Meet the Other Phone. Child-safe in minutes.

Meet the Other Phone.
Child-safe in minutes.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

The teacher from Batley is still in hiding

1000 replies

Nicetrynigel · 03/12/2024 05:55

Teacher Batley
His life ruined because a bunch of thugs decided they didn't like what he was teaching in his RE lesson.
This and the Labour MP's request for bhalsphey laws against those of the Abrahamic faith have made me concerned.

People should be free to offer an view against another's religion. It's scary that we are being a country where people thing being offended gives them a right to made death threats.

Batley Grammar School teacher felt “totally isolated” “abandoned” and “suicidal” due to inadequate support from relevant agencies.

An official review, due to be published on Monday 25th March, 2024, is set to recommend the banning of protests outside schools, following a concerning incident where a teacher was forced into hidi…

https://neilwilby.com/2024/03/24/batley-grammar-school-teacher-felt-totally-isolated-abandoned-and-suicidal-due-to-inadequate-support-from-relevant-agencies/

OP posts:
Thread gallery
18
TENSsion · 03/12/2024 16:16

All the people who are sending him death threats, and anyone engaging in promoting these death threats are engaging in hate speech.

Someone showing a cartoon is not.

You people, defending these lunatics calling for the death of a teacher over a CARTOON, are absolutely insane.

username358 · 03/12/2024 16:19

Dweetfidilove · 03/12/2024 16:08

I am aware of that, yes 👍🏾.

Glad that's cleared up.

Manypaws · 03/12/2024 16:21

TENSsion · 03/12/2024 16:16

All the people who are sending him death threats, and anyone engaging in promoting these death threats are engaging in hate speech.

Someone showing a cartoon is not.

You people, defending these lunatics calling for the death of a teacher over a CARTOON, are absolutely insane.

This

Puzzledandpissedoff · 03/12/2024 16:29

All the people who are sending him death threats, and anyone engaging in promoting these death threats are engaging in hate speech

That's why I wondered how many of them have been prosecuted, @TENSsion - especially considering just how fast the system's been made to operate for others

So far I'm not aware of any, but of course I could be wrong

Puzzledandpissedoff · 03/12/2024 16:44

If anyone would like to read the Khan review into what happened it's here: https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/the-khan-review-threats-to-social-cohesion-and-democratic-resilience

Interesting that in a further BBC article they didn't feature any "people in Batley" who'd condemn the protesters' actions, though they were happy to criticise the school leadership and structure and misinformation/social media
Even the police, while insisting they take threatening behaviour seriously and that "measures were put in place" failed to mention any consequences for that behaviour:

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-leeds-68659435#:~:text=A%20religious%20studies%20teacher%20at,the%20trust%20running%20the%20school.

username358 · 03/12/2024 17:01

This is from the Khan report:

"There also appeared to be a poor understanding of cohesion, where appeasing the protestors to secure the end of the protests – at the expense of the religious studies teacher – appeared to be the priority.

Such an approach would arguably undermine cohesion in the long-term as it appears to appease and encourage those who create an intimidating environment to enforce their beliefs, irrespective of the rights of others.

We heard of more cases of self-appointed ‘community faith leaders’ aggressively interfering in everyday teaching at some schools in Batley and creating a climate of fear. This appears to suggest there is a wider cultural problem in the area that is not being adequately addressed."

I don't understand how we've got here. Why are these self appointed leaders being allowed to interfer in schools?

Why are threatening and intimidating people being appeased at the expense of everything else? It just encourages this kind of behaviour rather than containing it.

ForegoneConfusion · 03/12/2024 17:16

EmmaMaria · 03/12/2024 13:23

This^

There's plenty of threads on this site calling for people to be sacked because of their views, and most of those people aren't teachers responsible for the care and education of impressionable young people. Freedom of speech does not exist in this country - nor do I believe it should exist. There should be no freedom to deliberately threaten of cause offense - and if he has freedom of speech then the protesters should have the same rights. Posters cannot have it both ways - if they are wrong to protest then so is he for giving them cause. Under no circumstances could any teacher have been unaware of the likely consequences of deliberately insulting the faith of a great many people. If he's that stupid, then he has no place in a classroom.

And people might perhaps want to recall that the offending cartoon was not simply a cartoon or image of the prophet Mohammed - it was from a specific set of images which portrayed the prophet as a terrorist, linking Islam and terrorism (because clearly no other adherents to so-called faith/ belief might ever be involved in terrorism).

I wonder though why the OP is choosing to be so outraged by an article published eight months ago. Has she only just come to the conclusion that she is outraged? Or is there another point in stirring this up again?

I can't find any mention of the teacher's views.

The lesson was part of the school curriculum, it had been signed off by the leadership team of the school and taught for the last two years by two other teachers.

After the lesson, a parent phoned the teacher and said 'there will be repercussions for his actions.' There followed protests outside the school, sharing of the teachers name, his picture and address, his wife's picture, pictures of their car. Even a local charity published the teachers name, accusing him of "terrorism" and "insulting Islam". The death threats didn't come out of the blue, they were purposefully incited.

Do you really think that this teacher gave cause for these actions?

PurpleChrayn · 03/12/2024 17:18

This reply has been deleted

Message deleted by MNHQ. Here's a link to our Talk Guidelines.

Puzzledandpissedoff · 03/12/2024 17:30

@username358 I rather expect that the report inclusions you mentioned may have fed into the police/CPS reluctance to pursue any prosecutions

The vast majority of thoroughly decent muslims would go nowhere near these threats, but as it says very clearly the minority who enjoy causing trouble were appeased, doubtless in tthe name of "community sensitivities"

The crying shame of this is that it doesn't work; the screamers and spitters regard it as weakness and licence, and respectable community members who are utterly sick of such people reflecting on them are chucked under the bus once again

Guavafish1 · 03/12/2024 17:31

Everyone has the right to protest but in the correct manner.

On the flip side… others must not harass and intimidate anyone especially at their home.

The school throw the teachers under the bus. They are the backbone of good society. They should have supported them in this distressing time.

User37482 · 03/12/2024 17:32

Ponoka7 · 03/12/2024 11:52

He put up offensive caricatures during a religious lesson. He fucked about and found out, quite frankly. An Inman met with the Head and went through what happened. They started protesting when the Teacher wasn't going to be sacked. The Teacher wanted to stir up hatred and that's what he's done. He should be bared from Teaching. He obviously doesn't know what is appropriate in a classroom. FYI I didn't agree with the people being jailed whose offences were online during the Southport riots.

We don’t have blasphemy laws and most of us don’t want them.

User37482 · 03/12/2024 17:36

Ponoka7 · 03/12/2024 12:08

He was teaching a class on religion. He has a good percentage of Muslim pupils in his class. He chose a offensive caricature to use. If it was a sexist or racist caricature, posters would be calling for him to be sacked and he would have broken laws and policies. It's a serious misjudgement at the least. He should have met with the Iman and explained his reasoning, then gone before a teaching panel. You can hold what views you want, but keep them out of a classroom.

Yes in a normal community parents would have complained and he would have been reprimanded. But nooooo this man got bloody death threast. The Uk police are basically rolling over for islamic extremism. It doesn’t shut them up it encourages them.

What they should have done is said “nothing illegal has happened here, expect for people harassing this man and threatening him, we will be tracking down each and every one of you and you will be charged.”

username358 · 03/12/2024 17:36

Puzzledandpissedoff · 03/12/2024 17:30

@username358 I rather expect that the report inclusions you mentioned may have fed into the police/CPS reluctance to pursue any prosecutions

The vast majority of thoroughly decent muslims would go nowhere near these threats, but as it says very clearly the minority who enjoy causing trouble were appeased, doubtless in tthe name of "community sensitivities"

The crying shame of this is that it doesn't work; the screamers and spitters regard it as weakness and licence, and respectable community members who are utterly sick of such people reflecting on them are chucked under the bus once again

This is exactly the point I was making earlier. The way this country handles 'community cohesion' is completely wrong.

You shouldn't capitulate to bullies and these self appointed community leaders aren't representative of the majority.

These people often police others within their community as well. They create an atmosphere of fear and unease.

Violence and harassment must never be condoned.

DanielaDressen · 03/12/2024 18:15

Ponoka7 · 03/12/2024 12:08

He was teaching a class on religion. He has a good percentage of Muslim pupils in his class. He chose a offensive caricature to use. If it was a sexist or racist caricature, posters would be calling for him to be sacked and he would have broken laws and policies. It's a serious misjudgement at the least. He should have met with the Iman and explained his reasoning, then gone before a teaching panel. You can hold what views you want, but keep them out of a classroom.

It had been taught before and the headmaster had been happy with the lesson content. Teachers and schools should not be answerable to Imans

DanielaDressen · 03/12/2024 18:16

And the school wouldn’t have been able to sack him even if they’d wanted to. We have employment rights in this country. Teaching pre approved material is not gross misconduct.

MonikerTwo · 03/12/2024 18:26

Thank goodness the voting on this issue is looking pretty conclusive. The vile views expressed by one or two on here obviously only represent a very tiny proportion .

SquirrelSoShiny · 03/12/2024 18:28

This reply has been deleted

Message deleted by MNHQ. Here's a link to our Talk Guidelines.

Yes, the great unsayable.

MathiasBroucek · 03/12/2024 18:37

This reply has been deleted

Message deleted by MNHQ. Here's a link to our Talk Guidelines.

We have terrifying gangs of militant Methodists round my way😉

MMOC · 03/12/2024 18:49

SquirrelSoShiny · 03/12/2024 18:28

Yes, the great unsayable.

Suppression of free thinking and free expression. Already here and probably already in a town near you.

YellowAsteroid · 03/12/2024 19:06

It’s appalling. Particularly when so much of public organised Islam is so deeply anti-Semitic. Seems it’s ok to be rude or satirical about the Jews, but not put Islam.

We live in a country where there is religious freedom. Rightly, freedom of worship is a British value. And with hat goes the freedom to mock, to satirise, to criticise religions.

YellowAsteroid · 03/12/2024 19:12

He chose a offensive caricature to use. If it was a sexist or racist caricature, posters would be calling for him to be sacked and he would have broken laws and policies

No he wouldn’t. The clue in the ord “caricature.” A caricature is satirical but rarely a hate crime.

Unless you’re hypersensitive. Britain has long and honourable tradition of muck-raking satires. It’s part of our political culture. If you can’t cope, examine yourself - why are you so oversensitive?

Lavender14 · 03/12/2024 19:16

Ponoka7 · 03/12/2024 12:08

He was teaching a class on religion. He has a good percentage of Muslim pupils in his class. He chose a offensive caricature to use. If it was a sexist or racist caricature, posters would be calling for him to be sacked and he would have broken laws and policies. It's a serious misjudgement at the least. He should have met with the Iman and explained his reasoning, then gone before a teaching panel. You can hold what views you want, but keep them out of a classroom.

I'm not sure about this I think it very much depends on the context the images are being used in. For example I remember in school being shown horrible anti semitic propaganda in the context of how wrong the holocaust was and how it happened. If the context is appropriate then why shouldn't the images be shown - children could come across them in other settings especially with the Internet being so readily accessible now so better to me that these things are discussed and debated safely in a classroom with a teacher to navigate and guide. To me this is part of the reason why teachers feel really underequipped to deal with many social issues like racial inequality when actually teachers are probably in one of the best positions to do that.

MonikerTwo · 03/12/2024 19:26

He chose a offensive caricature to use. If it was a sexist or racist caricature, posters would be calling for him to be sacked and he would have broken laws and policies

Teachers use this sort of material in History and Politics lessons all the time . ( eg Sexist and misogynistic cartoons during Suffragette period/ racist caricatures about the Irish in the 19th century etc)
While he may have been unwise in this context it is simply not true that he has broken laws .
And even if he had done something wrong ( and I don’t think he had) It still wouldn’t been acceptable for him to have been hounded and threatened.
It’s really shocking that some people on here think their offended feelings are more important than someone’s life or livelihood.

username358 · 03/12/2024 19:26

YellowAsteroid · 03/12/2024 19:06

It’s appalling. Particularly when so much of public organised Islam is so deeply anti-Semitic. Seems it’s ok to be rude or satirical about the Jews, but not put Islam.

We live in a country where there is religious freedom. Rightly, freedom of worship is a British value. And with hat goes the freedom to mock, to satirise, to criticise religions.

I've seen quite a lot of Islamaphobia by Jewish people. It seems to go both ways.

MonikerTwo · 03/12/2024 19:30

username358 · 03/12/2024 17:36

This is exactly the point I was making earlier. The way this country handles 'community cohesion' is completely wrong.

You shouldn't capitulate to bullies and these self appointed community leaders aren't representative of the majority.

These people often police others within their community as well. They create an atmosphere of fear and unease.

Violence and harassment must never be condoned.

“You shouldn't capitulate to bullies and these self appointed community leaders aren't representative of the majority.”

💯

Please create an account

To comment on this thread you need to create a Mumsnet account.

This thread is not accepting new messages.