Meet the Other Phone. A phone that grows with your child.

Meet the Other Phone.
A phone that grows with your child.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

Potentially, another national insurance tax increase to pay for social care

317 replies

Toodaloo1567 · 09/01/2025 10:40

Just stumbled on this and wondered about everyone’s thoughts. Essentially, the government is being advised to increase national insurance to pay for elderly social care. I’m not keen. apple.news/AQkrJ_mvnRmClZjz_HJzA9w

OP posts:
TizerorFizz · 12/01/2025 13:08

@Badbadbunny Yes, that’s correct so planning matters to those of us who want to minimise tax.

BIossomtoes · 12/01/2025 13:11

Badbadbunny · 12/01/2025 12:01

What people don't realise is that the residence nil rate band tapers away with estates over £2m, so those with larger estates are back to having only £325k of a threshold (or doubled if spouse's exemption also available). The number actually eligible for a £1m exemption is smaller than you think.

The number of estates worth over £2 million is even smaller.

Kendodd · 12/01/2025 13:39

Another option if we don't want to fork out for elderly care, which let's face it, nobody does, not even the dead, is to come at it from the other side and try to reduce the costs.

For one and actually nothing to do with the price, more of a moral issue. We need to stop extending the end of life period, were people are living in pain and distress, for as long as we possibly can. Nobody benefits from this cruelty (well, I suppose drug companies do) and instead of letting illnesses like flu take people living in constant terror because of dementia and constant pain from multiple other health conditions we aggressively treat so they can continue suffering for as long as possible. No way is this cruelty happening to me.
A side affect is that it'll save money.

We could 'warehouse' our elderly. Keep them drugged up in dormitories. Personally I think this is a horrible option and I for one would rather pay a big chunk of IHT to avoid this.

We could force the young do some sort of national service looking after the elderly. After all, we out number them and can vote to make them do it. I personally like this even less then the 'warehouse' option though and would rather live drugged up in a dormitory than force this on our young. I feel my generation have fucked over our young people enough already.

Any other ideas for cutting costs?

EasternStandard · 12/01/2025 13:47

Kendodd · 12/01/2025 13:39

Another option if we don't want to fork out for elderly care, which let's face it, nobody does, not even the dead, is to come at it from the other side and try to reduce the costs.

For one and actually nothing to do with the price, more of a moral issue. We need to stop extending the end of life period, were people are living in pain and distress, for as long as we possibly can. Nobody benefits from this cruelty (well, I suppose drug companies do) and instead of letting illnesses like flu take people living in constant terror because of dementia and constant pain from multiple other health conditions we aggressively treat so they can continue suffering for as long as possible. No way is this cruelty happening to me.
A side affect is that it'll save money.

We could 'warehouse' our elderly. Keep them drugged up in dormitories. Personally I think this is a horrible option and I for one would rather pay a big chunk of IHT to avoid this.

We could force the young do some sort of national service looking after the elderly. After all, we out number them and can vote to make them do it. I personally like this even less then the 'warehouse' option though and would rather live drugged up in a dormitory than force this on our young. I feel my generation have fucked over our young people enough already.

Any other ideas for cutting costs?

Family care

Some cultures do this more

MaggieHM · 12/01/2025 13:48

If working young and middle aged people were prepared to look after their own elderly relatives like a lot of other countries do then it wouldn't be needed. They don't though they abandoned them to the cold, hunger and neglect so Social Services have to step in. I agree don't increase NI. Raise the tax threshold to £15,000 and increase income tax by 5p.

poetryandwine · 12/01/2025 13:51

Kendodd · 12/01/2025 13:39

Another option if we don't want to fork out for elderly care, which let's face it, nobody does, not even the dead, is to come at it from the other side and try to reduce the costs.

For one and actually nothing to do with the price, more of a moral issue. We need to stop extending the end of life period, were people are living in pain and distress, for as long as we possibly can. Nobody benefits from this cruelty (well, I suppose drug companies do) and instead of letting illnesses like flu take people living in constant terror because of dementia and constant pain from multiple other health conditions we aggressively treat so they can continue suffering for as long as possible. No way is this cruelty happening to me.
A side affect is that it'll save money.

We could 'warehouse' our elderly. Keep them drugged up in dormitories. Personally I think this is a horrible option and I for one would rather pay a big chunk of IHT to avoid this.

We could force the young do some sort of national service looking after the elderly. After all, we out number them and can vote to make them do it. I personally like this even less then the 'warehouse' option though and would rather live drugged up in a dormitory than force this on our young. I feel my generation have fucked over our young people enough already.

Any other ideas for cutting costs?

To go by earlier comments there is a lot of waste in the NHS and a lot of profit in the private care sector.

Possibly bringing social care under the NHS umbrella and - one hell of a caveat - doing it right - would save a decent amount of money. But do we trust anyone with such a task?

Sunnnybunny72 · 12/01/2025 13:58

The thresholds for individual contribution for paid care should be reduced. So currently I think you can have around £23k and taxpayers start to subsidise you. Around £14k and you get even more financial help. Why so high? Take monies down to the last £5k before any help kicks in, enough for a funeral and use the rest.

BIossomtoes · 12/01/2025 14:00

EasternStandard · 12/01/2025 13:47

Family care

Some cultures do this more

That effectively means woman care. And it’s impossible for someone who needs 24/7 care/supervision.

Sunnnybunny72 · 12/01/2025 14:06

MaggieHM · 12/01/2025 13:48

If working young and middle aged people were prepared to look after their own elderly relatives like a lot of other countries do then it wouldn't be needed. They don't though they abandoned them to the cold, hunger and neglect so Social Services have to step in. I agree don't increase NI. Raise the tax threshold to £15,000 and increase income tax by 5p.

No Thankyou. All the family carers women I know who are in an elderly member caring role have ended up on antidepressants.
The wants and needs of people at the end of their lives don't trump others in the prime of theirs.
It's not what I'd want for my adult children.

EasternStandard · 12/01/2025 14:15

Sunnnybunny72 · 12/01/2025 14:06

No Thankyou. All the family carers women I know who are in an elderly member caring role have ended up on antidepressants.
The wants and needs of people at the end of their lives don't trump others in the prime of theirs.
It's not what I'd want for my adult children.

It’s an answer to the pp question. Of course culturally we haven’t embraced it as much

I wouldn’t go for the other options suggested in the pp

Badbadbunny · 12/01/2025 14:16

BIossomtoes · 12/01/2025 13:11

The number of estates worth over £2 million is even smaller.

Because those with estates over £2m ensure that by the time they die, their estates are no longer that size. They give away some assets, they spend some money, they invest in businesses to get business property relief, some even make large charitable donations, etc etc.

The statistics are skewed BECAUSE people who are liable for huge IHT liabilities ensure that they're not!

If IHT wasn't a ridiculously high flat rate 40%, there'd be less incentive for those with higher estates to plan for IHT, and so more estates would be larger as at date of death and more IHT would be raised overall.

Kendodd · 12/01/2025 14:17

EasternStandard · 12/01/2025 13:47

Family care

Some cultures do this more

Could do.
Ive read on here that being a carer is thought to reduce your own life expectancy by six years though.

MaggieHM · 12/01/2025 14:20

I'm not taking about one family member I'm talking about the whole family. In actual fact I've told my daughters to use my home to pay for my care as its only fair that if people go into residential care or need substantial home care that it's not all left to the taxpayers.

Badbadbunny · 12/01/2025 14:21

MaggieHM · 12/01/2025 13:48

If working young and middle aged people were prepared to look after their own elderly relatives like a lot of other countries do then it wouldn't be needed. They don't though they abandoned them to the cold, hunger and neglect so Social Services have to step in. I agree don't increase NI. Raise the tax threshold to £15,000 and increase income tax by 5p.

Families are fragmented. Children are encouraged to go off to Uni, but can't return to live and work at home because the decent jobs are centralised in London and a handful of other large cities, hence the brain drain away from the regions. You can't "care" for your elderly parents if you live and work in Hemel Hempstead but your family home was in Ulverston! Not many financial services, top legal, top financial or top engineering jobs in Ulverston for the child and their spouse! Elderly parents won't want to move to live with or closer to their children in a new/unknown location. Even more pronounced where the children emigrate for decent jobs etc to US, Canada, Australia or Dubai! No decent parent would want their parent to be stuck in a run down region of the UK doing minimum wage work when they've a degree and could be having a highly successful career doing what they studied for, just so that they'd be close to care for them in their old age!

Kendodd · 12/01/2025 14:39

Oh, and this idea that other cultures have kind caring relatives to look after the elderly isn't even true. They are also run to the ground with it. I've seen elderly women with dementia tied to a chair screaming in other cultures as this was the only way family could manage her care.

BIossomtoes · 12/01/2025 14:43

Badbadbunny · 12/01/2025 14:16

Because those with estates over £2m ensure that by the time they die, their estates are no longer that size. They give away some assets, they spend some money, they invest in businesses to get business property relief, some even make large charitable donations, etc etc.

The statistics are skewed BECAUSE people who are liable for huge IHT liabilities ensure that they're not!

If IHT wasn't a ridiculously high flat rate 40%, there'd be less incentive for those with higher estates to plan for IHT, and so more estates would be larger as at date of death and more IHT would be raised overall.

I disagree. Human greed is human greed, no matter how much money is involved.

TizerorFizz · 12/01/2025 14:50

@Badbadbunny I have a family member who actually does want this! It’s openly talked about! For most of us, we do want DC to be where the bests careers are. Taking less and staying around parents isn’t what they expect, but some do. It’s also a cultural thing. Look at who goes to some unis and live at home! Often the women in protective cultures. What will they be expected to do after they have had dc? Look after their elders!

If I have a poor future in terms of health and not enjoying anything, I would love to do the equivalent of going to Switzerland. We do extend life beyond reasonable endurance. It’s not all about drugs either. No drug can help the bedridden frail!

New posts on this thread. Refresh page
Swipe left for the next trending thread