not bothered either way, clearly.

ThisFluentBiscuit · 20/02/2025 10:27

SwingTheMonkey · 20/02/2025 10:25

You don’t seem to be getting the message, op. You’re coming across like you feel rather superior to him and he’s lucky to have you as a fwb. But actually, he’s putting in very little effort because you don’t matter to him. He's not bothered either way, clearly.

I don't think I'm superior to him but my sense of style is better. Agree that he's not fussed or he would make more effort.

OP posts:
TagSplashMaverick · 20/02/2025 10:27

Arlanymor · 20/02/2025 00:53

Norman Major? Don’t you mean John Major and are conflating his name with his wife’s name Norma?

Thank you. I’ve been wracking my brains as to who the hell Norman Major was.

ThisFluentBiscuit · 20/02/2025 10:28

chaosmaker · 20/02/2025 10:23

I'd have called your thread 'thick' not 'lighthearted'.

I've honestly never, ever thought of myself as bright.

OP posts: