My children are now teens - this was several years ago and we managed to get an EHCP, but thanks anyway 🙂
Unfortunately I'm all too aware how low the bar is. I'm also unfortunately aware that the LA doesn't always act lawfully. As well as having my own two SEN DC I was the SEN school governor for 5+ years. Some of the things I've seen from the LA have been shocking.
The point I was making - which may not have been clear - was that if there are specific objections that the LA has to assessing, being able to demonstrate how they are incorrect can be an effective way of getting the decision changed rapidly.
I think it is helpful to know why they have refused. The approach you might take on appeal would be very different if they believe a child didn't have sufficient needs compared to whether they feel there hasn't been sufficient efforts to support the child.
In our case, the LA acknowledged that my DS was demonstrating a need but felt that with more support that could be provided as part of the regular SEN support (and therefore within the normal budget), my DS wouldn't need an EHCP. Their argument was that because certain strategies hadn't been tried, there was no evidence that he would still need an EHCP.
If you don't know why the LA has refused, it's much more difficult to argue effectively. There has to be a reason and it's completely reasonable to expect to be told what this is. The LA will refuse to assess if they believe that needs could be met with reasonable strategies from the school/nursery. It's really important to know if this is the reason.
Obviously they were very wrong in our case as DS is a teen now with very high needs but plus ca change. So many similar stories from SEN parents. Heartbreaking.