Meet the Other Phone. Flexible and made to last.

Meet the Other Phone.
Flexible and made to last.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

To think Center Parcs should be ashamed of this

364 replies

ReallyCenterParcs · 12/03/2024 16:24

I think it may have been deleted now, but not before Center Parcs hid or deleted comments pointing out the stereotyping and misogyny of this Facebook post...
One comment I saw said mum's not keeping up because of all the shopping, cooking, washing and organising she had to before the family got to sodding Center Parcs in the first place. And she's riding a shite bike they've given her

To think Center Parcs should be ashamed of this
OP posts:
Thread gallery
6
crumblingschools · 13/03/2024 18:02

@ButWhatAboutTheBees but none of those adverts reference dad not doing something or keeping up.

Alalalalalongalalalalalonglonglilong · 13/03/2024 18:06

@crumblingschools Daddy pig has played that role for the past 20 years though! He is more well known and well referenced than any advert.

GreenAppleCrumble · 13/03/2024 18:22

ButWhatAboutTheBees · 13/03/2024 17:59

The opportunity to walk down the street after dark with a relative sense of ease.

I, a woman, walk down the street wirh a relative sense of ease. A man is in fact at more risk of attack

The opportunity to be judged on what he does rather than what he looks like.

Men are judged on what they look like rather than what he does

Actually I'm going to stop copy/pasting...

Men are turned into sex objects all the time. But it's fine for Betty to leer at Tom Hardy or Aidan Turner or the Chrises in topless scenes which are blatantly there for sex appeal and have no value. Heck as we are talking adverts... there was a Diet Coke ad not that long ago which was women leering over a man they had tricked into getting topless....

Women can purchase sex too

Statistically men won't report abuse (domestic and sexual) because the police won't believe them

There are very real issues for women - access to sanitary products, fairer pay, attitudes towards pregnancy, better treatment/care for the menopause, gender imbalance in clothing and relationships... (you're right about medical care)

There are also issues which affect everyone - police being shit for example.

One advert in a series of adverts showing families and couples being stereotypical families and couples isn't going to damage anything. Especially when the intention clearly isn't even to talk shit about a woman!

🤡Okey dokey.

Not going to engage with this bullshit. Read the ‘do men hate women’ thread if you actually want to learn something.

Jesus.

IntermittentFarting · 13/03/2024 18:26

GreenAppleCrumble · 13/03/2024 17:57

Welcome to planet Earth where women have been objectified in advertising campaigns since advertising was a thing. And where you are never more than two clicks away from a degrading image of a woman.

Pretend it’s not true all you like. Much good may it do you (and your daughters).

For goodness sake quit the patronising crap "Welcome to planet Earth" Hmm and you may get more women on side.

No one, not me or anyone else, has claimed that advertising and the media more generally isn't riddled with sexism and misogyny. It absolutely is. Appallingly so. This is news to no one.

But looking for things to complain about and screeching "sexism!" round every corner really doesn't help the cause; it rather diminishes it. There are loads of hugely unequal and discriminatory issues facing women, many of which you've highlighted. Kicking up a stink and complaining about sexism where it was likely unintentional - if, indeed, it's there at all - means it's more difficult to be taken seriously where it does matter.
Also, if women differ in their opinions on whether something is sexist/misogynistic then they differ; it's not the case, as you've said earlier, that if only every woman was as well read as you they'd share your exact opinion on how feminism should be done. They won't.

My daughters are doing fine, thank you.

Wellhellooooodear · 13/03/2024 18:27

Do you people ever have a day off from being offended by literally nothing? Are you not exhausted by constantly trying to find offence in everything?

GreenAppleCrumble · 13/03/2024 18:30

Wellhellooooodear · 13/03/2024 18:27

Do you people ever have a day off from being offended by literally nothing? Are you not exhausted by constantly trying to find offence in everything?

Recognising sexism is not being offended. I’m not offended. I’ve repeatedly pointed out that it’s normal - misogynistic and normal.

HelloMiss · 13/03/2024 18:32

No, there's never a day off from the madness on mumsnet!

itsalwaysthesame · 13/03/2024 18:32

It's a bit patronising but I think they should be more ashamed of there prices!

GreenAppleCrumble · 13/03/2024 18:37

But looking for things to complain about and screeching "sexism!" round every corner really doesn't help the cause; it rather diminishes it.

Noticing things is not ‘looking for things to complain about.’ It’s literally impossible not to see sexism once you’re alive to it.

And I think you’re very much mistaken about the importance of calling it out. Every Single Time. Even if it’s borderline. It doesn’t diminish the cause - quite the opposite. Zero tolerance is the best way.

Men have proved they will do whatever they can get away with. Women constantly have to push.

Nice use of ‘screeching’ by the way. Did you realise you were using misogynistic language? Maybe not. It’s endemic. It’s baked in.

crumblingschools · 13/03/2024 18:48

If you look at those adverts all the captions show the things you can do, positive messages, fun messages, the only one that hints at someone not being very good at something is the one targeted at mum

GreenAppleCrumble · 13/03/2024 19:06

@IntermittentFarting

as you've said earlier, that if only every woman was as well read as you they'd share your exact opinion on how feminism should be done.

Pretty sure I didn’t say this? Where?

IntermittentFarting · 13/03/2024 19:36

GreenAppleCrumble · 13/03/2024 19:06

@IntermittentFarting

as you've said earlier, that if only every woman was as well read as you they'd share your exact opinion on how feminism should be done.

Pretty sure I didn’t say this? Where?

I was paraphrasing. What you wrote was:

I would ask you this: do you agree that women (as a class, not me as an individual 🙄) have been systematically oppressed by men throughout history?
If ‘yes’ - well, you are part of the way to understanding why it’s perfectly justified to scrutinise the way women are portrayed in media and advertising because the odds are there’s some misogyny afoot.

If ‘no’, I suggest it’s back to school with you to learn some history.

I don't entirely disagree, but it did smack of "if you knew as much as me you'd see I was right"

LancashireTart · 13/03/2024 19:38

GreenAppleCrumble · 13/03/2024 17:38

The opportunity to benefit from medical research tailored to his body.

The opportunity to walk down the street after dark with a relative sense of ease.

The opportunity to be judged on what he does rather than what he looks like.

The opportunity to see his sex class represented in popular culture and media in a way that doesn’t revolve around sexual objectification.

The opportunity to purchase sex from abused service-providers.

The opportunity to abuse women with relative impunity safe in the knowledge that the police force gives not one shiny shit.

Will that do you for now?

Oh, please. Classic straw-clutching. The vast majority of that is utter bollocks.

LancashireTart · 13/03/2024 19:42

GreenAppleCrumble · 13/03/2024 18:30

Recognising sexism is not being offended. I’m not offended. I’ve repeatedly pointed out that it’s normal - misogynistic and normal.

Except you're not recognising sexism. You can't, because it simply doesn't exist in this case. You're simply looking for it, whether that's subconsciously or not. Either way, it isn't healthy.

LancashireTart · 13/03/2024 19:45

ButWhatAboutTheBees · 13/03/2024 17:59

The opportunity to walk down the street after dark with a relative sense of ease.

I, a woman, walk down the street wirh a relative sense of ease. A man is in fact at more risk of attack

The opportunity to be judged on what he does rather than what he looks like.

Men are judged on what they look like rather than what he does

Actually I'm going to stop copy/pasting...

Men are turned into sex objects all the time. But it's fine for Betty to leer at Tom Hardy or Aidan Turner or the Chrises in topless scenes which are blatantly there for sex appeal and have no value. Heck as we are talking adverts... there was a Diet Coke ad not that long ago which was women leering over a man they had tricked into getting topless....

Women can purchase sex too

Statistically men won't report abuse (domestic and sexual) because the police won't believe them

There are very real issues for women - access to sanitary products, fairer pay, attitudes towards pregnancy, better treatment/care for the menopause, gender imbalance in clothing and relationships... (you're right about medical care)

There are also issues which affect everyone - police being shit for example.

One advert in a series of adverts showing families and couples being stereotypical families and couples isn't going to damage anything. Especially when the intention clearly isn't even to talk shit about a woman!

Brilliant post. 👏

IntermittentFarting · 13/03/2024 19:46

Nice use of ‘screeching’ by the way. Did you realise you were using misogynistic language? Maybe not. It’s endemic. It’s baked in.

For goodness sake, "screeching" is not misogynistic language. Owls screech, tyres screech, cats screech, men screech, women screech.
Again, you're turning on other women by accusing me of misogyny. Playing right into the patriarchy's hands. Divide and conquer.

TheFancyPoet · 13/03/2024 19:55

Asthmatic and overweight. There are not many people I can keep up with

crumblingschools · 13/03/2024 20:00

How often do people describe men as being screechy?

ChaosAndCrumbs · 13/03/2024 20:03

inamarina · 13/03/2024 08:10

But how do you know the woman in the picture is the type who constantly does everything for everyone rather than someone who’s in a similar situation like PP?
Fwiw, I know several couples/ families where the man is the main breadwinner and carries a huge chunk of (or the entire) financial responsibility while the woman works part time/ doesn’t work/ is free to leave a job she doesn’t like without having another one lined up.
Most of them don’t have young children, some don’t have any children at all.
Of course that’s just anecdotal, but that’s what I see around me.
In the same way as others might see couples where both work full time and the woman still does most of the housework/ childcare.

There are always exceptions, but in general the statistics show otherwise for the UK.

GreenAppleCrumble · 13/03/2024 20:35

LancashireTart · 13/03/2024 19:42

Except you're not recognising sexism. You can't, because it simply doesn't exist in this case. You're simply looking for it, whether that's subconsciously or not. Either way, it isn't healthy.

What exactly is your problem? I’ve suggested that it is very possible to read a sexist tone in that advert. It’s true; it’s perfectly possible to see that. I mean, have you never ventured an interpretation of any text? Equally, it’s possible to argue that it’s innocent as the driven snow (plausible deniability and all that). So I’m being open-minded, but what I won’t accept is that there’s definitely no way that there’s anything sexist about it grrrrr which seems to be your wild and angry assertion. Given that we live in a world saturated with sexism, yours seems a bold claim.

I just can’t understand why women calling out potential sexism throws you into such paroxysms of rage.

GreenAppleCrumble · 13/03/2024 20:36

IntermittentFarting · 13/03/2024 19:46

Nice use of ‘screeching’ by the way. Did you realise you were using misogynistic language? Maybe not. It’s endemic. It’s baked in.

For goodness sake, "screeching" is not misogynistic language. Owls screech, tyres screech, cats screech, men screech, women screech.
Again, you're turning on other women by accusing me of misogyny. Playing right into the patriarchy's hands. Divide and conquer.

😂😂😂Sure. Me calling out misogynistic language is me doing Patriarchy.

IntermittentFarting · 13/03/2024 20:39

crumblingschools · 13/03/2024 20:00

How often do people describe men as being screechy?

Oh men screech! I'm thinking drill sergeants at new recruits, overexcited sports commentators... death metal vocalists definitely screech!

IntermittentFarting · 13/03/2024 20:41

GreenAppleCrumble · 13/03/2024 20:36

😂😂😂Sure. Me calling out misogynistic language is me doing Patriarchy.

It wasn't misogynistic language. You were, again, telling a woman she was feministing wrong. It's your way or it's wrong.

Catapultaway · 13/03/2024 20:48

It's simple, those offended should clearly boycott center parcs... don't think anyone would miss them 😉

GreenAppleCrumble · 13/03/2024 20:49

LancashireTart · 13/03/2024 19:38

Oh, please. Classic straw-clutching. The vast majority of that is utter bollocks.

Just catching up with your nonsense - hence the run of posts. Couldn’t let this slip through; you apparently live in a different world from the rest of us. Literally every thing on my list is based in fact.

You must be on the wind-up. No one can be this dim.

In Britain, women only got the vote just over 100 years ago. In all of time up to (and beyond) that point, women were in law less than men. Women’s bodies were their husbands property in law within my lifetime (marital rape not a crime until early 90s). This shit is still current in other countries. Do you really think millennia of men building a world for themselves with women as their support humans has been undone in, what, a century? I’m sorry if I’m patronising you, but you seem to know nothing.

Cultural and societal change is slow. Those attitudes to the sexes are absolutely hardwired in. They are sewn into the fabric of our language, literature, culture, family. They shine through in art and cinema. And definitely, definitely advertising.

We’ve made progress, sure; compare adverts now to 70s adverts and you’ll definitely see that.

But when an advert has the opportunity to not flirt with lazy stereotypes of women, it should definitely take that opportunity.

And when some women (the ones paying most attention) suggest that, all things considered, that ad might have been better if it had not (even inadvertently) borrowed from a tedious misogynistic stereotype, then maybe it’s better not to jump up and down shouting that there definitely isn’t any sexism. Are the men paying you for this or something?