Meet the Other Phone. A phone that grows with your child.

Meet the Other Phone.
A phone that grows with your child.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

Why do people think parents who pay for private education are enormously wealthy?

1000 replies

SheineOn · 06/06/2024 13:32

Is this just the stereotype?

I went to a school that cost 18k a year (15 years ago). It’s now 24k a year.

There were wealthy people there. But also many ‘normal’ people. At least 40% fell into that category. People who lived on estates, drove modest cars, skipped holidays and ate cheaply.

They made a choice to spend their money on private education. For context, two of my closest friends have dc in private. They live off 450 a month after paying fees. They are not high earners.

Not everyone has endless wealth. Some are just happy to make the sacrifice. I find it strange people don’t seem to get that and makes me wonder how lacking in knowledge you must be to have that view of the private sector.

OP posts:
Thread gallery
8
Bigcat25 · 06/06/2024 21:25

I think a lot of the examples of people on lower or normal salaries in this situation may have had inheritance, family help, or other sources of revenue. Even op's example iirc of her brother who had the small mortgage bc of the "hefty dp." I agree the private school system supports inequality. Some private schools are about networking, for kids and parents.

MrsSunshine2b · 06/06/2024 21:25

Basicallyluls · 06/06/2024 21:17

Education should be good for everyone, not just for those who pay.

So you won't have to make that choice.

In Europe like Germany, France, this is the norm and standards are good, regardless of where you live in all state schools. That means it is possible. By paying into it, whether you're rich or not, you're making this educational apartheid stronger.

The thing is, that's not the policy. It's not "Let's get rid of all private schools!"

It's going to impact the lowest earners who have chosen private school, and since we have established in this thread that it's hard to afford private school if you're not a high earner, they probably made that choice for very compelling reasons.

I can also confidently say it won't raise any money in the long term. In the short term, many parents will do everything they can, even if it means asking relatives for help or downsizing their home, not to pull their kids out of their school, especially if the alternatives aren't good.

In the long term, parents who might have chosen independent school will spend that money instead on moving to a better catchment area or more private tuition. If the price of something goes up 20% you cannot expect to keep the same number of customers in the long term.

That means a substantial number of kids who would have had their education paid for by their parents are now going to have it paid for by the state.

It will only be the richest parents that can afford to continue with private school.

rainingsnoring · 06/06/2024 21:25

'im glad you accept that even the top earners struggle to afford it.'

Hang on. I thought you said that you didn't need to be 'a top earner' and that if people were simply 'frugal', they could afford private schooling.

uniq · 06/06/2024 21:26

I think you are an utter snob OP. Enjoy your life looking down at the plebs

northernerinthesouth2000 · 06/06/2024 21:26

God I hope this is the last thread I see on this.. but I think not!

SheineOn · 06/06/2024 21:27

uniq · 06/06/2024 21:26

I think you are an utter snob OP. Enjoy your life looking down at the plebs

@uniq great response 👍🏼

OP posts:
Badgertime · 06/06/2024 21:28

So after school fees that leaves BIL with 25K which is about my salary.
If I was on my own, I'd be on some universal credit at least.
After tax, pension etc I get around £1700 pcm.
I own 25% of my house and pay £1000 pcm on the rest.
That leaves me £700 for my bills which come to more than that and that's without petrol, groceries or anything else.

It's highly unlikely unless they have paid off their mortgage and have no rent to pay and even then, it would still be tight.

Hatty999 · 06/06/2024 21:28

I understand people saying ‘we scrape to afford it’ is rather laughable when scrape to afford it for lots is about scraping to afford heating not schooling. However, state schools are good. What the kid and family does within that education is mostly what determines outcome. Outcome is not the school, it’s the child, the family, genetics etc. It’s too easy and simplistic to blame private educated schools on the outcomes of state kids. State needs more money- the private school added vat will absolutely not have the desired outcome. I reckon the majority of you know that but you are still jerk for those using it to be charged more.

TheaBrandt · 06/06/2024 21:29

Totally agree there needs to be a separate topic for private education- its a niche thing only 7% of pupils or similar at private schools but as someone else commented dear god it feels like every single one of them is on mumsnet starting threads!

Hatty999 · 06/06/2024 21:29

Hatty999 · 06/06/2024 21:28

I understand people saying ‘we scrape to afford it’ is rather laughable when scrape to afford it for lots is about scraping to afford heating not schooling. However, state schools are good. What the kid and family does within that education is mostly what determines outcome. Outcome is not the school, it’s the child, the family, genetics etc. It’s too easy and simplistic to blame private educated schools on the outcomes of state kids. State needs more money- the private school added vat will absolutely not have the desired outcome. I reckon the majority of you know that but you are still jerk for those using it to be charged more.

Not jerk, prefer

TorturedPoetsDepartmentAnthology · 06/06/2024 21:29

Did they not teach statistics and percentages at your private school? They did at mine.

northernerinthesouth2000 · 06/06/2024 21:29

Thank goodness this thread is coming to an end...

beardediris · 06/06/2024 21:31

I don’t usually get drawn into these debates but in my extensive experience of sending my DCs to independent schools including the same school Ritchie Sunak went too it’s inevitable that parents are wealthier than average and parents sending their DCs to Eton, Winchester etc are exceedingly wealthy. To claim otherwise is disingenuous and insulting to those who haven’t got a hope in hell of paying even the cheapest school fees. I also hate the “I work hard to pay the school fees” line so often trotted out, many people work bloody hard and will never be able to afford school fees.
Those of us who pay/paid are able to do so because by luck whether it be luck of birth, the type of education we received/chose, the career we chose, or the way we invested money have manoeuvred ourselves into a position where are post tax, and having paid for life’s essentials we still have sufficient money sloshing around to pay school fees. Let’s not pretend otherwise.

AllProperTeaIsTheft · 06/06/2024 21:32

Wishihadanalgorithm · 06/06/2024 20:34

I attended state schools and got my qualifications in spite of my school and not because of it.

Fast forward and I’m a teacher who has done over a decade in state schools and now work in an indie. The difference is astonishing - not because private school kids are “posh” (some are, most aren’t) but because all parents are on board, the classes are smaller and more manageable - not necessarily for the teacher but for the children, especially the one with SEN. There is much less tech in my school compared to the state comps I taught in, the facilities are a bit shabby and we don’t have our own sports grounds. However, the opportunities are these to be taken as teachers aren’t ground down by managing poor behaviour all day so happily run clubs.

I can see why parents scrimp and save for their kids to have this education rather than the local comp. I respect them for their sacrifices. Of course they have to be earning more than an average wage but they are also saving the government thousands by not taking a state school place.

I understand the prejudice and bigotry people have towards private schools as it’s a lack of understanding. I’ll be honest and say before I taught in indie I thought it would be full of very posh kids with entitled attitudes. It’s not like that and I feel sad for parents who are doing their best for their kids and being judged so harshly for their choices.

What a bafflingly bizarre post. I'm a teacher too and have taught in the state and private sector. Your apparently surprised revelations about private schools would not be news to anyone! Of course they are able to provide a better education. It's no secret that they usually have better facilities, their pick of teachers, small classes, amazing opportunities and are able to select and reject students as they wish. It is perfectly understandable that parents who can afford to would want to send their dc there.

But it's not a sacrifice. It's just wealthy (or at least relatively wealthy) people buying a superior product or service, just as they do with other products and services. Not everyone agrees that having private schools is a bad thing, but it certainly isn't bigotry to think that.

I'm surprised that your takeaway from moving from the state to the independent sector is that you feel sorry for the poor private school parents being judged. Mine was that I felt sad thinking how much some of my great state school students could achieve if they were able to come to a school like the one I'd moved to.

Hatty999 · 06/06/2024 21:32

northernerinthesouth2000 · 06/06/2024 21:25

We do - in fact we probably have a three tier system, when you consider the rubbish that many SEN children and their families have to deal with to get a level playing field and support for their children.

It will never be a level playing field- ever. Unless everyone is going to be paid the same for whatever job. That levels up earnings but what about parenting, brains, housing, all of the key stuff that determines how well people do?

Puffalicious · 06/06/2024 21:32

fungipie · 06/06/2024 21:21

and many of us do have the money, but have chosen to support our kids within the state system, and to support the other kids and the school too. Money much better spent.

Kids who became adults who could cope with all sorts of different people, organise themselves without being prepped and sat on by staff, and who benefited hugely from those skills later at Uni and later at work- which helped massively in promotion and success.

Absolutely. My boys are so much more able to get on with a wide variety of people than many of their privately educated friends.

Otherstories2002 · 06/06/2024 21:32

SheineOn · 06/06/2024 13:38

@LizzieSiddal you are wrong though. People on less than average pay can and do pay for these fees because they choose to make the sacrifice.

Do you know what the average annual full time salary is?

It is definitely not normal to have that kind of money lying around.

Kinshipug · 06/06/2024 21:33

OP, honestly, I'd pay a hell of a lot for my kids not to end up a closed-minded snob like you. Some life experience would have benefited you more than a posh education, i think.

NameChanged112 · 06/06/2024 21:34

40 a day costs over £9k and that would pay school fees for one child round these parts (not London).
Private school fees are actually cheaper than nursery fees round here. Lots of people can afford nursery and so they could afford private school. They just don't want to when there is Ikos / Sani to pay for, a RR Evoque on finance, LV luggage set, pizza ovens and meals out several times a week. But pay for private school and you truly are a terrible person (in the eyes of the great unwashed) 🤪

Nowdontmakeamess · 06/06/2024 21:34

northernerinthesouth2000 · 06/06/2024 21:25

We do - in fact we probably have a three tier system, when you consider the rubbish that many SEN children and their families have to deal with to get a level playing field and support for their children.

Absolutely. We received a letter today from our child’s school trust. They are cutting SEN support unless it’s stipulated in EHCPs to save money. Targeting the most vulnerable again. But let’s feel sorry for the privileged kids of the rich who might have to skip upgrading the Land Rover for a few years to cover the hike in fees.

Bignanna · 06/06/2024 21:35

SheineOn · 06/06/2024 13:38

@LizzieSiddal you are wrong though. People on less than average pay can and do pay for these fees because they choose to make the sacrifice.

If the sacrifice means you have to go without to the extent that you are living frugally, not having a normal life and sacrificing every that makes life enjoyable, then it’s not worth it! I also don’t believe that people on less than the average pay can afford it!

Basicallyluls · 06/06/2024 21:36

The thing is, that's not the policy. It's not "Let's get rid of all private schools!"

It's a good start. Hopefully towards this.

Propertyshmoperty · 06/06/2024 21:38

SheineOn · 06/06/2024 21:19

The state system won’t change. Take more from those already paying for their kids’ education… but it won’t magically fix the state sector. It’s very sad and more focus should be on education in the UK. I won’t be subjecting my Dd to it if there’s any way I can avoid it. The two experiences are worlds apart.

Then you can bloody pay for the privilege then can't you. Plus 20%

northernerinthesouth2000 · 06/06/2024 21:38

Hatty999 · 06/06/2024 21:32

It will never be a level playing field- ever. Unless everyone is going to be paid the same for whatever job. That levels up earnings but what about parenting, brains, housing, all of the key stuff that determines how well people do?

That’s no excuse not try and make things more equal. People are so full of excuses not to try and make things better it’s so sad

DanielGault · 06/06/2024 21:38

SheineOn · 06/06/2024 21:27

@uniq great response 👍🏼

It is

New posts on this thread. Refresh page
Please create an account

To comment on this thread you need to create a Mumsnet account.

This thread is not accepting new messages.