Throughout history, from the very beginning of time, when a certain species became successful, the things if ate quickly became extinct.
Over a period of less than 100 years, within which dependent species have been able to adapt accordingly through evolutionary development? Can you cite an example outside of humankind where one animal has killed/hunted another to extinction within that sort of timeframe (where all other things are equal, ie, where mankind has not introduced a species or destroyed the habitat of one such that they cannot be replenished)?
Nobody is saying that humans aren't operating outside evolution. We are saying they operate in a way that is bad for the planet. Extinction created by mankind takes many forms, not just their involvement in the food chain. Which part of the hunting an animal to extinction to create a fertility potion, a nice coat or an ornament to put on your mantlepiece is part of nature's great plan? Where do plastics in the ocean factor in? Or nuclear bombs?
Of course the planet will bounce back in some way or other once some part of it is destroyed by humans. Nature will adapt of course. Will humans accept the adaptations? So far, we don't accept animals that would have foraged in their natural habitats, had we not destroyed them and taken them for ourselves, coming to find food in ours. We have superior methods to prevent nature from adapting. That's why we are so destructive.