Meet the Other Phone. Flexible and made to last.

Meet the Other Phone.
Flexible and made to last.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

See all MNHQ comments on this thread

To be worried about what the Labour government will do next?

1000 replies

Scenicgirl · 17/12/2024 22:46

Let's be honest, Labour has been a massive disappointment for this country, pissing off the pensioners with taking away the WFA, the farmers, NI changes which impact employers, immigration etc and today refusing compensation to the WASPI women after they ridiculed the Conservatives when they didn't commit to a solution. Don't we deserve better than this constant shit show of lies and deceptions which were clearly spouted out purely to gain power?
For the 1st time in my life, I worry about where we are heading.

OP posts:
Thread gallery
20
Blue78ivy · 19/12/2024 23:42

MushMonster · 17/12/2024 22:53

Your turn to feel like this.
I felt that for years, watching this country electing Boris Johnson (and then having the other two NON-ELECTED idiots as PM) and sticking to the tories BS of government. I think I have PTSD, to be honest.
I am rather chilled at present.

Love this🤩 exactly how i feel 😅

Scenicgirl · 19/12/2024 23:45

Runninginthenight · 19/12/2024 23:29

I think the situation in France is interesting. Governments are collapsing due to politicians not being brave enough to face the electorate after making unpopular choices. The pension age was recently changed from 62 to 64 (I think) but this is done as the country is running at a large deficit. Public sector pensions in France are massively unaffordable, but no politicians dare to admit this to the public. So the country is running into the buffers because the politicians are being nicey-nicey when what is needed is honesty.

Can we afford to pay the WASPI women what they want? No of course not. it would be daft to pretend otherwise. At least Starmer has the balls to say this. VAT on private schools will prove to be a disaster, but it plays well with the grievance ridden so they went with it. Big mistake.

I live in Scotland where vast amounts of money was thrown at thoroughly unaffordable public sector pay rises. Humza Yousef announced a council tax freeze on a whim as he wanted to appear nice. Lots of extremely wealthy pensioners will see their winter fuel payment restored. University is free. There is an extra £25 per child given to parents of children in poverty. Money is flung about like confetti in order to buy votes. And yet education is swirling the plughole in desperate need of proper funding, there are over 10,000 people who have waited over 2 years (!!!) for an out patients appointment despite record SNHS funding and councils are shutting any service they are not legally obliged to offer.

The most important attribute of a politician is to be brave enough to make the unpopular but right decision.

Starmer only had the balls not to pay the WASPI women AFTER the event, ie; after he shamed the Tories for not helping them and pledged to help them if his party got voted in. He blatantly lied and won votes because of it. He doesn't have the balls to even say sorry now, siting the Tories to blame because of the 22 b black hole.......... I'm so sick of that statement, his advisors need to write him a new script.

OP posts:
Clavinova · 19/12/2024 23:48

StrindbergsSonata · 19/12/2024 22:20

I was talking academic credentials as it was being claimed that she wasn't a real economist with the 'Rach from customer services' jibes. She did Oxford PPE, as did Hunt et al and she also did an MSc at LSE. As I stated, business sense was another parameter entirely.However, Hunt's fucking over of the junior doctors eclipses anything else he did or didn't do in my book and speaks a lot about the character of the man.

Edited

What would you say about Johnson? Truss? Kwarteng? Sunak? What are their credentials over those of Reeves?

I know that Sunak graduated with a first-class degree (Oxford PPE) - Rachel Reeves graduated with a 2:1. Sunak also has a masters from Stanford University on a Fulbright scholarship.

StrindbergsSonata · 19/12/2024 23:50

Clavinova · 19/12/2024 23:48

What would you say about Johnson? Truss? Kwarteng? Sunak? What are their credentials over those of Reeves?

I know that Sunak graduated with a first-class degree (Oxford PPE) - Rachel Reeves graduated with a 2:1. Sunak also has a masters from Stanford University on a Fulbright scholarship.

So, similar then.

Papyrophile · 19/12/2024 23:51

We need all the voices from everywhere for proper representation.

And not paying WASPI women was duplicitous, having said they would, but it would have been a flawed decision, frankly. We were the generation who worked towards greater sexual equality -- with real results, even if the goal is still not fully achieved.

StrindbergsSonata · 19/12/2024 23:54

Papyrophile · 19/12/2024 23:51

We need all the voices from everywhere for proper representation.

And not paying WASPI women was duplicitous, having said they would, but it would have been a flawed decision, frankly. We were the generation who worked towards greater sexual equality -- with real results, even if the goal is still not fully achieved.

You were not THE generation who worked towards greater sexual equality. That's been a quest of many generations.

Clavinova · 19/12/2024 23:55

Runninginthenight
Can we afford to pay the WASPI women what they want? No of course not. it would be daft to pretend otherwise.
I live in Scotland...

Scottish Labour leader Anas Sawar says the prime minister was wrong not to compensate [the WASPI] women...

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/cpq9vr8x077o

Clavinova · 19/12/2024 23:58

StrindbergsSonata · 19/12/2024 23:50

So, similar then.

A first-class degree is obviously better than a 2:1 in the same subject and Sunak won a prestigious scholarship for his masters degree.

StrindbergsSonata · 20/12/2024 00:01

Clavinova · 19/12/2024 23:58

A first-class degree is obviously better than a 2:1 in the same subject and Sunak won a prestigious scholarship for his masters degree.

Difference between a First and 2:1 could be splitting hairs. A masters in Economics from LSE is pretty top drawer too. They are both academically high calibre. Not sure what your point is really.

MikeRafone · 20/12/2024 05:31

Scenicgirl · 19/12/2024 23:19

Thank you, although 2,100 criminals removed since July 24 hardly makes me want to jump for joy but great if it continues. The trouble is as word has got round that we are a soft touch it's a drop in the ocean (pardon the pun) compared to the numbers we are receiving.

Let’s have some facts on the numbers coming over in small boats and the comparison to those leaving, and proof that we are a soft touch compared to other European countries

Runninginthenight · 20/12/2024 06:17

Clavinova · 19/12/2024 23:55

Runninginthenight
Can we afford to pay the WASPI women what they want? No of course not. it would be daft to pretend otherwise.
I live in Scotland...

Scottish Labour leader Anas Sawar says the prime minister was wrong not to compensate [the WASPI] women...

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/cpq9vr8x077o

Anas is indeed a spineless politician who needs to grow up and start making the right calls, not just the calls what will make him look like a nice guy. To me it makes him look childish and weak.

EasternStandard · 20/12/2024 06:53

proof that we are a soft touch compared to other European countries

If you look at policies we are a 'softer touch', grant rates, accommodation. The journey is perilous though which is a barrier of sorts.

Starmer's issue with his approach is it is less likely to lower crossings. You can remove a profiteering gang member, send out a press release about removing a 'big piece of the puzzle' but over the next month numbers will be up as someone else can clearly step into that role.

Enforced returns are expensive but also won't deter. Unless a whole country eg Albania changes status

He has next summer as more of a test for the approach

YoYoYoYo12345 · 20/12/2024 06:56

Feelingstrange2 · 17/12/2024 22:55

Constant shit show of lies and deceptions? Could be talking about the 14 years of Tories there!

Look, they've had to make decisions. I wouldn't have done a few of their choices but the alternatives would probably have been unpopular too - balancing budgets never are as much fun as splashing the cash.

Interesting you are worried now and not when Tories were in power!

This.

14 years of mess has to be paid for. The money has to come from somewhere to fix this mess. Tough choices or head in the sand

BIossomtoes · 20/12/2024 07:09

Papyrophile · 19/12/2024 23:40

More importantly, how do we get the conviction politicians to come back? And the next generations to stand up?

We don’t because they no longer exist. There’s been a cultural shift and people of the quality of those late 20th/early 21st century politicians no longer exist. Even if they did the majority of the electorate doesn’t want them, they’d rather have populists. Look at the US.

MikeRafone · 20/12/2024 07:18

EasternStandard · 20/12/2024 06:53

proof that we are a soft touch compared to other European countries

If you look at policies we are a 'softer touch', grant rates, accommodation. The journey is perilous though which is a barrier of sorts.

Starmer's issue with his approach is it is less likely to lower crossings. You can remove a profiteering gang member, send out a press release about removing a 'big piece of the puzzle' but over the next month numbers will be up as someone else can clearly step into that role.

Enforced returns are expensive but also won't deter. Unless a whole country eg Albania changes status

He has next summer as more of a test for the approach

Edited

If you could show an example of the policies in just one European country, that is harsher than uk?

some facts to show the myths you chat about, aren’t actually myths

https://www.refugeecouncil.org.uk/latest/news/741_new_research_explodes_myth_of_uk_as_a_soft_touch_destination_of_choice_for_asylum_seekers/

New research explodes myth of UK as a 'soft touch' destination of choice for asylum seekers

Research commissioned by the Home Office exploring the motivations for asylum seekers who come to the UK belies assumptions about ‘pull factors’ which lead people to claim asylum here. Understanding the decision-making of asylum seekers looks into the...

https://www.refugeecouncil.org.uk/latest/news/741_new_research_explodes_myth_of_uk_as_a_soft_touch_destination_of_choice_for_asylum_seekers

BIossomtoes · 20/12/2024 07:18

StrindbergsSonata · 19/12/2024 23:54

You were not THE generation who worked towards greater sexual equality. That's been a quest of many generations.

We were the generation that achieved success. All the major improvements in women’s rights were achieved by second wave feminists - equal pay, maternity rights, availability of childcare, right to financial independence. The 1970s and 80s saw huge changes for women and it certainly wasn’t thanks to our mothers’ generation. Feminism was asleep for 50 years once we got the vote.

EasternStandard · 20/12/2024 07:34

MikeRafone · 20/12/2024 07:18

If you could show an example of the policies in just one European country, that is harsher than uk?

some facts to show the myths you chat about, aren’t actually myths

https://www.refugeecouncil.org.uk/latest/news/741_new_research_explodes_myth_of_uk_as_a_soft_touch_destination_of_choice_for_asylum_seekers/

If you look up some of the other grant rates you’ll see some are much lower in the EU

Here’s Spain

Spain granted asylum to 12% of applicants last year, the lowest rate among EU countries, putting the country 30 points below the EU average

https://www.euractiv.com/section/politics/news/spain-lags-behind-rest-of-eu-in-granting-asylum-says-ngo/

Other tougher policies include Italy reducing crossings by 60% through maritime law changes and push backs at country of origin. If you read up you’ll see the response to that

https://www.euractiv.com/section/politics/news/spain-lags-behind-rest-of-eu-in-granting-asylum-says-ngo/

Spain lags behind rest of EU in granting asylum, says NGO

Spain granted asylum to 12% of applicants last year, the lowest rate among EU countries, putting the country 30 points below the EU average and at the bottom of the table in terms of the rate of asylum granted, a report by the Spanish NGO Commission fo...

https://www.euractiv.com/section/politics/news/spain-lags-behind-rest-of-eu-in-granting-asylum-says-ngo

Alexandra2001 · 20/12/2024 07:54

YoYoYoYo12345 · 20/12/2024 06:56

This.

14 years of mess has to be paid for. The money has to come from somewhere to fix this mess. Tough choices or head in the sand

Yes, look at todays announcement on pot holes, 50% increase on last years amount... UK roads are a total disgrace.

No NHS dentistry in large parts of the UK, 7.6m on waiting lists, millions on sick and disability benefits....

Look at how the Tories ran the water industry? the costs, already paid for by us, now have to be paid again...

All this will billions to put right & we'd have a lot more if govt borrowing costs weren't so high.... any clues as to why they went from 1.8% to 5% ?

Better news is consumer spending up and Govt borrowing well down too.

YoYoYoYo12345 · 20/12/2024 07:59

Alexandra2001 · 20/12/2024 07:54

Yes, look at todays announcement on pot holes, 50% increase on last years amount... UK roads are a total disgrace.

No NHS dentistry in large parts of the UK, 7.6m on waiting lists, millions on sick and disability benefits....

Look at how the Tories ran the water industry? the costs, already paid for by us, now have to be paid again...

All this will billions to put right & we'd have a lot more if govt borrowing costs weren't so high.... any clues as to why they went from 1.8% to 5% ?

Better news is consumer spending up and Govt borrowing well down too.

I agree. All this needs putting right. People will moan if it isn't but moan when money has to be found.

The country is in a total mess. Every area, health, waiting lists , education, dentistry, pot holes, social care, housing, infrastructure, mental health provision, backlogs for asylum claims etc etc etc

Alexandra2001 · 20/12/2024 08:10

YoYoYoYo12345 · 20/12/2024 07:59

I agree. All this needs putting right. People will moan if it isn't but moan when money has to be found.

The country is in a total mess. Every area, health, waiting lists , education, dentistry, pot holes, social care, housing, infrastructure, mental health provision, backlogs for asylum claims etc etc etc

We went out with friends of ours yesterday, he is a CEO of a company employing 150 people, asked about the NI changes, he said yes it'll mean a % off pay rises but he also said employees had a cut in NI and his costs are going up all the time, its just another one they have to deal with but he also said Brexit has caused his company huge issues and costs, totally avoidable.

He went on to say that money has to be found from somewhere and echoed your comments, the country is a mess, he has key staff off sick unable to get NHS treatment & cannot get skilled UK staff.

People opposed to the NI rises, don't say how they would pay for the huge costs the new govt faces...... the NI employee cut is costing the Govt £50 billion over the course of the Parliament... all unfunded by Hunt.

Wond3747 · 20/12/2024 08:38

Tory borrowing was out of control. It’s just been announced that this November’s borrowing has been the lowest in 3 years.

The Tories have been so so shit the past 14 years on managing everything- because party politics and appeasing donors and backbenchers will
always be their priority.

At last we have a government that just gets on with the job and puts country first.

Nordione1 · 20/12/2024 08:40

Yes agreed the country is in a financial mess. But I'm not sure Labour are going about trying to solve it in a coherent way bearing in mind some groups are clearly in favour and some are not.

For example, no payments to the WASPI women despite promising to make payments for this "huge injustice"(K Starmer) contrasted with a 32% increase in pension payments for ex mine workers.

How can we afford that if we have a £22billion black hole?

How come we apparently can afford huge above inflation pay rises for public sector workers that are already very well paid, but the winter fuel payments for pensioners near the poverty line are cut as we can't afford them.

It's all very odd. I expect there will be some convoluted explanation or justification given but few will believe it.

EasternStandard · 20/12/2024 08:44

Wond3747 · 20/12/2024 08:38

Tory borrowing was out of control. It’s just been announced that this November’s borrowing has been the lowest in 3 years.

The Tories have been so so shit the past 14 years on managing everything- because party politics and appeasing donors and backbenchers will
always be their priority.

At last we have a government that just gets on with the job and puts country first.

At last we have a government that just gets on with the job and puts country first.

I'd say that depends on what the policies continue to do to the private sector

It's what funds the public one after all

ChallahPlaiter · 20/12/2024 08:50

Nordione1 · 20/12/2024 08:40

Yes agreed the country is in a financial mess. But I'm not sure Labour are going about trying to solve it in a coherent way bearing in mind some groups are clearly in favour and some are not.

For example, no payments to the WASPI women despite promising to make payments for this "huge injustice"(K Starmer) contrasted with a 32% increase in pension payments for ex mine workers.

How can we afford that if we have a £22billion black hole?

How come we apparently can afford huge above inflation pay rises for public sector workers that are already very well paid, but the winter fuel payments for pensioners near the poverty line are cut as we can't afford them.

It's all very odd. I expect there will be some convoluted explanation or justification given but few will believe it.

You are wrong.
See the IFS report on public sector pay, headline finding:

Overall, between December 2019 and November 2023, inflation-adjusted average private sector pay grew by 2.3%, whereas public sector pay fell by 0.3%.

https://ifs.org.uk/publications/recent-trends-public-sector-pay

Recent trends in public sector pay | Institute for Fiscal Studies

How has public sector pay changed in recent years? Which type of workers have done better and which have done worse?

https://ifs.org.uk/publications/recent-trends-public-sector-pay

Wond3747 · 20/12/2024 08:53

EasternStandard · 20/12/2024 08:44

At last we have a government that just gets on with the job and puts country first.

I'd say that depends on what the policies continue to do to the private sector

It's what funds the public one after all

Well the Tory policy of out of control borrowing isn’t going to help any sector and sadly nobody within the party was/ is capable of sorting it out along with immigration, the decimation of the nhs, education, social care, roads, environment, Brexit, mis management of Covid, contracts for mates…..which they brought about. They all ran for the hills as they all knew they were incapable of the job that labour are now having to do. All mouth and no trousers. That was what their entire government was about and what they’re about now.

We see them, we lived under them for 14 years, we know what a Tory government brings….patience and resilience is what is needed with this new government. You can’t polish a turd and labour have a massive turd to sort out. It isn’t going to be pretty. Normally the rich and privileged go untouched, now they’re not. So a minority will squeak. C’est la vie.🤷‍♀️

Please create an account

To comment on this thread you need to create a Mumsnet account.

This thread is not accepting new messages.
Swipe left for the next trending thread