Meet the Other Phone. Protection built in.

Meet the Other Phone.
Protection built in.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

To ask teachers about disruptive behaviour in secondary schools?

443 replies

mimblewimble · 24/11/2024 08:42

I hear of so many teachers leaving the profession, or describing how they work in extremely stressful conditions, with student behaviour being awful and seemingly getting worse.

My kids report so much disruption in class at their school, which is apparently one of the best local state schools.

As I write this I'm thinking I'm probably BU just for asking teachers anything as I'm sure you don't have loads of spare time and mental energy!

But I'm interested in what teachers would like to see done to tackle behaviour in secondary schools - are there changes that you think would help?

Or do you work in a school where the behaviour is good, and if so why do you think that is?

OP posts:
FrodosTemper · 25/11/2024 11:43

IWantToGetOffHelp · 25/11/2024 09:52

I think you need to look at Indy schools that generally do not have problems with behaviour. The over riding factor is that all the parents are invested in their child’s education as they are paying a bloody fortune for it! So you don’t really get many uninvolved parents. Getting into trouble and being naughty is seem as pretty pathetic by the other students - it’s cool to be involved with music, sport and get good grades. The occasional naughty one in a class is treated with disdain. Since by DD has been in private ( 10 years) the naughtiest thing that’s ever happened is a bit of answering back to the teacher and not doing homework - both of which is a scandal for weeks and the children involved are heavily sanctioned .Day to day, there aren’t many silly rules and sanctions for little misdemeanours and everyone respects each other. Children are treated and known as individuals.

Edited

Well done, you and your dc are winning in life.

peppeRomia · 25/11/2024 12:54

While I agree that problems caused by parenting style/lack of support are a serious issue, just as bad is the lack of support from SLT.

During my long career in teaching I saw this change from the headteacher always defending teachers (sometimes when they were in the wrong) to the sort of undermining illustrated by Jifmicroliquid.

Defending the indefensible needed to change, but it has swung far too far the other way. Quite honestly the type of people promoted to these posts nowadays are a big part of the problem. And the few SLT members who never give up tend to end up completely burned out.

Birdscratch · 25/11/2024 13:36

Independent schools don’t tend to have children with behavioural problems because that behaviour isn’t tolerated and the parents are highly (financially) invested in their child’s education. Children are sanctioned and then the parents are asked to remove their child from the school.

That doesn’t mean that private schools are good at managing disruptive behaviour. In fact it’s quite the opposite - private schools don’t have to manage disruptive behaviour because they just ask the children to leave. State schools don’t have the luxury of refusing service to difficult customers. They’re not businesses that can cherry pick the easiest kids to teach. They have a duty to educate children. They have to find a way to work with difficult, unsupportive parents and children that can’t or won’t engage with learning.

Hoppinggreen · 25/11/2024 13:42

Birdscratch · 25/11/2024 13:36

Independent schools don’t tend to have children with behavioural problems because that behaviour isn’t tolerated and the parents are highly (financially) invested in their child’s education. Children are sanctioned and then the parents are asked to remove their child from the school.

That doesn’t mean that private schools are good at managing disruptive behaviour. In fact it’s quite the opposite - private schools don’t have to manage disruptive behaviour because they just ask the children to leave. State schools don’t have the luxury of refusing service to difficult customers. They’re not businesses that can cherry pick the easiest kids to teach. They have a duty to educate children. They have to find a way to work with difficult, unsupportive parents and children that can’t or won’t engage with learning.

You are absolutely correct but whatever the reasons for behaviour being better at Private schools the fact is that it IS the case at most Private schools, which is a major reason why parents choose them.
No child who wants to learn should be prevented from doing so by the bad behaviour of others but all too often its how it is

FrippEnos · 25/11/2024 13:54

Birdscratch · 25/11/2024 13:36

Independent schools don’t tend to have children with behavioural problems because that behaviour isn’t tolerated and the parents are highly (financially) invested in their child’s education. Children are sanctioned and then the parents are asked to remove their child from the school.

That doesn’t mean that private schools are good at managing disruptive behaviour. In fact it’s quite the opposite - private schools don’t have to manage disruptive behaviour because they just ask the children to leave. State schools don’t have the luxury of refusing service to difficult customers. They’re not businesses that can cherry pick the easiest kids to teach. They have a duty to educate children. They have to find a way to work with difficult, unsupportive parents and children that can’t or won’t engage with learning.

From experience of working in a school that has had to accept an ex private school pupils.
Schools will often syphon them off into the bottom buckets of progress 8 and leave the teachers to try and teach these pupils. Who can often destroy entire classes whilst the SLT stand there and watch. Often setting teachers (and whole classes) up for failure.

Piggywaspushed · 25/11/2024 13:55

Again , though, I think parents don't actually know what goes on.

DH works in a private school. He deals with different issues form me but still complains of poor behaviour often at the arrogant end of the spectrum-and knows kids run rings around some staff.

Piggywaspushed · 25/11/2024 13:57

I do think we have to bear in mind, though, that there are some schools with very vicious management of behaviour - often in MATs. Teachers have been speaking out themselves about Mossbourne and about the Astrea Trust in Cambs which has leaked staff left , right and centre and where staff themselves took strike action.

Toomanyvampires · 25/11/2024 14:02

@Birdscratch I don’t doubt that there is some comparison between apples and pears between independent and state schools.

What can a teacher or state school do now to give a good experience to a child who is having a bad experience because of bad behaviour and disruption? I’m sure it’s a horrible environment to teach in but it’s worse to have to learn through this. Most of the suggestions to fix this are structural or adopting rigid behaviour controls but that doesn’t help a child in the system now.

I’m asking as a reluctant private school parent as I no longer have confidence in the state offer and want to know if anything can change quickly to help my children.

FrodosTemper · 25/11/2024 15:46

Piggywaspushed · 25/11/2024 13:55

Again , though, I think parents don't actually know what goes on.

DH works in a private school. He deals with different issues form me but still complains of poor behaviour often at the arrogant end of the spectrum-and knows kids run rings around some staff.

Edited

pssssst 🙃you must not say that there is bad behaviour in fee paying schools. There can't be, right? Fee paying families are all about music, art, culture, sport, a sophisticated life, they have no time to be horrible. If there is any bad behaviour at all it's kitten like bad behaviour. All private school parents are super involved and invested and therefore super nice and anyone who calls out in class gets sent to coventry. According to some on this thread.

JudgeJ · 25/11/2024 16:06

I help 2 schools with Y11 Mock interviews and the school with the tighter discipline certainly better prepares the DC for the world of work based on what I see.

I recall one girl coming to school on the morning she would be going to her mock interview wearing a very short skirt, what we called a pubic pelmet back in my day, and a very tight cropped top, displaying her belly piercings. I quietly asked her, in private, if she though that the outfit, lovely as it was (I can lie with the best of them), was suitable for going to meet a stranger in a formal setting. The next day her mother was yelling on the phone to the Deputy Head that I had humiliated her daughter, it was none of my blankety-blank business what her daughter wanted to wear.

FrodosTemper · 25/11/2024 16:45

JudgeJ · 25/11/2024 16:06

I help 2 schools with Y11 Mock interviews and the school with the tighter discipline certainly better prepares the DC for the world of work based on what I see.

I recall one girl coming to school on the morning she would be going to her mock interview wearing a very short skirt, what we called a pubic pelmet back in my day, and a very tight cropped top, displaying her belly piercings. I quietly asked her, in private, if she though that the outfit, lovely as it was (I can lie with the best of them), was suitable for going to meet a stranger in a formal setting. The next day her mother was yelling on the phone to the Deputy Head that I had humiliated her daughter, it was none of my blankety-blank business what her daughter wanted to wear.

Wow. Are we back to shaming girls for what they wear? It really wasn't your business I'm afraid. Of course she thought it was suitable otherwise she wouldn't have worn it. You did shame her, at least own it. As well meaning as you presumably were, you embarrassed her. There is always a way of getting these things across. Asking the girl if she thought it was appropriate for meeting a stranger in a formal setting was a bit dishonest. Were you her teacher? Part of the mock interviews? If you were directly involved, you could have said that interviews require formal attire, such as suits or similar and dressing for the job you're applying for. If the girl was applying for a job in a tattoo place or other alternative places, her outfit may have been ok.

pubic pelmet Biscuit

When women speak about pother women this way, what hope is there for feminism Sad

DoreenonTill8 · 25/11/2024 17:16

@FrodosTemper it's not 'shaming' to tell someone that their outfit is inappropriate for the world of work, and that accusation is a good example of why things are the way they are.
Would you be happy if you went into a medical consultation and the doctor had on hot pants and a sports bra just? Or in for parents night and the teacher wore that?

Mozartine · 25/11/2024 17:23

FrodosTemper · 25/11/2024 16:45

Wow. Are we back to shaming girls for what they wear? It really wasn't your business I'm afraid. Of course she thought it was suitable otherwise she wouldn't have worn it. You did shame her, at least own it. As well meaning as you presumably were, you embarrassed her. There is always a way of getting these things across. Asking the girl if she thought it was appropriate for meeting a stranger in a formal setting was a bit dishonest. Were you her teacher? Part of the mock interviews? If you were directly involved, you could have said that interviews require formal attire, such as suits or similar and dressing for the job you're applying for. If the girl was applying for a job in a tattoo place or other alternative places, her outfit may have been ok.

pubic pelmet Biscuit

When women speak about pother women this way, what hope is there for feminism Sad

And this girl won’t learn an important lesson and won’t get offered jobs she otherwise would. The feedback given is precisely the message the girl needs to hear. So incredibly valuable.

Hoppinggreen · 25/11/2024 17:26

FrodosTemper · 25/11/2024 15:46

pssssst 🙃you must not say that there is bad behaviour in fee paying schools. There can't be, right? Fee paying families are all about music, art, culture, sport, a sophisticated life, they have no time to be horrible. If there is any bad behaviour at all it's kitten like bad behaviour. All private school parents are super involved and invested and therefore super nice and anyone who calls out in class gets sent to coventry. According to some on this thread.

And all State schools are full of feral children with parents who don't give a shit if we are going to generalise?
Can't be, right?

Hoppinggreen · 25/11/2024 17:30

JudgeJ · 25/11/2024 16:06

I help 2 schools with Y11 Mock interviews and the school with the tighter discipline certainly better prepares the DC for the world of work based on what I see.

I recall one girl coming to school on the morning she would be going to her mock interview wearing a very short skirt, what we called a pubic pelmet back in my day, and a very tight cropped top, displaying her belly piercings. I quietly asked her, in private, if she though that the outfit, lovely as it was (I can lie with the best of them), was suitable for going to meet a stranger in a formal setting. The next day her mother was yelling on the phone to the Deputy Head that I had humiliated her daughter, it was none of my blankety-blank business what her daughter wanted to wear.

I interviewed a young lady at a mock interview and I can honestly say she was one of the smartest most switched on savvy young women I had ever met.
She looked like she was about to go clubbing, would I have given her a job? Maybe but it was 50/50. IF she had been dressed more appropriately it would have been 100% so these kids need to learn that what you wear CAN affect your prospects and it starts at school

ilovegranny · 25/11/2024 18:12

Gentle parenting is a crock of shit, and is creating a generation of feeble, hostile, and entitled adults. Children need direction, support, effort, love, discipline (now a dirty word), reward, praise, and consequences.

menopausalmare · 25/11/2024 18:28

DoreenonTill8 · 25/11/2024 17:16

@FrodosTemper it's not 'shaming' to tell someone that their outfit is inappropriate for the world of work, and that accusation is a good example of why things are the way they are.
Would you be happy if you went into a medical consultation and the doctor had on hot pants and a sports bra just? Or in for parents night and the teacher wore that?

If you can see up it, down it or through it, don't wear it to work/school. If the staff dressed as some of our year 11 girls do on interview day, the parents would lodge formal complaints to the Head (and rightly so).

Treesandsheepeverywhere · 25/11/2024 19:01

Mostly down to parents wanting to be best friends with their kids.

If your kids don't learn respect at home, they won't respect anyone else.

Have said this to friends who are afraid of upsetting their kids as they answer back passive aggressively.

All this soft parenting leads to kods who don't respect you.

BBCK · 25/11/2024 19:35

Pomegranatecarnage · 24/11/2024 21:21

Do you teach MFL by any chance?

LOL. How did you know?

MadeInYorkshire69 · 25/11/2024 19:36

DrRuthGalloway · 24/11/2024 10:54

Only if you fundamentally misunderstand what it means.

It doesn't mean that you have to accept poor behaviour or are not supposed to apply firm boundaries.

It means that if you can work out the reason for the behaviour you are seeing, or talk to the young person about it, you might be able to prevent it from happening in the first place.

An awful lot of poor behaviour in secondary school is from youngsters (esp young men) posturing. This is either to curry favour with peers or to cover up that they cannot effectively access the work. Incidents of the latter have increased dramatically since the new curriculum which is overly packed, deliberately difficult and psychologically damaging to all but the most able children. For example, AQA biology in 2023 to get a grade 9 - a score attained by just the top few percent - you had to get 63 percent or thereabouts. What is the point of a GCSE set so difficult that even the brightest few percent of children cannot access 1/3 of the paper? That means that kids who are ok at biology and "passing" are getting probably just 30-40 percent correct. If you sat an exam where you couldn't answer well over half the paper, would you enjoy it? Would you feel like you were doing ok?

Pass marks in the higher maths for grade 4 have hovered around 26 percent. Again, this is psychologically damaging.

Our less academically able youngsters are sitting in classes day in and day our where the majority of the work is not accessible to them. And I am not talking about kids with severe learning difficulties here, I mean ordinary average range kids who are perfectly capable of functioning well in society.

I am telling you now that changing the curriculum to one that is flexible enough to meet the needs of ALL children, not just aimed at the academically most able ten percent, one that acknowledged and celebrates creativity, sporting prowess, working with one's hands, problem solving as well as a narrow academic focus, would solve a heck of a lot of the problems around behaviour in schools today.

If I was in a job where everyday 3/4 of what I was asked to do made no sense to me and then I got into trouble for not being able to do the stuff that made no sense, I took would be pissed off and mucking about within a couple of months, and clinging to the things that do bring me happiness in that situation - friends, football, whatever.

Edited

Yes yes yes ( in spades)
My reasonably bright 16yo DS says the curriculum is boring with too much content and not enough choice at GCSE. School is putting him off going to Uni.
Micheal Gove has a lot to answer for. I feel sorry for those non academic kids who years ago would have thrived on a more creative and practical curriculum that isn’t designed to fail them.

Ex teacher.

laraitopbanana · 25/11/2024 19:41

QuirkyandGreen · 24/11/2024 08:58

The basic idea that children are there to learn, not be entertained is something that I'd like to be acknowledged. Also basic manners and respect often aren't there. I am strict, I never talk over students talking and I follow our behaviour system fully (students are removed for consistent disruption). But I've had parents say I'm 'bullying' their child because I have to keep telling them to get on with their work or reinforcing behaviour rules with them!

The offended generation is exhausting

QuirkyandGreen · 25/11/2024 20:02

I totally agree with @DrRuthGalloway above, been saying it for years! In my subject, you have to get 2/3rds of the paper to get a 5. A 5!!

CandyCane457 · 25/11/2024 20:03

Primary teacher here, but my feelings may still resonate with high school.

There are two huge problems with the pupils in my school and their behaviour.

1- Parents who believe their ch are little angels and can do no wrong. I could write a book on all the times I’ve informed parents of bad behaviour and their parents make/look for excuses, Blame me somehow, or flat out refuse to believe it. A few months back I had an incredibly disruptive incident with a pupil where she swore and screamed and was violent to another child, causing injury. I called her mum, and to be fair mum was understanding, but didn’t seem that bothered, and when she picked her up that night she met her on the playground with a huge toffee apple. And I just thought… no!

2- Our SLT are a huge problem when it comes to dealing with behaviour. We as teachers tackle as much as we possibly can, but when things are bigger than the classroom and need further backup from SLT, they give children a soft talking too and they usually end up coming out of the office with a sticker. But the biggest problem is, really, really bad behaviour (I’m talking swearing at staff, hitting other kids, throwing things, acting dangerously, fighting) doesn’t get properly addressed. It’s just a lunch time detention and then move on. But the children see this as “getting away” with bad behaviour and then they know they can just do it again, knowing there’s no proper sanction. My partner teacher has a child in her class who was a bit cheeky at the start of the year but nothing major, but in a fit of rage a few weeks ago told the class TA to “just piss off” and nothing was done about it, and since then the girl has been so much worse, and my partner teacher fully believes it’s because she tested the waters with that sort of behaviour and got away with it, so now feels untouchable.

Combattingthemoaners · 25/11/2024 20:31

MadeInYorkshire69 · 25/11/2024 19:36

Yes yes yes ( in spades)
My reasonably bright 16yo DS says the curriculum is boring with too much content and not enough choice at GCSE. School is putting him off going to Uni.
Micheal Gove has a lot to answer for. I feel sorry for those non academic kids who years ago would have thrived on a more creative and practical curriculum that isn’t designed to fail them.

Ex teacher.

It really is boring! It’s a competition - who can remember the most pointless facts. Completely overwhelming for the vast majority of student and not promoting a love of learning. The whole curriculum and system needs an overhaul. I teach secondary.

Swipe left for the next trending thread