I’m “constantly surprised” by how often this comes up on MN - usually with a horrified cry of “But it’s a life skill!”.
The idea that everyone can and should be driving is a major problem with our society, and was used as a key excuse to drastically reduce public transport options back in the sixties. There are an awful lot of people who absolutely should NOT be driving (I am one of them!). Unfortunately, the pressure to do so means there is a worrying number of drivers out there who did just enough to scrape through their tests, probably after several attempts.
Imagine coming on MN and saying “I’m taking lessons to operate a piece of heavy machinery that has the potential to kill someone if I can’t use it properly. I’ve failed the test six times. Should I have a seventh try?”. People would be up in arms. But specify that that machine is a car and suddenly posters are queuing up to say “Of course you must keep trying, don’t give up, you can do it OP!”. It’s madness.
The arguments in favour of everyone and his dog driving are always the same (and easily debunked) too. “Non-drivers are always CFs who expect others to ferry them about”. Well, I’m sure some do exist, but it really isn’t the norm - even if just because in practical terms you are going to struggle to find someone to do the “ferrying” a lot of the time. Expecting it doesn’t mean it will happen! But in my experience, it actually tends to go the other way - drivers want to offer you a lift when a journey will be very simple on the bus. They’re just so entrenched in the idea that public transport is inconvenient that they can’t imagine it might actually be easier than waiting around for a lift.
“Well, it’s all very well if you live in London or another big city, but what would you do if you lived in a one-street village with only one bus a week?”. Just a radical idea - maybe I wouldn't live there if I couldn’t drive! Or if I’d be born somewhere like that and really found it impossible to drive, I might, you know, move? And if I’ve never lived anywhere like that, why would I plan for a life I don’t have?
“It’s so restrictive if you want to go on holiday” is another one. Well, maybe if you want to go somewhere exceptionally remote, but there are countless places you can go on holiday without a car. I’ve somehow managed to see Rome, Barcelona, Prague, Lisbon, Dubrovnik, Stockholm, Athens and many more places and resorts without a car - and there are still a lot of places I’d still like to see. Also, how many holidays are people going on? I’d say I take four or five holidays a year, which is probably above average, and I’m in no danger of running out of destinations yet. Who are all these people who have seen everywhere you can without a car and are now stranded?
Finally there’s age to consider. I agree with those saying it’s a bad idea to rely on your partner driving, as they might not be around forever. But isn’t it also a bad idea to rely on being able to drive - indeed, having to rely on being able to drive - into old age? My uncle is 85 and has been told to stop driving for medical reasons; he’s bereft. He’s become so reliant on his car that he’d rather risk harming himself and others (he’s already backed into a neighbour’s car) than get on a bloody bus. But at least he’s someone with the option of buses - if he’d moved to a small village thinking “I’ll be fine because I can drive”, he’d be stuffed now.
I'm not on some anti-driving crusade. Of course it’s a very useful skill if you have the aptitude for it. But I do think this idea that it’s something everyone should be able to do is worrying.