They would have been broadly anti EU, and anti equal pay for women because any influx of foreign workers or women workers would have impacted men's jobs.
With this, I think it's important to understand why and not kneejerk label them as Bad People. It can't be denied that increased job competition can affect unemployment levels and lowers wages. That's the case whoever the increased competitiom comes from, whether women or migrants, or regional incomers. See the multiple threads where people are upset about 'blow ins' adding housing or job pressure. 'Blow ins' who, after being told to move away from their area for more affordable housing or for work, take that advice.
Some people are genuinely prejudiced (against different groups in the workplace or their area simply because they're different) but I suspect they're a small minority. Most are simply genuinely worried about the impact on their already difficult or precarious financial and or social circumstances. It's actually imo very right-wing to not consider the impact on disadvantaged people and communities. That doesn't mean I'm saying different groups should be made to feel unwelcome or blamed. Rather that it is important to not dismiss concerns, and instead discuss and look at potential solutions. Solutions that are compassionate to all groups involved, and taking into account the impact on and needs of less advantaged people and communities.
The importance of not defaulting to automatically labelling someone as Bad without listening to their concerns or reasoning, goes beyond just the workplace issues above. I think it's relevant in general, including attitudes towards people's political voting choices. I'd like to see less labelling of people as Bad or Good, and efforts made to avoid unnecessary hostility, blaming whatever group, or kneejerk accusations of bigotry (unhelpful and does nothing to change people's views or solve the actual issues or concerns).
I'm probably too idealistic though.