Yep that seems to be the case.
Hypocrisy and inconsistency at it's finest.
I should imagine that Londoners, long known to be welcoming of all, have got fed-up with the hypocrisy seen in the regular 'Londoner bashing' threads.
Especially as many of those being bashed for pricing out 'local born and bred' aren't originally from London, and when moved there priced out London 'born and bred'.
It shouldn't matter where they're originally from, except that it obviously seems to matter to the bashers.
People on these threads complain about 'Londoners' moving to 'their' areas. Suddenly being 'born and bred' does matter after all. Apparently. In which case that needs to apply equally to London 'born and bred'.
FWIW I don't personally like the bashing or the gatekeeping of what defines a 'local' (although I do think more social housing and work opportunities everywhere, including London, is needed to address genuine worries about incomers). However I also dislike the hypocritical and inconsistent attitudes especially regarding Londoners, on what constitutes a 'true local'.
@HoldingTheDoor Regarding your question on what's a 'true Londoner'. In my view threads like this make the more relevant question, what's a 'true local'?
I hope this post explains what I think is the issue. I'm not a Londoner (although my, not rich or arrogant, friend is from there) but it's something I've noticed from the Londoner bashing threads.