I know what you mean. My parents were both teachers it the 1970s and I think their quality of life meant that they overall had much more stable and hopeful lives than probably two people in a similar position (no inheritance etc, first generation to go to University) would have today.
They worked abroad for a few years (helped conduct an academic educational study in African countries). Then came back to permanent roles in good schools and were on the property ladder in a nice flat in a nice area within a couple of years. They had little to no savings when they returned because they given local living expenses plus a small stipend whilst abroad.
I’m including things like job security, the number of hours their jobs took (including commute) and the amount of hours they had left for family life and their own interests, the size/location of home they could afford, the general quality/durability of goods like clothes and furnishings etc in that assessment.
They divorced the 1980s so everything went a bit skew whiff then.
I inherited some money (enough for a deposit) from my mum which made an huge difference at the time and DP earns an enormous salary.
And I’d say on that we have a similar standard of living materially in many ways, in terms of things like where we can afford property.
We’ve got more money for luxuries, but the quality of goods isn’t as good for many ordinary things, so we replace stuff more often. We also got less time/security and more stress. So I think overall it’s about the same.
And I think we’re hugely lucky in that we’ve manage to manage to stand still overall compared to my parents.