Meet the Other Phone. Flexible and made to last.

Meet the Other Phone.
Flexible and made to last.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

Should we be worried about war

952 replies

Seasidesand76 · 19/11/2024 11:45

Seen a lot in the news about Ukraine using USA missiles against Russia. I've been thinking more along the lines that it won't start a WW3 and will resolve at some point without the UK getting directly involved in war. But there seems to be more and more tension and threats of an all out war recently.

Should we be worried about WW3? I haven't been prepping or anything but does make me wonder if I should start getting a few days worth of food in case. At the same time I don't want to go down the prepper hole and start getting over the top.

OP posts:
Thread gallery
14
Artistbythewater · 19/11/2024 20:51

HRTQueen · 19/11/2024 20:49

Honestly more positive for Putin than for Zelensky

There is a more important war going on that potentially can have a far bigger impact to more people

I don’t see it that way - Zelensky is a worldwide icon. A legend. A hero. Putin will end up being tried in The Hague. That is the best case scenario for Putin.

Outoftheways · 19/11/2024 20:51

HRTQueen · 19/11/2024 20:49

Honestly more positive for Putin than for Zelensky

There is a more important war going on that potentially can have a far bigger impact to more people

This is what I believe too. Unfortunately,

MistressoftheDarkSide · 19/11/2024 20:52

Outoftheways · 19/11/2024 20:47

So how do you think this shitshow will actually end?

Well, at a point when the destruction has been too great, and a diplomatic solution is apparently reached, certain global corporations will tender for contracts to rebuild Ukraine, and a few people will make an awful lot of money.

At least, that's how it usually goes.

I think they're currently negotiating what constitutes an acceptable level of destruction.

Disaster capitalism for the win.
(That's sarcasm by the way).

HRTQueen · 19/11/2024 21:02

Artistbythewater · 19/11/2024 20:51

I don’t see it that way - Zelensky is a worldwide icon. A legend. A hero. Putin will end up being tried in The Hague. That is the best case scenario for Putin.

Edited

maybe in parts of Europe and the US

many many people admire Putin and he isn’t going to go anywhere that he could possibly be arrested he isn’t a fool

but it doesn’t come down to that the war in the ME has the potential to negatively impact lives in the ME, Europe and the US

EverythingAllatOnceAllTheTime · 19/11/2024 21:02

DogInATent · 19/11/2024 20:35

I have no idea why you think the use of ATACMS is in any way escalating the situation from Zelensky's perspective.

It's a minor political escalation from Biden, but only matching Putin's deployment of North Korean troops in Kursk.

Then why did Putin amend his nuclear doctrine?

The US would not previously permit Ukraine to use targeting data that permitted strikes within Russia - reports would suggest that is no longer the case.

It’s potentially escalatory because Zelensky is attempting to provoke Putin before Trump enters the WH. The same thinking has informed Biden’s decision.

EverythingAllatOnceAllTheTime · 19/11/2024 21:08

Lyannaa · 19/11/2024 20:36

Zelensky knows that Trump will be inaugurated in Jan. He knows that Trump will probably try to force him to sue for peace.

Putin started this war. It's not Zelensky's responsibility to make peace happen so stop talking as though he's the one who set off this ugly war. Putin sycophants make me sick.

What did you call me?

Outoftheways · 19/11/2024 21:11

MistressoftheDarkSide · 19/11/2024 20:52

Well, at a point when the destruction has been too great, and a diplomatic solution is apparently reached, certain global corporations will tender for contracts to rebuild Ukraine, and a few people will make an awful lot of money.

At least, that's how it usually goes.

I think they're currently negotiating what constitutes an acceptable level of destruction.

Disaster capitalism for the win.
(That's sarcasm by the way).

They showed a youngish crying woman on the news here today, who was asked if she thought it was time to surrender. And she said maybe, because this is just too hard. She had just lost her family. But I’ve not seen that on the news before, and I found it both sad and worrying.

StandingSideBySide · 19/11/2024 21:34

icecreamscoops · 19/11/2024 18:31

Sweden! However Norway and finland also sent out the leaflet, it made it to the bbc news

Actually now you mention Scandinavian countries I remember
I wish our Govn would have a bit of foresight….after all, you never know

AlteredStater · 19/11/2024 21:38

StandingSideBySide · 19/11/2024 21:34

Actually now you mention Scandinavian countries I remember
I wish our Govn would have a bit of foresight….after all, you never know

Goodness, it would be just like our government not to prepare us in any way! 🙄

Edingril · 19/11/2024 21:40

Why does worrying make it go away?

broccolienthusiast · 19/11/2024 21:43

1dayatatime · 19/11/2024 19:21

@broccolienthusiast

"And surely no one is naive enough to believe that Putin will stop at Ukraine."

Other than remembering GCSE History on appeasement in the 1930s
what actual evidence is there for Putin wanting to attack other Eastern European territory, most of which are NATO members and they would clearly request support.

It's nonsensical to believe that unless we stop Russia in the Donbas then their next target will be Basingstoke.

And why do you think Poland is the third biggest contributor in NATO when it comes to military spending?
It’s because we actually remember our history very well.

Washingforweeks · 19/11/2024 22:36

MumOfOneAllAlone · 19/11/2024 13:36

I imagine me and my dd doing what that old couple on the titanic did, lay in bed and wait for death

Then get myself into a state and start crying, then have to shake myself out of it

This is what I do too 😂

1dayatatime · 19/11/2024 22:40

@Hididi11

"The person who is bitter about sthm is probs bitter because she can't stay at home.

To all the sthm.....welldone for doing you!!!"

I agree- I'm not bitter just plain old envious at those who've managed to be sahm.

Anyway back to that power point presentation I have to finish by tomorrow night.

1dayatatime · 19/11/2024 22:59

Outoftheways · 19/11/2024 20:47

So how do you think this shitshow will actually end?

Well both Russia and Ukraine are too weak to win outright and too strong to lose outright. So it grinds on in an attritional conflict (much like WW1) where it's a case of who runs out of soldiers or more accurately men willing to fight and die. In this point Russia has the advantage with a bigger population (plus some N Koreans).

I think Trump will threaten to pull military aid unless Ukraine agrees to hand over roughly the current occupied territories and an agreement not to join NATO/ EU.

The Western European countries will make a lot of noise about standing by Ukraine but ultimately won't because they are unwilling to spend more on defence in order to contribute more to Ukraine. I mean how many people in the UK would support higher taxes or cuts in spending on the NHS in order to increase military support to Ukraine?

Zelensky then refuses such a deal, tries to carry on with less western aid, military situation gets worse for Ukraine, Zelensky becomes unpopular due to setbacks and gets removed. New leader agrees peace deal with Russia on worse terms than originally offered.

Ukraine and Europe conveniently blame the US and Trump. Big reconstruction project for Ukraine begins with China and Chinese firms the biggest beneficiaries.

Then China tries to invade Taiwan in the late 2020s where the US does step in to help but Western European countries do not because they don't want to pay for it and they are still holding a grudge about Ukraine.

Well that's my crystal ball gazing anyway!

MissConductUS · 19/11/2024 22:59

broccolienthusiast · 19/11/2024 21:43

And why do you think Poland is the third biggest contributor in NATO when it comes to military spending?
It’s because we actually remember our history very well.

Poland also gets more value for money in military spending than other European NATO members by buying commercially available weapons systems from countries like South Korea, rather than bespoke, locally produced systems that are made in smaller quantities. So Poland gets more "bang for the buck" as they say.

It's not just a question of how much a country spends, it's also how smartly they spend it.

1dayatatime · 19/11/2024 23:07

@broccolienthusiast

"And why do you think Poland is the third biggest contributor in NATO when it comes to military spending?
It’s because we actually remember our history very well."

Nothing to do with history and more to do with geography and sharing a border with Kalingrad and Belarus.

Given the bigger population, the higher military spending, NATO membership, living memory experience of life under Soviet rule and a population that is very proud of being Polish and would definitely fight to preserve this - then I don't Putin would ever consider attacking Poland.

nomoretoriesforme · 20/11/2024 01:36

BackinBlack24 · 19/11/2024 13:58

Well if the doomsday clock is anything to go by ... I think one wrong move by any country right now could set off a world war .

Exactly this.. We are just pawns in this geopolitical game..

Stravaig · 20/11/2024 05:02

Artistbythewater · 19/11/2024 18:10

But in your zombie apocalypse scenario you haven’t factored in the most likely scenario here, and that is Putin disappearing with a sudden terminal illness.

'Zombie apocalypse'? What an ignorant, dismissive, sneering response to the everyday lived reality of hundreds of millions of people who are currently trying to survive in disaster and war zones around the world.

In the UK, with its imagined superiority and delusional complacency, any crisis situation will be vastly worsened by the colossal uselessness and casual thuggery of a great many of the population.

devilsadvocate77 · 20/11/2024 07:38

ThreeLocusts · 19/11/2024 19:36

Interesting thread... clearly there is a small chance of everything at the moment, including nuclear war. But Putin making noises about it doesn't mean it's going to happen. A conventional war is more likely, starting I'd guess with the invasion of one of the Baltic states. But how that will play out with Trump in charge of US involvement, f*ck knows.

The whole discussion sounds a bit odd to me. It's the British media specifically that are going on about living in a pre-war era. I read Flemish, German and US media as well (reading news being my main procrastination method, and having lived/living in these countries) and the war talk doesn't happen the same way anywhere else.

I think it has to do with the way WW II is fetishized in the UK, as this great test of society (that society passed). Implication being that 'we' all have to pull our socks up again, gird 'our' loins, be ready for the next test...

It's very different in a country that doesn't stand a chance in a major conflict (Belgium) or has lost a couple of them crashingly (Germany). You don't talk about getting ready for war by way of rhetorical flourish (which is how the Tories first brought it up, I think, bunch of unserious chancers that they are).

(In the US, I think they just worry less because they've got other things on their plate and are big, isolated and used to fighting wars, win, lose or draw, with relatively little hardship for civilians.)

I bought some extra bottled water, a water filter, some tinned food and a camping gas stove with canisters in the run-up to the US election (and was a leetle bit tempted to invest in a lead suit, but gave my head a wobble).

My 2016 self would be in stitches at these actions, but I think by now they're sensible if you've got kids to look after and are the worrying kind. It stops me thinking about it too much (which is clearly a waste of time, as there are too many imponderables involved).

There has definitely been talk of war in some other European countries too, including Sweden, Estonia, Poland etc. And seem to recall Generals of Western Countries mentioning the threat too including Germany.

I do think that the current US 'escalation', if you'd call it that, is not going to hit deep enough into Russia. Perhaps Biden and administration saw it as a good move, then unpredictable Trump, I'm not a fan but he may well then come in and play the peace / negotiation card.

tammy98 · 20/11/2024 08:08

Why worry about war? Worry about waking up each day and living day to day. Nothing is guaranteed in life. What can we do if war is declared. Love our families a lot more ❤

EverythingAllatOnceAllTheTime · 20/11/2024 08:25

Putin looses just one small yield tactical warhead - even airburst, and not only will he be a total pariah, he will be taken out from within.

Thats the calculation he knows only too well.

TheWhalrus · 20/11/2024 08:44

SummerFeverVenice · 19/11/2024 15:54

Oh they are effective alright. The Plutonium isotope in nuclear warheads has a shelf life of 24,100yrs and even then that means they are still half as powerful as they day they were made. Russia have plenty of long range missiles to insert nuclear warheads onto.

Don’t confuse restraint with weakness.

Edited

I was referring to the initiators in these things, which are largely tritium-based (half-life ~12 years). If the tritium hasn't been replaced since the end of the USSR its entirely possible that these Russian nukes are unable to detonate their radioactive (typically plutonium or uranium) payloads.

And looking at Russia's tiny nuclear weapons budgets and infinite capacity for corruption, I would not be surprised if the tritium hasn't been replaced at all in the 35-or so years since the USSR fell apart.

DogInATent · 20/11/2024 08:47

EverythingAllatOnceAllTheTime · 20/11/2024 08:25

Putin looses just one small yield tactical warhead - even airburst, and not only will he be a total pariah, he will be taken out from within.

Thats the calculation he knows only too well.

The first use of any nuclear weapon is strategic, regardless of the warhead size.

Thegraduates · 20/11/2024 08:56

SummerFeverVenice · 19/11/2024 16:08

I am talking about a direct attack, yes, I thought I made that clear.

Attacking the U.K. directly would be “stupid” in what way? Our military is woefully inadequate to go toe to toe with Russia btw. The odds of attacking us are objectively much higher than the odds of attacking the US.

Especially with President (Defund NATO) Trump incoming.

More likely, Russia would attack and then EU and US would condemn the attack but then publicly tell us not to counter attack to avoid further escalation…

That's a good point. With Trump coming into power in a matter of weeks Putin would be more likely to "teach the UK a lesson" rather than the USA... It's all rather frightening