Meet the Other Phone. Protection built in.

Meet the Other Phone.
Protection built in.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

To be shocked at the net migration figures currently being discussed

1000 replies

Feelingathomenow · 28/11/2024 11:06

Yesterday’s figures discussed by the Tories stated that since 2010 the net migration figures to the UK has equalled the size of the population of Wales. Today we were told the figures to June 2023 showed a net migration figure of nearly 1 million for that year, for the year to June 2024 this had reduced to a mere 3/4 of a million. The numbers coming in of the boats per year alone is equal to a large town. AIBU to think this has to stop. We need to immediately crack down on people allowed into this country- limit it to urgently needed highly skilled jobs and start offshore processing (or similar) of the people who are here illegally (basically like many other countries).

We just can’t cope with those numbers. - no wonder our infrastructure is collapsing, we have a housing crisis etc.

I want to hear from the government how they are going to tackle it. We have heard from the Tories now it is over to Starmer.

OP posts:
Thread gallery
21
TENSsion · 28/11/2024 16:56

I think the issue here is that many middle class people are completely cushioned from the negative impact of uncontrolled immigration. This means they’re able to sneer and feel morally superior to those who are impacted and don’t have the financial means to escape it.

Littlemissgobby · 28/11/2024 16:57

@MauveCrow I bet you voted tory because yes they should be paid more but capitalism baby. Social care should never have been privatised but it was agencies charge say 31 an hour poor carer gets 12 an hour maybe a bit of fuel if lucky. So who rakes in all the other profits from that then? Theee businesses don't pay enough the gov doesn't fund enough it's all a mess. There in my experience are many good care workers that are british but it's crying for more and inhavd now got two ladies from Pakistan who seem very nice so yes immigration is needed

cardibach · 28/11/2024 16:57

1dayatatime · 28/11/2024 16:33

@cardibach

"Claiming asylum isn’t illegal. "

True but entering the UK without leave (a passport or equivalent) is illegal under section 24 (B1) of the Immigration Act 1971 which states that person who a) requires leave to enter the United Kingdom and, b) knowingly enters the UK without such leave, commits an offence.

The Illegal Immigration Act which is itself illegal you mean?
International law says you can enter a country by any means if your intention is to claim asylum and you do so as soon as practicable. Which makes perfect sense if you think about the situation of asylum seekers for more than a millisecond.

Feelingathomenow · 28/11/2024 16:57

ForRealTurtle · 28/11/2024 16:54

YABVU. It is not people coming in on boats, they are a tiny number. It is people flying in from places like Hong Kong and settling legally. The policy to allow people from Hong Kong to emigrate easily to the UK was publicised in the press. If you did not want it to happen you should have kicked up a fuss then.

Oh believe me, having lived in an area where there were many people coming from Hong Kong I did point this out. It totally changed the nature of the area.

OP posts:
Fletchasketch · 28/11/2024 16:58

Havanananana · 28/11/2024 16:53

Perhaps not Vikings and Romans, but modern England was indeed "founded" by the Normans (who were at the time perhaps described as being "bloody forrins crossing the Channel in their small boats and stealing our land and jobs and our women ...) and much of the current land ownership and aristocracy can be traced back to 1066 and all that.

No other modern democracy still has unelected lawmakers in the form of Peers and religious figureheads - a situation that has existed since 1215, i.e. only 150 years after the Norman conquest and that was brought about by the noblemen who were all descended from Norman knights who had been given land by William - land that was taken by force from the original owners and given to William's followers and to the Church.

There is an excellent Stewart Lee sketch along these lines. A lot of the anti-immigration posters on this thread would do well to watch it.

cardibach · 28/11/2024 16:58

TENSsion · 28/11/2024 16:56

I think the issue here is that many middle class people are completely cushioned from the negative impact of uncontrolled immigration. This means they’re able to sneer and feel morally superior to those who are impacted and don’t have the financial means to escape it.

It’s not uncontrolled.
Many migrants are students etc and probably middle class themselves.
I live in an area with a lot of asylum seekers. Not an issue.

Littlemissgobby · 28/11/2024 16:59

TENSsion · 28/11/2024 16:56

I think the issue here is that many middle class people are completely cushioned from the negative impact of uncontrolled immigration. This means they’re able to sneer and feel morally superior to those who are impacted and don’t have the financial means to escape it.

I am working class live in dewsbury yet I have no big issues i find many working classes that hate immigration tend to live in small towns that are very much white actually. Yes many do feel like you do in my area but I also know many that don't even have immigrants near them

Username056 · 28/11/2024 16:59

Zimunya · 28/11/2024 16:49

This is ALREADY the case. DH is a (legal) immigrant, and his visa clearly states "No access to public funds." That means he can't claim SSP, unemployment benefit, or any other benefits / public funds. As a part of his visa application he had to pay an NHS surcharge (approximately £3,ooo). He works in a highly skilled position in construction. He pays tax and NI and everything else he is supposed to pay. He is a net contributor. I think all of this is quite correct (as does he) but I'm really surprised that so many people are unaware of the no access to public funds rule. No wonder there's such bad feeling towards legal migration on here.

Yes this is the case for legal migrants. I think if you come as an asylum seeker whilst you may have “no recourse to public funds” you will have the same access to the NHS as a citizen. And I believe women here on their husband’s visa with “no recourse to public funds” will still receive full maternity care including health visitor visits etc. There is a huge cost to all this. If you go as a “trailing spouse” to most other countries, the working spouse would need to pay private family medical cover, or their employer would.

ForRealTurtle · 28/11/2024 17:00

@PlopSofa You are wrong. No one cared about migration until housing got to expensive and living standards went to shit.
Except migration is not the cause.

Hunglikeapolevaulter · 28/11/2024 17:00

Many migrants are students etc and probably middle class themselves.

There's certainly the wealthy students attending the major universities, but there is also a huge market in "student visas" for dubious tertiary educational institutions. It's a huge loophole.

dogmandu · 28/11/2024 17:00

@MoMhathair
So what if men are put up in hotels while their claim is being processed? What do you suggest?
You've hit the nail on the head. Some of them come from a culture that does not respect women or treat them as equals so consequently many women are fearful of them.
This is an important issue and one hat isn't treated with the importance it deserves.

Feelingathomenow · 28/11/2024 17:00

MoMhathair · 28/11/2024 16:46

What the difference is between the many millions of people who came to Britain over the past couple of thousand years - the people who created the current population of Britain - and the people who are coming here now, i.e. what you perceive to be the difference between migration and immigration. To me the difference is just a small semantic one - immigration means going into a country, migration can mean going in or out, but you seem to see some other difference that I don't.

Who are we talking about specifically, each group of people and their movement will be different

OP posts:
LBFseBrom · 28/11/2024 17:01

ExtraOnions · 28/11/2024 12:17

…so who is going to do the “low skills” jobs that have been filled by migrant labour? Fruit Picking, Factory work, Hospitality etc? (Apologies for the term “low skilled”). Do you have people in your immediate circle who would do these jobs.

You are never going to stop people coming over, we are a nation built in immigration. When it comes to illegal immigration, or asylum seekers etc, we need more staff to process claims.

We have an ageing demographic and need young people.. we should be encouraging them over to make their homes here

I agree - and I would not believe everything in the Telegraph by any means.

PandoraSox · 28/11/2024 17:01

Doijb · 28/11/2024 16:39

We’re a bloody island. The mishandling is shocking.

I feel for anyone seeking a better quality of living but this country is on its knees.

Go look at our state run care homes, you will be appalled. MANY of the men and women who paid into the system are downright being neglected. If not worse.

Go look at our state run care homes, you will be appalled. MANY of the men and women who paid into the system are downright being neglected

And how is that the fault of immigrants?

Naunet · 28/11/2024 17:01

Havanananana · 28/11/2024 16:53

Perhaps not Vikings and Romans, but modern England was indeed "founded" by the Normans (who were at the time perhaps described as being "bloody forrins crossing the Channel in their small boats and stealing our land and jobs and our women ...) and much of the current land ownership and aristocracy can be traced back to 1066 and all that.

No other modern democracy still has unelected lawmakers in the form of Peers and religious figureheads - a situation that has existed since 1215, i.e. only 150 years after the Norman conquest and that was brought about by the noblemen who were all descended from Norman knights who had been given land by William - land that was taken by force from the original owners and given to William's followers and to the Church.

That would be colonisation/invasion, not founding a country.

ForRealTurtle · 28/11/2024 17:01

Bloody hell, so many people talking absolute rubbish on this thread. I despair.

sparklyfox · 28/11/2024 17:02

Always interesting to see the disparity between the poll and the comments on threads like this.

EssexMan55 · 28/11/2024 17:02

MauveCrow · 28/11/2024 13:01

Who will do the shitty jobs??

I'm sure slave owners asked the same thing. How everyone applauds this inverse racist shite astounds me, but it's usually normal that left wingers turn out to be the real racists.

Why don't we make sure the there are no shitty jobs, either through higher renumeration or better working conditions or preferably both.

The economy will not collapse without a million Uber eats drivers entering the country each year.

It only takes one simple change to policy to fix all this. No access to the NHS, benefits system, education or social housing for 5 years after arrival, unless you pay up front. Anyone self sufficient will stay, the spongers will leave.

Thats already the case. You have to pay a fortune in NHS surcharges to get a visa nowadays. And you can't claim any benefits either when on a visa.

MoMhathair · 28/11/2024 17:02

Feelingathomenow · 28/11/2024 17:00

Who are we talking about specifically, each group of people and their movement will be different

Ok, specifically Irish people, for the sake of argument.

drspouse · 28/11/2024 17:03

Feelingathomenow · 28/11/2024 16:54

Maybe they should have left with their female relatives and claimed asylum in one of the many safe countries they went through in order to reach the beaches of France to get on the dangerous boats

The ones who speak a language other than English, and who don't have family/connections in the UK, generally do.

EssexMan55 · 28/11/2024 17:03

Username056 · 28/11/2024 16:59

Yes this is the case for legal migrants. I think if you come as an asylum seeker whilst you may have “no recourse to public funds” you will have the same access to the NHS as a citizen. And I believe women here on their husband’s visa with “no recourse to public funds” will still receive full maternity care including health visitor visits etc. There is a huge cost to all this. If you go as a “trailing spouse” to most other countries, the working spouse would need to pay private family medical cover, or their employer would.

the spouse has to pay an NHS surcharge which is comparable to the cost of private health cover.

NotMeNoNo · 28/11/2024 17:04

Migrants would not come here if there wasn't a commercial or social driver. The NHS and UK universities actively recruit from overseas, the NHS because it needs the workers and universities for the fees. We are an ageing population with a falling birth rate so that is only going to be balanced by younger working-age immigrants to look after, house, transport and feed us all. I should be more worried if we didn't have as many immigrants as that would leave some sectors badly understaffed. They pay tax and contribute to the economy.

Havanananana · 28/11/2024 17:09

@louddumpernoise But why do we need so many now? has the country aged dramatically in the last 4 years???

Yes. This is exactly what has happened, although it has happened over the last two decades rather than just the last 4 years. The median age in the UK passed 40 years old in 2021/22 - in 1980 the median age was 33, and in 2000 it was 36.

The baby boomers have reached retirement age, so not only did they leave the employment market, but as they got older, they also needed more social and health care. Some of the numbers produced around the time of the Brexit referendum highlighted the issue. The average age of British lorry drivers was well over 50, so when the EU drivers left and the British drivers retired, there were shortages of drivers. Over a third of nurses, mainly those who trained in the UK in the 1970s, were over the age of 50 and therefore due to retire in 2010s and early 2020s.

BagsofPopcorn · 28/11/2024 17:09

I am a second generation immigrant. My parents came here in the 50s to work in the NHS and were subjected to all kinds of abuse. I work in the NHS. My DH is a first generation immigrant and also works in the NHS, which is how we met. Many of our friends are immigrants (first and second generation) working in the NHS. Indeed I have no idea how the NHS would function without people like our friends and colleagues. However, every single one of the first generation had to go through an extended application process before they got here, even the ones that were extricating themselves from difficult countries and frightening situations.
It just seems to be such a muddle now and the boat situation is horrific.
BUT, I live in an area with lots of money laundering establishments and dodgy dealing going on and the individuals involved in that seem to be coming from a supposedly safe country, so I don't know how that works.

BedatNine · 28/11/2024 17:09

LivingLaVidaBabyShower · 28/11/2024 13:39

Agree thee is wild gov mismanagement but disagree there is “enough for all”

In 22 53.8% of uk population were net recipients (not net contributors) this was 55% in 21

These are truly depressing stats and I don’t think it’s sustainable however you want to cut it

Does this figure include people under 20 and over 60? So those you wouldn't expect to be contributing? If so it seems reasonable, we probably work for around half our lives
Figures can be very misleading out of context.

Please create an account

To comment on this thread you need to create a Mumsnet account.

This thread is not accepting new messages.