Reminds me of meetings in secluded sections of hospital sites in 2004.
'We're going to have everybody using the same system, all running exactly the same programs, all run from four sites across the country, one per region, it'll be great and perfect and everything will be awesome'
Ummm, what happens if something goes wrong with any of those four sites or programs? Why aren't they set up so if one goes down, the other three take up the slack?
'Why are you being so negative, Mooncup?'
I hadn't even asked what made them think that it would be possible to implement a countrywide standard to work with all areas' and locations' IT. Or who would be the recipient of the money to implement this scale of IT, infrastructure and telecoms financing. Or what would happen to the thousands of IT staff in the health service if 'everything's done remotely by one team'. Or why I was in a presentation being given by a very important manager who I had already shown how to log in because they didn't understand what CAPS LOCK did when typing in a case sensitive password and not by anybody with enough IT experience to understand the principle of redundancy.
But this is why I don't enable automatic updates of anything. Automatic updates mean automatic clusterfucks being pushed out to everybody at once.