Meet the Other Phone. A phone that grows with your child.

Meet the Other Phone.
A phone that grows with your child.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

Thread gallery
14
Doidling · 07/10/2024 09:21

Didimum · 05/10/2024 22:08

Only someone truly up their own arse can think this is politics of envy. We can easily afford private school and choose not to, as do many of our friends and family. We all agree with the policy.

Financially its a loss to the government. It interrupts children half way through Alevels and GCSEs, SEND and military children are left out to dry.
No country in the world taxes school education. Some give credits for private education.

80smonster · 07/10/2024 09:21

Bellaboo568 · 07/10/2024 09:15

@80smonster I think where you and I differ is that I don't mind paying the tax to fund state school for people like nurses, carers, teachers, shop workers etc but you seem to object to anyone who isn't a net contributor?

If you re read my post you will see I am vehemently against my friend's situation (and it is a difficult stumbling block in a 40 Yr friendship in fact). My DH are both additional rate tax payers so I do pay my way in terms of tax.

We are happy to pay the vat, but want to see UC cancelled - it’s just a lazy bastard benefit. Anyone choosing not to work full time is choosing not to contribute, many pointing the finger at self funders whilst they behave this way. It’s hypocritical and also why the country is skint

80smonster · 07/10/2024 09:24

EasternStandard · 07/10/2024 09:07

@goodluckbinbin why wouldn’t you pay more rather than expecting it of others?

It’s hypocrisy in real time. I’m happy to pay the vat, but I want to see higher taxes for everyone, so these public services issues are fixed long term. Ditto the NHS. People lounging about on UC need to get a grip and get applying for new jobs, ones that adequately support their families.

Didimum · 07/10/2024 09:29

Doidling · 07/10/2024 09:21

Financially its a loss to the government. It interrupts children half way through Alevels and GCSEs, SEND and military children are left out to dry.
No country in the world taxes school education. Some give credits for private education.

Some of that remains to be seen – in one here has a crystal ball. Yet we do know that many more children are displaced from mainstream school each year due to poverty and unfit schools, so I’m far more concerned about those children in the grand scheme of things.

Regardless, my post was referring to it not being the politics of envy. You’ll find many, many very non envious backers of this policy.

Another76543 · 07/10/2024 09:30

Blanketyre · 07/10/2024 09:15

I think they are about to borrow more and all our mortgages will go up.

Yes, I linked an article to this yesterday. I wonder if people will still be saying “well it’s only a 20% increase in your outgoings. If you couldn’t afford it, you can’t have it. You should’ve planned for this. Crack on and manage like the rest of us have to. Move to a smaller house or a cheaper area” Just like they do when it comes to VAT on school fees.

80smonster · 07/10/2024 09:35

Aduvetday · 07/10/2024 09:13

They will. That’s the only place not paying their fair share. I don’t think this policy will happen. Much like the tax relief on pensions which is not not happening - as I said it wouldn’t. It would destroy growth and target the people who have this country on life support. I think people are in for a nasty shock. I for one will laugh my arse off. About time others paid their fair share and it’s all good when it is someone else’s money. No I don’t have children in private school. I am laughing that the Labour government has realised the tax base is too small and the gullible who voted on this dog whistle policy haven’t cottoned on yet.

Yes is embarrassing how unpolitical and gullible many voters are. Labour will increase taxes for everyone, but it’s mostly been a lack of contribution from lower and middle salaries that will have to pay their way (for a change). The Tories wanted everyone to pay less tax, which clearly isn’t a successful formula.

80smonster · 07/10/2024 09:37

Another76543 · 07/10/2024 09:30

Yes, I linked an article to this yesterday. I wonder if people will still be saying “well it’s only a 20% increase in your outgoings. If you couldn’t afford it, you can’t have it. You should’ve planned for this. Crack on and manage like the rest of us have to. Move to a smaller house or a cheaper area” Just like they do when it comes to VAT on school fees.

That’s exactly what will happen. The result of this is poor people will lose their homes, which they cannot adequately afford. They aren’t nailed to the spot, time to sell up. This will be the first Labour government that creates more homelessness.

mugboat · 07/10/2024 09:39

80smonster · 07/10/2024 09:24

It’s hypocrisy in real time. I’m happy to pay the vat, but I want to see higher taxes for everyone, so these public services issues are fixed long term. Ditto the NHS. People lounging about on UC need to get a grip and get applying for new jobs, ones that adequately support their families.

OR we need legislation to ensure that businesses are paying people a living wage.

mugboat · 07/10/2024 09:40

This reply has been deleted

Message deleted by MNHQ. Here's a link to our Talk Guidelines.

Blanketyre · 07/10/2024 09:40

mugboat · 07/10/2024 09:39

OR we need legislation to ensure that businesses are paying people a living wage.

We have this already. Labour are not touching zero hours contracts.

OP posts:
mugboat · 07/10/2024 09:42

Blanketyre · 07/10/2024 09:40

We have this already. Labour are not touching zero hours contracts.

Yes, but the national living wage is not adequate in some areas, e.g. London.

mugboat · 07/10/2024 09:44

IMustDoMoreExercise · 06/10/2024 21:35

Well, lucky you. Most poor people aren't so lucky.

I am not poor. I am just not wealthy enough to afford private school with or without VAT.
And that's quite the statement you're spaffing with zero evidence.
According to you, "most poor people" have to send their child to a crap state school?

mugboat · 07/10/2024 09:47

80smonster · 07/10/2024 08:51

I believe that those who use state schools should be net contributor's - otherwise it’s the very people who use the service who are running it into the ground.

this is not how tax works... we live in a civilised society.

Start denying good education to swathes of people and crime will go up (to say the very least).

80smonster · 07/10/2024 09:47

mugboat · 07/10/2024 09:39

OR we need legislation to ensure that businesses are paying people a living wage.

Sure, which do you suppose will happen first? I’m willing to hazard a guess… They aren’t about to chase large businesses away. Otherwise we will face recession. Agree living wages need to rise (so we can all pay our fair share of tax).

80smonster · 07/10/2024 10:02

mugboat · 07/10/2024 09:47

this is not how tax works... we live in a civilised society.

Start denying good education to swathes of people and crime will go up (to say the very least).

I didn’t suggest denying an education to those who can’t pay, but maybe rearing children that others in society have to cover the cost of (or further denigrating public services) should be carefully considered. Ultimately many want to not make their fair share of contributions and continue to take from underfunded services. The solution is for everyone to pay more tax. Sorry if that makes you feel uncomfortable.

80smonster · 07/10/2024 10:02

mugboat · 07/10/2024 09:47

this is not how tax works... we live in a civilised society.

Start denying good education to swathes of people and crime will go up (to say the very least).

I didn’t suggest denying an education to those who can’t pay, but maybe rearing children that others in society have to cover the cost of (or further denigrating public services) should be carefully considered. Ultimately many want to not make their fair share of contributions and continue to take from underfunded services. The solution is for everyone to pay more tax. Sorry if that makes you feel uncomfortable.

Another76543 · 07/10/2024 10:03

For those who are convinced that only private school parents care about the VAT on school fees, Twitter (or X, whatever it’s called now) has had 4.6m views on Phillipson’s ridiculous post on Saturday. Given that there are only 600k children in private school, and a lot of those parents aren’t on Twitter, it shows there is wider interest on this.

80smonster · 07/10/2024 10:04

mugboat · 07/10/2024 09:42

Yes, but the national living wage is not adequate in some areas, e.g. London.

People will have to cut their cloth to fit their budget. An accusation that has been levelled at private school parents on here repeatedly.

80smonster · 07/10/2024 10:05

mugboat · 07/10/2024 09:44

I am not poor. I am just not wealthy enough to afford private school with or without VAT.
And that's quite the statement you're spaffing with zero evidence.
According to you, "most poor people" have to send their child to a crap state school?

Are you a net contributor for each member of your household - is the question you should ask yourself?

mugboat · 07/10/2024 10:07

80smonster · 07/10/2024 09:47

Sure, which do you suppose will happen first? I’m willing to hazard a guess… They aren’t about to chase large businesses away. Otherwise we will face recession. Agree living wages need to rise (so we can all pay our fair share of tax).

you were complaining about people on universal credit being a drain on the system... your solution is that that get off their backside and earn more money...
how do they do that?

  1. what jobs should they be aiming for
  2. how will they get these jobs?
  3. are the low-paid jobs that they are leaving necessary for society
  4. if so, who will do the jobs they are leaving?
80smonster · 07/10/2024 10:08

mugboat · 07/10/2024 10:07

you were complaining about people on universal credit being a drain on the system... your solution is that that get off their backside and earn more money...
how do they do that?

  1. what jobs should they be aiming for
  2. how will they get these jobs?
  3. are the low-paid jobs that they are leaving necessary for society
  4. if so, who will do the jobs they are leaving?

How other people fund their lifestyle is entirely down to them. Expecting UC handouts isn’t a way to successfully motivate the unambitious. All the while expecting those who are able to fund their lifestyle to fund yours.

mugboat · 07/10/2024 10:10

80smonster · 07/10/2024 10:05

Are you a net contributor for each member of your household - is the question you should ask yourself?

my husband and I earn more than average. I have not sat down and worked out whether or not I am net contributor (and I really don't see why my finances are any of your business).
Since you ask, we earn more than average, pay a decent amount of tax and NI have children in school but rarely use the NHS as we are fortunate enough to be healthy.

80smonster · 07/10/2024 10:11

mugboat · 07/10/2024 10:10

my husband and I earn more than average. I have not sat down and worked out whether or not I am net contributor (and I really don't see why my finances are any of your business).
Since you ask, we earn more than average, pay a decent amount of tax and NI have children in school but rarely use the NHS as we are fortunate enough to be healthy.

That’s 50k of taxed salary per household member, should be a nice quick calculation. Not wanting to engage with how much tax is required to support society is exactly how we ended up in this mess.

mugboat · 07/10/2024 10:13

80smonster · 07/10/2024 10:08

How other people fund their lifestyle is entirely down to them. Expecting UC handouts isn’t a way to successfully motivate the unambitious. All the while expecting those who are able to fund their lifestyle to fund yours.

Edited

People claiming UC do so to top up poorly paid jobs. Reasons they do those jobs are myriad.

I am not a UC claimant BTW, I think I probably pay more into the system than I get out in fact.

Your comments about people's lifestyles make you sound very angry and bitter, and I feel sorry for you.

Have a good day.

mugboat · 07/10/2024 10:14

80smonster · 07/10/2024 10:11

That’s 50k of taxed salary per household member, should be a nice quick calculation. Not wanting to engage with how much tax is required to support society is exactly how we ended up in this mess.

Have a lovely day you absolutely charming person :)

Please create an account

To comment on this thread you need to create a Mumsnet account.

This thread is not accepting new messages.
Swipe left for the next trending thread