Meet the Other Phone. Flexible and made to last.

Meet the Other Phone.
Flexible and made to last.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

See all MNHQ comments on this thread

Rachel Reeves lied on her CV was not an “Economist”

1000 replies

Disappointedagain22 · 16/11/2024 11:33

AIBU - it’s OK to lie to get ahead

AINBU - it’s bad RReeves very Publicly lied about her prior work. We are right to feel annoyed by this lie.

saw this headline and am feeling really disappointed. Think Rachel Reeves needs to tell public exactly her job title.
She changed job title from Economist, to “Retail Banking”
An Economist at a Bank, is a clear and specific job, it’s a economic research position. A good experience for her current position.

”Retail Banking” - is not a job title … she could have been doing anything in a branch from Bank Teller, to Branch manager, or working in back office operations putting bank notes in the plastic bags or in HR.

OP posts:
Thread gallery
25
EverythingAllatOnceAllTheTime · 19/11/2024 15:16

EasternStandard · 19/11/2024 15:11

‘Andrew Bailey, the governor of the Bank of England, told the Treasury committee on Tuesday that retailers were right to warn on the risk of job cuts due to the change in NICs.

Not good, Labour are going for it anyway

The number of potential job losses is eye-watering.

Those poor people.

Ytcsghisn · 19/11/2024 15:29

Not to mention the inflation that will result from businesses increasing prices to make up for tax increases.

So the ‘economist’ chancellor’s first triumph is to cause economic decline, initiate job losses, cause price hikes, lower than inflation wage increases in private sector and give a bribe to union paymasters by giving out billions in public sector pay increases.

Cue the tired old ‘oh but Tories’ hysteria. What about the Tories. They got booted out because of what they did. Reeves is in the treasury now and destroying what’s left of the country’s economy. If you defend that, you’re about as much of an economist as Reeves is.

Disappointedagain22 · 19/11/2024 15:36

Ytcsghisn · 19/11/2024 15:29

Not to mention the inflation that will result from businesses increasing prices to make up for tax increases.

So the ‘economist’ chancellor’s first triumph is to cause economic decline, initiate job losses, cause price hikes, lower than inflation wage increases in private sector and give a bribe to union paymasters by giving out billions in public sector pay increases.

Cue the tired old ‘oh but Tories’ hysteria. What about the Tories. They got booted out because of what they did. Reeves is in the treasury now and destroying what’s left of the country’s economy. If you defend that, you’re about as much of an economist as Reeves is.

She says has experience being a “Japan analyst” at BOE circa 2000. That was when Japan was at least 10 years into their “lost decades/lost 30 years”
So it’s clear that she knows how to lose an economy …..

OP posts:
Zonder · 19/11/2024 15:42

cardibach · 19/11/2024 14:42

We seem to have allowed ourselves to be held hostage by big businesses. Many of them are subsidised by the tax payer, as top up benefits allow them to pay very low wages. They say the only way to pay their greater contribution is to cut the wage bill and increase prices, but it’s not, is it? They could also reduce profits which have been kept artificially high by state support of low wages.
We have to find a way to change this - businesses can’t dictate government policy.

This is exactly what I was thinking. Big businesses warn chancellor that they will pass on any reduction in their enormous profits to the employee and consumer.

EverythingAllatOnceAllTheTime · 19/11/2024 15:46

Zonder · 19/11/2024 15:42

This is exactly what I was thinking. Big businesses warn chancellor that they will pass on any reduction in their enormous profits to the employee and consumer.

What do you make of Andrew Baileys comments?

DuncinToffee · 19/11/2024 15:50

Zonder · 19/11/2024 15:42

This is exactly what I was thinking. Big businesses warn chancellor that they will pass on any reduction in their enormous profits to the employee and consumer.

Wasn't Brexit supposed to end the low wage labour force?

Ytcsghisn · 19/11/2024 15:59

Zonder · 19/11/2024 15:42

This is exactly what I was thinking. Big businesses warn chancellor that they will pass on any reduction in their enormous profits to the employee and consumer.

Yes, and?

It’s a fact and it will happen. Blaming big business doesn’t make the problem go away.

And what exactly is enormous profits? is 3% margin enormous. Do you want supermarket to give you food at cost price?

EasternStandard · 19/11/2024 16:00

EverythingAllatOnceAllTheTime · 19/11/2024 15:16

The number of potential job losses is eye-watering.

Those poor people.

I wonder what lines they thought were legit pre GE, I mean why did they believe what was being said?

I can't see a full list of the 70 that signed this letter, I wonder if any of those who put their faith in that pre GE spin have signed it.

Zonder · 19/11/2024 16:17

DuncinToffee · 19/11/2024 15:50

Wasn't Brexit supposed to end the low wage labour force?

Good point 🤔

EverythingAllatOnceAllTheTime · 19/11/2024 17:49

Our aim is to:

  • Make parents' lives easier by pooling knowledge, advice and support.
  • We try, as far as possible to let the conversation flow and not to over-moderate. Mumsnet is a site for grown-ups.
EverythingAllatOnceAllTheTime · 19/11/2024 18:01

Zonder · 19/11/2024 16:17

Good point 🤔

What do you make of Andrew Baileys comments?

PandoraSox · 19/11/2024 18:59

EverythingAllatOnceAllTheTime · 19/11/2024 17:49

Our aim is to:

  • Make parents' lives easier by pooling knowledge, advice and support.
  • We try, as far as possible to let the conversation flow and not to over-moderate. Mumsnet is a site for grown-ups.

Why have you posted that?

EverythingAllatOnceAllTheTime · 19/11/2024 19:16

PandoraSox · 19/11/2024 18:59

Why have you posted that?

What do you make of Andrew Baileys comments?

DuncinToffee · 19/11/2024 19:18

Echo?

PandoraSox · 19/11/2024 19:26

EverythingAllatOnceAllTheTime · 19/11/2024 19:16

What do you make of Andrew Baileys comments?

I had a feeling you might say that.

EverythingAllatOnceAllTheTime · 19/11/2024 19:28

PandoraSox · 19/11/2024 19:26

I had a feeling you might say that.

Why do you say that?

PandoraSox · 19/11/2024 19:30

EverythingAllatOnceAllTheTime · 19/11/2024 19:28

Why do you say that?

Not getting into a bunfight, sorry.

EasternStandard · 19/11/2024 19:42

EverythingAllatOnceAllTheTime · 19/11/2024 19:21

Up to 100,000 pensioners will be pushed into poverty by the decision to end universal winter fuel payments, the Government has admitted.

So cold rn. Really feel for them

Zonder · 19/11/2024 19:42

Looks like this thread has run out of steam.

EverythingAllatOnceAllTheTime · 19/11/2024 19:43

EasternStandard · 19/11/2024 19:42

So cold rn. Really feel for them

Sadly, I think we will soon see some tragic headlines.

Terrible policy from Labour - shameful.

EverythingAllatOnceAllTheTime · 19/11/2024 19:43

Zonder · 19/11/2024 19:42

Looks like this thread has run out of steam.

Happily, I have started a new one!

Efacsen · 19/11/2024 19:50

Zonder · 19/11/2024 19:42

Looks like this thread has run out of steam.

It's certainly become very repetitious

cardibach · 19/11/2024 19:50

EverythingAllatOnceAllTheTime · 19/11/2024 19:21

Up to 100,000 pensioners will be pushed into poverty by the decision to end universal winter fuel payments, the Government has admitted.

Can’t read it as not a subscriber. The first para is about councils though. What does it say about the government, exactly?

poetryandwine · 19/11/2024 19:52

Yes, @DuncinToffee , Brexit was supposed to end the low wage labour force. If the Tories had told half the truth about Brexit, Labour would not be tasked with digging us out of such a deep hole

Please create an account

To comment on this thread you need to create a Mumsnet account.

This thread is not accepting new messages.