My flu is receeding but I'm still stuck in bed so I'm back on this thread.
Can I ask everyone making this kind of point (I just chose this one post, sorry!)
...regarding the 'my dog is more important than you or your child' type arguments- in what regard is it that the dog is more important than the child?
i.e. is it more important that my dog can run around wherever it likes than having to be tethered/under strict verbal control?
Or
My dog hates wearing a lead so his personal wishes are more important to be upheld?
Or
My dog gets really upset when asked to heel because he knows he's a good boy and he finds it really patronising so I would rather not ask him to?
I'm just struggling to see what it is in the context of this discussion (please keep dogs under control/away from children- and do not allow them to approach) that can possibly mean that the dog is more important.
I've taken on board the 'don't let kids approach dogs' argument and put that to one side, because:
- I agree and have made that point already, as have many others
- It's just a different point to the one raised by OP and therefore isn't a direct argument to what is being discussed.
But I want to make it clear that in the case of a kid approaching a dog, I can understand the dog becoming more important, just that's not what we are discussing here.