Meet the Other Phone. A phone that grows with your child.

Meet the Other Phone.
A phone that grows with your child.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

To be shocked at the net migration figures currently being discussed

1000 replies

Feelingathomenow · 28/11/2024 11:06

Yesterday’s figures discussed by the Tories stated that since 2010 the net migration figures to the UK has equalled the size of the population of Wales. Today we were told the figures to June 2023 showed a net migration figure of nearly 1 million for that year, for the year to June 2024 this had reduced to a mere 3/4 of a million. The numbers coming in of the boats per year alone is equal to a large town. AIBU to think this has to stop. We need to immediately crack down on people allowed into this country- limit it to urgently needed highly skilled jobs and start offshore processing (or similar) of the people who are here illegally (basically like many other countries).

We just can’t cope with those numbers. - no wonder our infrastructure is collapsing, we have a housing crisis etc.

I want to hear from the government how they are going to tackle it. We have heard from the Tories now it is over to Starmer.

OP posts:
Thread gallery
21
Garlicpest · 28/11/2024 17:33

I'm still laughing at the opening post. The Tories, it says, are fulminating over the increase in immigration since 2010, when the Tories took power.

Now they're demanding to know what Labour's going to about the issue the Tories created. Well, it's true that Labour's entire five years WILL be spent fixing the damage the Tories caused ... but the Tories are hardly covering themselves in glory by repeatedly highlighting this fact, are they?!

oakleaffy · 28/11/2024 17:34

Cockwomblers · 28/11/2024 17:30

Mumsnet immigration thread bingo

  • this country was build on immigration!
  • a mention of ‘Islamaphobia’
  • a story about how their child (insert other close family member) loves how ‘diverse’ their area is and has loads of friends from all over the globe and how enriching it’s been
  • anyone with an opposing view to their own is ‘right wing’
  • ”the NHS would collapse without immigration!”

Bingo!
Full 🏠 House!

NotMeNoNo · 28/11/2024 17:34

YesterdaysFuture · 28/11/2024 17:25

There are 11 million people of working age not in employment, perhaps look at those working before stating we need migrant labour?

Yes, many of those are ill so they are literally relying on migrants to staff the NHS and get them their operations. Others are carers so they would need to employ childcare or social carers so no net gain. Plus students.

RafaistheKingofClay · 28/11/2024 17:34

TheDisgustingBrothers · 28/11/2024 17:27

Not the cause? I’m confused how an increase of 906,000 people in this country wouldn’t have an impact on our infrastructure (housing, traffic, NHS etc) - can you explain?

The government stopped building the houses it needed to maintain stock. This had the advantage of meaning demand outstripped supply and caused prices to rise, making home owners asset rich but putting housing out of the reach of many more people. Then they blamed it on immigrants so you wouldn’t blame it on them.

The government always have a handy enemy for you to blame for their errors, first it was the EU, and EU immigration, now its other migrants. If they ever manage to lower net migration figures to any sort of low level it’ll be someone else. However, this is unlikely to happen.

inamarina · 28/11/2024 17:35

IAmNotAMorningPerson · 28/11/2024 15:54

Hysteria about imaginary lines on maps and dividing human beings into imaginary tribes, while the Earth burns and we destroy our own habitat.

What an utterly stupid species we are.

If there were no „imaginary lines“ and anyone could move anywhere anytime, do you think something like a welfare state would exist?
How would that work?

TheDisgustingBrothers · 28/11/2024 17:37

poetryandwine · 28/11/2024 17:31

This is false. The 1951 Convention on the Status of Refugees, the UN Treaty governing the behaviour of those seeking and granting refugee status, imposes no requirement to seek asylum in the first country you come to.

OTOH the Dublin Agreement does provide an orderly process for deciding where in the EU someone wishing to make an asylum claim there should do it. If only the UK had not left the EU, we would be subject to the DA.

Oddly enough many who are most opposed to immigration, especially irregular immigration, seem to have voted for Brexit.

but why do you think they don’t want to? Not goady, just interested in your personal opinion as to why you think persecuted people, fleeing terrible situations might want to travel through multiple safe countries and not stop in a single one of them?

YesterdaysFuture · 28/11/2024 17:38

Alicecatto · 28/11/2024 15:51

Why were Ukranians welcomed, but Afghanis not? Couldn't we have argued that they all should stay there and fight and sort themselves out? Of course not.

I don't think any of use who have not been in a Taliban like government or a war zone can blithely say...oh, something for you lot to sort out.

We can agree to disagree about that.

Afghans were welcomed. There was a scheme in place where councils had to take them in and then house them out of their budget. They were housed in hotels and council owned property.

When the Ukraine war started there literally wasn't any space for Ukrainians as the accommodation was already used for Afghans, so the home a Ukrainian scheme was set up instead.

alienpilotingaboeing · 28/11/2024 17:38

Cockwomblers · 28/11/2024 17:30

Mumsnet immigration thread bingo

  • this country was build on immigration!
  • a mention of ‘Islamaphobia’
  • a story about how their child (insert other close family member) loves how ‘diverse’ their area is and has loads of friends from all over the globe and how enriching it’s been
  • anyone with an opposing view to their own is ‘right wing’
  • ”the NHS would collapse without immigration!”

Also 'what about Brits in Magaluf' - that is also bad, and if the Spanish government wanted to stop immigration from the UK, that would be their prerogative!

RafaistheKingofClay · 28/11/2024 17:39

Garlicpest · 28/11/2024 17:33

I'm still laughing at the opening post. The Tories, it says, are fulminating over the increase in immigration since 2010, when the Tories took power.

Now they're demanding to know what Labour's going to about the issue the Tories created. Well, it's true that Labour's entire five years WILL be spent fixing the damage the Tories caused ... but the Tories are hardly covering themselves in glory by repeatedly highlighting this fact, are they?!

Also, Labour have said what they are going to do about lots of the issues, so people could just read about it if they were actually bothered. I’d imagine advertising the number of people that have been processed and removed under the Labour government might be a bit embarrassing for the Tories.

Always worth bearing in mind that the U.K. doesn’t have a particularity good system for tracking people leaving the country. I think the last government had to admit that with the asylum seekers they’d lost track of they weren’t sure how many were actually still in the country.

TheDisgustingBrothers · 28/11/2024 17:39

RafaistheKingofClay · 28/11/2024 17:34

The government stopped building the houses it needed to maintain stock. This had the advantage of meaning demand outstripped supply and caused prices to rise, making home owners asset rich but putting housing out of the reach of many more people. Then they blamed it on immigrants so you wouldn’t blame it on them.

The government always have a handy enemy for you to blame for their errors, first it was the EU, and EU immigration, now its other migrants. If they ever manage to lower net migration figures to any sort of low level it’ll be someone else. However, this is unlikely to happen.

You’ve totally danced round my question. I’ll ask again in a more simple way: do you think that an increase in population of 906,000 people would have an impact on our infrastructure?

ismu · 28/11/2024 17:40

I haven't read the full thread but a huge number of people have been resettled from Hong Kong over the past few years due to an open door policy for anyone who disagreed with Chinese rule.

Feelingathomenow · 28/11/2024 17:41

MoMhathair · 28/11/2024 17:02

Ok, specifically Irish people, for the sake of argument.

Which migration of Irish people? Are we talking the potato famine?

OP posts:
Bignanna · 28/11/2024 17:42

Eraserbread · 28/11/2024 13:17

The vast majority come to work.

How can you know that?

CandlesOrangesRedribbon · 28/11/2024 17:42

How can we still need low paid workers when so many people are coming here?

Surley what we are asking for is not right.
To live somewhere like Australia you have a very strict entry system and requirements

ContactNightmare · 28/11/2024 17:43

Tbh I would actually rather that the jobs market, universities, training, access to support was strongly limited to UK citizens. We have left the EU, we aren’t bound to a requirement to have equal treatment in migration, but we have to do something to favour our own people. We have lost our social contract with each other. We built this country after the war with a welfare state and common resources. Countries are not just about economics. They are about functioning societies.

Mass migration is a disaster on the scale announced today without massive social investment. This country cannot take in a million people in a year and have several million in benefits. This is a social disaster waiting to happen - we’ve had some riots that tell us just what it might look like.

ForRealTurtle · 28/11/2024 17:44

Limit international students and university fees will have to rise significantly.

louddumpernoise · 28/11/2024 17:44

ismu · 28/11/2024 17:40

I haven't read the full thread but a huge number of people have been resettled from Hong Kong over the past few years due to an open door policy for anyone who disagreed with Chinese rule.

No ... it is an open door for policy for anyone of 5m people, whether they are against Chinese rule or whole heartedly support Chinese rule.

Utter madness.

lollypopsforme · 28/11/2024 17:44

Cockwomblers · 28/11/2024 17:26

not the sort of men you’d want if you value your freedoms I presume.

It really does not bother me.

Cockwomblers · 28/11/2024 17:44

lollypopsforme · 28/11/2024 17:44

It really does not bother me.

It should bother anyone who is a feminist.

RafaistheKingofClay · 28/11/2024 17:45

YesterdaysFuture · 28/11/2024 17:38

Afghans were welcomed. There was a scheme in place where councils had to take them in and then house them out of their budget. They were housed in hotels and council owned property.

When the Ukraine war started there literally wasn't any space for Ukrainians as the accommodation was already used for Afghans, so the home a Ukrainian scheme was set up instead.

Hmm lots of Afghans ended up having to come over in small boats and claim asylum. They system for claiming asylum here, even those that worked for us, is widely regarded as having been a shambles.

Pretty sure the home a Ukranian thing was set up so we didn’t have to grant Ukranian refugees asylum status. Mind you, we’d probably given up processing asylum seekers by that point and just decided putting them up in hotels for eternity was a better option.

BefuddledCrumble · 28/11/2024 17:45

ismu · 28/11/2024 17:40

I haven't read the full thread but a huge number of people have been resettled from Hong Kong over the past few years due to an open door policy for anyone who disagreed with Chinese rule.

This is probably going to be quite unpopular to say but... immigrants from certain cultures/countries are more beneficial than others.

Check out the UK crime statistics. The immigrants from Hong Kong on the whole are very beneficial members of society, they aren't committing crime at a higher rate than the native population.

Compare that to Albanians...

ContactNightmare · 28/11/2024 17:46

ForRealTurtle · 28/11/2024 17:44

Limit international students and university fees will have to rise significantly.

They should pay a lot more and subsidise our best people. The UK needs homegrown talent.

Abcxyz123user · 28/11/2024 17:46

Zimunya · 28/11/2024 17:31

DH basically pays for healthcare three times:
1st time - paying the NHS surcharge upfront when he applied for his visa
2nd time - his monthly NI contributions
3rd time - private medical insurance insurance that he pays as it’s the only way to see a doctor here.

I believe women on dependent visas also have to pay the NHS surcharge in advance of receiving their dependant visas.

There is a huge cost to all of this indeed!

I paid NHS surcharge when I came to the country and on my visa 'no resource to public funds' was stated but I was allowed to use NHS. Your husband can use NHS services.

UK unfortunately don't have any natural resources like Norway, nor it has landmass of USA, so it is understandable why British people are worried. Government needs to come up with a plan to come to an optimal number of immigrants. Even from immigrants' point of view, it is not possible to sustain good quality of living with these numbers.

ForRealTurtle · 28/11/2024 17:46

Cockwomblers · 28/11/2024 17:44

It should bother anyone who is a feminist.

Stop being racist.

Cockwomblers · 28/11/2024 17:47

ForRealTurtle · 28/11/2024 17:46

Stop being racist.

Explain how that’s racist, please?

Please create an account

To comment on this thread you need to create a Mumsnet account.

This thread is not accepting new messages.