The point is that I do not disagree with child benefit - I believe in a state system. Likewise I don’t begrudge the 1.5 million pound cheque my husband wrote to cover my dads IHT bill.
The state is there to support the vulnerable and sadly my son is one of those.
However also we believe in supporting disability charities and recently wrote out £500 to a disability charity that helps us. I would hate to jace such a small mind that I begrudged a cinema trip. Oddly I gave cinema tickets for a Xmas present to a family I know who were once homeless and now on pip plus groceries and other luxuries for Xmas.
My adult son is entitled to pip as it is used as required for his needs. We more than cover our family costs in taxes and I have no dispute with child benefit or pip - just the hypocrites who complain about pip and then take child benefit and use it towards holidays!
I believe in a tax system and importantly so does my husband who will never vote for tax cuts. More than 50% of his salary is taxed at 45% - he is one of the state net contributors.
I don’t believe in a small state I believe in a state that looks after people like my son
. if I was selfish I would want tax cuts as it benefits us the most - far more then his pip but that’s not my belief.
The biggest cost to the NHS is the elderly with diabetes 2. Again I don’t knock people with that it’s hard to exercises and eat well when you are tired from work etc. More access to gyms and pools might help and also far higher on crisps and cakes etc - the amount of crisps sold is obscene.
Re depression - the ability to access support would be good - it’s impossible to access mental health.
Any reform has to be done in an understanding way to see what can be done to support people and not accusatory way.
As for my son - institutional type or care or care organised by the state is far more expensive than dolling out pip and direct payments. It’s more of an efficient use of money. If I was confronted with vouchers I just would not engage - he would be over to the council to organise all his care needs - anything organised by councils be it foster care or disability care is never never cheap. So his costings would rise. As a corporate body they can’t just keep him in a room and would have to organise activities to the theatre and to the cinema as you would do old people on a care home . So more money spent and no money saved.
I mean perhaps you could have a nazi like party and they got rid off them! I’m sorry I don’t know what you expect from reform .
His needs are genuinely, they are being managed more efficiently with pip and direct payments as opposed to council led care - where are the savings to be made? In the meantime the only person being exploited is me for £81 per week. ( on which I then pay tax as I have investments)