This one is my obsession, and it started on the day he was convicted - based on what a body-language expert said about his sky tv interview on the day of her funeral.
This seemed to be a trial-by-media conviction (no DNA from Luke but DNA from other man in used condom near the body).
He was a weirdo, not well liked by his peers, urinated in bottles because he didn't want to pause his game to go to the loo, was a goth and so on.
There was something odd about Jodie's father/uncle/brother/cousin but I'd have to Google what it was.
My opinion is her family didn't like Luke and were quick to point the finger. A sympathetic community and relentless media ran with it and Luke was convicted on 'dislike'.
He's still inside and would have been released on parole years ago if he confessed.
My main concern is that he was convicted of murder based on flimsy circumstantial evidence. In fact, there isn't even any CE when you look at it.
And nobody cares. No politicians up in arms, the community, moj orgs etc. He's been swept under the carpet.
The other cases that have me obsessed are the Moors murders, Soham murders, Denis Nielsen, Jeremy Bamber and Ted Bundy