I very recently had an extremely poorly-behaved child moved into my tutor group. My tutor group is generally excellent - a mix of luck (I have many students who generally want to do well) and my very firm rules and boundaries.
This student has been out of control for some time, and is badly-behaved in class - continuously out of their seat, jumping around, hijacking every conversation, messing with equipment in my room (gas taps, telephone on my desk, swearing and ignoring anything anyone tells them to do, trying to be intimidating). I have followed the systems, raised concerns about their influence on others (other students see them get away with things, because restorative behaviour techniques do not work, and some have started imitating behaviours) and am now having parental complaints because other students go home crying because of the constant disruption to lessons, but I am told by school leaders that the student will remain where they are because I have a tighter grip on them (for the 20min I see them a day) than most and such a lovely tutor group.
My argument was and is, does this student have more rights to be in school and in classes than all the students who try to do the right thing, some of whom have stated that they now stay at home on particularly bad days? When students go home crying and their stress levels are now constantly high because of this student, why do the one student's needs trump that of the many who now suffer?
This is Y9 in secondary; our school has students in tutor groups for all lessons until their options kick in.
And this is what we have to deal with.