Meet the Other Phone. Only the apps you allow.

Meet the Other Phone.
Only the apps you allow.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

To wonder about the OP whose daughter had ASD and she was going zero tolerance any associated behaviour for the happiness of her other child, herself and husband.

355 replies

Shestolemyboyfriend · 21/04/2024 07:30

I remember a poster who had a daughter with Autism and was having meltdowns due to beig overstimulated al lot of the time. I think there were issues around misophonia around eating , control over the TV etc and who could be in the room at any time. The OP decided that the needs of the few were outweighing the needs of the many and had decided she wasn't going to engage with any of the behaviour any more as it was making the rest of the family miserable. She had everyone divided but it sounded so hard for the whole family with a seemingly no win situation. I wonder how she fared and how it all panned out. I have a friend in a similar situation and she is doing the same with her son, after some kick back the dynamic is totally different. I just wondered how it worked for her.

OP posts:
WaitingForMojo · 21/04/2024 19:01

fieldsofbutterflies · 21/04/2024 18:53

But there may be situations where you have no choice - the car breaks down, or something happens that means the only way you can get home is to catch the bus.

There's no guarantee that you can always avoid situations that make you uncomfortable, nor can you necessarily ensure you can always meet your sensory needs beforehand.

What happens, for example, if your car breaks down on the motorway and the only way home is a breakdown lorry plus a bus or train journey of several hours?You can't just stay on the side of the motorway, you have to get to safety so you need techniques to cope with that.

Edited

Hard for me to imagine that scenario as it’s not a situation I’d ever be in… I’d never be alone in a car on a motorway, it just wouldn’t happen.

I can apply it to other situations I wouldn’t enjoy though… and I can see that in the past, I’d have had to call someone to come and help, I wouldn’t have been able to handle it on my own.

These days, I would, and that’s because I reduce sensory input the majority of the time and have some reserves.

fieldsofbutterflies · 21/04/2024 19:02

Sirzy · 21/04/2024 19:00

But from DS POV in your scenario the car breaking down would send him into complete overwhelm (I keep his wheelchair in the car at all times incase we do break down so I can safely restrain him) so no matter what getting on public transport after that would be a no go, we would have to find another way back.

ones person “can struggle through” is another persons “not a chance” and no amount of preparation can get them through it

Of course, it wouldn't work for everyone and I didn't mean to imply that it did.

But if someone can learn to cope in certain situations, I don't see why that's being knocked back at every turn by so many posters.

WaitingForMojo · 21/04/2024 19:04

I get what you’re saying @fieldsofbutterflies and I agree, it’s positive to learn coping techniques.

I just don’t think that can be done by forcing autistic people into situations that overwhelm them, as some posters (not you) seem to be suggesting.

fieldsofbutterflies · 21/04/2024 19:05

WaitingForMojo · 21/04/2024 19:01

Hard for me to imagine that scenario as it’s not a situation I’d ever be in… I’d never be alone in a car on a motorway, it just wouldn’t happen.

I can apply it to other situations I wouldn’t enjoy though… and I can see that in the past, I’d have had to call someone to come and help, I wouldn’t have been able to handle it on my own.

These days, I would, and that’s because I reduce sensory input the majority of the time and have some reserves.

But calling someone for help is a valid way of managing the situation. But lots of autistic people would need to be taught how to stay calm and rational enough to make the phone call in the first place.

I've certainly been in situations where I've had no choice but to ring my "safe person" to come and help me, but in the meantime I've also used other techniques to prevent a meltdown or a shutdown.

I'm not really sure why the idea of teaching autistic children/adults how to cope is being knocked back like it's a bad thing. It's not about masking or pretending you don't have autism, it's about knowing that actually, if X happens, you can try and Y and Z to make your situation easier until you can get home or to somewhere you know is safe.

fieldsofbutterflies · 21/04/2024 19:06

WaitingForMojo · 21/04/2024 19:04

I get what you’re saying @fieldsofbutterflies and I agree, it’s positive to learn coping techniques.

I just don’t think that can be done by forcing autistic people into situations that overwhelm them, as some posters (not you) seem to be suggesting.

Gotcha! It's been a really good discussion though and I'm glad it's been civil and even friendly :)

RadoxMoon · 21/04/2024 19:08

I'm not really sure why the idea of teaching autistic children/adults how to cope is being knocked back like it's a bad thing.

Teaching people to cope, to the extent they can, is not a bad thing -of course it isn’t.

Some people (not you) do seem to be expecting autistic people to mask / hide their autism, though - it’s not easy to look back at the thread on my device, but quite a few people earlier were saying that people needed to learn to fit in. That’s what I’m objecting to. Not coping strategies that make lives easier.

fieldsofbutterflies · 21/04/2024 19:09

RadoxMoon · 21/04/2024 19:08

I'm not really sure why the idea of teaching autistic children/adults how to cope is being knocked back like it's a bad thing.

Teaching people to cope, to the extent they can, is not a bad thing -of course it isn’t.

Some people (not you) do seem to be expecting autistic people to mask / hide their autism, though - it’s not easy to look back at the thread on my device, but quite a few people earlier were saying that people needed to learn to fit in. That’s what I’m objecting to. Not coping strategies that make lives easier.

That makes sense :) I definitely don't think people should be changing to try and fit in, I tried that in my twenties and it led to a mental breakdown - would definitely not recommend 😂

MargaretThursday · 21/04/2024 19:20

I'm not sure why the word "training" has got such a huge reaction. I've never seen any objection to "potty training" and I do "training" at work.
It's not being "trained" out of showing ASD, but more being "trained" to react in such a way that will make life easier both for the person with ASD and the people around them.
In the same way we "train" a child to say 'thank you' because it is nicer for others and ultimately also nicer for them because people will react to them better.

I'm another that grew up with siblings with (undiagnosed) ASD, and one of them we had to tiptoe round so much, and not doing so was seen as behaving badly. I very rarely didn't make accommodations, I often volunteered to do them, but on the odd times I didn't, I was treated as though I was the problem for not conceding.

Dm went through about 10-15 years where she'd say "let him get away with it - he's going through a difficult time."
And that was meant to explain everything from a trip out had been planned and he didn't want me to go, playing his music very loudly (but complaining if mine was on, even if it was inaudible - I remember once him complaining about the volume when I was rewinding a tape. He'd passed as I'd clicked a button. Even when I explained that, dm said I needed to turn the volume down), not going somewhere I wanted to go, being expected to go somewhere he did want to go, having the smaller serving of a treat food (I remember one time him (age about 16yo) having a strop because I 'wasn't dividing the food fairly'. I was literally going round putting one on each plate in turn. His response when I pointed this out was 'you're giving me the same as everyone else'. Dm gave him hers.). Expected to share my things (which often came back damaged) but never even think of borrowing something of his, even if it wasn't in use any more etc.

But the most frustrating was timing. Dm is one of those last minute people. We'd typically be running in as the doors closed to something we had tickets for. One of the reasons why I'll now be 45 minutes early.
My sibling used to say they didn't want to go, until we were leaving the house. Then as we went out, would announce he wanted to go. Then he'd need a shower, change of clothes, get something to eat... The number of things we arrived at the end or even after it had finished. We're talking when he was mid teens and older, so easily able to be left.
He now freely admits he did it to control the family, and says that if dm had started saying 'no' to him and leaving he'd have stopped doing it. He wishes that she had put that boundary in place too.

QueenOfTheLabyrinth · 21/04/2024 19:22

WaitingForMojo · 21/04/2024 18:47

I don’t think anyone is saying this is ok. I’m certainly not.

In this scenario, it doesn’t sound like anyone’s needs were met.

I’m not saying anyone thinks it’s okay, I’m saying some people are failing to THINK AT ALL about anyone other than the person with autism & not acknowledging the other side of the coin. I spelt out my upbringing as some people seem to be missing the point of the thread, this wasn’t started as a general discussion about autism but about what happens when certain behaviours become ABUSIVE to others which seems to have become lost; this isn’t about general expectations to conform to society or reasonable adjustments etc.

You’re right that in my situation no one’s needs were met so the hard question is what can be done about it? It seems even daring to explore solutions is bringing up accusations of ableism etc. If we can’t talk about it without being shouted down, then the only alternative seems to be to put up & shut up.

justasking111 · 21/04/2024 19:25

There was a mum on here ages ago now. Her son had in the past broken her arm, smashed her eye socket, various other injuries I can't recall. Her husband had walked out a few years before her other child was around 11 years of old.

That day he had smashed up the house. Ripping off doors, throwing televisions, all this she was quite sanguine about her fear was that he would attack her younger child.

She asked what to do. Everyone said call the police now. Get him arrested. She really didn't want to, I can't imagine the hell that little family had endured.

So coping strategies are important.

SecretSoul · 21/04/2024 19:27

This reply has been deleted

Message deleted by MNHQ. Here's a link to our Talk Guidelines.

BustyLaRoux · 21/04/2024 19:36

RadoxMoon · 21/04/2024 18:42

But for all those people on the side of allowing ASD children to have all their needs met and not have to be made to conform to what is considered acceptable behaviour, I just wanted to present a portrait of what can happen when that is allowed to play out

I am sorry that your father was controlling and that your mother couldn’t adequately protect you from him. But that was down to him. Not all people with ASD want or need to control people to that extent - I don’t, my own father didn’t - and not all controlling people are controlling due to ASD.

And shouldn’t all children have their needs met?

No I am certainly not saying that all people with ASD want to control others. I am saying that the place where this thread originated was how another poster had decided zero tolerance to the controlling behaviours her ASD DD had been exhibiting was going to be her new approach, having tried in every way to meet the need of DD to control all her surroundings and how it had become intolerable.

It opened up a debate about lack of understanding and needs being met. Some fairly defensive posts about how people with ASD should have their needs met and to expect them to change their behaviours to be more acceptable to others amounted to being ableist and disgusting. Which I think was met with some challenge about the needs of others and what to do when control starts to affect other people in the family.

One person saying zero tolerance amounted to disgusting abuse - overlooking the fact this thread is about trying to balance the needs of those who need to control with the rights of others not to be controlled and how that in itself is abuse.

I know not all ASD people need to control. But this thread is quite an emotional debate about control. What happens when need is about control in order to feel safe and the horrendously damaging impact of that.

At least that’s how I see it. A debate about zero tolerance approach to controlling behaviours born of desperation. Other people feeling this was ableist and could lead to masking and poor mental health resulting in suicide. People missing each others’ points and getting quite heated. And I wanted to reiterate that when the need is about control (because that’s how this thread started) it is absolutely not fair on those around them and the lasting damage this can have.

LordSnot · 21/04/2024 19:55

This reply has been deleted

Message deleted by MNHQ. Here's a link to our Talk Guidelines.

shockeditellyou · 21/04/2024 20:03

One can see how, if you try to deal with a reaction to one particular issue (such as loud noises/others eating) by control over it to the degre of not eating with others ever, or by making everyone else keep quiet, and that helps a person feel in control, it follows that being out of control feels even more scary and “not copeable” as well.

SecretSoul · 21/04/2024 20:05

BustyLaRoux · 21/04/2024 19:36

No I am certainly not saying that all people with ASD want to control others. I am saying that the place where this thread originated was how another poster had decided zero tolerance to the controlling behaviours her ASD DD had been exhibiting was going to be her new approach, having tried in every way to meet the need of DD to control all her surroundings and how it had become intolerable.

It opened up a debate about lack of understanding and needs being met. Some fairly defensive posts about how people with ASD should have their needs met and to expect them to change their behaviours to be more acceptable to others amounted to being ableist and disgusting. Which I think was met with some challenge about the needs of others and what to do when control starts to affect other people in the family.

One person saying zero tolerance amounted to disgusting abuse - overlooking the fact this thread is about trying to balance the needs of those who need to control with the rights of others not to be controlled and how that in itself is abuse.

I know not all ASD people need to control. But this thread is quite an emotional debate about control. What happens when need is about control in order to feel safe and the horrendously damaging impact of that.

At least that’s how I see it. A debate about zero tolerance approach to controlling behaviours born of desperation. Other people feeling this was ableist and could lead to masking and poor mental health resulting in suicide. People missing each others’ points and getting quite heated. And I wanted to reiterate that when the need is about control (because that’s how this thread started) it is absolutely not fair on those around them and the lasting damage this can have.

I was going to post something similar about the difficulties with balancing conflicting needs.

And I think these posts get heated because there are different groups of people who all bear their own scars.

You have autistic people whose needs are largely dismissed, they’re spoken over, and regularly demonised. There’s a long-running series of threads on MN dedicated to how awful it is to live with an autistic person. Honestly, it’s really hard to see the thread regularly pop up. There’s no other group of people who have to endure others just piling in and slating them, with sweeping stereotypes and unfair statements made about the nature of neurodivergence. A whole series of threads dedicated to what shitty people we are.

So there’s that.

But then you have exhausted parents with ND children who are getting no support and watching their child spiral out of control. They don’t know what to do for the best, and often receive poor advice from the school. Parents trying hard are often demonised too as shit parents when that’s not the case.

And there’s a third group. People who grew up with an ND sibling which affected them deeply. Individuals who are traumatised from what they had to endure because their sibling wasn’t getting the right support. Understandably, their focus is on the impact on the wider family. Sometimes there’s real bitterness that their needs as a child were trampled over because all the focus was on the ND child.

Lots of emotions, lots of baggage all round from all three groups. Ignoring the posters who are just being dismissive arses, there are really good reasons why there’s such conflicting views.

I think there’s probably more middle ground than it seems. But everyone is so sensitive because of past experiences, it makes it really hard to overcome.

It’s really hard to drop your defences and try to view the other side when you feel attacked or just misunderstood. And I think thats often the case with anyone who has skin in this game, regardless of which group you fall into.

SecretSoul · 21/04/2024 20:06

This reply has been deleted

Message deleted by MNHQ. Here's a link to our Talk Guidelines.

Likewise.

justasking111 · 21/04/2024 20:06

This reply has been deleted

Message deleted by MNHQ. Here's a link to our Talk Guidelines.

I've reported you for your unpleasantness @LordSnot

WingsofRain · 21/04/2024 20:50

LordSnot · 21/04/2024 16:52

Everyone is happy to make reasonable adjustments for someone in a wheelchair? Lol.

Using your own words, " Until you experience things for yourself, you have no idea what it’s like."

Thank you @LordSnot, you saved me from having to say this.
I was so struck by the hypocrisy in that post I actually laughed out loud when I read it.

SecretSoul · 21/04/2024 21:18

WingsofRain · 21/04/2024 20:50

Thank you @LordSnot, you saved me from having to say this.
I was so struck by the hypocrisy in that post I actually laughed out loud when I read it.

Not quite sure where the hypocrisy is?

Differing treatment between visible and invisible disabilities is real and widely recognised as a problem.

That’s not diminishing the very real problems people in a wheelchair face.

And I don’t know if you read my follow-up replies but I was very clear that I can’t speak for wheelchair users, nor would I want to.

Wheelchair users still face enormous difficulties every day. Those with invisible disabilities face a different kind of discrimination and are often disbelieved.

Both things can be simultaneously true, hence why there are studies on the subject of the different barriers that those with invisible disabilities face. I can’t see the hypocrisy in pointing it out.

Oneofthesurvivors · 21/04/2024 21:20

SecretSoul · 21/04/2024 21:18

Not quite sure where the hypocrisy is?

Differing treatment between visible and invisible disabilities is real and widely recognised as a problem.

That’s not diminishing the very real problems people in a wheelchair face.

And I don’t know if you read my follow-up replies but I was very clear that I can’t speak for wheelchair users, nor would I want to.

Wheelchair users still face enormous difficulties every day. Those with invisible disabilities face a different kind of discrimination and are often disbelieved.

Both things can be simultaneously true, hence why there are studies on the subject of the different barriers that those with invisible disabilities face. I can’t see the hypocrisy in pointing it out.

Wheelchair users are also often disbelieved

WingsofRain · 21/04/2024 22:19

“Not quite sure where the hypocrisy is?”

The hypocrisy was that the PP said nobody should assume what a person’s life is like unless they have actually experienced it and then went on to make a comment that showed they are not a wheelchair user.

Everyone is not happy to make adjustments for wheelchair users, in my local town alone there are so few dropped curbs I end up having to wheel along the road if I want to go to any of the few shops that have any access at all.

I recently tried to find a solicitor with wheelchair access from a list of specialists and the only one who would even see me said they could put a couple of planks up to their back door. I could go on.

I know from personal experience how difficult it is to function as an autistic person in modern society, but minimising others’ difficulties isn’t the way to persuade people to make the accommodations that would make it easier.

justasking111 · 21/04/2024 22:51

WingsofRain · 21/04/2024 22:19

“Not quite sure where the hypocrisy is?”

The hypocrisy was that the PP said nobody should assume what a person’s life is like unless they have actually experienced it and then went on to make a comment that showed they are not a wheelchair user.

Everyone is not happy to make adjustments for wheelchair users, in my local town alone there are so few dropped curbs I end up having to wheel along the road if I want to go to any of the few shops that have any access at all.

I recently tried to find a solicitor with wheelchair access from a list of specialists and the only one who would even see me said they could put a couple of planks up to their back door. I could go on.

I know from personal experience how difficult it is to function as an autistic person in modern society, but minimising others’ difficulties isn’t the way to persuade people to make the accommodations that would make it easier.

Edited

I think that someone who has been a carer for 40 years since their childhood, deserves more respect from you. Are you this mean to your carers?

Tahinii · 21/04/2024 22:55

justasking111 · 21/04/2024 22:51

I think that someone who has been a carer for 40 years since their childhood, deserves more respect from you. Are you this mean to your carers?

Are you this mean to everyone online? That poster was expressing her view of her experience of being a wheelchair user.

People who are ND on this thread have spoken up about how they don’t want parents/non ND people to speak over them. This is absolutely correct. Fair enough, maybe I’m a carer of a child with ND but I don’t assume to know what it’s like to be ND. Therefore, a non wheelchair user does not get to speak up over other people either! Being a carer doesn’t mean you get to make assumptions.

DemBonesDemBones · 21/04/2024 23:38

@justasking111 no one died having a meltdown? You sure? Because my Son has run down a dual carriageway when in meltdown. He's broken my nose, punched through numerous windows. All before the age of 7.

We are all miserable. There is no help available. But to come on this thread and see people talking about autistic kids as if they are animals has upset me more than any of his behaviours ever has.

bendmeoverbackwards · 21/04/2024 23:48

Silkymum · 21/04/2024 08:59

I don't think sudden sweeping changes like zero tolerance approaches ever work well with autistic kids. But I do think that they need boundaries, and that there is a danger with the current trend for lowering demands that what happens is that child's window of tolerance shrinks and shrinks until they are not only school refusing but refusing all the demands of social life, and making family life intolerable for the other members of that family. So finding a balance between the needs and wants of everyone in the household, and slowly and steadily working on boundaries and social behaviours to help everyone to live together and in the social world, is really important. Really hard to find that balance, but letting an autistic child believe they are in control of everyone around them as just as scary for them as if is for a NT child. They need to know that their care givers can keep them safe and that the world is not going to fall apart if they have a meltdown. Permissive parenting approaches do not teach the child this, instead it teaches them that they are out of control and nobody can protect them because when they push the boundary they find a curtain where a wall should be.

Fantastic post @Silkymum and I needed to hear that. I’m on some FB groups for parents of autistic children, some people seem to think their ASD child’s needs come above everything else.

Two years ago, my youngest dd who is diagnosed ASD developed an intense dislike/fear of her oldest sister. It went on for six fucking months. Because dd used phrases like ‘I don’t feel safe [around dd1]’, I was advised to listen to my ‘younger, more vulnerable child’ by people in these groups. Dd1 hadn’t done anything wrong but by siding with dd3, it caused a lot of damage to the relationship between me and dd1. I made a huge mistake and have apologised profusely to dd1.

Because dd3’s autism diagnosis was a huge curveball we let the boundaries slip over the years. She us now 17 and I just hope I haven’t left it too late to turn things around.

Swipe left for the next trending thread