Meet the Other Phone. Protection built in.

Meet the Other Phone.
Protection built in.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

Slightly offended DGM announced I 'married well'

110 replies

Jackjackjackaroo · 04/07/2024 21:36

For the record, DGM has form for being very spiteful, lots of backhanded compliments and general bitterness towards others doing well for themselves.
At a large Family gathering yesterday I overheard her saying how lucky I am to have DH because of his Job and that I should be grateful I married well.
Yes, DH does have a very successful job, we are comfortable but due to the nature of his Work, he is often an absent Father / Husband and has been for Years.
I on the other hand, earn pennies but have spent my entire career working for Charities, volunteering, fundraising and raising awareness. My upbringing was truly terrible so my life's mission has always been to help others, DH supports that wholeheartedly.

Not sure where I'm going with this post, perhaps just a rant, but I can't help but feel annoyed that my contribution to society is so overlooked by Salary!

OP posts:
fieldsofbutterflies · 05/07/2024 11:09

Poolstream · 05/07/2024 11:04

Everyone saying op married well. We don’t know that.

In my case dh and I were both low earners but his career took off and anyone looking at us 10 years later may say I married well.
In actual fact I met and married a man who built a career but at the point we got married he was an administrative assistant.
I didn’t bag a wealthy man.

Very few people are high earners at a young age, though.

When I met DH he was only on minimum wage. He now earns well above that running a very successful business - I would absolutely say I "married well" in that respect, especially as his income gives me the ability to work in a field that's very much my passion - I couldn't do that if he didn't earn what he does.

lap90 · 05/07/2024 11:16

I dont see the issue tbh.

You do appear to have married well.

Rondel · 05/07/2024 11:24

fieldsofbutterflies · 05/07/2024 11:06

He (or she if the roles were swapped) could not have had both a career and a family without the OP's support

How do you figure that out? Loads of families manage just fine with two full time workers Confused

Absolutely. I don’t recognise the idea that the lower earner (and guess what, it is seldom the man…) ‘naturally’ takes a professional step back when the couple have children. DH earns more than I do because he left the field we both trained for in favour of a more lucrative one, but this doesn’t mean he or I accept he does less parenting, less household gruntwork, or that my career is less important.

GingerPirate · 05/07/2024 11:33

OP, I married well too.
I'm not offended the slightest, in fact I'm very fortunate and grateful to have the life I always wanted.
45 yo, no kids.

Theweepywillow · 05/07/2024 11:38

Rondel · 05/07/2024 11:24

Absolutely. I don’t recognise the idea that the lower earner (and guess what, it is seldom the man…) ‘naturally’ takes a professional step back when the couple have children. DH earns more than I do because he left the field we both trained for in favour of a more lucrative one, but this doesn’t mean he or I accept he does less parenting, less household gruntwork, or that my career is less important.

The poster thinks it’s the 1950s who on earth thinks a man can’t have a family and support unless he’s some little woman behind him. Bloody hell

Viviennemary · 05/07/2024 11:40

But you have. Well done.

rumnraisins · 05/07/2024 12:07

But you have married well! What’s wrong with saying it?

In comparison to you, I’ve spent my working life unable to pursue a passion due to the simple fact that it could not pay any of my bills without a significant financial investment upfront (training), and I don’t have money or a rich husband who could bear the financial burden while I do what I love.

You have the luxury of being able to do what you love and not worry about money. You’re very much an outlier.

I say this without envy. It’s just baffling to me that you don’t see that the only reason you can do this is thanks to your husband being a high earner = marrying well (if he’s also a nice person and it sound like he is).

Nobody is questioning your ‘contribution to society’ but it’s also not wrong to point out that you are able to do it because you love it and because money is not something you have to worry about, thanks to your husband.

Btw, I’d say the same if you were a man married to a wealthy woman and complaining about being described as having married well.

letsgoooo · 05/07/2024 12:26

Whitesky75 · 04/07/2024 22:22

Im sure a lot of people want to do charity, but cannot as they have to earn to pay bills and put food on the table.

You are lucky that your DH earns enough to enable you to take up charity jobs. You definitely married well. Nothing wrong with what your relative said.

And presumably he married well in choosing someone with compassion at the heart of their nature and who has the capacity to do the lions share of parenting abd enabling his career to progress by enabling him to work away all the time.

letsgoooo · 05/07/2024 12:29

fieldsofbutterflies · 05/07/2024 08:02

I'm not sure what's offensive about it - she's right. You have married well.

You have a husband who earns a great income and allows you to dedicate your life to your passion (charity work) without having to worry about how you're going to pay the mortgage or the bills every month. That's pretty fucking amazing, really.

And he married well in that he married someone willing to take on the lions share of domestic and parenting responsibilities enabling him to work away from home so much of the year.

letsgoooo · 05/07/2024 12:31

@EdgyCat

Your compromise is that you see him less and his compromise is not seeing his family much AND being responsible for their income.

Her compromise is ALSO that he is not around much to share in the day to day drudgery and responsibility of parenting and domestic work.

Unless you don't think this is any sort of work or effort

Yippiddy · 05/07/2024 12:40

It sounds like you did 'marry well' but also that your husband 'married well'. I don't think that's offensive.

I have always done regular charitable work but have only been able to do it because of my husband's salary. 🤷🏻‍♀️

EdgyCat · 05/07/2024 12:41

letsgoooo · 05/07/2024 12:31

@EdgyCat

Your compromise is that you see him less and his compromise is not seeing his family much AND being responsible for their income.

Her compromise is ALSO that he is not around much to share in the day to day drudgery and responsibility of parenting and domestic work.

Unless you don't think this is any sort of work or effort

But he is also putting up with some form of drudgery and shit at work, too. It's not a competition it's about owning the choices you have and being grateful to be able to choose. Plenty other women don't have the money this husband brings while also doing most of parenting and daily drudgery.

I thought "missing" him also encapsulated missing a person when they are needed to help with something, not just staring out of a window longingly and sighing 🙄

Even if she had a high flying career, it would still be correct to say she married well since he is bringing a lot of money or from a rich background. Whether homemakers are valuable to society m, which i believe they are, is a separate discussion entirely. You and op are taking a very defensive angle at a factual comment 'married well'. It doesn't mean he hasn't also got lucky with op for different reasons, it's just a very common expression that someone married a spouse with money which op did, even more impressive because it changed her fortunes dramatically. It's got nothing to do with her being a charity worker because that is a standalone comment. It's people who are insecure and sensitive about their own lack of career that offence. This is hugely projecting on the granny's comment.

Squareplate · 05/07/2024 12:43

EdgyCat · 05/07/2024 12:41

But he is also putting up with some form of drudgery and shit at work, too. It's not a competition it's about owning the choices you have and being grateful to be able to choose. Plenty other women don't have the money this husband brings while also doing most of parenting and daily drudgery.

I thought "missing" him also encapsulated missing a person when they are needed to help with something, not just staring out of a window longingly and sighing 🙄

Even if she had a high flying career, it would still be correct to say she married well since he is bringing a lot of money or from a rich background. Whether homemakers are valuable to society m, which i believe they are, is a separate discussion entirely. You and op are taking a very defensive angle at a factual comment 'married well'. It doesn't mean he hasn't also got lucky with op for different reasons, it's just a very common expression that someone married a spouse with money which op did, even more impressive because it changed her fortunes dramatically. It's got nothing to do with her being a charity worker because that is a standalone comment. It's people who are insecure and sensitive about their own lack of career that offence. This is hugely projecting on the granny's comment.

But she'd still be doing that if she'd married a man doing 2 minimum wage jobs to make ends meet.

letsgoooo · 05/07/2024 12:47

@EdgyCat you associate marrying well purely on financial reasons.

I associate marrying well with a broader outlook

Yes historically it referred to predominantly social class and then secondly with money.

We don't live in those times.

I think marrying well encompasses a much broader reflection of what is considered high value.

Looks
Money
Social status
Education level
Character

Someone with significant disability may be thought to have married well if they married someone who chose a life with them in spite of the added challenges.

Someone very unfortunate looking may be thought to have married well if they married someone stunning

Someone with little education may be thought to have married well if they married someone with a PhD

fieldsofbutterflies · 05/07/2024 12:51

@letsgoooo except lots of people work away and work long hours without a partner at home earning pennies while they "follow their passion" 🤷‍♀️

OP can only earn very little in a field she loves because her husband supports her and carries all the financial burden. She couldn't do what she loves if he earned minimum wage.

Whereas most high earners can easily outsource childcare and cleaning if they want, and still keep their careers.

Deebee90 · 05/07/2024 12:52

I mean to be fair she’s right, without him working his well paid job you couldn’t work for pennies could you. So she’s right In a way if it offends you then you know she’s hit a nerve.

EdgyCat · 05/07/2024 12:53

This comment is from a granny and while you define it differently, i would have thought most British people would interpret it about money and social status @letsgoooo

Someone marrying better looking or better educated I would think is said to be punching or married out of their league.

Theweepywillow · 05/07/2024 12:54

Not sure where I'm going with this post, perhaps just a rant, but I can't help but feel annoyed that my contribution to society is so overlooked by Salary!

such a privalged entitled viewpoint when your husband pays for it

EdgyCat · 05/07/2024 12:54

Deebee90 · 05/07/2024 12:52

I mean to be fair she’s right, without him working his well paid job you couldn’t work for pennies could you. So she’s right In a way if it offends you then you know she’s hit a nerve.

Exactly, she is projecting her insecurities. It's her own inner critic.

coldcallerbaiter · 05/07/2024 15:24

EdgyCat · 05/07/2024 12:53

This comment is from a granny and while you define it differently, i would have thought most British people would interpret it about money and social status @letsgoooo

Someone marrying better looking or better educated I would think is said to be punching or married out of their league.

Correct, it is about money.

The others are out of league type scenarios.

Howecer if you marry money but the spouse is much older or unattractive, then you are sniggered at a bit. Not seen as having done so well because you are paying a price/trade off.

Rondel · 05/07/2024 15:56

coldcallerbaiter · 05/07/2024 15:24

Correct, it is about money.

The others are out of league type scenarios.

Howecer if you marry money but the spouse is much older or unattractive, then you are sniggered at a bit. Not seen as having done so well because you are paying a price/trade off.

The OP is paying a high price, though — her DH is away a lot. She describes him as a ‘absent father/husband’ who has been so for years. Not only is she the solo day to day parent very often, but, if her DH supports her poorly-paid charity work, it’s not in the day to day sense of doing nursery pick up so the OP can chair an unforeseen crisis meeting just work late. Her career has to fit around his as well as be limited by her being sole parent in practice a lot.

That’s a huge price.

KarenOnTour · 05/07/2024 16:14

Well yes, IMHO you did - you married a man who was rich enough to take care of you, whilst you indulge your crusade

Rondel · 05/07/2024 16:27

KarenOnTour · 05/07/2024 16:14

Well yes, IMHO you did - you married a man who was rich enough to take care of you, whilst you indulge your crusade

Why is the OP ‘indulging’ her crusade though? Isn’t it equally possible to read it as the OP paying heavily for a financially comfortable life by having a usually-absent husband and father to her children, and whose professional life (while she doesn’t need to worry about paying bills) has had to fit around her husband’s absences and her own status as default parent?

She seems to me to have paid a significant price for her position.

Squareplate · 05/07/2024 16:31

Rondel · 05/07/2024 16:27

Why is the OP ‘indulging’ her crusade though? Isn’t it equally possible to read it as the OP paying heavily for a financially comfortable life by having a usually-absent husband and father to her children, and whose professional life (while she doesn’t need to worry about paying bills) has had to fit around her husband’s absences and her own status as default parent?

She seems to me to have paid a significant price for her position.

Except that she smuggly says "my life's mission has always been to help others" ,which she wouldn't have been able to do, or would have had to do with a very different lifestyle if it weren't for DH.

Rondel · 05/07/2024 16:49

Squareplate · 05/07/2024 16:31

Except that she smuggly says "my life's mission has always been to help others" ,which she wouldn't have been able to do, or would have had to do with a very different lifestyle if it weren't for DH.

With a present, actively-supportive spouse, she might have ended up as the CEO of a major charity, and both helped people and made a lot of money, though? The CEO of Barnardos earned £209,999 in 2019, the CEO of MacMillan Cancer Support £200,000 in 2022 (just two grabbed at random from the internet). The two things aren’t mutually exclusive.

Swipe left for the next trending thread