Meet the Other Phone. Flexible and made to last.

Meet the Other Phone.
Flexible and made to last.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

What do you think of Australia's vaccine policy?

603 replies

rampy · 25/11/2024 23:19

I'm born and bred Aussie. We live in WA and kids here can't go to kindy or school
without having been vaccinated. I have a couple of British friends who were so offended that they needed to vaccinate their kids they home schooled because 'well we'll just go back to the uk' but they've stayed and now need to get their kids vaccinated because they have no friends their own age and can't go to school without vaccines.

You can't apply for child related benefits if your kid isn't vaccinated either here.

Having seen NZ have just declared a whooping cough epidemic Id say I agree with WA stance I'm honest!

OP posts:
Thread gallery
13
IKEAJesus · 26/11/2024 14:52

So far, their kids have never caught anything that they'd have been vaccinated against

That is probably because other kids have been vaccinated so they’re benefiting from herd immunity. Which is only a thing if enough people get vaccinated in the first place…

meditrina · 26/11/2024 14:54

Notmoog · 26/11/2024 14:46

yes of course.
The cell lines are still going and still used

Yes, for rubella, chicken pox and hep A vaccines. It's used as the growth medium for the virus strain. It is not contained in the final product at all.

The cells were taken originally from a foetus aborted for medical reasons in 1966.

The Vatican has made a ruling, which essentially says it deplores their use, and urges scientists to find alternatives so that human cells are not used in this way. But that it does not object to Roman Catholics receiving the jab, because it does not believe the harm that would accrue to women and children from not vaccinating is justified, not least as it would not right the wrong and would only increase human suffering.

I don't know if any other religions or denominations have issued a policy on this aspect.

Notmoog · 26/11/2024 14:55

meditrina · 26/11/2024 14:54

Yes, for rubella, chicken pox and hep A vaccines. It's used as the growth medium for the virus strain. It is not contained in the final product at all.

The cells were taken originally from a foetus aborted for medical reasons in 1966.

The Vatican has made a ruling, which essentially says it deplores their use, and urges scientists to find alternatives so that human cells are not used in this way. But that it does not object to Roman Catholics receiving the jab, because it does not believe the harm that would accrue to women and children from not vaccinating is justified, not least as it would not right the wrong and would only increase human suffering.

I don't know if any other religions or denominations have issued a policy on this aspect.

no idea TBh but I can understand why a lot of people object to its use at all and don't want to have that product

Phonomnomnom · 26/11/2024 15:01

Notmoog · 26/11/2024 14:39

"Yet it only seems to be vaccinations that get people incensed about their ‘freedom’."

and why do you think people get so incensed about mandatory vaccines?
It's really not difficult.
I'll give you a clue: vaccines involve injecting a substance into your body that you personally think will do your harm- in the case of covid vaccines that was borne out for unprecedented numbers of people.
Now, carry on with a little think about why that is different to having to have a driving license etc,

But vaccinations aren’t mandatory. They are required as part of the entry conditions for certain places. Don’t want a vaccine? Ok, don’t have it, but your freedom to choose is paralleled with society’s freedom to exclude you from full participation.

Also, I’d love to see your evidence for the Covid vaccination. From what I’ve read (albeit a while ago now), despite the extraordinary numbers of people given them, the serious side effects were remarkably low. But if you have some evidence to refute this, please do share.

You personally ‘believing’ it will do you harm isn’t relevant - belief doesn’t trump science. You are free to practice your beliefs - society is free to structure itself to protect others from those beliefs.

Notmoog · 26/11/2024 15:03

Phonomnomnom · 26/11/2024 15:01

But vaccinations aren’t mandatory. They are required as part of the entry conditions for certain places. Don’t want a vaccine? Ok, don’t have it, but your freedom to choose is paralleled with society’s freedom to exclude you from full participation.

Also, I’d love to see your evidence for the Covid vaccination. From what I’ve read (albeit a while ago now), despite the extraordinary numbers of people given them, the serious side effects were remarkably low. But if you have some evidence to refute this, please do share.

You personally ‘believing’ it will do you harm isn’t relevant - belief doesn’t trump science. You are free to practice your beliefs - society is free to structure itself to protect others from those beliefs.

this is all very 2020!

I'm not engaging further with someone who disregards fundamental human rights so readily.

Phonomnomnom · 26/11/2024 15:03

Mirabai · 26/11/2024 13:50

And what happens when, “for the betterment of collective living”, abortions are banned or mandated; or a one child policy is implemented. Would you be so breathily naive then?

Edited

If there was robust scientific evidence that supported either of those policies, I would likely support them myself and use my vote accordingly.

As there isn’t, and as we currently we live in a democracy, I’m not so concerned.

There is nothing naive about my stance - it is well researched (with appropriate educational background to evaluate source material). HTH.

Notmoog · 26/11/2024 15:05

Phonomnomnom · 26/11/2024 15:03

If there was robust scientific evidence that supported either of those policies, I would likely support them myself and use my vote accordingly.

As there isn’t, and as we currently we live in a democracy, I’m not so concerned.

There is nothing naive about my stance - it is well researched (with appropriate educational background to evaluate source material). HTH.

nope, that's naiive ( and deffo no further comment to you until you form a slightly more sophisticated view of consent, human rights etc.)

Bloom15 · 26/11/2024 15:08

I'm in the UK and wish we did this

Gogogo12345 · 26/11/2024 15:09

PomPomtheGreat · 26/11/2024 00:11

I'm in Australia, and it's not mandatory in practice. Parents can opt out. But I think it's like our voting here being mandatory unless you want to pay a small fine - it concentrates minds and makes parents realise how out of step they are with everyone else when they refuse to vaccinate their children.

My daughter was at high school with the daughter of anti-vaxxers. The girl missed more than half a year of high school with a severe and recurring case of whooping cough. None of her vaccinated friends got it.

Hospitals also expect any visitors for newborn babies to be up to date on their whooping cough. We have a grandchild due in a few weeks and have all just been for our boosters.

Where did she get it from if everyone else was vaccinated??

Btw I had both whooping cough and measles as a child , - vaccinated for both. My DD1 has mmr jab when about a year. No rubella immunity in first pregnancy, another MMR after giving birth. 2 nd baby no rubella immunity, another MMR. 3 rd baby guess what - no immunity. The vaccines don't always work

Narkacist · 26/11/2024 15:11

Annabmt · 26/11/2024 00:09

I am in process of getting a nursing degree, some of them are useful, others can be extremely harmful

Why would you get a degree to work in evidence-based medicine if you don't believe in it? Why not learn reiki or something instead?

Mirabai · 26/11/2024 15:14

Narkacist · 26/11/2024 15:11

Why would you get a degree to work in evidence-based medicine if you don't believe in it? Why not learn reiki or something instead?

Evidence-based medicine is not a belief system.

sharpclawedkitten · 26/11/2024 15:18

If your vaccine works, how exactly are you being 'put at risk' by those choosing not to have it? You're personally protected from your own vaccine, no

Yes. But there is a surprising number of immune-suppressed people as we found out during covid. For them vaccines may not work, so they really do need herd immunity. And unlike the covid vaccine, most vaccines work to prevent the illness altogether, rather than just making it milder, so people who can't have the vaccine are protected.

Narkacist · 26/11/2024 15:19

Mirabai · 26/11/2024 15:14

Evidence-based medicine is not a belief system.

Neither is climate change, for example, but some people claim not to believe in that.
What I really wanted to say was 'if you don't understand it' but that doesn't sound very polite.

sharpclawedkitten · 26/11/2024 15:20

wisbech · 26/11/2024 12:13

Fairly simple - the government of the time sets rules around it. Not sure how else you expect a mandate to work? I mean, seat belts and airbags carry risks too, but they have been mandated.

I was in WA for COVID. They never made vaccination mandatory, but did make it so you couldn't buy alcohol without showing your certificate. Given the relationship of sand gropers to their beer, vaccination rates shot up...

Who knew that covid was more likely to get you if you drank alcohol. Now that really is/was a stupid policy without any scientific foundation...

Phonomnomnom · 26/11/2024 15:20

Jumpingthruhoops · 26/11/2024 14:33

Smallpox was already on its way out by the time the vaccine was introduced, hence its success.

I know about all of the above. However, it's still about weighing up the risk/benefit of having a jab for each 'specific individual'.

Yes, people in society ARE vulnerable, so those people specifically should take any necessary precautions.
It's not up to individuals who aren't currently vulnerable to make themselves potentially vulnerable (by way of a vaccine injury) to protect those people.

As hard as it is, that's just not life.

Where are you getting that nonsense from re smallpox?

Vaccination reduced prevalence and surveillance & containment was the thing that led to eradication. Of course improved sanitation and living conditions played a part, but if it was just that, then why haven’t all infectious diseases been eradicated?

There are 2 ways to mitigate infection risk for vulnerable individuals:

  1. Remove vulnerable individuals from society to avoid potential infection
  2. reduce prevalence of diseases in society through vaccination (and in serious outbreaks, isolate cases as a ‘firebreak’)

The former requires someone to be removed from society because of something they can’t help (being vulnerable), so the latter is preferable and adopted - but for it to work, people are asked to collectively protect each other.

Anyone is free to opt of their collective responsibility, but that comes with varying restrictions to them - could be travel restrictions (eg yellow fever, Covid at the time etc) or restrictions on shared spaces (eg restaurants during Covid, schools, nurseries) or restricted access to the benefits of society (eg tax reliefs / benefits payments).

I know you’d like to have it both ways, being both selfish in ignoring your collective responsibility AND grabbing what society has to offer at the same time, but thankfully you can’t - at least in Australia - hopefully here soon, too.

Phonomnomnom · 26/11/2024 15:24

Notmoog · 26/11/2024 15:03

this is all very 2020!

I'm not engaging further with someone who disregards fundamental human rights so readily.

No one is denying you the right to body autonomy - your human rights are not being disregarded.

What you want is to have it both ways - engage in society when it suits you, but not hold any collective responsibility.

I’m happy not to continue engaging in someone so fundamentally selfish.

Phonomnomnom · 26/11/2024 15:26

Notmoog · 26/11/2024 15:05

nope, that's naiive ( and deffo no further comment to you until you form a slightly more sophisticated view of consent, human rights etc.)

Oh no! Whatever will I do?

Holly20000 · 26/11/2024 15:28

UhhhhhhhOK · 25/11/2024 23:23

You have to show vaccinations for uk schools as well. Each to their own.

Edited

This is not true.

Mirabai · 26/11/2024 15:29

Narkacist · 26/11/2024 15:19

Neither is climate change, for example, but some people claim not to believe in that.
What I really wanted to say was 'if you don't understand it' but that doesn't sound very polite.

You’re the only one who made claims about beliefs.

Concern about adjuvants does not mean the poster does not understand vaccination.

ByGentleFatball · 26/11/2024 15:33

See my problem is that I am pro vaccine and I'd like everyone who can vaccinate to do so. The problem with enforcing it through social consequences is that there may be other things that are recommended which I won't take up for one reason or the other. I don't want everything recommended by science to be enforced on me.

For instance, I'm eligible for the flu jab, but I have it every other year because I got really unwell after having three on the trot, and then the fourth year I was ill too. I wouldn't want to face consequences for that. I also delayed the vaccines of one of my children because she was ill for about 6 weeks and I wanted her to be fully well before the vaccine. She had it before she started nursery but after the recommended window.

CharlotteRumpling · 26/11/2024 15:36

ByGentleFatball · 26/11/2024 15:33

See my problem is that I am pro vaccine and I'd like everyone who can vaccinate to do so. The problem with enforcing it through social consequences is that there may be other things that are recommended which I won't take up for one reason or the other. I don't want everything recommended by science to be enforced on me.

For instance, I'm eligible for the flu jab, but I have it every other year because I got really unwell after having three on the trot, and then the fourth year I was ill too. I wouldn't want to face consequences for that. I also delayed the vaccines of one of my children because she was ill for about 6 weeks and I wanted her to be fully well before the vaccine. She had it before she started nursery but after the recommended window.

You would fall under medical exemptions.
Immigtants to the UK are required to have the TB vax and TB xrays. I bet no one is fussing about their bodily autonomy.

ByGentleFatball · 26/11/2024 15:36

I think it could be a slippery slope and then before we know it, we are forced into having smear tests in case of HPV even though we know we aren't at high risk of related cervical cancer or even transmitting the disease.

I have smears because I'm at risk. If my risk was very low, partly because I wasn't sexually active, I wouldn't put myself through it without symptoms.

Smout · 26/11/2024 15:41

I am from the first generation to have the polio vaccine. The village I lived in had an outbreak before the rollout reached us and we were immunised as a matter of urgency. Possibly because the damage done by polio was visibly affecting friends and family, there were no anti- vaxxers. I was in very real danger of contracting polio as children I played and went to school with fell ill. I am eternally grateful that I was protected.
The eradication of polio has been very close for some time but seems impossible to achieve because of vaccine refusers who not only put themselves at risk ( their choice) but also those who are unable to be vaccinated for whatever reason.

Phonomnomnom · 26/11/2024 15:43

ByGentleFatball · 26/11/2024 15:36

I think it could be a slippery slope and then before we know it, we are forced into having smear tests in case of HPV even though we know we aren't at high risk of related cervical cancer or even transmitting the disease.

I have smears because I'm at risk. If my risk was very low, partly because I wasn't sexually active, I wouldn't put myself through it without symptoms.

HPV doesn’t have to be present for cervical cancer to arise, so really, everyone should be checked, whether or not they test positive for HPV. But financial constraints mean the NHS doesn’t check cells anymore. Don’t get me started on having to wait until 50 for mammograms…

Swipe left for the next trending thread