Meet the Other Phone. Flexible and made to last.

Meet the Other Phone.
Flexible and made to last.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

To think they call us Karen because they fear us

1000 replies

InformEducateEntertain · 01/02/2025 12:15

I absolutely hate the term Karen. It's pejorative and deeply unpleasant.

Middle aged women (of whom I am one and to whom the term is most generally applied) are bloody amazing. Putting us down for our don't give a f**k badass attitude and willingness to fight back strikes me as lazy categorisation.

I'd go as far to say that those who use it are scared by the knowledge that looking the menopause in the eye has given us the courage to have a voice at last.

AIBU?

OP posts:
Thread gallery
12
JandamiHash · 02/02/2025 19:58

PlanetJanette · 02/02/2025 19:05

I’ve already answered that.

It’s because many people share your blinked view of racism and like to think of it only as violent or criminal behaviour.

Hence the need to be able to pinpoint the specific set of behaviours we’re talking about. In an ideal world we’d be at a point where it’s not contentious to say that dismissing the lived experience of people of colour, minimising the racism they face, leveraging positions of relative power and privilege to control or police people of colour and centering the sensitivities of white people in any discourse is racist.

But we’re not there yet. As you have demonstrated on this thread. You’ve done all of the above. Now of course you’d love if people just labelled it racist and moved on. You could do the ‘who? Me?’ routine and everyone who’s been socialised to also only think of racism as violence or slurs would agree that you had been grievously offended.

But that is precisely why just labelling all racist behaviours as racist and being done with it doesn’t work - specific terms for specific manifestations are needed precisely so that we can discuss why those behaviours are problematic without it immediately becoming another discussion about how hurt and outraged white people are that someone might think they are racist.

It’s because many people share your blinked view of racism and like to think of it only as violent or criminal behaviour.

Stop making things up. I don’t have this view and I’ve said it several times.

And for the rest of your post - it doesn’t ever justify monopolising a woman’s name (and a common one) to use as a slur when “racist woman” will do just fine. Especially k owing that misogynists and men take ABY opportunity to twist the smallest criticism of a woman into a global slur

Why won’t you hear women when we say we don’t like it, that it’s harmful and for women called Karen it’s hurtful?

JandamiHash · 02/02/2025 19:59

Princessconsuelabananahammock9 · 02/02/2025 19:30

I don’t think calling it a trope and referring to situations “ in the past “ is helpful.

These are ongoing issues for the black community.

You can object to the term Karen without belittling our experiences.

Similarly you can call out racism without using a word that women are telling you is sexist!

JandamiHash · 02/02/2025 20:00

Travis1 · 02/02/2025 19:31

ive seen women basically sexually assaulting bar staff and it being laughed off because ‘guys like that don’t they?’ Had a regular in the nightclub who would stand at the end of the bar and whistle at me, big double finger in the mouth whistles.

the women I’ve encountered when I worked the bar in clubs were just as disgusting and in many cases worse than the men I dealt with and don’t even get me started on the state of the women’s toilets 🤢

i Hate the mantra on here that women can do no wrong. They bloody well can and do.

Who said women can do no wrong?

In these bars we’re the female bar staff never assaulted by men?

MoreIcedLattePlease · 02/02/2025 20:06

No.

They're mocking you and hold you in complete disdain. You are laughable to them.

Quite literally the opposite of fear. You have to value something to fear it.

CountryCob · 02/02/2025 20:12

JandamiHash · 02/02/2025 19:55

It’s interesting isn’t it and it’s everywhere.

Im not sure if you watch The Traitors (spoilers coming) but over on Telly Addicts there were threads where a few of us pointed out the POC are always booted out first and the white people left at the end in previous seasons. Well it happened again!

Another amusing/depressing moment I had recently was when I I was saying to a male colleague that I was looking forward to the nights getting lighter because I could go running in the evening again. He said “Just wear a head torch!” 🙄 this is a 50-odd year old man whom I had to explain why a head torch wouldn’t stop me getting attacked.

Yes I don't watch the programme but it unfortunately sounds about right. I did have a well meaning FiL try to tell me this year I could go out in a country where women aren't able to go out on their own normally without him to see a historical site I wanted to without him, I wanted to bring my daughter and was worried how I would manage the situation which was evidenced to be dangerous. I stayed home minding the kids again. My qualifications in history are outrageous (sorry to blow own trumpet), I would have loved to go. Couldn't go without a man and a man in my family told me it was in my head. Genuinely almost cried. Often I realise that my mixed heritage has helped me realise what is going on, so little is told to children. It is perfectly possible to explain institutional racism and how the Stephen Lawrence enquiry define it to children, they understand how it is to be travelling home from school. It helps me explain this as I grew up hearing about the Birmingham 6 and the Guilford 4 whilst being raised by a unionist father also. When children get taught the I have a dream speech someone needs to explain the bravery that took and that someone died to say it, as it is no one tells the children what happened next. I don't think you are racist.

Travis1 · 02/02/2025 20:17

JandamiHash · 02/02/2025 20:00

Who said women can do no wrong?

In these bars we’re the female bar staff never assaulted by men?

I didn’t say that, no one is denying some men are cunts but the idea on here that women are just constantly being misjudged and deliberately downtrodden is laughable.

CountryCob · 02/02/2025 20:22

@Travis1 I wish that was right. What are your thoughts on the gender pay gap?

NotTerfNorCis · 02/02/2025 20:24

MoreIcedLattePlease · 02/02/2025 20:06

No.

They're mocking you and hold you in complete disdain. You are laughable to them.

Quite literally the opposite of fear. You have to value something to fear it.

You say this as what? A man? A younger woman?

Pretty vile thing to say about middle aged women tbh.

JHound · 02/02/2025 20:31

I use the term Karen and shall continue to do so. It describes a certain type of behaviour committed by certain types of women that causes harm to specifically people of colour / non-white people.

The fact some people choose to misuse it is not really my concern.

MorrisZapp · 02/02/2025 20:32

Princessconsuelabananahammock9 · 02/02/2025 19:30

I don’t think calling it a trope and referring to situations “ in the past “ is helpful.

These are ongoing issues for the black community.

You can object to the term Karen without belittling our experiences.

The examples given of Karen behaviour were from the past. If you think Karen is still a much needed descriptor of some women's behaviour, are you able to say why?

JHound · 02/02/2025 20:35

PlanetJanette · 02/02/2025 17:15

I don’t think anyone thinks you can’t be both anti-racist and sexist.

But the point is that there is a manifestation of racism which is inherently tied to some women’s leveraging of aspects of being women for racist purposes. It is specifically a female manifestation of racism - and so using a female term to describe that is not in itself sexist.

Of course the problem is that one of the most active posters here has been at pains to deny such a manifestation of racism exists or is a problem.

This thread isn’t ’to think the term Karen should not be used too liberally’ or ‘to think there is a better term to describe the particular manifestation of racism than Karen’. If it were this could be a very different discussion.

Instead it is full of posters claiming they know better than people of colour how racism manifesta itself and denying or minimising the very widely recounted experiences of people of colour.

THIS!

Those weaponised tears that lead to violence and death. It is a specific way in which racist women weaponise their womanhood / femininity and so it is right that there is a gender specific term to refer to this. Similar to how we use the term “toxic masculinity” to describe certain negative expressions of behaviour. We could just label it “bad behaviour” but that would lose all nuance.

MorrisZapp · 02/02/2025 20:45

JHound · 02/02/2025 20:35

THIS!

Those weaponised tears that lead to violence and death. It is a specific way in which racist women weaponise their womanhood / femininity and so it is right that there is a gender specific term to refer to this. Similar to how we use the term “toxic masculinity” to describe certain negative expressions of behaviour. We could just label it “bad behaviour” but that would lose all nuance.

What is the causal link between women crying and violence and death? Is there a reason the tears are gendered but the violence and death isn't?

TheBirdintheCave · 02/02/2025 20:46

JHound · 02/02/2025 20:31

I use the term Karen and shall continue to do so. It describes a certain type of behaviour committed by certain types of women that causes harm to specifically people of colour / non-white people.

The fact some people choose to misuse it is not really my concern.

How would you feel if your name was the one being used as an insult?

NotTerfNorCis · 02/02/2025 20:49

MorrisZapp · 02/02/2025 20:45

What is the causal link between women crying and violence and death? Is there a reason the tears are gendered but the violence and death isn't?

It's misogyny disguised as progressivism. Some men on the left love this kind of thing because they can be shitty about women and still think they look virtuous.

JHound · 02/02/2025 20:53

MorrisZapp · 02/02/2025 20:45

What is the causal link between women crying and violence and death? Is there a reason the tears are gendered but the violence and death isn't?

It’s the way in which they weaponise womanhood, their tears and the “damsel in distress” narrative to cause harm to black and brown men. The fact that you have a bigger issue with the word used to describe the behaviour and not the behaviour itself speaks volumes.

Do you equally find the term “toxic masculinity” sexist and problematic?

I mean we could just call it “toxic white femininity” but personally I think that is worse that “Karen”.

JHound · 02/02/2025 20:53

NotTerfNorCis · 02/02/2025 20:49

It's misogyny disguised as progressivism. Some men on the left love this kind of thing because they can be shitty about women and still think they look virtuous.

Who is the man in this conversation?

JandamiHash · 02/02/2025 20:53

JHound · 02/02/2025 20:35

THIS!

Those weaponised tears that lead to violence and death. It is a specific way in which racist women weaponise their womanhood / femininity and so it is right that there is a gender specific term to refer to this. Similar to how we use the term “toxic masculinity” to describe certain negative expressions of behaviour. We could just label it “bad behaviour” but that would lose all nuance.

But “toxic masculinity” isn’t a catch all insult levied at men. They aren’t offended by it. And as I keep saying female racists aren’t nearly enough of a problem to arrant a misogynistic insult

JHound · 02/02/2025 20:55

TheBirdintheCave · 02/02/2025 20:46

How would you feel if your name was the one being used as an insult?

I wouldn’t care. I would be far more concerned by the behaviour being criticised than the term used to describe such behaviour.

I am sure the “Fannys” and “Dicks” of the world got over their names having a different meaning.

JHound · 02/02/2025 20:57

JandamiHash · 02/02/2025 20:53

But “toxic masculinity” isn’t a catch all insult levied at men. They aren’t offended by it. And as I keep saying female racists aren’t nearly enough of a problem to arrant a misogynistic insult

Except some people do use it as a “catch all insult aimed at men”.

I cannot help that people misuse the term.

And the same is true for “Karen”.
Look feel free not to use it. I shall continue to do so when confronted they a woman expressing the specifically female expression of racism that has resulted in the term.

JandamiHash · 02/02/2025 20:57

JHound · 02/02/2025 20:53

It’s the way in which they weaponise womanhood, their tears and the “damsel in distress” narrative to cause harm to black and brown men. The fact that you have a bigger issue with the word used to describe the behaviour and not the behaviour itself speaks volumes.

Do you equally find the term “toxic masculinity” sexist and problematic?

I mean we could just call it “toxic white femininity” but personally I think that is worse that “Karen”.

It’s definitely not worse than Karen

And that way it can’t be used to mean something else entirely ie “women who complain”.

It also doesn’t put a target on a set of women omens whose only crime is they are called Karen

NotTerfNorCis · 02/02/2025 20:58

JHound · 02/02/2025 20:53

It’s the way in which they weaponise womanhood, their tears and the “damsel in distress” narrative to cause harm to black and brown men. The fact that you have a bigger issue with the word used to describe the behaviour and not the behaviour itself speaks volumes.

Do you equally find the term “toxic masculinity” sexist and problematic?

I mean we could just call it “toxic white femininity” but personally I think that is worse that “Karen”.

Toxic masculinity means too much emphasis on aggression, dominance, selfishness, impulsiveness etc. If you're a feminist, it's obviously part of the patriarchy problem.

Referring to toxic masculinity as an abstract is miles away from calling individuals 'Karen', which is obviously derogatory and contemptuous. As a PP said, 'they are laughing at you... you have no value'.

MorrisZapp · 02/02/2025 20:59

JHound · 02/02/2025 20:55

I wouldn’t care. I would be far more concerned by the behaviour being criticised than the term used to describe such behaviour.

I am sure the “Fannys” and “Dicks” of the world got over their names having a different meaning.

How many people named Fanny or Dick do you know?

JHound · 02/02/2025 20:59

JandamiHash · 02/02/2025 20:53

But “toxic masculinity” isn’t a catch all insult levied at men. They aren’t offended by it. And as I keep saying female racists aren’t nearly enough of a problem to arrant a misogynistic insult

“Female racists aren’t nearly enough of a problem”….

Spoken from a position of immense privilege or complete ignorance.

You have complained about men “dictating to women” what is and what is not sexist….

While engaging in that same behaviour towards black and brown people and dictating to
them what their primary concerns with racism should be.

Hypocrite much?

JHound · 02/02/2025 21:01

MorrisZapp · 02/02/2025 20:59

How many people named Fanny or Dick do you know?

I know two Fannies no dicks.

I know three Karens two of whom use the term “Karen” with no issue.

JandamiHash · 02/02/2025 21:01

JHound · 02/02/2025 20:57

Except some people do use it as a “catch all insult aimed at men”.

I cannot help that people misuse the term.

And the same is true for “Karen”.
Look feel free not to use it. I shall continue to do so when confronted they a woman expressing the specifically female expression of racism that has resulted in the term.

It’s not a name. There is no man whose first name is Toxic Masculinity

Why would you continue to sue it when women are telling you it’s harmful and hurtful?

Please create an account

To comment on this thread you need to create a Mumsnet account.

This thread is not accepting new messages.
Swipe left for the next trending thread