Meet the Other Phone. Only the apps you allow.

Meet the Other Phone.
Only the apps you allow.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

Greater Manchester Police brutality

981 replies

Gummybear23 · 24/07/2024 22:22

https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/article/2024/jul/24/armed-police-officer-filmed-kicking-man-in-face-at-manchester-airport

Sickening behaviour. Surely tasering the man is enough.
He is on the floor tasered so you give him some kickings to the head?

Hope this is properly investigated.
Greater Manchester Police have an awful reputation.

Manchester airport: officer removed from frontline duty after arrest video goes viral

Armed police officer seen kicking suspect in footage Greater Manchester police called ‘truly shocking’

https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/article/2024/jul/24/armed-police-officer-filmed-kicking-man-in-face-at-manchester-airport

OP posts:
Thread gallery
12
rosiers · 28/07/2024 11:01

@JacquesHarlow you've repeatedly said that the officers were outnumbered as though you are placing weight on this. There are three officers attempting to arrest one man. One other man (his brother) instigates the violence. The 3 police officers were not outnumbered by the two perpetrators.

Usercyzabc · 28/07/2024 11:02

FineFettler · 28/07/2024 10:59

Are you seriously suggesting that it was OK to kick him in the head because one of a number of possible actions he might have taken was to take a gun and shoot someone? Even though he could easily have been prevented from doing anything of the sort by being restrained and handcuffed? On that basis, it's OK for the police to carry out violent attacks on anyone peacefully going about their business, because they don't know that those people don't intend to steal their guns and shoot people. Is that the sort of police force you want?

How do you excuse the subsequent attack on the man sitting on a seat behind them with his arms up in a surrender gesture? The same officer tells him to lie on the ground, as he is complying the officer kicks him in the leg, then when he's on the ground he hits him on the head with his taser gun. Was that attack also OK with you?

The response was ok with me - yes you were t asking me but I’m jumping in anyway.

FineFettler · 28/07/2024 11:02

MyGladEagle · 28/07/2024 10:54

What's your precedent for establishing non-zero threat at this point? Do you have an expert in taser effectiveness or a conclusive reference to back this up?

You don't understand the law of evidence, do you? Precedent and "conclusive references" simply don't come into it. The evidence is there in the video: the man is lying on the floor having just been tasered, the police can simply take his arms and restrain them behind his back, ditto his feet, to neutralise any threat.

If kicking someone in the head was an appropriate response in this situation, the officer wouldn't have been suspended.

MyGladEagle · 28/07/2024 11:03

FineFettler · 28/07/2024 10:59

Are you seriously suggesting that it was OK to kick him in the head because one of a number of possible actions he might have taken was to take a gun and shoot someone? Even though he could easily have been prevented from doing anything of the sort by being restrained and handcuffed? On that basis, it's OK for the police to carry out violent attacks on anyone peacefully going about their business, because they don't know that those people don't intend to steal their guns and shoot people. Is that the sort of police force you want?

How do you excuse the subsequent attack on the man sitting on a seat behind them with his arms up in a surrender gesture? The same officer tells him to lie on the ground, as he is complying the officer kicks him in the leg, then when he's on the ground he hits him on the head with his taser gun. Was that attack also OK with you?

Please prove he could have easily been detained and handcuffed while on the floor. Are you an expert in detaining violently out of control people or do you have one to hand?

FineFettler · 28/07/2024 11:04

greengreyblue · 28/07/2024 11:00

@FineFettler thing is this all happened in a matter of seconds. To get close enough to cuff him was risky given the extreme violence and disrespect for authority that had already been seen.

Come off it, it was too risky to get close enough to cuff him, but not too risky to get close enough to kick him? These are officers trained to deal with precisely this sort of situation.

AzureAnt · 28/07/2024 11:04

Nobody can say we weren't warned
Decades ago
Waiting for the delete message

MyGladEagle · 28/07/2024 11:05

FineFettler · 28/07/2024 11:02

You don't understand the law of evidence, do you? Precedent and "conclusive references" simply don't come into it. The evidence is there in the video: the man is lying on the floor having just been tasered, the police can simply take his arms and restrain them behind his back, ditto his feet, to neutralise any threat.

If kicking someone in the head was an appropriate response in this situation, the officer wouldn't have been suspended.

How do you know they can simply take his arms and restrain him behind his back?

Scammersarescum · 28/07/2024 11:05

MauveCrow · 28/07/2024 09:54

Ermmm No. The police would change their threat assessment after getting attacked, punched, and injured.

Most police interactions do result in violence, the fact this did probably made the copper wonder why they are physically grabbing and attacking someone carrying a loaded firearm. I know I would probably do anything I thought was required to eliminate that potential threat.

Are you really that moronic?

These idiots are lucky the police were restrained enough not just just shoot them dead.

Maybe the police should only be allowed to carry narwhal tusks in the future.

In the USA they would have been shot as the police are a lot more trigger happy.

It's a shame they weren't, they wouldn't be a sad loss to society, behaving like violent scum in an airport area where their horrific behaviour would be inflicted on others. Not to mention the violent assault against the police. I hope they get the heaviest sentence possible.

They are a disgrace just as are the 'protestors' who are just a bunch of trouble makers intent on a riot. Even the Imam trying to diffuse the situation outside the police station was reported as stating to the crowd 'this is what these brothers want' as though the police and locals want this kind of violence and disorder! How dare he? He should have said you are behaving like a bunch of intimidating thugs are bring shame on your family and community. It's no surprise at all that the cowards hide their faces. They had no need to react at all until they saw the entire incident.

In bradford the same kind of unrest was seen after the fatal shooting of the drug dealer Yassar Yakuub. The community blocking roads, masked up, waving black lives matter banners. He was a heroine dealing scumbag whose house had been shot up by rival dealers and who reached for a gun. But yet again a massively overheated reaction was seen which was utterly unjustified.

It's no wonder Reform are making gains is it? Nigel will be fucking loving this. Anti Muslim sentiment will certainly increase.

Those men have got a lot to answer for. The policeman who kicked the perpetrator much less so. Not only did he deserve it, he needed immobilising .

EsmaCannonball · 28/07/2024 11:05

FineFettler · 28/07/2024 11:02

You don't understand the law of evidence, do you? Precedent and "conclusive references" simply don't come into it. The evidence is there in the video: the man is lying on the floor having just been tasered, the police can simply take his arms and restrain them behind his back, ditto his feet, to neutralise any threat.

If kicking someone in the head was an appropriate response in this situation, the officer wouldn't have been suspended.

But one could argue that the official treatment of the police officer in this case is to appease potential rioters and to diffuse sectarian tensions. It's politics more than justice.

MyGladEagle · 28/07/2024 11:06

rosiers · 28/07/2024 11:01

@JacquesHarlow you've repeatedly said that the officers were outnumbered as though you are placing weight on this. There are three officers attempting to arrest one man. One other man (his brother) instigates the violence. The 3 police officers were not outnumbered by the two perpetrators.

Were the officers outnumbered when two of them became incapacitated?

MyGladEagle · 28/07/2024 11:07

rosiers · 28/07/2024 10:58

@MyGladEagle you've lost me now. When considering whether or not force is reasonable, the race or religion of the person on the receiving end should not factor in at all. My view would not change if you changed the race or religion of any of the people involved.

Somehow I doubt that.

JacquesHarlow · 28/07/2024 11:08

rosiers · 28/07/2024 11:01

@JacquesHarlow you've repeatedly said that the officers were outnumbered as though you are placing weight on this. There are three officers attempting to arrest one man. One other man (his brother) instigates the violence. The 3 police officers were not outnumbered by the two perpetrators.

I count five people surrounding three officers in the new video, with others just out of vision.

Yes two of them appear to be the main perpetrators, but you make it sound as if there were only two people - there were many more in a situation which needed controlling.

What you also fail to say @rosiers is how the man in light blue punches one officer (F I think), to the ground. Then takes a huge swing and downs a second female officer. Then runs straight back to the male officer and sucker punches him in the head, with a flying punch. Then drags the injured officer to the ground and makes a reach for his belt.

I’d love to hear how people feel this would have concluded in the US, Canada, France, China or Russia.

rosiers · 28/07/2024 11:08

greengreyblue · 28/07/2024 11:00

@FineFettler thing is this all happened in a matter of seconds. To get close enough to cuff him was risky given the extreme violence and disrespect for authority that had already been seen.

But he did get close enough. After the kick he kneels on his kidney. He could have cuffed him then, but for whatever reason chose not to.

MyGladEagle · 28/07/2024 11:09

rosiers · 28/07/2024 11:08

But he did get close enough. After the kick he kneels on his kidney. He could have cuffed him then, but for whatever reason chose not to.

How do you know he could have cuffed him?

JacquesHarlow · 28/07/2024 11:11

MyGladEagle · 28/07/2024 11:06

Were the officers outnumbered when two of them became incapacitated?

Exactly - way better put than I just did.

Two of the officers are felled by the man in light blue. That makes it two or three on one, and the huge sucker punch from the light blue guy brings the third police officer (M) to the ground.

At this point it’s about fighting for your life and trying to regain control of a situation that could turn very scary. When on the ground, the perpetrator appears to reach for the officer’s belt - I may be wrong here but it looks like it.

At that stage it’s a proper crisis. What followed merits investigation, but I never said it didn’t

What I’m sick of is people making out that the police were fine. They had three people, etc.

NO.

Two of them were heavily incapacitated, one with a broken nose. The third is at this point trying to contain two highly aggressive males.

AhBiscuits · 28/07/2024 11:11

Punching a police officer and breaking her nose should be a jail sentence. We can't tolerate attacks on those who enforce our laws, it needs to be clear that assaulting them is severely punished.

EsmaCannonball · 28/07/2024 11:12

FineFettler · 28/07/2024 11:04

Come off it, it was too risky to get close enough to cuff him, but not too risky to get close enough to kick him? These are officers trained to deal with precisely this sort of situation.

Cuffing him would have involved holstering the taser and bending down close enough to him so he could start punching you in the head (again) or grapple with you and grab your weapons. This guy has just shown that he was willing to resort to extreme violence in order to avoid arrest.

I hope none of the police officers, who were all punched in the head, (some repeatedly) have developed cysts. Would be terrible if they counter-sued.

FineFettler · 28/07/2024 11:12

MyGladEagle · 28/07/2024 11:03

Please prove he could have easily been detained and handcuffed while on the floor. Are you an expert in detaining violently out of control people or do you have one to hand?

Yes.

wtfissummer · 28/07/2024 11:13

rosiers · 28/07/2024 10:49

I'm sorry to labour this point but we have just had another derisive reference to this man's "community". I genuinely do not believe that had these perpetrators been white Christian men, so many people would be concerned with their "community". There are obvious undertones of either conscious or unconscious Islamophobia and racism.

But why should anyone be referencing a "community"

There is one law, defined legal processes for anyone in this country

Why should police be having meetings with "community leaders". Why should the "community" be involved at all in what was basically a couple of violent scumbags and their by-standing enablers trying to get to interfere with police doing their jobs?

MyGladEagle · 28/07/2024 11:14

FineFettler · 28/07/2024 11:12

Yes.

So how do you know he could have been easily detained then?

I assume since you're an expert in detaining violent criminals you'll be able to give us a precise example of where you've been violently attacked and then had to detain one. Strange how you haven't already.

MrsSkylerWhite · 28/07/2024 11:16

LovelyBitOfHam · Today 01:42
It always amuses me how much some Mumsnetters hate the police.

I certainly don’t hate the police. I respect and admire anyone who puts themselves forward. I also respect the law, though, and the officer was acting illegally.

FineFettler · 28/07/2024 11:17

EsmaCannonball · 28/07/2024 11:12

Cuffing him would have involved holstering the taser and bending down close enough to him so he could start punching you in the head (again) or grapple with you and grab your weapons. This guy has just shown that he was willing to resort to extreme violence in order to avoid arrest.

I hope none of the police officers, who were all punched in the head, (some repeatedly) have developed cysts. Would be terrible if they counter-sued.

There are a number of officers close by, including the one who has just tasered the man on the ground. He could have been tasered again if necessary. It's not all down to the one officer and, as I have said, they are trained to restrain people safely.

MrsSkylerWhite · 28/07/2024 11:18

AhBiscuits · Today 11:11
Punching a police officer and breaking her nose should be a jail sentence. We can't tolerate attacks on those who enforce our laws, it needs to be clear that assaulting them is severely punished.

Absolutely, by due process of law.

cakeorwine · 28/07/2024 11:19

EsmaCannonball · 28/07/2024 11:12

Cuffing him would have involved holstering the taser and bending down close enough to him so he could start punching you in the head (again) or grapple with you and grab your weapons. This guy has just shown that he was willing to resort to extreme violence in order to avoid arrest.

I hope none of the police officers, who were all punched in the head, (some repeatedly) have developed cysts. Would be terrible if they counter-sued.

In the video, you can see the person on the floor get up after the officer who kicked him in the head then goes to the other person who is on the bench with his hands behind his head.

The officer leaves the unrestrained man on the ground - the one who he has kicked in the head. A second or 2 later, the man on the ground is then restrained by another officer.

MyGladEagle · 28/07/2024 11:20

FineFettler · 28/07/2024 11:17

There are a number of officers close by, including the one who has just tasered the man on the ground. He could have been tasered again if necessary. It's not all down to the one officer and, as I have said, they are trained to restrain people safely.

Edited

Were all the tasers still functioning at this point in time?