The main problem I see with these voters is that they fail to grasp what party politics is in a democracy. Especially low information, single issue voters.
Your government has to run an enormous organization, raise and spend taxes responsibly, further the welfare of all the people in the country that it defines as significant, restrain
the excesses of capitalism, run the NHS, protect the borders etc…
Parties produce party platforms that are meant to serve as public statements and blueprints for what the party will do in power. But there are what you might call too lines snd bottom lines. Top lines are voter grabbing promises “make America great again!” Or “ more money for the NHS” they appear simple, heartfelt, exciting. The bottom line is often quite different: looting the treasury, selling peerages, corruptly benefiting from insider trading, narrowing the suffrage by discouraging people from voting, creating a new class of enemies within and without yo distract the voters from regular good government.
The entire trans fuss in the UK was a basic form of sucker bet, like the “free” first bets casinos and gamblers give the rubes or the free first taste of drugs. If you enter the tent marked with “exciting offer tailored exactly to your tastes” you often find yourself agreeing to vote for a whole lot of other policies you don’t like that brought other voters into the tent.
You have to ask yourself whether a passionate belief in X, whatever X is, means you also want to see Y, Z, and lots of other policies put in place. Whether getting women only bathrooms is such a great idea when you’ve voted in an Andrew Tate fan to run the schools and advocate for ending women’s suffrage.
That’s what I mean by top line and bottom line. Beware the easy appeal to the voters “we can easily do this thing for you” as long as you look away while we loot the treasury, or deport immigrants, or destroy the economy .