Meet the Other Phone. Flexible and made to last.

Meet the Other Phone.
Flexible and made to last.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

To be shocked at the net migration figures currently being discussed

1000 replies

Feelingathomenow · 28/11/2024 11:06

Yesterday’s figures discussed by the Tories stated that since 2010 the net migration figures to the UK has equalled the size of the population of Wales. Today we were told the figures to June 2023 showed a net migration figure of nearly 1 million for that year, for the year to June 2024 this had reduced to a mere 3/4 of a million. The numbers coming in of the boats per year alone is equal to a large town. AIBU to think this has to stop. We need to immediately crack down on people allowed into this country- limit it to urgently needed highly skilled jobs and start offshore processing (or similar) of the people who are here illegally (basically like many other countries).

We just can’t cope with those numbers. - no wonder our infrastructure is collapsing, we have a housing crisis etc.

I want to hear from the government how they are going to tackle it. We have heard from the Tories now it is over to Starmer.

OP posts:
Thread gallery
21
Dorisbonson · 28/11/2024 19:32

lljkk · 28/11/2024 19:08

Most migrants are lower wage earners.

Are they?
Can anyone understand the Earnings chart on this page? I think it's saying that the median income of migrants is a wage which is 80th percentile compared to all-UK working age income. In other words, the migrants earn WAY more than entirely-native British workers, typically.

I would call balls on the heavily caveated research (read what the authors have said at the bottom of it) you have quoted which doesnt cover recent years either. The research you quote also points to downward trend in migrant earnings.

Most of the visas issued in the past few years for skilled worker routes were for jobs which have below average earnings. 72% of migrant worker visas in 2022-23 were for low wage roles. 54% of those visas were for jobs which pay less than half the UK average salary!

ChicOP · 28/11/2024 19:33

Its a hard, low paying job which many people don't want to do. They would happily to it if they paid more.

TheDisgustingBrothers · 28/11/2024 19:34

downwindofyou · 28/11/2024 19:21

@WildCat2877

And in the mean time we have to pay for them?
Of course we have to finance the upkeep of people seeking asylum. What are you suggesting? They just die of starvation? Live on the streets? Do you know what genuine asylum is?

Do you think all of those seeking asylum are genuinely seeking asylum? 🙃

TheGretaGarboHomeForWaywardBoysAndGirls · 28/11/2024 19:37

WestwardHo1 · 28/11/2024 17:13

But then we are poaching healthcare workers from countries where they have studied and paid for their training.

Surely that's a bit immoral?

Possibly but either we make it affordable for British people to train as doctors or we are going to be stuck with a doctor shortage in the NHS.

ChicOP · 28/11/2024 19:37

TheDisgustingBrothers · 28/11/2024 19:34

Do you think all of those seeking asylum are genuinely seeking asylum? 🙃

Edited

Of course they aren't. They are largely Christian or gay which means they cannot ever return back home.

ChicOP · 28/11/2024 19:38

TheGretaGarboHomeForWaywardBoysAndGirls · 28/11/2024 19:37

Possibly but either we make it affordable for British people to train as doctors or we are going to be stuck with a doctor shortage in the NHS.

There is now an over supply of doctors with many unable to get permanent jobs. There are as many foreign trained doctors in the NHS and UK trained.

Marmut · 28/11/2024 19:52

Dorisbonson · 28/11/2024 19:32

I would call balls on the heavily caveated research (read what the authors have said at the bottom of it) you have quoted which doesnt cover recent years either. The research you quote also points to downward trend in migrant earnings.

Most of the visas issued in the past few years for skilled worker routes were for jobs which have below average earnings. 72% of migrant worker visas in 2022-23 were for low wage roles. 54% of those visas were for jobs which pay less than half the UK average salary!

Where did you get these figures from? Genuine curiosity.

poetryandwine · 28/11/2024 19:54

ChicOP · 28/11/2024 19:37

Of course they aren't. They are largely Christian or gay which means they cannot ever return back home.

If you cannot return home because you are Christian or gay, you are being persecuted (possibly to a life threatening degree) because of a personal characteristic.

According to the 1951 Convention on Refugees, the UN Treaty laying out the structure of the asylum process, this is a valid reason to seek asylum. So I am not sure what you mean?

Beeloux · 28/11/2024 19:59

poetryandwine · 28/11/2024 19:54

If you cannot return home because you are Christian or gay, you are being persecuted (possibly to a life threatening degree) because of a personal characteristic.

According to the 1951 Convention on Refugees, the UN Treaty laying out the structure of the asylum process, this is a valid reason to seek asylum. So I am not sure what you mean?

Many lie about being Christian or gay in order to claim asylum. Hence why certain visa programmes for nationals of certain countries have been recalled due to the misuse.

Appleandoranges · 28/11/2024 20:06

The thing is UK can reduce immigration if it wanted to as illegal immigration still remains a very small proportion.. The fact is though care homes, farms, hospitals and universities need migrants and that is why net migration is so high. It will continue to increase due to reducing birth rates and the ageing population. People can get irate. But those are the facts. In fact all European countries will have increasing net migration over the next few decades unless the fall in birth rates is reversed. It's an irony that those who voted Brexit increased immigration from Asia while reducing immigration from Europe, especially given that immigration from Europe is less likely to be permanent.

Feelingathomenow · 28/11/2024 20:19

poetryandwine · 28/11/2024 19:54

If you cannot return home because you are Christian or gay, you are being persecuted (possibly to a life threatening degree) because of a personal characteristic.

According to the 1951 Convention on Refugees, the UN Treaty laying out the structure of the asylum process, this is a valid reason to seek asylum. So I am not sure what you mean?

Yes and I’m sure those putting those as the reason they’re claiming asylum know this. Maybe if they are later found to not be active members of a church or in a relationship with a member of the opposite sex it would then be safe to return them to their home country? That would seem sensible

OP posts:
Wishingthingsweredifferent38 · 28/11/2024 20:28

WildCat2877 · 28/11/2024 12:53

they are putting them their until they decide if they are staying or not

They are housed in a hotel (or dispersal accommodation) once the Home Office has accepted their asylum claim, at which point they have the right to stay in the UK while a decision is being made on their case (and for any further appeals etc) so yes, they are legal

HellsBalls · 28/11/2024 20:29

ChicOP · 28/11/2024 19:37

Of course they aren't. They are largely Christian or gay which means they cannot ever return back home.

They SAY they are Christian or Gay.

poetryandwine · 28/11/2024 20:34

Feelingathomenow · 28/11/2024 20:19

Yes and I’m sure those putting those as the reason they’re claiming asylum know this. Maybe if they are later found to not be active members of a church or in a relationship with a member of the opposite sex it would then be safe to return them to their home country? That would seem sensible

You aren’t granted asylum on just your word. The bar for evidence is rather high

EasternStandard · 28/11/2024 20:35

You aren’t granted asylum on just your word. The bar for evidence is rather high

Would you say it's possible to lie and get through the system?

fedup33 · 28/11/2024 20:40

Feelingathomenow · 28/11/2024 19:03

Eh? You feeling ok?

I feel fine but anything that begins with Bring back and/or National Service isn;t going to be good.

fedup33 · 28/11/2024 20:42

ChicOP · 28/11/2024 19:37

Of course they aren't. They are largely Christian or gay which means they cannot ever return back home.

Rubbish. I could telll you stories form people that should never be heard.

Feelingathomenow · 28/11/2024 20:42

fedup33 · 28/11/2024 20:40

I feel fine but anything that begins with Bring back and/or National Service isn;t going to be good.

Why? What do you object about national service?

OP posts:
TheDisgustingBrothers · 28/11/2024 20:47

poetryandwine · 28/11/2024 20:34

You aren’t granted asylum on just your word. The bar for evidence is rather high

it’s almost as if they could lie during the approval process in order to be granted asylum and then live a totally different life when they’re here isn’t it? 🙃

quantumbutterfly · 28/11/2024 20:47

ToothHurtyAppointment · 28/11/2024 19:00

The Vikings would like a word…

Tbh they're not very chatty after a few hundred years underground.

SuzieNine · 28/11/2024 20:48

Feelingathomenow · 28/11/2024 18:58

The question arises why aren’t we training up people who aren’t working to be care workers. Maybe we should introduce some kind of national service where those not in education or work need to undertake socially useful work and get a tax free top up to their benefits

Because once you take out the short term unemployed, the students, the SAHPs, the early retirees, those who don’t need to work due to a high earning partner, those with disabilities, your pool of working age people available for work is incredibly small. And those that remain are very unlikely to be suited to care work.

Where I am we have huge cohorts of early retirees (“Down from Londons”) in their 50s and early 60s buying up local houses. Care homes and farms are universally staffed by immigrants - perhaps we should round up all the DFLs and force them to pick raspberries and wipe arses?

it’s only going to get worse - already infants schools only have half-full reception classes, meaning even fewer workers in 20 years time and meanwhile our elderly population is ballooning.

TheDisgustingBrothers · 28/11/2024 20:50

SuzieNine · 28/11/2024 20:48

Because once you take out the short term unemployed, the students, the SAHPs, the early retirees, those who don’t need to work due to a high earning partner, those with disabilities, your pool of working age people available for work is incredibly small. And those that remain are very unlikely to be suited to care work.

Where I am we have huge cohorts of early retirees (“Down from Londons”) in their 50s and early 60s buying up local houses. Care homes and farms are universally staffed by immigrants - perhaps we should round up all the DFLs and force them to pick raspberries and wipe arses?

it’s only going to get worse - already infants schools only have half-full reception classes, meaning even fewer workers in 20 years time and meanwhile our elderly population is ballooning.

So are the immigrant populations miraculously not going to age or something? Is it just native British people who get old?

poetryandwine · 28/11/2024 20:51

TheDisgustingBrothers · 28/11/2024 20:47

it’s almost as if they could lie during the approval process in order to be granted asylum and then live a totally different life when they’re here isn’t it? 🙃

No. It’s about the evidence

TheDisgustingBrothers · 28/11/2024 20:53

poetryandwine · 28/11/2024 20:51

No. It’s about the evidence

What evidence can someone provide to prove without doubt they are gay?

User135644 · 28/11/2024 20:55

Ytcsghisn · 28/11/2024 19:15

You are wrong OP. We at importing low skilled migrants to then pay for them to live. Immigrants are not net contributors. Not a controversial statement, but a true one. Migration is reducing the per capita income of every single person in this country. It is literally making people poorer individually.

To all the wide eyed faux outrage at who is going to do the jobs. How about the 10 million working age people not in work. About half of whom are being paid to sit at home and funded by the the net contributors. So net contributors are funding the welfare dependent out of work already here, and the migrants, who on average don’t enough to support themselves and their dependent when you take into account the services they use. Again not controversial, just true.

Immigration in this country is a disaster. A Ponzi scheme. Import millions of low skilled and unskilled to do low paid jobs. And them import some more millions to support them because they don’t earn enough to pay tax to be net beneficiaries.

What does this all mean? More and more people taking a share of an ever shrinking pie. Prepare to get poorer and poorer.

The higher immigration levels of got, the worse state our economy is in.

Most people would recognise we need some levels of immigration, but if high immigration was genuinely a big economic boost then this thread would be moot.

Please create an account

To comment on this thread you need to create a Mumsnet account.

This thread is not accepting new messages.