Meet the Other Phone. A phone that grows with your child.

Meet the Other Phone.
A phone that grows with your child.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

To be concerned about a new fresh hell for female school pupils?

157 replies

Villamariawine · 21/06/2024 09:57

I’ve name changed for this as I don’t want the assumption to be I am one of the parents. I’m not. But I am the mother of a 6th former DD.

From The Times today - it is behind a paywall so I’ve included some of the salient points. I’ve removed the poll because frankly I’d be aghast if anyone thinks I am being unreasonable.
Two private schools are at the centre of a criminal investigation into the alleged making and sharing of deepfake pornographic images. Police are investigating claims that the deepfakes were created at a boys’ school by someone manipulating images taken from the social media accounts of pupils at a girls’ school.
The schools are in the same area of the country. Detectives became involved seven weeks ago when staff at the girls’ school alerted police and social services to reports that deepfake images and videos were in circulation at the boys’ school. About a dozen girls are thought to have been victims.

The report goes on to say:

Both schools are spending tens of thousands of pounds on crisis management PR firms and London law firms to manage the fallout. It is understood police asked the schools not to undertake internal inquiries or disciplinary measures during their investigation.

And

Police declined to comment on claims that they had been unable to recover phones and computer equipment of potential value to the investigation.

And

A spokesman for the boys’ school said: “Were any allegation to be received, the school would always take all appropriate steps to ensure the matter was fully and thoroughly investigated, including through making reports to, and taking advice from, the relevant external agencies and authorities. The school will always fully co-operate with any police investigation or directions.”

I’m not interested in which schools these are (The Times has not named them) and for the sake of the girls, please don’t name them. I’d wager that the lack of progress into some sort of justice for the girls is why The Times knows about the situation.

My AIBU is that this apparently happened at the start of May. Exams will have taken place, pupils will have left, important choices will have had to be made and these poor girls have had to deal with this on top of everything and the perpetrators are seemingly facing no consequences almost two months on. The Police have moved very quickly on other matters, why not this one? It is a criminal offence to even make deepfake images of a child, let alone distribute them. If there is nothing amiss, why are PR firms and Law Firms involved? Why would the girls school need to hire them? Surely their first thought is for the welfare on their pupils who are involved through no fault of their own? These images could follow them around forever if they were created of the girls when they were over the age of 18. Was nothing learned by schools after ‘everyone’s invited?’ about trying to cover up bad behaviour?

I’m dismayed that girls and their parents are being subjected to this new fresh hell.

OP posts:
Villamariawine · 21/06/2024 11:37

jacks11 · 21/06/2024 11:23

Whilst it is an awful incident, and certainly needs to be dealt with, I do think you are being unreasonable about what you allege re the police and the school. Not everything that doesn’t go as seamlessly or quickly as someone thinks it should is because something is wrong/unfair or there is someone to blame or someone has to be at fault.

The police have to follow procedure and there may well be perfectly legitimate reasons for-what seems to you- slow progress (identifying who did what, for example) that you are unaware of. I assume you aren’t an expert in the investigation of these sorts of crimes- neither am I- but I do think there is a possibility that these cases could be quite complex. If the police don’t do things by the books, they risk the CPS not being able to bring charges, for vital evidence being deemed inadmissible or for attempted prosecution to fail. I imagine the parents of the young men involved may well be able to afford good legal advice, so they would likely find any failures to exploit. I don’t think that would help any of the young women affected, frankly. Surely, better a little slower and done properly, than rushed so people like OP “see” that justice has been done, according to their perception of appropriate timetable?

You also don’t know how seriously or otherwise the school have taken it. Getting legal advice and hiring a PR firm are not unexpected to me and don’t indicate that they believe there is no issue/ that they aren’t co-operating with the police. For a start, you don’t know a)if the equipment has not been recovered as there is no comment; and b) if it is true who is responsible for that failure. If the items were never in the school’s possession, it might be that the pupils/their families have somehow prevented the police accessing them. I highly doubt the school would deliberately try to destroy evidence it was known to have- opening themselves up to prosecution is far more damaging than the pupils being the only ones breaking the law. I’m not clear, really, that either school have been trying to cover anything up or are stating nothing is amiss. They may not have announced it- nor would I have expected them to- but I don’t see any evidence from what you have posted that they are saying there is nothing to investigate? Perhaps it is in the article you quote?

Neither school can really comment on what they have or have not done because of the ages of those involved and because of the police investigation. You have no idea what consequences those involved have faced, but other than suspension (and you won’t know if they have or have not been), I’m not sure what you expect the school to do- name the alleged perpetrators and have them flogged at dawn on the playing fields, recorded for your perusal, perhaps? The police investigation and any subsequent convictions will result in consequences for those proven to be responsible. A full investigation, CPS decision/charges being brought and a full trial completed was never going to happen in just a few months. I don’t really understand why you think it would?

I think that it is entirely understandable that the school would want to look for legal advice, given that the young people were in their care (especially if boarders) and quite possibly using school equipment or it/internet. Why do you think they should not have done? The PR is also because the schools rely on their reputations to a large extent- so again, not sure why you are surprised by this. That does not mean that the boys school condones the actions of those pupils. They are trying to protect the school. They can do that and still comply with police investigation.

You might be right- perhaps the two schools don’t care about re the victims/the actions of their pupils and one (or both) are hindering the police investigation deliberately. Perhaps the police aren’t doing a good job of investigating due to misogyny and/or incompetence. But I don’t really think we can be certain of that from the information you’ve quoted.

Sorry if I sound harsh OP- it must be extremely traumatic for the young women involved and those responsible must be held fully accountable. I just take issue with the idea that this all about police incompetence or misogyny and the school being happy for the girls to suffer, because nobody cares whether girls suffer. Too many people seem to like to ascribe everything needs to be seen through a prism of misogyny and incompetence, I find it concerning. These issues absolutely exist, but if we overuse/misapply it, the impact is of actual examples are diminished.

Or perhaps my judgement is clouded by the fact that a female friend of my DD was told at her private school to drop the complaint against a male pupil because he had a place at a prestigious university (she did not) and because it was her word against his, she wouldn’t be believed because they needed his place for their figures. So what is the point of calling behaviour like this out?

If you look right now at the Tory party betting scandal they too are hiding behind ‘investigation/procedure etc’ and yes everyone wants the evidence to be admissible in this case but until the perpetuation of behaviour stops it is the girls who bear the bring of it all.

It has to stop somewhere.

OP posts:
Villamariawine · 21/06/2024 11:41

jacks11 · 21/06/2024 11:35

I agree. It’s a real problem for young people, parents and schools. We need to stop making this about female (good) vs male (evil). It’s an issue which needs tackling, not making one group victims and the others group to blame. I hate the way these trends are going, it doesn’t help make things better. I would also say you would be very naive to assume girls will be the only victims of this.

in my daughter’s school, there was an incident of a girl circulating an intimate picture of one of the boys (so they could all ridicule him) amongst some of the girls. To my knowledge, not happened the other way round. And there are definitely more issues with girls towards girls in terms of bullying/malicious messages and images etc.

And I hope the girls creating the image were dealt with? I agree it should not be the presumption that all girls are good and all boys are bad, but there does seem to be more incidents involving boys sharing images than girls. Anecdotally at least.

OP posts:
poetryandwine · 21/06/2024 11:41

Thank you for the link to the Times article, @ErrolTheDragon

And thank you for your posts, OP. Your latest is shocking but not surprising

shearwater2 · 21/06/2024 11:41

Cazpar · 21/06/2024 11:35

Oh you imagine. That solves that then. Why bother with due process eh?

The story in The Times is not a figment of my imagination.

Sossijiz · 21/06/2024 11:42

shearwater2 · 21/06/2024 11:33

Stupid comment. The story has made it to a national newspaper. I imagine there is a bit more to it than "rumours".

Of course. Nothing printed in a national newspaper ever turned out to be inaccurate did it?

poetryandwine · 21/06/2024 11:43

PS, not your latest post, OP. We crossed. Your post of 11.37

shearwater2 · 21/06/2024 11:44

Sossijiz · 21/06/2024 11:42

Of course. Nothing printed in a national newspaper ever turned out to be inaccurate did it?

Of course things can be wrong or misconstrued in the press. But this sounds like quite a detailed report.

Do you believe these things don't happen?

Is it just us feminists making it up?

Villamariawine · 21/06/2024 11:45

poetryandwine · 21/06/2024 11:41

Thank you for the link to the Times article, @ErrolTheDragon

And thank you for your posts, OP. Your latest is shocking but not surprising

Depressing isn’t it?

OP posts:
Sossijiz · 21/06/2024 11:47

shearwater2 · 21/06/2024 11:44

Of course things can be wrong or misconstrued in the press. But this sounds like quite a detailed report.

Do you believe these things don't happen?

Is it just us feminists making it up?

I wouldn't be at all surprised if it did happen, in fact it was very likely to happen once the technology became available. I merely pointed out that publication is not proof.

herownworstenemy · 21/06/2024 11:48

Or perhaps my judgement is clouded by the fact that a female friend of my DD was told at her private school to drop the complaint against a male pupil because he had a place at a prestigious university (she did not) and because it was her word against his, she wouldn’t be believed because they needed his place for their figures. See also victims (& parents) being told not to damage the schools reputation or rock the boat for the sake of harmony in the class/boarding house. Even threatened by lawyers to shut up. While wealthy parents of miscreants rock up with their own heavy hitting lawyers or their cheque book offering a fat contribution to the school’s latest building project to make the problem go away. I’ve heard this sort of crap often enough over the years to think some schools are definitely not innocent, not that I'd tar them all with the same brush.

Your judgement isn't clouded OP. The police will take time to investigate especially if they're encountering a well funded legal defence. But some schools do seem to have a habit of sweeping this stuff under the carpet and posters suggesting the school needs to distance itself from criminality that occurred within its own walls is interesting don’t you think?

KitKatChunki · 21/06/2024 11:51

Christ. These boys need this kn their record. If they think they've got away with it, guess who's coming to a workplace near you?

BrigadierEtienneGerard · 21/06/2024 11:51

Sorry OP I am not clear.

Is this the Australian case or another one here in the UK?

TheaBrandt · 21/06/2024 11:52

There was a program on radio 4 - there’s a whole industry devoted to helping men make deep fake porn of women they don’t like / think need taking down a peg or two. Then they all share it with each other. So that’s nice 🙄. So sadly find this article entirely credible .

Girls aren’t perfect but Dd was horrified on seeing the boys group chat. How nasty and vile they were about the girls physically horrible names etc. The girls chat is just not like that.

YellowAsteroid · 21/06/2024 11:55

This is the result of “Boys will be boys.”

It’s shocking but not surprising I suppose that the ruling class keeps on doing what the ruling class does. Protect little toe rags.

Villamariawine · 21/06/2024 11:56

BrigadierEtienneGerard · 21/06/2024 11:51

Sorry OP I am not clear.

Is this the Australian case or another one here in the UK?

Mine was about the Times article. The school is in the UK. Someone else shared a link to a similar incident in Melborne, Aus.

OP posts:
TheaBrandt · 21/06/2024 12:00

It’s everywhere.

As Germaine Greer said most women have little idea of how much men hate them. It’s sad when you uncover the evidence of this.

Goldenbear · 21/06/2024 12:00

Fairyliz · 21/06/2024 10:39

There was an article yesterday about falling birth rates around Europe, apparently we are not having enough children to replace people dying.
As the mother of two DD’s in their 20’s I can understand why. Who would want to have sex with the sorry examples of manhood we have now. They all seem to be spoilt entitled babies even in their 20’s and 30’s.

I get what you are saying on the back of this story but when you write, ‘manhood we have now’ are you honestly suggesting that back in the day 10, 20, 30+ years ago men were definitely a cut above, all men were fine specimens of the human race that we wanted to pro create with? It was worse then were more likely to think that you were a possession of theres and really there to accommodate and support their life once you were in a relationship long term with them!

Goldenbear · 21/06/2024 12:04

TheaBrandt · 21/06/2024 11:52

There was a program on radio 4 - there’s a whole industry devoted to helping men make deep fake porn of women they don’t like / think need taking down a peg or two. Then they all share it with each other. So that’s nice 🙄. So sadly find this article entirely credible .

Girls aren’t perfect but Dd was horrified on seeing the boys group chat. How nasty and vile they were about the girls physically horrible names etc. The girls chat is just not like that.

I have a DD who is a young teen and sadly that is not my experience. One girl wrote a scathing attack on another outlining what was wrong with her physical looks, her personality and her clothes, I think she also tried to physically harm her, she comes from a lovely MC family - sadly like in my day there are some horrible girls around.

BeRoseBee · 21/06/2024 12:04

Villamariawine · 21/06/2024 09:57

I’ve name changed for this as I don’t want the assumption to be I am one of the parents. I’m not. But I am the mother of a 6th former DD.

From The Times today - it is behind a paywall so I’ve included some of the salient points. I’ve removed the poll because frankly I’d be aghast if anyone thinks I am being unreasonable.
Two private schools are at the centre of a criminal investigation into the alleged making and sharing of deepfake pornographic images. Police are investigating claims that the deepfakes were created at a boys’ school by someone manipulating images taken from the social media accounts of pupils at a girls’ school.
The schools are in the same area of the country. Detectives became involved seven weeks ago when staff at the girls’ school alerted police and social services to reports that deepfake images and videos were in circulation at the boys’ school. About a dozen girls are thought to have been victims.

The report goes on to say:

Both schools are spending tens of thousands of pounds on crisis management PR firms and London law firms to manage the fallout. It is understood police asked the schools not to undertake internal inquiries or disciplinary measures during their investigation.

And

Police declined to comment on claims that they had been unable to recover phones and computer equipment of potential value to the investigation.

And

A spokesman for the boys’ school said: “Were any allegation to be received, the school would always take all appropriate steps to ensure the matter was fully and thoroughly investigated, including through making reports to, and taking advice from, the relevant external agencies and authorities. The school will always fully co-operate with any police investigation or directions.”

I’m not interested in which schools these are (The Times has not named them) and for the sake of the girls, please don’t name them. I’d wager that the lack of progress into some sort of justice for the girls is why The Times knows about the situation.

My AIBU is that this apparently happened at the start of May. Exams will have taken place, pupils will have left, important choices will have had to be made and these poor girls have had to deal with this on top of everything and the perpetrators are seemingly facing no consequences almost two months on. The Police have moved very quickly on other matters, why not this one? It is a criminal offence to even make deepfake images of a child, let alone distribute them. If there is nothing amiss, why are PR firms and Law Firms involved? Why would the girls school need to hire them? Surely their first thought is for the welfare on their pupils who are involved through no fault of their own? These images could follow them around forever if they were created of the girls when they were over the age of 18. Was nothing learned by schools after ‘everyone’s invited?’ about trying to cover up bad behaviour?

I’m dismayed that girls and their parents are being subjected to this new fresh hell.

As this is a criminal matter (correctly in my opinion) I don’t think 8 weeks is that much time. The police need time to investigate to make sure they don’t jeopardise any future legal action.

It is terrifying though that this kind of thing can be done so easily now.

Mushroomlasagne · 21/06/2024 12:08

Which school? Does it begin with H?

BeRoseBee · 21/06/2024 12:11

SomewhereOverTheHill · 21/06/2024 10:24

The 3 things that anger me about this are 1. The technology is freely available for the general public to use to be able to create deepfakes in the first place. 2. That boys with this much privilege have decided to do this. 3. The fact the schools have called in PR companies and lawyers which shouts that they are trying to cover it up and possibly start whipping out NDAs to shut it down.
I fear for my daughter in this shitty world.

I’m not sure their “privilege” is relevant? This is a sex crime and they should face the same consequences whether their parents have £100 in the bank or £100 million.

Villamariawine · 21/06/2024 12:15

Mushroomlasagne · 21/06/2024 12:08

Which school? Does it begin with H?

As I said in the opening post, please do not speculate on the school out of respect for the girls going through this. It is bad enough for them as it is.

OP posts:
SilverElf · 21/06/2024 12:15

This is, of course, awful. Sadly, all young people need to know that their images can now easily be used to make deep fake porn. I am regularly shocked by how many parents share images of their kids on accounts which are essentially public, as well as how few teenagers have their SM appropriately locked down. Please teach your kids to look after the images they have of themselves and their friends

Summerhillsquare · 21/06/2024 12:17

timenowplease · 21/06/2024 11:09

Of course, this will be a fresh new hell for all students regardless of sex when someone realises it's just as easy to make deepfake porn of boys too.

Please direct us to the examples of women and girls abusing men in this way.

CurrentHun · 21/06/2024 12:21

This is awful. Legislating seems to be the only way out of this if kids (or adults) are accessing tools which they are using for such destructive purposes. It’s way beyond the capacity of schools and the current powers available to police to deal with.

Swipe left for the next trending thread