Meet the Other Phone. Child-safe in minutes.

Meet the Other Phone.
Child-safe in minutes.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

To think that those private school parents banging on about their fees

1000 replies

Thegreatergoodgerald · 23/05/2024 11:23

Seriously have misjudged how little anyone else gives a stuff??? NHS, social care, state education, public transport, bloody potholes everywhere - that’s what matters to everyone I know.
Not whether or not VAT is added to a business.

YANBU - it’s hardly the end of the world if Clemmie or Charles end up going to a state school. We have bigger things to worry about in the U.K. right now

YABU - of course everyone cares private school parents might have to pay more

OP posts:
Thread gallery
13
Lowin2024 · 23/05/2024 18:04

wombat15 · 23/05/2024 18:01

I like the way you assume all the privately educated children will get into the grammar schools.

Where on earth did I say that? I said that more children will sit for them. Not that they will take the places. I’m not ignorant enough to believe that privately educated children are “better”. 🙄

PrincessTeaSet · 23/05/2024 18:06

Kandalama · 23/05/2024 16:46

But the policy will make Private schools even less diverse.

Labours policy will therefore do the opposite

People choose private school precisely to avoid their children having to mix with the plebs so will probably be happy about that.

twistyizzy · 23/05/2024 18:06

LarkspurLane · 23/05/2024 18:04

I'd be concerned if people couldn't.

Bollocks noone stress tests for 20% increase in mortgage costs

Willyoujustbequiet · 23/05/2024 18:06

notbelieved · 23/05/2024 17:48

I don't care though that rich people may need to pay more money

The short sight on this thread is astounding. Try having a think about some of the issues mentioned in this thread. Because this policy will affect us all and it's difficult to see any positives.

It won't affect my family and I suspect many others. I have read the arguments against and I'm not convinced sorry.

Labraradabrador · 23/05/2024 18:08

PrincessTeaSet · 23/05/2024 17:42

If 5% leave then the added income from the vat the remainder pay for their school fees will cover their state education about 17 times over.

But enrolment has dropped 3% this year already, if it hits 10% the policy raises no money. That’s just the simple math - if you factor in other economic impacts (send support, reduced income tax due to reduction in working hours, admin costs, legal costs) it’s probably a lower threshold before gains are zeroed out.

shockeditellyou · 23/05/2024 18:08

When a private school round here closed, the other private schools gleefully mopped up the pupils from the closed school - and made the effort to add in buildings to accommodate them. Net impact on state was small.

Wishihadanalgorithm · 23/05/2024 18:08

On a slightly different note (but hopefully still relevant to the OP), how much money does the Dep for Education need to bring state schools up the standard they should be?

How much will the VAT on school fees bring in to meet that need?

From having worked in state and indie I think the VAT is going to be a drop in the ocean and a whole lot more money will be required.

Friends in various state schools tell me the horror stories which are their lives on a daily basis - and I wish this was an exaggeration. A total overhaul is needed and that’s very brave for anyone to do.

One big issue with education is that the teachers’ pension scheme is just so expensive (and I’ve heard it’s going up again) so staff cost schools so much. This is one of the reasons education is just such a never end hole to be filled. What can Labour do about this?

I do wonder is VAT on private ed just a vote winner for the politics of envy?

crumblingschools · 23/05/2024 18:09

People who were paying for private school will have access to money for additional tutoring to get into grammar schools. So it certainly won’t help with levelling the playing field

LarkspurLane · 23/05/2024 18:10

twistyizzy · 23/05/2024 18:06

Bollocks noone stress tests for 20% increase in mortgage costs

Of course they do.
If the interest rate was 5%, people would check that they could manage a 1% rise in rate.

RecurringDecimal · 23/05/2024 18:11

The business I help run with DH has had a good year and will owe 100k in corporation tax, which has gone up from 19% to 25%. It's an export business so cash coming into the UK from other parts of the world that wouldn't come here if we didn't do the work.

The business nearly paid 0k in tax this year as DH who is the main wealth creator in the business was stricken with a debilitating illness that meant we were in danger of not being able to fulfill our contract. The best the NHS could do as his condition became more serious was to offer to move him up the waiting list. We had no private health insurance and had to pay for an operation from savings. We have now bought private health insurance.

Meanwhile the children are at state schools. But the oldest hasn't had a maths teacher all year so we are having to pay for a tutor. Generally the education they are getting isn't great so now we will send the youngest to a private school in the hope that at least they will have teachers.

On the one hand I feel very fortunate to be able to do this. On the other I feel annoyed that we are paying a fortune in tax and that public services have become so crap.

PrincessTeaSet · 23/05/2024 18:11

dementedmummy · 23/05/2024 17:53

Lets say you are correct and 95% stay in private school paying VAT of around £3k on a £15k tuition. That VAT doesn't get kept by the schools - they have to PAY IT ON to the government! There is no retention as at present to spend on other things. It also means the £3k spent on VAT by parents isn't being spent on local business- meals out stop. Holidays stop. New clothes aren't bought. Small businesses close. And thats before the fees are increased fees to cover those that left due to unaffordability. The ramifications of VAT being added to tuition fees goes far beyond whether parents can pay fees. If people stop or slow down their spending elsewhere it affects the RPI and inflation which could cause further rises in inflation and that affects absolutely everyone.

Yes, I meant the vat goes to the government who can then spend it on state education including that of former private pupils.

Your second point I disagree with. It's well known that the trickle down economy doesn't work. In any case, the numbers affected are small - unlikely to have any dramatic effect on local economies.

someonethatyoulovetoomuch · 23/05/2024 18:12

PrincessTeaSet · 23/05/2024 18:06

People choose private school precisely to avoid their children having to mix with the plebs so will probably be happy about that.

We’re planning to send our two to private because the local state provision near us is absolutely dreadful. Only 21% of kids leaving with 5 or more GCSEs, metal detectors at the entrances because of a rise in knife carrying etc. We aren’t wealthy, we’re going to have to save and make careful choices to make it a possibility but I’m happy to do that so my kids have a half decent chance at life. If that’s me choosing for my kids not to “mix with the plebs” then fine, would
rather they didn’t get stabbed in the corridor. Not everyone lives in the catchment of excellent grammar schools.

AIstolemylunch · 23/05/2024 18:12

MsFogi · 23/05/2024 17:13

Agreed - I don't give a stuff, particularly because so many of them seem to think that their child is magically brighter/better than state school children because they are at private school (many people I speak to assume my dcs are at private school and therefore spout all sorts of crazy shit about private school kids vs state school kids to me - latest was recommending a hall at a uni ds has applied to because 'there are mainly private school kids in it so it is definitely the one to chose', guess which one my ds said he is certainly not choosing?) and don't get me started on private school parents suggesting that ALL state school kids get given lower offers to uni than private school kids and are therefore less deserving of their place/are thicker than private school kids (this seems to be a view held by 95% of private school parents).

god this is the most ridiculous post I have seen yet. Do you think private school parents are all so dim that they don't understand how contextual offers work? Do you think that there are no kids from private schools that benefit from contextual offers? Of course there are.

crumblingschools · 23/05/2024 18:13

Many private schools have opted out of the teacher pension scheme. This policy will probably encourage other private schools to do that too. I wonder if this will be an option for Academy Trusts, to help their funding crisis, obviously won’t help teacher retention crisis

Itsjustlikethat · 23/05/2024 18:14

wombat15 · 23/05/2024 18:01

I like the way you assume all the privately educated children will get into the grammar schools.

Perhaps not all but on average, they stand a much better chance of passing. In our area most non-selective preps we look at have 80%+ pass rate, vs 20-25% on average for the whole county.

ShillyShallySherbet · 23/05/2024 18:15

Sorry if this is a derail but why aren’t private schools paying VAT now? I don’t understand why that hasn’t always been a thing when they’re a business.

ttcat37 · 23/05/2024 18:15

There is a huge grey area between the YABU and YANBU though isn’t there?

Don't worry, they’re still going to pay for your child’s education through their taxes too. Don’t fret!

PrincessTeaSet · 23/05/2024 18:16

notbelieved · 23/05/2024 17:48

I don't care though that rich people may need to pay more money

The short sight on this thread is astounding. Try having a think about some of the issues mentioned in this thread. Because this policy will affect us all and it's difficult to see any positives.

It will have zero effect on the vast majority whose kids just attend the local school, who never had any choice in the matter anyway.

crumblingschools · 23/05/2024 18:16

@ShillyShallySherbet because relate to education

BIossomtoes · 23/05/2024 18:17

morechocolateneededtoday · 23/05/2024 16:48

Your lack of experience with the NHS is really showing.

Pre-2010 when we had a labour government and I was still a junior doctor, we were also told overtime will be paid. Funnily enough, it rarely was so this policy fills me with very little hope.

My lack of experience after a 30 year career in the NHS? OK 🤷‍♀️

JustOneDD · 23/05/2024 18:18

JacketPotatoFoodOfTheGods · 23/05/2024 17:21

There should be no gap ffs! There should just be schools!

I really would like to understand what you mean and I’m not wanting to sound argumentative at all. Are you saying that there should be no gap in quality of teaching? There should be no gap in quality of facilities? There should be no gap in extracurricular activities? Is it that you want everyone to have the same quality of teaching regardless of whether that means it’s bad because then you think it will be an equal playing field? Because that won’t be true when school leavers are competing with others from other countries. It also doesn’t take into account all the parents that pay a huge premium to live in a catchment area of an outstanding school and then pay for extracurricular activities and tutoring separately to get into grammar schools. Do you think that paying for any type of “advantage” should be taxed so tutoring should be subject to VAT? If you think that everyone is entitled to a certain standard of education then why is that standard not being targeted by everyone paying more for it? And if a certain level of education should be funded by the state, why does the government not fund independent schools as well at the same level of all children in the state system if their parents are UK resident? Why not just tax those things that are over and above a standard level of education and becomes a “luxury” effectively. If raising the standard of education for all is the aim this policy will not achieve that and the most obvious losers will be those who have had to sacrifice other things to send their child or children to independent schools will no longer be able to do so and some independent schools will close meaning increased pressure on some state schools.

JimBobsWife · 23/05/2024 18:19

There's almost no point in a thread like this because people are so entrenched in their positions, they're not really interested in hearing opposing views and considering them on their merits. It's all about politics of envy which is why it will be a vote winner.

Like George Osborne's tax changes for private landlords. It's been really successful in decimating the PRS and affected renters just as much as landlords (as many predicted it would in 2016) but hey, why let that stop a bit of good old fashioned landlord bashing which people just love to do.

ForlornLindtBear · 23/05/2024 18:20

Another76543 · 23/05/2024 18:03

A lot would, because the exams are easy to tutor for. Our prep has an almost 100% pass rate to the nearest grammar, partly because they prepare the pupils for the exam.

But the bigger question is how do they cope when they get there? They will be with lots of naturally very bright children and they don't get the spoon feeding they have had in prep. It is a shock to many them and some don't cope

crumblingschools · 23/05/2024 18:20

Has the impact of how much schools can claim input VAT been factored in if they charge VAT on fees?

Please create an account

To comment on this thread you need to create a Mumsnet account.

This thread is not accepting new messages.