@Catsmere
It all boils down to telling women we should really get back to having children and having no life outside that.
I think there’s an element of truth in this. Not so much in relation to children vs pets, more in relation to children vs other sources of interest and self actualisation.
I do think a fairly substantial group of people think that children are tye only proper, authentic and wholesome direction for a woman’s efforts. They may not think this consciously but it’s very evident in their focus.
I have lost count of the conversations I have had with people where they will ask how I am and I will talk about some aspect of my life (my job, hobbies or social life) and they will immediately bulldoze into asking about my daughter as if the rest is window dressing.
I think that a lot of the attitudes on this thread follow this logic: people find it so self evident that children are a blessing and a goal for everyone that they assume any woman who doesn’t want them is warped or damaged in some way or has been “let down by society”, either due to mistreatment by men, lack of money or some other defect.
In fact the way I see it is totally different: having children was in the past a more or less inevitable trajectory for a woman’s life. Contraception, improved career opportunities and better education mean that is no longer automatically the case. Women are therefore able to revert to their genuine wishes with respect to children and have them or not have them as they see fit rather than having them because it was expected of you and something everyone did.
I see this as an unequivocal positive to be honest. There are large amounts of data that show positive links between female independence and female reproductive control and healthier socities.
Trying to spin female reproductive autonomy as “sad” in some way is wildly missing the mark.