Meet the Other Phone. Flexible and made to last.

Meet the Other Phone.
Flexible and made to last.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

White Saviour

188 replies

username8348 · 25/11/2024 06:32

Ed Sheeran has said that he wouldn't participate in a rerecording of Do they Know it's Christmas which was first released in the 80s to raise money for a famine in Africa.

The single and other similar endeavours have been criticised as portraying a negative view of Africa and belying a White Saviour complex.

Some critics have said that Africa is capable of dealing with its own problems and such sentiments mean it loses business and investment:

While they may generate sympathy and donations, they perpetuate damaging stereotypes that stifle Africa’s economic growth, tourism and investment, ultimately costing the continent trillions and destroying its dignity, pride and identity - Fuse ODG

Do they know it's Christmas was last rereleased to raise money for ebola. Geldof has denied the claims saying that they're bollocks and the money has achieved a lot.

Western countries give a lot of aid to African nations, is it time to stop that aid? Many countries are feeling the pinch and could plough the money into their own nations.

AIBU to believe that we should stop playing the White Saviour and as advised, let Africa deal with its own problems?

OP posts:
Pudmyboy · 25/11/2024 22:05

Sethera · 25/11/2024 08:27

When the single was first released in 1984, there were no easy ways for the average person, especially young people, to donate to charities. It would involve queuing in a bank or post office to pay money into a published account number; sending off a cheque/postal order in the mail, or happening on someone with a collection bucket or some other local fundraising initiative.

Buying a record was an easy way to give - singles were sold in many high street shops, including places you might be going for other things, such as Boots and Woolworths. It was a good idea to raise money. Everyone had seen footage of starving children on the TV news, and most people wanted to 'do something', so this was a way of doing it. The project was pulled together at very short notice, involving the music A-listers of the day, in an era when they couldn't contribute their performance remotely.

But - we live in a very different world now, where anyone can donate money to any cause at the touch of an app in their living room. The legacy of the original song will live on as it's established as a classic Christmas hit (rightly or wrongly). The lyrics, though well-meant, are now seen for what they are - hastily written and thoughtless in their lumping together the whole continent of Africa. So, I don't think there's a place for repeated iterations of the song - time to say, it did its job well in the 1980s, let it retire now.

Oh I absolutely agree!
It is and always has been, a crap song, written quickly, recorded quickly to get it out to raise money. It is in no way a good song aside from the fundraising aspect.
I would be so happy to never hear it again.
Plus it is sad and frustrating that the money raised does not reach the intended recipient.

Gonegurl · 25/11/2024 22:10

Pudmyboy · 25/11/2024 22:05

Oh I absolutely agree!
It is and always has been, a crap song, written quickly, recorded quickly to get it out to raise money. It is in no way a good song aside from the fundraising aspect.
I would be so happy to never hear it again.
Plus it is sad and frustrating that the money raised does not reach the intended recipient.

Lots of people don't/didn't think it was a crap song. Turn your radio on (now OR in 1984!) and you will hear many songs you think are crap and someone else likes.

CrispWinterSunshineBright · 25/11/2024 22:49

I don't think Ed Sheeran was born!

CrispWinterSunshineBright · 25/11/2024 22:51

RingoJuice · 25/11/2024 08:27

Fosters dependency, kills local industries and barely gets to the people that could use it.

He’s right even as his explanation is wrapped in woke.

As we right-wingers often say, sometimes the woke ARE more correct. Here’s a relevant example.

Stop using the word woke for a start and generally the left wing are more correct dear.

CrispWinterSunshineBright · 25/11/2024 22:56

Womblewife
The song lyrics are quite unpleasant really - “thank god it’s them instead of you” - that is not nice, I have never thanked god someone is going through terrible times so I am not. What an absurd lyric!

the song raised money, let’s not have it again.

@Womblewife the lyric is "TONIGHT thank god it's them... meaning, tonight they are raising money for "them" and not "you"

mitogoshigg · 25/11/2024 22:58

Things have moved on but we cannot get away from the fact that many of the systemic issues in African were caused by European colonists. I think longer term there's a difference between relief efforts which will always be periodically needed around the world for disasters/unexpected events and long term support to build self sufficient nations. I don't have a solution but simply abandoning Africa to its fate is unfair because we (collective we, the French, Belgium's, Italians, Portuguese, Germans and Spanish) have all been to blame

sashh · 26/11/2024 06:48

MsMarch · 25/11/2024 13:01

Want an orphanage built, lets send a bunch of students paying £5k each on a gap year over to do it 🤔. Really want to help that orphanage get built, give the local builders the job. If they don't have the skills, send some builders over to teach them.

I think you're sort of missing a few key points here.

eg, things like houses for humanity or building orphanages - often these are projects undertaken in a very short space of time and the volunteers are not there designing the building, measuring the frames etc... they're carrying bricks around and maybe digging holes, under the supervision of people who actually know what they're doing (many of whom are local) but they're basically free labour.

As importantly, many of these sort of projects build long-term relationships. So, a group of students come out and support the building. They meet some people. Perhaps they stay in touch. They go home. They lobby their local church or university to set aside some funds to go to the orphanage for routine maintenance and costs or, as they get older, they set up a direct debit and send money over directly. Over time, perhaps they become wealthy or are in a position to direct more money in some way..... These organisations rely heavily on these funds to keep doing the work they're doing.

My brother, who works in this sector, told me recently that when they do fundraising of this sort, it takes on average, at least five direct contacts with potential donors before they see any real investment. Building those relationships, and finding ways to do so by, for example, getting these people out on a bit of a "jolly" to experience it for themselves, is often a crucial step in the process.

That's not to say there aren'y many many faults with the way these funds get channeled to Africa and other parts of the world, but dismissive casual comments like these really get my back up because they're completely out of touch of the reality.

Wow.

Even if the volunteers are working for 'free' the money spent getting Europeans to the place to build would have paid for professional builders to be brought in from a local area or even another closer country.

I like the way you assume it would be the European who may become rich, if you are wanting to improve things, then education to allow the orphans to thrive and earn would be better than being the pet project of a uni or church.

I have looked in to volunteering, a few years ago the first school for Deaf children opened in Uganda. Ugandan Sign Language is very close to BSL which I'm fluent in, I'm also a teacher.

I decided the best thing I could do was buy a couple of school uniforms that allow children to attend.

MsMarch · 26/11/2024 10:22

Even if the volunteers are working for 'free' the money spent getting Europeans to the place to build would have paid for professional builders to be brought in from a local area or even another closer country.

Except that these people are spending the money, not the orgphanage, and they're NOT going to just send the money.

As for who gets rich - god, if things go well, I'd hope that everyone gets rich. When, say, a church or university in another country supports an orphanage or a school in Africa, it absolutely is about helping the children in that community to thrive. It pays for teachers. Sometimes it pays for equipment or facilities. sometimes it might pay for transport because otherwise chidlren can't access those facilities, or food so that they can eat during the day. If those funds are not there, then there are no teachers, there are no classrooms, there is no support to get to school. That money has to come from somewhere - I'm all in favour of some of it coming from other countries.

The point I was making is that in the original comment, a poster was being very dismissive and inaccurate about how some (not all) of these volunteering schemes work, what these volunteers do, and the long term value. Not least that they're not doing professional jobs!

As for you, personally, I'd have thought you going out there and hgelping to teach other teachers to use sign language would have been quite helpful potentially, but obviously it depends on the program, existing skill levels etc. Although yes, of course, if you spent the money with them instead of on your fights and accomodation, I can see how that's a great value too.

My midwife when I had DD was from Nigeria. She spends 3 months every year returning to Nigeria (over the worst of winter here! Sensible woman!) during which time she works in communities training women and midwives because many don't have the skills or knowledge that can prevent infant and maternal deaths.

Pudmyboy · 26/11/2024 10:26

Gonegurl · 25/11/2024 22:10

Lots of people don't/didn't think it was a crap song. Turn your radio on (now OR in 1984!) and you will hear many songs you think are crap and someone else likes.

I stand by my comment, I was in my late teens when it came out and it head and shoulders stank above everything else that came out at that time, rubbish tune, painful lyrics, it was just a vehicle for collecting money, and it did that very successfully

TheignT · 26/11/2024 12:54

Pudmyboy · 25/11/2024 22:05

Oh I absolutely agree!
It is and always has been, a crap song, written quickly, recorded quickly to get it out to raise money. It is in no way a good song aside from the fundraising aspect.
I would be so happy to never hear it again.
Plus it is sad and frustrating that the money raised does not reach the intended recipient.

Where does the money go then? Someone posted a link to the charity report, it says they give grants to support groups that are supporting health initiatives and providing food.

RadioBaBa · 26/11/2024 13:01

MsMarch · 25/11/2024 20:13

I don't actually know whether to laugh or cry at this level of ignorance.

So where do you think HIV originated? Or are you disputing the interaction between HIV & TB?

https://www.who.int/westernpacific/health-topics/hiv-aids/hiv-and-tuberculosis

https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC2935100/

HIV and Tuberculosis

https://www.who.int/westernpacific/health-topics/hiv-aids/hiv-and-tuberculosis

TheignT · 26/11/2024 13:18

LessonsinChemistryandLove · 25/11/2024 20:55

The point is that times have moved on. African people are talking about the negative impact of using language that dehumanises and negatively stereotypes a whole continent, and the impact this has had, both socially and economically on such continent. The idea of ‘white saviour complex’ is evidenced numerous times on this thread alone. The idea that all, or at least most of Africa, is in dying need of saving from white people sending there kids on a gap year or singing a shitty song, to help them. It’s really not complicated, and Bob Geldof response to any notion of change, just shows him to be arsehole imo. Yes, all artists including ES probably did this with the best intention but actually, the people who you claim to be helping with your oh so wonderful gestures, are telling you it’s not hitting the way you think it is. I much prefer Ed’s response to Geldof!

No one is saying that there is no place for charity, unfortunately that is not the world we live in. But instead of singing a song about there being no joy in Africa and starving children everywhere you turn, just listen and see if there is a better way of doing it.

For those of you so desperate to listen to music that makes you charitable this year, Fuse ODG has a much better one!

Is it the people they are claiming to help that are complaining? Or it is better off Africans, maybe Africans not living in Africa who are complaining because they don't like the image it projects.

Fuse is the one who was embarrassed as a child because of the pictures of starving children. Lucky him, he was being fed but hey let those children starve rather than offend his sensibilities. No one is stopping wealthy Africans or African countries from being the saviours, black or white

I couldn't care less about the music, I never bought the record as I donate in other ways but unless someone can prove that no one in need got food I'm all for helping the starving. Lots of talk about the money not going to the right place but the BBC had to apologise for their allegations about that.

Ten years ago when this was again discussed Farm Africa said this, "“Since 2000 Farm Africa has received grants worth over £550,000 from Band Aid that have supported our work with Ethiopian pastoralist communities to develop sustainable livelihoods; our programmes empowering Ethiopian women through goat breeding and other livelihoods, access to savings and credit and legal advice; and our work in South Sudan (then still part of Sudan) to support the recovery and development of rural communities.” She adds: “We remain true to our founding belief that small-scale agriculture is the key to ending hunger and poverty in rural Africa and that, with the right support, Africa can feed itself.”"Sounds positive to me.

MsMarch · 26/11/2024 13:21

I had missed the more updated info re the SIV strain found in primates. Thank you for pointing me to it. V interesting and I've done a little reading today.

I will need to go and read up more as I don't understand why it took so long to become an epidemic .

Certainly, in the late 90s, when I was studying this (from a historical and sociological perspective, not as a scientist), there was a lot being written about the fact that it was spreading quickly in populations that are heavily migratory (including, for example, through people in the travel industry, merchant navy etc as wel as migrant labour in Africa, combined with these populations more inclined to wide ranging sexual activity (ie promiscuis, and across borders). Certainly, those types of migrant labour/ migratory populations (maybe less air travel) would still have been an issue in the 50s and 60s. I will have to read a lot more about this.

MsMarch · 26/11/2024 13:23

Oh, and yes, the TB thing is a huge issue. But from memory, I believe that HIV often leads to significant deaths by diseases that are particularly problematic in those populations? I clearly need to update my understanding of HIV but I remember being taught that lots of people who die of AIDS, would technically be considered to have died from somethign else - TB etc. Isn't that why Thabo Mbeki got into trouble many years ago? He said something about HIV lowering the population's ability to manage/prevent/recover from other diseases but it sounded like he was denying that there was a problem?

Bollihobs · 26/11/2024 13:31

Ginmonkeyagain · 25/11/2024 08:40

I had a economics lecturer who grew up in Eritrea. His thoughts on Live Aid were .... interesting.

I cringe every time I hear "do they know it's Christmas" - Ethiopia is an country with an ancient tradition of Christianity that pre dates most European countries.

Surely the lyric is referencing their lack of means to 'celebrate' or mark the day rather than being unable to follow the Christian calendar?

ARealitycheck · 26/11/2024 18:51

MsMarch · 26/11/2024 10:22

Even if the volunteers are working for 'free' the money spent getting Europeans to the place to build would have paid for professional builders to be brought in from a local area or even another closer country.

Except that these people are spending the money, not the orgphanage, and they're NOT going to just send the money.

As for who gets rich - god, if things go well, I'd hope that everyone gets rich. When, say, a church or university in another country supports an orphanage or a school in Africa, it absolutely is about helping the children in that community to thrive. It pays for teachers. Sometimes it pays for equipment or facilities. sometimes it might pay for transport because otherwise chidlren can't access those facilities, or food so that they can eat during the day. If those funds are not there, then there are no teachers, there are no classrooms, there is no support to get to school. That money has to come from somewhere - I'm all in favour of some of it coming from other countries.

The point I was making is that in the original comment, a poster was being very dismissive and inaccurate about how some (not all) of these volunteering schemes work, what these volunteers do, and the long term value. Not least that they're not doing professional jobs!

As for you, personally, I'd have thought you going out there and hgelping to teach other teachers to use sign language would have been quite helpful potentially, but obviously it depends on the program, existing skill levels etc. Although yes, of course, if you spent the money with them instead of on your fights and accomodation, I can see how that's a great value too.

My midwife when I had DD was from Nigeria. She spends 3 months every year returning to Nigeria (over the worst of winter here! Sensible woman!) during which time she works in communities training women and midwives because many don't have the skills or knowledge that can prevent infant and maternal deaths.

The difference is your midwife is takin a skill over. 18 year old Julie and Jonathan just out of school with no skills whatsoever are off on a holiday. They are calling it volunteering to look good.

tuvamoodyson · 26/11/2024 19:01

FOJN · 25/11/2024 08:31

Lots of people seem to misunderstand this lyric. It's similar to "there but for the grace of god", I don't think its unpleasant at all. I think it makes it pretty clear that starvation isn't a personal moral failing and invites you to consider what it would be like if it was you rather than someone else.

Yes, this! I always think of the rough sleepers on these cold, winter nights and say ‘Thank God’ for my clean warm bed, I appreciate how very fortunate I am that I have a roof over my head…very much ‘there but for the grace of God’

TheignT · 26/11/2024 19:03

ARealitycheck · 26/11/2024 18:51

The difference is your midwife is takin a skill over. 18 year old Julie and Jonathan just out of school with no skills whatsoever are off on a holiday. They are calling it volunteering to look good.

My kids and GC have never done it but from GS has told me about friends they pay a lot for the experience and I'm sure the money must be useful even if the teenagers aren't.

ARealitycheck · 26/11/2024 19:07

TheignT · 26/11/2024 19:03

My kids and GC have never done it but from GS has told me about friends they pay a lot for the experience and I'm sure the money must be useful even if the teenagers aren't.

Have a look at the companies arranging these 'volunteering' breaks on companies house. A massive amount are private businesses making money for themselves and selling it to youngsters as altruistic endeavours.

Also in an area with limited resources eg rural Africa, do they really need another 6 UK teens to feed. Also remember the UK is not the only Country with youngsters doing the same. It's a holiday industry.

camelfinger · 26/11/2024 19:13

I always thought “thank God its them instead of you” meant that we should consider ourselves lucky to not be suffering a famine. And “do they know it’s Christmas?” meant that if you’re struggling for food then you might not even think about Christmas that year.

But anyway, it is a bit cringy and probably best left in the past now. I was definitely affected by the song, the images and the whole movement. I remember seeing footage of Addis Ababa as a young child and being surprised that there were normal roads, buildings and people that seemed well nourished. It would be good to get a more balanced view of campaigns these days.

ohfook · 26/11/2024 22:08

I think it's really worthwhile having a conversation about charity and whether or not the current model is working but the problem is some people hear the chat about 'white saviours' and get their knickers in a twist about white people can't do anything right and the whole conversation is derailed.

I'm coming from this from a slightly biased point of view because I really can't stand live aid/comic relief/children in need and a load of mega wealthy, tax dodging entertainers trying to persuade people with far less cash than them to try and part with it, however I'll try to be objective.

  • I wish people had a better understanding of why we give aid to some other countries.
  • IMO the current model isn't fit for purpose and lines the pockets of the wrong people. I actually like the idea of micro loans better.
  • I've worked in a developing country before (apologies I know that's not the correct term anymore but I can't remember it) and there's a lot people in the U.K. don't realise about how much people there are taken advantage of - I mainly saw by British and American companies though I have no doubt that that other countries are doing it too.
  • I really hope we're past the days of celebs boosting their own profile by flying off to some orphanage in Malawi to film themselves crying amongst the kids for a comic relief segment. I do think these types of videos have contributed to the idea of poor starving lazy Africans doing nothing to help themselves.
Fizbosshoes · 26/11/2024 23:19

ARealitycheck · 26/11/2024 19:07

Have a look at the companies arranging these 'volunteering' breaks on companies house. A massive amount are private businesses making money for themselves and selling it to youngsters as altruistic endeavours.

Also in an area with limited resources eg rural Africa, do they really need another 6 UK teens to feed. Also remember the UK is not the only Country with youngsters doing the same. It's a holiday industry.

Edited

A church I used to go to sent a group out to "build a school" it was generally a pretty affluent area and mostly people that worked in banks/law/finance that were going, they probably employed the local handyman to put up a shelf or plumb in the dishwasher at home, I'm not sure how helpful they or their teen kids were going to be.

I often wonder what would happen if all the teens going on world challenge, half way round the world to build a well/toilet block/school, turned up at a building site to offer their services somewhere in the UK....

ShittyShouter · 26/11/2024 23:42

Sethera · 25/11/2024 08:27

When the single was first released in 1984, there were no easy ways for the average person, especially young people, to donate to charities. It would involve queuing in a bank or post office to pay money into a published account number; sending off a cheque/postal order in the mail, or happening on someone with a collection bucket or some other local fundraising initiative.

Buying a record was an easy way to give - singles were sold in many high street shops, including places you might be going for other things, such as Boots and Woolworths. It was a good idea to raise money. Everyone had seen footage of starving children on the TV news, and most people wanted to 'do something', so this was a way of doing it. The project was pulled together at very short notice, involving the music A-listers of the day, in an era when they couldn't contribute their performance remotely.

But - we live in a very different world now, where anyone can donate money to any cause at the touch of an app in their living room. The legacy of the original song will live on as it's established as a classic Christmas hit (rightly or wrongly). The lyrics, though well-meant, are now seen for what they are - hastily written and thoughtless in their lumping together the whole continent of Africa. So, I don't think there's a place for repeated iterations of the song - time to say, it did its job well in the 1980s, let it retire now.

this very important post didn’t get enough attention imo.

username8348 · 27/11/2024 00:15

“The initiative is good – to help people is a good thing,” Harur says, although he adds that “aid is not a long-term solution”, saying Africa needs a “technological revolution” that starts from within.

“Good economics is the prerequisite of democracy,” he says. “What people want is sustainable growth. If there is political justice, economic justice and social justice, you can maintain peace.”
https://www.theguardian.com/music/2024/nov/26/everyone-was-happy-but-it-became-annoying-ethiopians-look-back-on-band-aid

OP posts:
sashh · 27/11/2024 06:42

Except that these people are spending the money, not the orgphanage, and they're NOT going to just send the money.

That says it all doesn't it?

They are going for the experience, for a bit of a jolly, not to genuinely help a community.

Swipe left for the next trending thread