Meet the Other Phone. Flexible and made to last.

Meet the Other Phone.
Flexible and made to last.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

to think that this is a really weird premise for a novel? (Lionel Shriver)

115 replies

stressedout1994 · 06/04/2024 13:06

https://www.thetimes.co.uk/article/mania-lionel-shriver-review-kd35wrtn5

I think that Lionel Shriver used to write really interesting and thoughtful novels, but that her involvement in 'culture war' stuff has made her a bit myopic and odd. The premise of this novel is that there is a world where it's considered 'discriminatory' to call people stupid, or to say that some people are more intellectually gifted than others, and she claims that this is "a millimetre" away from where we are now. I certainly think that some elements of cultural life are becoming a bit more low-brow, but it seems soooooo overblown and hysterical to pretend that we have a culture that valorises stupidity.

I am just a bit suspicious of people who honk on about other people being inherently more gifted than others, and how this is a special and important distinction. I sometimes think this sort of thing is borderline eugenics-y.

Interested to hear what others think!

Mania by Lionel Shriver review — equal rights for stupid people!

A cancelled college teacher battles the anti-thought police in this viciously funny satirical novel

https://www.thetimes.co.uk/article/mania-lionel-shriver-review-kd35wrtn5

OP posts:
MsLuxLisbon · 06/04/2024 16:28

PlasticOno · 06/04/2024 16:27

Wasn’t that just a fairly short short story, though? Not one of Vonnegut’s more subtle moments, with the masks for the above averagely beautiful, handicapping weights for the more than averagely strong/athletic etc.

It wasn't a great story, true. It might be interesting to see what Shriver does with the same idea.

stressedout1994 · 06/04/2024 16:28

Some of you are sooooooooo mannerless and belligerent... meekly accepting what the writer says the book is about is not the same as reading and considering the text.... genuinely don't get how some of you don't grasp that the vehicle for the satire (mocking the stupid) is in and of itself a significant literary choice?

Needless to say I will be getting it out the library :)

OP posts:
alittleprivacy · 06/04/2024 16:37

stressedout1994 · 06/04/2024 16:28

Some of you are sooooooooo mannerless and belligerent... meekly accepting what the writer says the book is about is not the same as reading and considering the text.... genuinely don't get how some of you don't grasp that the vehicle for the satire (mocking the stupid) is in and of itself a significant literary choice?

Needless to say I will be getting it out the library :)

You do know that authors get a royalty for library borrows right? Or is that sooooooooo mannerless and belligerent too?

Tbh, your whole style of arguing is like everything you accuse Shriver of being. Except she has genuine skill and perseverance as a writer. Honestly, my main take away from your posts is that you are someone who harbours dreams of success as a novelist but rather than commit yourself to honing your skill and doing the work, you'd rather find reasons to tear successful writers down.

PlasticOno · 06/04/2024 16:49

stressedout1994 · 06/04/2024 16:28

Some of you are sooooooooo mannerless and belligerent... meekly accepting what the writer says the book is about is not the same as reading and considering the text.... genuinely don't get how some of you don't grasp that the vehicle for the satire (mocking the stupid) is in and of itself a significant literary choice?

Needless to say I will be getting it out the library :)

Well, it’s not out till the 11th, and Amazon doesn’t even have a sample of the Kindle edition available, so it’s a little difficult for anyone other than reviewers to ‘read and consider’?

godmum56 · 06/04/2024 16:49

WearyAuldWumman · 06/04/2024 14:01

I can't read the article either. The one paragraph I could see suggests to me that it's an expanded version of Kurt Vonnegut's short story: "Harrison Bergeron". I first read it in the '70s, at secondary school.

"THE YEAR WAS 2081, and everybody was finally equal. They weren't only equal before God and the law. They were equal every which way. Nobody was smarter than anybody else. Nobody was better looking than anybody else. Nobody was stronger or quicker than anybody else. All this equality was due to the 211th, 212th, and 213th Amendments to the Constitution, and to the unceasing vigilance of agents of the United States Handicapper General.

Some things about living still weren't quite right, though. April for instance, still drove people crazy by not being springtime. And it was in that clammy month that the H-G men took George and Hazel Bergeron's fourteenyear-old son, Harrison, away.

It was tragic, all right, but George and Hazel couldn't think about it very hard. Hazel had a perfectly average intelligence, which meant she couldn't think about anything except in short bursts. And George, while his intelligence was way above normal, had a little mental handicap radio in his ear. He was required by law to wear it at all times. It was tuned to a government transmitter. Every twenty seconds or so, the transmitter would send out some sharp noise to keep people like George from taking unfair advantage of their brains."

Link to the full short story: https://ia803002.us.archive.org/25/items/HarrisonBergeron/Harrison%20Bergeron.pdf

that's the one about the dancers having to wear weights?

CRE2024 · 06/04/2024 16:53

stressedout1994 · 06/04/2024 16:28

Some of you are sooooooooo mannerless and belligerent... meekly accepting what the writer says the book is about is not the same as reading and considering the text.... genuinely don't get how some of you don't grasp that the vehicle for the satire (mocking the stupid) is in and of itself a significant literary choice?

Needless to say I will be getting it out the library :)

Did anyone else read this in Moira Rose's voice? 😁

Anyway, of course anti-intellectualism exists. And of course there is a deliberate erosion of standards of intelligence -particularly within British universities. Why wouldn't she write about this?

YankSplaining · 06/04/2024 16:54

@nojudge Oh, I see. You don’t have the will, the energy, and/or the skills to back up your assertions, so you’re going to pretend like you won’t bother because I would be too stupid to understand. “I don’t feel like getting into this topic - let’s agree to disagree” would have been fine.

Abhannmor · 06/04/2024 17:36

DeanElderberry · 06/04/2024 15:11

I suspect the name change (well into her 30s if not 40s, not 'age 15' as Google has it, was a deliberate ploy to make her earlier comments and commentary unsearchable when she left Belfast after the Good Friday agreement and in the comparative peace and prosperity that followed. She supported some very dangerous people - the likes of Taylor, Robinson and Donaldson used to disassociate themselves. Scary woman.

The photograph with the UVF mug is still around? She clearly thinks peace in Ireland and cooperation in Europe are some kind of treason. Lots of right wing Americans seem to feel let down by their ancestral homeland? Of course we are familiar with that in Ireland too , the Returned Yank syndrome.
'You let the government run your transport - y'all Communist!'

SmudgeButt · 06/04/2024 17:37

There's a Kurt Vonnegut story along this line about a culture where everything must be made equal. So smart people have to wear an earpiece that randomly squawks loudly to disrupt their thoughts and glasses that are wrong for their eyes to give them headaches. Strong people have weights strapped to them and beautiful people wear ugly masks. I must admit I think about this every time I hear Jonathan Ross who has an obvious speech impediment because there's a part of the story where there's a news reader who can say what's happening because of his incredibly bad stutter.

But Vonnegut makes it clear he's very anti this sort of equalisation.

DeanElderberry · 06/04/2024 17:56

Abhannmor · 06/04/2024 17:36

The photograph with the UVF mug is still around? She clearly thinks peace in Ireland and cooperation in Europe are some kind of treason. Lots of right wing Americans seem to feel let down by their ancestral homeland? Of course we are familiar with that in Ireland too , the Returned Yank syndrome.
'You let the government run your transport - y'all Communist!'

It was a UFF / UDA mug

https://ansionnachfionn.com/2018/04/16/lionel-shriver-the-uff-mug-and-british-terrorism-in-ireland/

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ulster_Defence_Association

I have no idea whether there have ever been IRA mugs, but can't imagine a novelist posing with one.

Geebray · 06/04/2024 18:22

stressedout1994 · 06/04/2024 15:33

I think some of you are being a bit deliberately obtuse and will look to crowbar the trans issue into literally anything.... sometimes a spade is a spade. This book is clearly designed to mock those who are stupid, and to a lesser extent those who will pursue an agenda to advance their own interests (so yes, maybe you could include female champions of trans issues in the latter camp... but it's hardly the guiding premise for a 300 page novel!)

Ha ha ha at you using "obtuse" to disguise what you really want to say - stupid.

The irony is hilarious.

And no, that's not what her novel is doing.

Definitelylivedin · 06/04/2024 18:55

I think it is a good premise for a dystopian book.

I will definitely look out for it. The Mandibles is on my top ten list of books.

RedRosie · 06/04/2024 19:04

I'm looking forward to it 😀

I think she's just reflecting what she's seeing, and factoring it up. It's what she does.

People are so shouty. It's not a compulsory purchase or anything 😂

Geebray · 06/04/2024 19:06

Honestly OP, the more I reread your original post, combined with the title of this thread, the less sense it makes. Nothing in your argument follows.

KTheGrey · 06/04/2024 22:55

Abhannmor · 06/04/2024 16:19

Toby is another disappointed genius. His dad wrote the manifesto for the Labour landslide in 1945. I don't think Toby has ever forgiven him. One wonders why Lionel isn't back in the USA , embedded with the Trump campaign. There is a line between free speech and hateful demagoguery. Trump doesn't always walk it very carefully. Lionel could surely give him some pointers.

Well maybe because she's not keen on Trump and never has been.

WearyAuldWumman · 07/04/2024 02:28

godmum56 · 06/04/2024 16:49

that's the one about the dancers having to wear weights?

Yes.

Abhannmor · 07/04/2024 09:13

KTheGrey · 06/04/2024 22:55

Well maybe because she's not keen on Trump and never has been.

She could reform him. Make him a more respectable sort of bigot.

KTheGrey · 07/04/2024 09:29

Abhannmor · 07/04/2024 09:13

She could reform him. Make him a more respectable sort of bigot.

Yeah because she's the kind of Victorian heroine who's spent her whole life just waiting for the opportunity to reform a narcissistic douchebag, rather than a successful and talented writer who wants to use character and story to explore ideas about life in the modern world.

KTheGrey · 07/04/2024 09:34

MsLuxLisbon · 06/04/2024 16:23

My problem with this is that it has already been written! 'Harrison Bergeron' was written over sixty years ago.

Harrison Bergeron is quite short and thr focus is on all equality / inequality though. Also Vonnegut's is a pretty brutal satire - always feel he never steps away from his traumatic becoming-a-writer experience; Shriver is a much more nuanced and "difficult" writer. You cannot disagree with Vonnegut because of his subject matter; Shriver likes looking at what we disagree about.

SleepingStandingUp · 07/04/2024 10:30

WearyAuldWumman · 06/04/2024 14:01

I can't read the article either. The one paragraph I could see suggests to me that it's an expanded version of Kurt Vonnegut's short story: "Harrison Bergeron". I first read it in the '70s, at secondary school.

"THE YEAR WAS 2081, and everybody was finally equal. They weren't only equal before God and the law. They were equal every which way. Nobody was smarter than anybody else. Nobody was better looking than anybody else. Nobody was stronger or quicker than anybody else. All this equality was due to the 211th, 212th, and 213th Amendments to the Constitution, and to the unceasing vigilance of agents of the United States Handicapper General.

Some things about living still weren't quite right, though. April for instance, still drove people crazy by not being springtime. And it was in that clammy month that the H-G men took George and Hazel Bergeron's fourteenyear-old son, Harrison, away.

It was tragic, all right, but George and Hazel couldn't think about it very hard. Hazel had a perfectly average intelligence, which meant she couldn't think about anything except in short bursts. And George, while his intelligence was way above normal, had a little mental handicap radio in his ear. He was required by law to wear it at all times. It was tuned to a government transmitter. Every twenty seconds or so, the transmitter would send out some sharp noise to keep people like George from taking unfair advantage of their brains."

Link to the full short story: https://ia803002.us.archive.org/25/items/HarrisonBergeron/Harrison%20Bergeron.pdf

Well that was sad!!

Ofcourseshecan · 07/04/2024 10:50

It sounds like a smart, funny take on people having to pretend they believe humans can change sex! That is reality today, if you don’t want to lose your job, get visits from the police or receive death threats. I’ll buy it.

AllPrincessAnneshorses · 07/04/2024 23:03

FloatyBoaty · 06/04/2024 13:31

She’s become the Katie Hopkins of literature.

We Need To Talk About Kevin was smart and chilling.

I have no time for her these days.

You won't get much support around here for that sensible view. Much like certain other writers, being so- called GC is a 'get out of being shitty free' card to too many MNers.

CarterBeatsTheDevil · 07/04/2024 23:08

Abhannmor · 06/04/2024 14:00

That's Lionel. At heart she is a Randroid. Thinks of herself and her ilk as genius being held back by tiresome mediocrities like us - the dreaded Collective.

I was coming on to say that she's turned into Ayn Rand, though Ayn Rand never produced anything even half as good as WNTTAK. It's a shame as I was very excited about her at first.

Abhannmor · 09/04/2024 13:21

CarterBeatsTheDevil · 07/04/2024 23:08

I was coming on to say that she's turned into Ayn Rand, though Ayn Rand never produced anything even half as good as WNTTAK. It's a shame as I was very excited about her at first.

She has to be a better writer than perpetual teen angster and apologist for psychos Rand. I saw a young woman engrossed in the Fountainhead on a train a couple of years ago. Shudder.

KreedKafer · 09/04/2024 13:30

She’s written one good book, which is We Need To Talk About Kevin.

Everything else she’s written has been astonishingly bad.