Well, I think it is still a bit soon to judge the government. But on the things you've stated:
WFA - Correct decision in principle. Pensioners are the wealthiest demographic with 1/4 over 65s living in a household with >£1m assets. Blanket subsidies from those with a fraction of their income/assets is offensive to me. That said, the threshold was too low. I realise admin costs are prohibitive but my starting point would be average property price in assets plus equivalent income to NMW per household. So maybe no WFA for those with £300,000 of assets including house, plus a household income of £25k-ish.
Farmers IHT - I agree with them in principle but if we mess up farming we mess up our food supply. This was a difficult one and applaud their bravery in being decisive.
WASPI - I'm tired of hearing about this. It was the right decision to equalise SPA and the right decision to speed up the increase in SPA given life expectancy and the burden on the taxpayer. Paying billions in compensation to the wealthiest demographic because a few women apparently live on the moon is an insult to the working population bearing the biggest tax burden in generations.
Immigration - Well, they seem to be using tougher rhetoric than I perhaps imagined. The proof of the pudding will be in the eating once the figures come out. Fingers crossed we can get some logic to our policies where we welcome productive people to fill our vacancies and keep out those who hate our values and are a drain.
What I fear with this government is that they are dragging us ever deeper into the Ukraine war which is dangerous and ultimately futile. I also fear the government are proving to be a flaky ally to Israel in their hour of need.
Closer to home, I fear that the government sees middle earners as a cash cow, even more so than the last government. VAT on school fees and continued freezing of tax thresholds are evidence of that, but I hope this is the end point and not a thin end of the wedge of the raid on the lower-middle classes.