Happy Elon Musk calling out govt over grooming gang PT 2

[Chainzreaction]

Pt 2 can commence!

Well yes, that’s proves my point.

Theres are gaps in the reporting, and recommendations that these gaps are plugged.

So how can people confidently say one way or the other about the prevalence or over representation of any ethnic group?

• As set out in Part B, collating accurate and reliable data on the ethnicity of victims and perpetrators has long been recognised as an important exercise. The failures to do so in the case study areas mean that the police and other agencies in those areas are unable to identify local patterns and trends of child sexual exploitation in respect of ethnicity*

What has brought the CSE in Rotherham back into the news? And why.

Maybe these reports will answer your questions
https://www.greatermanchester-ca.gov.uk/what-we-do/safer-and-stronger-communities/tackling-child-sexual-exploitation/

You can’t keep getting words wrong whilst taking the piss out of somebody else making what was obviously a typo @Chainzreaction .

Well, you can, but it makes you look ignorant and hypocritical.

Re: humiliated at a global level, here's how the New York Times is covering it. There's no mention in the LA Times, Washington Post, Sydney Morning Herald, China Daily.com, Le Monde and pretty much every major global news outlet. I've just checked them all and none of them is reporting on this story.

In fact, it seems to be just the Dail Mail that's claiming it to be an embarrassment on the world stage for Starmer. Go figure.

It should never have been out of the news in the first place!
It's scandalous that the enquiry was completed in 2022 but the recommendations haven't been implemented.
Thank God EM has made it front & centre again. Let's see what Stramer does.

https://www.foxnews.com/world/elon-musk-demands-uk-act-grooming-gang-scandal-amid-growing-calls-probe-national-inquiry-now

And this is how Fox News is covering it!

Ah, Fox News, that notoriously reliable and independent organisation which is unique in not having any kind of political agenda. 😂

Do better.

Like so many threads like this the over-riding theme is being a disappointed Labour voter now hating on Starmer and specifically on this thread a desire to see the 'government humiliated'

Stramer?

You’re thanking some made up dude in the sky for some rich right wing dude in America pissing around in British politics. Oh dear.

Fox News have a massive following! Grow up!

Fox News, that arbiter of truth. 😂

A following of ignorant fucking racists. You’re really not helping yourself.

Being shred?? And you question my comprehension!!! Pot, kettle!!

A spelling mistake is not an issue with comprehension.

It's an autocorrect I didn't pick up - and I don't for one minute get surprised at anyone picking up my SPaG - I'm dyslexic. But misspelling words is an entirely different kettle of fish to not reading and listening to what is being said.

But I don't believe your thick like most here - I think your a drama llama 🤷‍♀️

Following does not equal accurate reporting. There is no media outlet more responsible for right washing the truth than Fox News.

Lots of things have massive followings. Love Island, for example. Being popular does not equal being unbiased, informative or in any way intelligent or educated. I wish I could say I can't believe you don't know that. But I can.

Any comment on your dictatorship post?

https://finance.yahoo.com/news/fox-news-channel-finishes-2024-151200740.html

Yes this one with highest audience share in the USA!!

I asked you to find the posts! I was waiting for you to provide the info!

International press

Fox News and the Daily Mail?

Ha ha ha

Because in 14 years they failed to find appropriate conclusions? So they think KS should have solved it in 5 months? Right.....

EM is a misogynist racist no mark. He's just stirring up shit.

Again, you are equating audience share with accurate reporting. Seriously, you need to exercise better critical thinking if you honestly believe the number of viewers a channel has means it tells the truth.

It's you're not your just for the sake of being pedantic..!

Are you being deliberately obtuse? Surely nobody can be this dense?

The bit that doesn't match their agenda!

So basically any of it that's true!