Meet the Other Phone. Flexible and made to last.

Meet the Other Phone.
Flexible and made to last.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

TW death etc I think it’s a conspiracy theory but I’m afraid to google!

593 replies

SensibleSigma · 07/11/2024 17:10

someone was telling me about embalmers having to pull ‘stuff’ out of the veins since Covid/vaxines.

My natural instinct is to declare it total guff. Generally I’d use snopes or similar. But I don’t want to read conspiracy nonsense!

Are we experiencing unusual deaths since Covid/vaccines? I have a relative with an unexpected, unusual heart condition.
Could anyone oblige with actual information rather than conspiracy theories? To be honest I think I am being v v unreasonable to ask but I’m mulling on it.

OP posts:
Thread gallery
15
ginasevern · 09/11/2024 12:47

At the end of the day there's no vaccine for stupid. Even if there was, they wouldn't take it.

Hoppinggreen · 09/11/2024 13:03

Jumpingthruhoops · 09/11/2024 12:00

Of course the BHF would say the risk is 'very low'... they receive funding from the very govt promoting it!

I know more people personally who have 'died suddenly' and/or who now have a life-limiting heart condition than I've ever known to have severe covid.

These cardiac events aren't nearly as rare as organisations like the BHF want you to think they are.

Since people on here like to listen to 'experts' so much, it's woefully ignorant - not to mention a tad disrespectful - to dismiss what someone, who ACTUALLY looks at heart health for a living, is telling you!

Demonstrates my point very well.
One person references the BHF to back up the idea that the Vaccine causes heart disease and another says the BHF website is downplaying the risks as they are funded by the Govt - which is it?

Teanbiscuits33 · 09/11/2024 13:12

Hoppinggreen · 09/11/2024 13:03

Demonstrates my point very well.
One person references the BHF to back up the idea that the Vaccine causes heart disease and another says the BHF website is downplaying the risks as they are funded by the Govt - which is it?

This is what they do, move the goal posts to suit themselves, just ignore anything they don’t want to believe and then call themselves intelligent. The whole reason people subscribe to them is because they don’t understand the complexities of scientific research, so instead of accepting their weaknesses, they just ignore it and do mental gymnastics to maintain their own egos. Blaming someone makes them feel more in control. I find it hilarious they have the nerve to refer to other people as ‘woefully ignorant’ 🤣

HowardTJMoon · 09/11/2024 13:14

MotherOfDragon86 · 09/11/2024 10:47

What part of what I said was bullcrap exactly? I simply stated what went on in the scanning department. It was a specifically list of patients who all had the mRNA vaccine and they were looking at cardiac issues due to this.

How fascinating! How did they distinguish between a) patients who had myocarditis etc caused by the mRNA vaccine, b) patients who had myocarditis etc caused by COVID, and c) patients who had myocarditis etc caused by something else?

Notmoog · 09/11/2024 13:17

"Quite. Those who were paranoid/anxious about having the vaccine should have been encouraged in their nonsense fears in the hope they would then refuse it.
That way, COVID stood a chance of killing them and thereby increasing the overall IQ in the remaining gene pool."

you sound pleasant ( and uninformed re. transmission)

PointsSouth · 09/11/2024 13:35

CookieMonster28 · 07/11/2024 18:30

I'm by no means an anti vaxxer - have had myself...but I did listen to the podcast about this and it was certainly good for thought! It's also got an interesting stance on fertility rates etc and anecdotally women have reported changes to their menstrual cycle since having the vaccine...it's hard not to believe there may be some truth in some of it!

Why is it hard not to believe there’s some truth in it?

What have you been offered that makes you more willing to believe that than any contradictory proposition? How has what you’ve heard addressed the evidence given in those contradictory propositions?

What, in short, makes this so easy to believe?

My rule of thumb, incidentally, is ‘Never believe anyone who feels that an exclamation mark clinches it.’

Notmoog · 09/11/2024 13:35

Teanbiscuits33 · 08/11/2024 23:07

Yes, but he fails to mention important caveats to the research and often uses papers that are not peer reviewed or methodologically sound. Are you telling me you believe those bits of information that confirm your beliefs, but not the others? 😨 you can’t be!!! Really!? Is that confirmation bias I see? 😉. It is easy for lay people who don’t fully understand what they are being told to be taken in, that’s exactly why he does it. Humans also are wired to be alert to threats, so will often seek out ‘’negative’’ things. This is why conspiracies make more money than accurate accounts of things.

Can you tell me, if conspiracy theorists know what they are talking about, why does what they believe change like the wind? I mean, one minute it doesn’t exist at all, the next it does but not as bad as is being said, the next the vaccine contains a chip for tracking, the next it’s meant to kill the underclass within three years etc etc etc and on we go. Which is it? There can only be one truth. Surely you all knowing folk know what that is!?

I think you're getting confused about something quite simple. there are lots of people with lots of different opinions. You are assuming individual people are changing their opinions when in fact you are reading opinions from lots of people.
Quite easy really

Teanbiscuits33 · 09/11/2024 13:43

Notmoog · 09/11/2024 13:35

I think you're getting confused about something quite simple. there are lots of people with lots of different opinions. You are assuming individual people are changing their opinions when in fact you are reading opinions from lots of people.
Quite easy really

No. Not all opinions are created equal. John Campbell knows what he’s doing, he is deliberately omitting and misrepresenting things to suit himself because he has realised this gets him more views. If something has a strong logical basis and has been repeatedly demonstrated using robust data and methods, then that should be accepted until something else leads people to think differently, and even then, consensus does not usually change wildly from one point to the next.

I could have the opinion that the sky is green, it doesn’t make it true or logical. When did we stop valuing intelligence and critical thought and start giving people the idea that all opinions are equally valid and anything goes? It’s a load of absolute bollocks. If that’s the case, how do we ever know what is true and what isn’t?

Notmoog · 09/11/2024 13:52

gosh, it's really not difficult.
No matter what the opinions it is not logical to hear lots of opinions and decide the same group of people are stating all of them and changing their minds every few minutes.

Notmoog · 09/11/2024 13:52

"No. Not all opinions are created equal."
i never said they were.

Teanbiscuits33 · 09/11/2024 13:57

Notmoog · 09/11/2024 13:52

"No. Not all opinions are created equal."
i never said they were.

No, conspiracy theorists frequently move the goal posts on their opinions, it’s not always different people with different opinions. When challenged, they will often think for a minute and then say things like, ‘’well, it must be this then…’’ or ‘’yeah, that evidence you just showed me doesn’t prove anything, they’re all in on it’’ I have spoken to many of the same people who change their opinion more than I have had hot dinners. They don’t know what to believe because they have no idea what is true, they just pick up any old shit and run with it, as long as it says it’s all a big conspiracy then they aren’t fussy, they will claim ‘’they were right’’

Notmoog · 09/11/2024 13:59

As an aside, could someone please explain the difference between verified data and robust data?
Robust data seems to be touted as the gold standard to interpret results from but even after many years in medical research I have never once heard the phrase "robust data" so could anyone who uses the phrase enlighten .

Anothernamechane · 09/11/2024 14:00

Excess deaths are down this year. The highest spike was understandably during 2020, pre vaccine. They were still higher than normal in 22 and the first 6 months of 23, but have been on a downward trend all this year.

Basically there's no good evidence young people, or in fact any people are currently dying at a higher rate than average and in fact deaths have slowly come down from much higher rates at peak covid since the introduction of the vaccine.

There is some evidence that lockdowns and the pandemic reaction was bad for our health in general and it's taken a few years to recover from that

Teanbiscuits33 · 09/11/2024 14:04

Notmoog · 09/11/2024 13:59

As an aside, could someone please explain the difference between verified data and robust data?
Robust data seems to be touted as the gold standard to interpret results from but even after many years in medical research I have never once heard the phrase "robust data" so could anyone who uses the phrase enlighten .

Pretty much the same thing. Robust to me means well sampled, reliable. Just a different terminology I suppose

jannier · 09/11/2024 14:44

Jumpingthruhoops · 09/11/2024 12:00

Of course the BHF would say the risk is 'very low'... they receive funding from the very govt promoting it!

I know more people personally who have 'died suddenly' and/or who now have a life-limiting heart condition than I've ever known to have severe covid.

These cardiac events aren't nearly as rare as organisations like the BHF want you to think they are.

Since people on here like to listen to 'experts' so much, it's woefully ignorant - not to mention a tad disrespectful - to dismiss what someone, who ACTUALLY looks at heart health for a living, is telling you!

So all those deaths were a lie and your friend base is elderly, immune suppressed and vulnerable and they are all up partying?

jannier · 09/11/2024 14:46

HowardTJMoon · 09/11/2024 13:14

How fascinating! How did they distinguish between a) patients who had myocarditis etc caused by the mRNA vaccine, b) patients who had myocarditis etc caused by COVID, and c) patients who had myocarditis etc caused by something else?

My friend has myocarditis caused by slapped cheek a fit healthy 30 year old before

Abhannmor · 09/11/2024 14:47

I recommend the YouTube videos of the Australian immunologist Dr Susan Oliver. She was a guest on the podcast of John Campbell until she noticed he had misunderstood a report about Ivermectin. She tried to tell him privately but he has blanked her.

So she makes short videos debunking what she calls ' anti vaccine bollocks'.
Her dog 🐶, Sindy , is very cute also.

Biffbaff · 09/11/2024 15:27

My favourite type of anti-vax videos were those ones of people fake trembling while sitting there fully made up with their fake nails and hair extensions in. Looked like utter prats. What happened to those shakey people? Haven't seen one of those pop up for ages.

HowardTJMoon · 09/11/2024 16:58

My favourites are the ones who examine their blood and urine to find the 5G-activated self-assembling nanobots that they are convinced were injected with the vaccines. The thought of them crouched over piss-smelling microscopes, seeing crystals of urea or calcium and mistaking them for nanomachinery, brings me joy.

Over40Overdating · 09/11/2024 18:14

@HowardTJMoon the government in power at the time quite literally could not even organise a piss up without someone ratting them out yet the piss inspectors and their pals want us to believe the same people have been able to stay quiet about a sinister vaccine which is part of some new world order plan / injecting us with 5g / A N OTHER bat shit theory.

I wish I knew these people in real life. I have loads of magic beans I need to sell. Maybe a bridge or two as well. All 5g free.

Notmoog · 09/11/2024 19:50

Teanbiscuits33 · 09/11/2024 13:57

No, conspiracy theorists frequently move the goal posts on their opinions, it’s not always different people with different opinions. When challenged, they will often think for a minute and then say things like, ‘’well, it must be this then…’’ or ‘’yeah, that evidence you just showed me doesn’t prove anything, they’re all in on it’’ I have spoken to many of the same people who change their opinion more than I have had hot dinners. They don’t know what to believe because they have no idea what is true, they just pick up any old shit and run with it, as long as it says it’s all a big conspiracy then they aren’t fussy, they will claim ‘’they were right’’

what an odd set of people you know then.
Myself and many people I know refused the injections and have the opinion that they have done more harm than good for the majority of people but our opinion hasn't changed over the last however many years

Notmoog · 09/11/2024 19:50

HowardTJMoon · 09/11/2024 16:58

My favourites are the ones who examine their blood and urine to find the 5G-activated self-assembling nanobots that they are convinced were injected with the vaccines. The thought of them crouched over piss-smelling microscopes, seeing crystals of urea or calcium and mistaking them for nanomachinery, brings me joy.

Edited

and most bizarre made up anecdote award goes to .......

HowardTJMoon · 09/11/2024 19:58

Notmoog · 09/11/2024 19:50

and most bizarre made up anecdote award goes to .......

You think there aren't people who are convinced the covid vaccines contain self-assembling nanobots that are activated by 5G? Want some links?

Notmoog · 09/11/2024 20:03

HowardTJMoon · 09/11/2024 19:58

You think there aren't people who are convinced the covid vaccines contain self-assembling nanobots that are activated by 5G? Want some links?

I'm sure there are but I can bet you have never encountered one ( unless you work in an acute psychiatric ward) so looks very silly to pretend that's a wide held belief you have come across

CharlieMagenta · 09/11/2024 20:15

Anothernamechane · 09/11/2024 14:00

Excess deaths are down this year. The highest spike was understandably during 2020, pre vaccine. They were still higher than normal in 22 and the first 6 months of 23, but have been on a downward trend all this year.

Basically there's no good evidence young people, or in fact any people are currently dying at a higher rate than average and in fact deaths have slowly come down from much higher rates at peak covid since the introduction of the vaccine.

There is some evidence that lockdowns and the pandemic reaction was bad for our health in general and it's taken a few years to recover from that

Excess deaths are down most likely because of the shift in goalposts:

www.gov.uk/government/statistics/excess-mortality-within-england-post-pandemic-method/a9b0ef01-a08f-4e8e-b655-86b67791199d