Meet the Other Phone. Flexible and made to last.

Meet the Other Phone.
Flexible and made to last.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

To think that non-binary candidates are more unlikely to be offered a job?

1000 replies

GinnyPiggie · 24/09/2024 12:24

I have a non-binary child in their twenties and they are really struggling to secure work.

It might be unfair of me, but I really think that in presenting themselves as non-binary, they are going to struggle to be offered a job with the vast majority of employers. Yes this might be pure discrimination but personally I'd be worried about HR issues and getting sued for saying the wrong thing.

AIBU to think that if you have a range of good candidates, you are going to be reluctant to hire a non-binary candidate because of the potential for issues in the office?

OP posts:
Thread gallery
14
CautiousLurker · 24/09/2024 14:29

I think it depends upon the industry and whether EDI is prioritised within it - ie, being LGBTQI+ is something that should be highlighted at CV creation/application stage. Ie, is she in the Hotel & Leisure industry and applying for trainee management roles in Gay bars/clubs? Or is she is applying to be a trainee chartered accountant or a camera technician at a TV company where gender identity has bugger all to do with the role and of no significance to service users/clients? Then frankly, yes, foregrounding her status is likely to be a turn off to prospective employers who couldn’t care less about pronouns and do not want to potentially allocate so much as 5mins of their limited HR staff to disputes between staff or unwanted EDI training.

Many employers really do just want competent staff who bring their professional selves to work and leave their authenticity for out of hours socialising.

ArabellaScott · 24/09/2024 14:29

MurdoMunro · 24/09/2024 14:16

I have many colleagues who present as non-binary, some young but most in their 50s (the horror!) but are they actually non-binary? No idea. Should I know or care? It’s a genuine question and I’m being sincere as I always want to learn.

What would make that information important in the work place? Have I fallen into a trap of discriminating through ignorance? I have done that before when I didn’t have experience of something and therefore didn’t realise the consequence of my actions, so it has been helpful to have had someone willing to explain.

It may matter when it comes to changing rooms, showers, toilets, maternity rights, etc. All of which are relevant to sex, of course, not 'gender'.

DadJoke · 24/09/2024 14:30

GuestFeatu · 24/09/2024 13:15

Firstly, yes they do, and secondly non binary is literally just a personality trait (if that, often it's just a clothing preference) so anyone who chooses to change the pronouns they ask people to use when referring to them is ABSOLUTELY making a choice. Nobody has to call themselves non binary. Absolutely nothing will happen to them if they get called she/he or woman/man.

It is not a "personality trait" any more than being gay or disabled is a personality trait. It's a protected characteristic.

Luio · 24/09/2024 14:30

Rights and wrongs aside, I think it would put some people off. I do know someone who is non binary but thinks that it is confusing and difficult for other people to work out. For an easy life he just goes by the pronouns of his sex at work. Might work for your DD. It could be like having a married name but keeping your maiden name for work.

Coulditbeperimenopause · 24/09/2024 14:31

If your daughter (let's face it, non binaries are nearly always female) is struggling to find work perhaps she needs to look at why. Is she coming across as potentially being a challenging person to employ?

Pluvia · 24/09/2024 14:32

DadJoke · 24/09/2024 14:18

Being gay or transgender is not poltical. It's a protected characteristic, which all employers need to respect. LGBT people are the opposite of homophobic and misogynistic, and parents who crush their children's sexuality or gender identity are abusers. People who make transphobia their whole personality are not likely to be good employers.

T is misogynistic and homophobic.

T is based on the concept of gender, which is a belief system. Some people believe in it, others don't. Lots and lots of LGB don't. They know that their sexuality is based on same-sex attraction. T people don't recognise that sex is important. They think gender feelings are more important. So you've got one group who say sex isn't important and that it's totally acceptable for a man with a penis to call himself a woman and force his way into the lesbian disco because he defines himself as a lesbian. And you've got the other group, who are attracted to people because of their physical sex, who say 'Get out of here Brian, you're a man.'

DadJoke · 24/09/2024 14:32

CautiousLurker · 24/09/2024 14:29

I think it depends upon the industry and whether EDI is prioritised within it - ie, being LGBTQI+ is something that should be highlighted at CV creation/application stage. Ie, is she in the Hotel & Leisure industry and applying for trainee management roles in Gay bars/clubs? Or is she is applying to be a trainee chartered accountant or a camera technician at a TV company where gender identity has bugger all to do with the role and of no significance to service users/clients? Then frankly, yes, foregrounding her status is likely to be a turn off to prospective employers who couldn’t care less about pronouns and do not want to potentially allocate so much as 5mins of their limited HR staff to disputes between staff or unwanted EDI training.

Many employers really do just want competent staff who bring their professional selves to work and leave their authenticity for out of hours socialising.

It's funny, leaving their "authentic selves" at home tends to apply to straight, white, cisgender people. We've heard all this before. It used to be that a gay person couldn't mention their engagement with colleagues, now they can.

Transgender people are just as professional as anyone else.

titchy · 24/09/2024 14:33

It is not a "personality trait" any more than being gay or disabled is a personality trait. It's a protected characteristic.

Well it's a belief isn't it? The same as religion and being gender critical are (protected) beliefs.

Twart · 24/09/2024 14:33

HarpyBirthday · 24/09/2024 13:59

But surely the level of fervour can be discerned at interview?

Surely someone shouldn't be discriminated against for putting that they are non- binary on a CV.

If their CV was much the same as others I’d filter it out because of my experience with NB people. In a small and friendly working environment it’s just not worth the risk.

An outstanding CV would make it through, obviously, but personality and fervour in an interview would be watched carefully.

I may be biased though. The 10-12 NB women I’ve met/worked with have all been attention seeking pains in the arse. I’ve worked with others whose personalities jar with the group, and they have a similar style of coming across. If I had a way to filter them out too I would.

Pluvia · 24/09/2024 14:34

DadJoke · 24/09/2024 14:30

It is not a "personality trait" any more than being gay or disabled is a personality trait. It's a protected characteristic.

Here's the Equality Act 2010:
https://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2010/15/contents

Please identify where being non-binary is a protected characteristic.

It's not. Stop spreading disinformation.

Equality Act 2010

An Act to make provision to require Ministers of the Crown and others when making strategic decisions about the exercise of their functions to have regard to the desirability of reducing socio-economic inequalities; to reform and harmonise equality law...

https://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2010/15/contents

CautiousLurker · 24/09/2024 14:35

DadJoke · 24/09/2024 14:32

It's funny, leaving their "authentic selves" at home tends to apply to straight, white, cisgender people. We've heard all this before. It used to be that a gay person couldn't mention their engagement with colleagues, now they can.

Transgender people are just as professional as anyone else.

Used to be that we genuinely didn’t know or care whether our colleagues were gay/straight/married or had children. We just cared that they could do their job brilliantly so that the company flourished and we could all go home on time…

newyorker74 · 24/09/2024 14:35

I think this is a situation where, assuming your child's experience allows some flexibility, they will need to check out the company before applying and try to ascertain their openness to diversity. Lots of larger companies pay lip service to it but that doesn't always translate down into the hiring stream but generally, larger international companies who have a strong public facing service, might be more likely to be open to hiring. Thinking they want/need to represent their users more. It's a pain and shouldn't be a necessary step but I would look at is as making sure that, once your child is in work, that the company will be supportive.

Pluvia · 24/09/2024 14:35

titchy · 24/09/2024 14:33

It is not a "personality trait" any more than being gay or disabled is a personality trait. It's a protected characteristic.

Well it's a belief isn't it? The same as religion and being gender critical are (protected) beliefs.

No, that's transphobic to called gender a belief! It's a thing. Transwomen are women, no debate and all that.

minipie · 24/09/2024 14:35

Derwent01 · 24/09/2024 13:40

When referring to the "binary concept of male and female," it traditionally relates to the idea that gender is strictly divided into two categories based on biological sex (i.e., male and female bodies). However, when we talk about "presenting themselves as non-binary," it’s not only about bodies but also about how people express their gender identity beyond those traditional categories.

Appearance, pronouns, behaviors, and language are ways individuals can communicate their gender identity to others. While bodies might be traditionally classified under male or female, non-binary presentation is about how someone chooses to externally express their internal sense of gender—which could include:

Clothing choices that don’t conform to traditionally male or female norms.

Hair and makeup that blend or reject gendered styles.

Pronouns like "they/them," which move away from binary identifiers like "he" or "she."

Behaviors that don’t fit stereotypical masculine or feminine roles.

These forms of expression are important because gender identity is not solely tied to physical bodies but is also about how individuals feel and wish to be recognized. Even if someone’s biological sex is male or female, their gender identity and how they present themselves might not align with those physical attributes. That's where appearance and behaviors come into play, helping to visually and socially express something that goes beyond just the physical body.

Edited

Based on this explanation I’d say about 90% of humans are non binary. Since about 90% don’t conform fully to gender stereotypes.

For example, I am female but I like physics, science fiction and wearing trousers. I dislike beauty treatments and prosecco. I guess I must be non binary?

I’ve yet to see any explanation of non binary that manages to explain how non binary people are somehow in a different category from all the rest of us who also don’t fully conform to gender stereotypes. Is it perhaps all about names and pronouns? Are they the only important non conformities?

WhyamIinahandcartandwherearewegoing · 24/09/2024 14:36

pinkfleece · 24/09/2024 12:54

That's the issue.
Just say 'My name is'

No-one cares about their pronouns and that introduction would really put me off.

👍👍👍

TonTonMacoute · 24/09/2024 14:37

Agree that the job market for Gen Z is absolutely awful at the moment.

I know many who are desperate to find a job, are making hundreds of applications and often don't even get an acknowledgment, let alone an interview. Meanwhile, they are constantly being portrayed in the press as lazy and entitled 'quiet quitters'.

World's gone mad!

WearyAuldWumman · 24/09/2024 14:38

BenditlikeBridget · 24/09/2024 13:10

If they just turned up with a unisex name or an indeterminate appearance but were a good candidate, that would be fine. But the announcing of their gender identity would put me off tbh, as it would if they introduced themselves with any irrelevant identity type information. It makes workplace drama seem more likely and I need my team to gel.

Yup.

I now use my married name. If I'd started an interview with "I'm Weary AuldWumman", but my maiden name was "Pavlović", the interviewer would be wondering why on earth I would need to give that information - was I trying to set up a claim for discrimination?

Flibflobflibflob · 24/09/2024 14:38

To be blunt well yes, putting the fact that you are non-binary on your CV screams navel gazing, drama llama. I would dread the “I want to be referred to as xyz and the inevitable whinging when people correctly identify your sex”.

I’ve never felt the need to out my sexual orientation or my feelings about gender stereotypes on a CV, I wouldn’t expect an employer to give a shit.

Morecoffeeforme · 24/09/2024 14:39

newyorker74 · 24/09/2024 14:35

I think this is a situation where, assuming your child's experience allows some flexibility, they will need to check out the company before applying and try to ascertain their openness to diversity. Lots of larger companies pay lip service to it but that doesn't always translate down into the hiring stream but generally, larger international companies who have a strong public facing service, might be more likely to be open to hiring. Thinking they want/need to represent their users more. It's a pain and shouldn't be a necessary step but I would look at is as making sure that, once your child is in work, that the company will be supportive.

Supportive of what exactly?

The fact this woman says she’s neither female or male?

Shes clearly got mental health issues! And will presumably kick off if anyone accidentally calls her “she” instead of they/them

MurdoMunro · 24/09/2024 14:39

Pluvia · 24/09/2024 14:24

FWIW I'd absolutely consider a non-binary person as a candidate. Furthermore I can imagine for the right person, the challenges they face and

I'm intrigued. What challenges does a non-binary person face?

I ask because I'm an older lesbian. When I was young I had fewer rights than the straight population. I couldn't marry, I couldn't have a share of my partner's pension, my partner and I were turned away from hotels and guests houses, asked to leave restaurants and bars because they didn't want queers there... I could be sacked for being lesbian. I'd love to know what kind of challenges a non-binary person thinks they face today. And above all, I'd love to know what non-binary actually means. Can you help me with that?

Thanks @Pluvia you explained that better than me. I am interested in the answer for similar reasons to you.

I think this thread is getting a bit muddled, trans and non-binary is being used interchangeably for example and I would normally hold those to be different, although I don’t have the knowledge to know why. But I think the middle aged lesbian perspective on this is useful which is why I locked into your comment.

When working with someone who doesn’t conform to traditional ideas of gender norms, maybe in how they dress or speak, behave or the things that they are interested in I might have the time to run down my list of available labels and land on non-binary. But why would it be important for me to be told that, particularly at interview?

TheDeepLemonHelper · 24/09/2024 14:39

This reply has been deleted

This has been deleted by MNHQ for breaking our Talk Guidelines.

DadJoke · 24/09/2024 14:40

Pluvia · 24/09/2024 14:34

Here's the Equality Act 2010:
https://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2010/15/contents

Please identify where being non-binary is a protected characteristic.

It's not. Stop spreading disinformation.

Sure, it was established in a tribunal case:

www.springhouselaw.com/knowledge-hub/discrimination-bullying-and-harassment/are-non-binary-people-protected-against-workplace-discrimination

MargolyesofBeelzebub · 24/09/2024 14:42

DadJoke · 24/09/2024 14:32

It's funny, leaving their "authentic selves" at home tends to apply to straight, white, cisgender people. We've heard all this before. It used to be that a gay person couldn't mention their engagement with colleagues, now they can.

Transgender people are just as professional as anyone else.

I have gay colleagues, I have vegetarian colleagues and I have Muslim colleagues. When chatting, they are likely to mention their partners, or a great veggie restaurant they went to the other night or the fact they are fasting because of a religious observance. Cool beans. Nobody is saing things like "you must only eat vegetarian food around me because meat offends me" or "when you say 'Mohammed' you must say 'peace be upon him", even if they're thinking those thoughts.

But my former non-binary colleague required everyone to tie themselves in knots to use they/them pronouns. Meetings involving this person were tense because nobody wanted to get it wrong and upset him. And the odd occasion people did get it wrong, because it's fecking difficult, people winced and felt awkward. Other characteristics don't require capitulation to some annoying recently established and hard to follow social rules. It's why non-binary status also attracts narcissists who enjoy the control they wreak on others. Not saying all NB people are narcissists, but it's a status that attracts that kind of personality.

TheSquareMile · 24/09/2024 14:44

GinnyPiggie · 24/09/2024 13:06

Generally in quite small and traditional industries, but lately pretty much anything that they have experience in.

@GinnyPiggie

Could they branch out into a new field in which there might be more opportunities, OP?

CrochetForLife · 24/09/2024 14:46

Only reading end-thread posts here and there, not sure that I want to read the whole thread as it probably won't be good for my blood pressure. But just wanted to add (for OP's sake more than anything).... there is no such thing as 'non-binary'. It 'exists' only as a fad to make people feel special and unique. In truth, none of us 100% adhere to our sex's stereotypes. There are around 9 billion people on the planet. With 9 billion different personalities. That's it. No one is 'binary'. 'non-binary' is not a thing and never has been except for around the last 8 years and OP I'd sit your daughter down and have a serious talk with them and ask them why they feel they are 'non-binary', what they get from it, and what it does for them when they claim 'non-binary' status. Try and talk some sense into her. There is obviously a need for her to fit in to some cult or movement especially if she is insecure. But nonsense like this will hinder her chances of getting a job. Many employers said they shred resumes/cover letters without fully reading them if they have pronouns on them. And if she goes around randomly announcing her pronouns (something never done before in civilisation except for around the last 8 or so years), she is going to look unhinged and she'll start clearing rooms. Employers (and general society) have had enough. This pronoun fad is starting to take it's last breath.

Please create an account

To comment on this thread you need to create a Mumsnet account.

This thread is not accepting new messages.
Swipe left for the next trending thread